News
Mystery deepens over Dinesh Schaffter death
Criminal investigators have begun looking for a motive and suspects after a majority opinion of forensic experts ruled that the death of corporate executive Dinseh Schaffter was a murder and not suicide.
Four of the five experts had said that Schaffter died in December 2022 following “pressure applied to his neck and face.” The dissenting opinion was that it was a “complex suicide” committed by ingesting cyanide while trying to make the death look like murder.
“The circumstantial evidence, the timeline last events, observations of first autopsy and second autopsy findings are indicative of ‘complex suicide,’” the Judicial Medical Officer of the Karapitiya Teaching Hospital, Dr. R. P. Ruwanpura said.
He noted a “probable attempt to mimic homicidal circumstances,” to mask the suicide and distract the investigators, a line that is rejected by the three academics – professors Asela Mendis of Colombo University, U. C. P. Perera of Ruhuna and D. M. G. Fernando of Peradeniya.
Former JMO of the Kandy Hospital, Dr. M. Sivasubramaniam, also agreed with the majority opinion. The majority disagreed with the findings of Dr. Ruwanpura that cyanide poisoning caused the death. The majority held that the victim died of asphyxiation.
“The level of cyanide detected in blood taken from the blood vessel is less than the fatal level,” according to the majority opinion. “Therefore, it is not possible to attribute the death to cyanide. It is also not possible to postulate the degree of contribution of this non-fatal level of cyanide in blood to the death.”
Dr. Ruwanpura noted that blood samples had been tested seven days later and that was the reason to show a lower level of cyanide. He also notes that lesions (marks) Schaffter’s neck and face were due to attempts at the hospital to resuscitate him, due to two autopsies, embalming and decomposition and not fatal injuries.
Although there was such a divergence of expert opinion, Additional Colombo magistrate Rajindra Jayasuriya ruled that there were reasonable grounds to rule the death as a murder and asked the police to investigate and arrest suspects and produce them before her.
Police said they were consulting the Attorney General for new direction in the case which they had earlier considered a suicide after failing to establish a credible motive or suspects.
“We must look at this case a fresh. We can’t exclude an insurance angle. The new investigation would focus on the kind of coverage the victim had, who would be the beneficiaries. Who would have a motive to murder,” a senior investigator said.
Several of Schaffter’s business associates have already been interviewed by investigators. A former cricket commentator and media personality Brian Thomas who is said to owe a large amount of money to Schaffter had been questioned.
A phone analysis of Schaffter’s telephone and all the mobile devices that were operating at the time in the vicinity of the murder scene – Borella kanatte – failed to point to a possible suspect, according to the investigator who asked not to be named.
CCTV footage along the route he took on his final drive suggested that he travelled alone in his Toyota Camry, he said.
Following the magistrate’s ruling to issue a death certificate to the next of kin, the family issued a statement thanking those who stood by them and saying that they could now begin to mourn.The family accused unnamed officials of “prying into our lives” to push the “suicide narrative.”
“The lie was printed across headlines, whispered behind our backs, and told to our faces by heartless professionals who should, and did, know better. In the days and months following Dinesh’s death, the suicide narrative continued to be pressed on us.
“So rather than seek justice for a murder, