Midweek Review
Need for reappraisal of overthrowing of Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal governments like houses of cards
The recent anti-immigration protests in London yet again displayed the power of social media. Organisers mustered as many as 150,000 people to demand that the UK take tangible measures to curb illegal immigration. Such a massive gathering wouldn’t have been possible without vigorous social media campaigns. It would be pertinent to mention that American social media platforms can be used to promote anti-American agendas as well.
The recent unprecedented events in Nepal underscored the need for a reappraisal of developments in Pakistan (2020), Sri Lanka (2022) as well as Bangladesh (2024). The change of governments in Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal revealed intensification of external interventions under various pretexts. Some have pointed the finger at the US for causing regime change. Of the four instances, the overthrowing of Nepal government is the first since the last presidential election that brought back Donald Trump into power for a second term last January.
The collapse of Premier K.P. Sharma Oli’s government, within 48 hours, as the Army turned a blind eye to unprecedented developments, and the election of Nepal’s former Chief Justice, Sushila Karki, highlighted the overall failure of those responsible for the law and order situation. Oli’s administration appeared to have totally ignored the Pakistani and Sri Lanka crises in 2020 and 2022 hence the absence of any strategy, whatsoever, to meet the challenge.
The media credited Generation Z with the operation that caused the downfall of the ruling Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist-Leninist). Interested parties justified the high profile and utterly violent operation on the banning of 26 major social media platforms, citing non-compliance with registration requirements.
The way well-organised Nepali protesters overwhelmed the lightly armed police, guarding Parliament, and set it ablaze, exposed the lie that people took to the streets, spontaneously, against the ban on social media platforms. The destruction of Parliament took place in spite of Premier Oli having given up office, after having lifted the ban on social media. They also attacked the Supreme Court and Prime Minister’s office complex. Obviously, there was a hand working, not so mysteriously, from behind the scene, as we saw in Sri Lanka. For example, in our case someone even paid for train tickets for a packed train load of protesters to come to Colombo from Kandy to storm the Presidential palace, with others who were already here, on May 22, 2022.
In Nepal, the protesters also set fire to politicians’ homes and freed prisoners from jails, including arrested politician and ex-Minister Rabi Lamichhane of the Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP). Such an operation couldn’t have been launched over a sudden social media ban. Instead, they must have planned that action over a period of time, taking into consideration various factors, including the reaction of the Nepali military.
The common denominator was that in all such successful turmoil, in all four countries, the protesters behaved in a deranged manner, so what was the drug that was administered for usually peaceful people to behave as if they were out of their minds, so spontaneously?
Bravo Ranil
Former President and UNP leader Ranil Wickremesinghe, obviously at the tail end of his career, with nothing to lose, except for his life, had no hesitation in directly alleging US social media platforms of overthrowing governments. Wickremesinghe’s statement, issued close on the heels of Premier Oli’s resignation and the destruction of the Nepali Parliament, on 09 September, made direct reference to a couple of US social media platforms. Wickremesinghe, no stranger to controversy, explained how American-owned media companies, such as Google, Facebook and YouTube, caused and exploited political turmoil to overthrow governments. But no other Sri Lankan political party commented on the overthrowing of the Nepali government.
The failure on the part of the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SLPP) to, at least ,draw parallels between Nepal and Sri Lanka, is a mystery. That party, having suffered debilitating setbacks at presidential and parliamentary polls in September and November, 2024, respectively, seems to be still struggling to cope up with the developing situations, both here and abroad.
The SLPP parliamentary group leader Namal Rajapaksa owed a dwindling support base, at least a plausible explanation as to the continuing deterioration of the party.
The former ruling party has been overwhelmed by the recent Supreme Court determination pertaining to petitions filed against the Presidents’ Entitlements (Repeal Bill) that compelled twice President Mahinda Rajapaksa to give up his official bungalow at Wijerama Mawatha.
In spite of repeatedly alleging that the National People’s Power (NPP) government enacted that particular Bill at the behest of the Tamil Diaspora and the LTTE rump, the SLPP refrained from voting against it. The Namal Rajapaksa-led three-member parliamentary group skipped the vote on the Presidents’ Entitlements (Repeal Bill) though the party is on record as having alleged that the Tamil Diaspora and the LTTE-rump had a hand in the 2022 protest campaign that forced wartime Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa out of President’s Office.
Here in Colombo, well-organised protesters, with meticulous intelligence, hit back hard at the government, the same night following the Temple Trees leadership possibly ordering a foolish attack on those camping at Galle Face, whereas in Kathmandu, Nepalese violently reacted to the killing of nearly two dozen of their own on the first day of the protest. But setting ablaze Parliament and causing serious damages to the country’s Supreme Court and Prime Minister’s Office complex seem to have been meticulously planned.
Sri Lankan protesters, too, acted in military-style as they torched properties belonging to politicians, killed one SLPP lawmaker, along with his police bodyguard, on 09 May, 2022, and destroyed the then acting Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe’s private residence at Kollupitiya, in Jyly, 2922.
Wickremesinghe has pointed fingers at a section of the media, and social media, for making him a target. Referring to the overthrowing of the Nepali government, Wickremesinghe emphasised that the role social media platforms played shouldn’t be underestimated.
Wickremesinghe is on record as having said that he was asked to give up the premiership the day after protesters set his house ablaze on 09 July, 2022. The UNP leader said so at an event to mark the 40th anniversary of the International Democrats Union (IDU) in London. Wickremesinghe made his revelation against the backdrop of an investigative books published by National Freedom Front (NFF) leader MP Wimal Weerawansa and distinguished writer Sena Thoradeniya. They directly accused the US of spearheading the regime change operation here. They discussed the role played by US Ambassador Julie Chung in the overall project. Interestingly she is still here directing operations even though her term expired many moons ago, in 2023. In the following year, Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena inadvertently confirmed claims of external intervention but he conveniently stopped short of making direct reference to the US.
Imran Khan’s predicament
Recently, RT reported how Russian pranksters tricked former USAID Chief Samantha Power to disclose clandestine funding operations in the former Soviet Republic Moldova.
Power, during a conversation with Russian pranksters, admitted that USAID provided tens of millions of dollars in support of its pro-EU President Maia Sandu.
Speaking to the notorious duo Vovan and Lexus, who deceived Power, the former US official recalled how, under her leadership, USAID made “unprecedented investments” in Moldova and “massively” expanded its presence in the country.
Power recalled that in the USAID supplementals designated for Ukraine, there was always “tens of millions of dollars” earmarked for Moldova and noted that these funds “went much more further in Moldova than in Ukraine” given the country’s small size.
Such disclosures made it easier for the public to understand US operations here. Let us examine the circumstances leading to popular Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s removal in 2020. Khan earned the wrath of the US for visiting Moscow in February 2020 in the immediate aftermath of the massive eruption of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
Obviously the US believed Khan should have called off his previously arranged visit to Moscow in the wake of the Russian declaration of war. It would be pertinent to mention what Khan said in April 2020 about the US targeting him. The then Pakistani leader is the first to question rationale in US policy vis-a-vis India and Pakistan in relation to their relations with Moscow.
Premier Khan alleged a powerful country that supported India was angry over his recent visit to Russia to meet President Vladimir Putin. Khan made the declaration as Pakistan summoned a senior US diplomat in Islamabad and lodged a strong protest over America’s alleged interference in its internal affairs.
Addressing the Islamabad Security Dialogue, on 01 April, 2020, Khan emphasised the importance of an independent foreign policy and Pakistan could so far never reach its true potential because of its dependent syndrome on other powerful nations. “A country without an independent foreign policy remains unable to secure the interests of its people,” the media quoted Khan as having said. But, the Premier couldn’t thwart the conspiracy. The Parliament, notorious for buying corrupt politicians, voted in favour of a no-confidence motion moved against him. The Pakistani Army, ever tilted towards the US, threw its weight behind the Opposition move against Khan and finally they got him behind bars. Although Khan made an attempt to reach some sort of consensus with the US after having accused the Biden administration of meddling in Pakistan’s internal affairs, the US obviously by that time had made its mind to go with Pakistan’s powerful Army.
Pakistan Field Marshal Asim Munir visits to the US, in the wake of the short Indo-Pakistan war over Pahalgam terrorist attack, underscored new direction Donald Trump administration is taking. US-India relations have been undermined by the latter’s refusal to halt Russian crude oil purchases. New Delhi has been also deeply upset by Trump’s repeated claims that he arranged a ceasefire between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by New Delhi but gleefully appreciated by Islamabad.
Indian stand that it wouldn’t end its longstanding partnership with Moscow, regardless of US threats, appears to have placed the Trump administration in an extremely embarrassing position. Modi most probably wouldn’t have attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit, near Beijing, if India had not felt betrayed by the utterly irresponsible US action over the past couple of months. The appearance of Putin, Modi and Chinese Leader Xi on one platform meant that the US has compelled India to take a stand. Modi skipped the annual Victory Day military parade in May this year.
Kim Jong Un joined Putin and Xi to view a massive Chinese military parade that coincided with the SCO summit. The bottom line is unpredictable Trump strategies have forced major countries to review their policies and explore the possibility of firming up consensus with others affected by the US actions. There cannot be a better example than India and China seeking to improve relations against the backdrop of US threats.
Sri Lanka will find itself in an unenviable situation. Sri Lanka has already skipped the SCO summit. SJB lawmaker Mujibur Rahuman strongly criticised the NPP government decision not to attend the event. Sri Lanka also skipped the BRICS summit, held in Kazan, in the Russian Federation, last October. Both President Anura Kumara Dissanayake and Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath were too busy to accept the invitation from President Putin.
Sri Lanka is obviously under tremendous pressure to toe the US line. The situation has changed a bit over the developing differences between the US and India but the latter is very much unlikely to give a free hand to Sri Lanka. Let us wait and see how the NPP government responds to the next Chinese request to berth one of its modern scientific research ships here.
During the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa administration, India, backed by the US, caused significant turmoil over Chinese ship visits. Unbearable pressure compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to declare a ban on foreign scientific research vessels during 2024. That ban was meant for Chinese vessels only. The NPP is yet to disclose its position on ship visits though Wickremesinghe’s ban lapsed on 31 December, 2024.
Bangladesh crisis
Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, too, accused the US of engineering her ouster. While taking refuge in India, Hasina was quoted as having said: “I resigned so that I did not have to see the procession of dead bodies. They wanted to come to power over the dead bodies of students, but I did not allow it, I resigned from the premiership. I could have remained in power if I had surrendered the sovereignty of Saint Martin Island and allowed America to hold sway over the Bay of Bengal. I beseech to the people of my land, ‘Please do not be manipulated by radicals’.”
Bangladesh obviously didn’t bother to examine the clandestine external interventions in Sri Lanka. Plethora of NGOs pursue foreign agenda at Sri Lanka’s expense in a post-war setup that thrived on failure on the part of successive governments to curb waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement, sometimes blown out of proportion with the help of these same NGOs . Those who steadfastly stood by separatist Tamil project propagated campaigns on the basis of promoting good governance and accountability.
Sri Lanka experienced major US intervention at the 2010 presidential election when the superpower threw its weight behind General Sarath Fonseka. Having categorised Fonseka a war criminal, along with the Rajapaksa brothers Mahinda, Basil and Gotabaya, the US engineered a coalition, involving the UNP, JVP, TNA and SLMC, to back Fonseka. That project failed, pathetically, with Fonseka losing the contest by a staggering 1.8 mn votes but a similar operation succeeded at the 2015 presidential poll.
Although their plans went awry due to the collapse of the Wickremesinghe-Sirisena arrangement, and the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, the 2022 Aragalaya reiterated US commitment to regime change here. If the NPP government is genuinely interested in establishing the truth, an explanation can be sought from former Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena who went public with the allegation that external interference was the cause of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s ouster from power. In addition to that Wickremesinghe, too, can help the investigation as his role in Aragalaya is undisputed, though Gotabaya Rajapaksa offered him the premiership in May, 2022, and a few months later made him the President.
****
Not Daya

Nirmala
Reference was made to one-time SLBC announcer and lyricist Daya, the first wife of Premakeerthi de Alwis, in last week’s midweek article, headlined ‘Killing of Premakeerthi amidst govt., JVP onslaught on media.’ The writer apologises for inadvertently and wrongly naming Daya as the person who cleared the JVP of Premakeerthi’s assassination, whereas ‘Premakeerthi Ghathanaye Sulamula,’ authored by Dharman Wickremaratne, clearly found fault with the SLBC staffer’s second wife Nirmala as the offender. Nirmala, who accused Hudson Samarasinghe of Premakeerthi assassination, and was embroiled in a defamation case filed by the controversial media personality, passed away recently. The former Divaina journalist Wickremaratne told the writer that there is absolutely no ambiguity in respect of the perpetrators of Premakeerthi’s killing. The JVP carried out that killing in line with its overall strategy at that time meant to neutralise the state-run media, the author of four books on the JVP told The Island, adding that the late Nirmala authored book, titled ‘Premakeerthini,’ probably on the advice of the JVP, in the run-up to 2015 presidential election, for obvious reasons. Nirmala reiterated her support for the JVP-led NPP, again, at the 2019 presidential election when she appeared on stage with NPP candidate Anura Kumara Dissanayake.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot
The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.
Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.
The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.
The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.
The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.
Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.
Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).
Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.
The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.
MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.
The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.
Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation
The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.
The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.
The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.
No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.
JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.
The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.
Major cases, key developments
Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments
* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.
Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.
* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.
The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:
* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.
Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.
Foreign policy dilemma
Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?
Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.
Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.
Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.
Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.
In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.
Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.
But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.
The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?
The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.
****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?
Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community
Through the Eyes of the Patua:
Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.
The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.
The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”
‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.
A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”
There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”
As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”
From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.
Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.
While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.
Midweek Review
Spoils of Power
Power comes like a demonic spell,
To restless humans constantly in chains,
And unless kept under a tight leash,
It drives them from one ill deed to another,
And among the legacies they thus deride,
Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,
By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,
Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,
And other such places of hallowed renown,
Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.
By Lynn Ockersz
-
News6 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
News4 days agoBritish MP calls on Foreign Secretary to expand sanction package against ‘Sri Lankan war criminals’
-
Features6 days agoGeneral education reforms: What about language and ethnicity?
-
News6 days agoSuspension of Indian drug part of cover-up by NMRA: Academy of Health Professionals
-
Sports4 days agoChief selector’s remarks disappointing says Mickey Arthur
-
News3 days agoStreet vendors banned from Kandy City
-
Editorial6 days agoA very sad day for the rule of law
-
News6 days agoUS Ambassador to Sri Lanka among 29 career diplomats recalled
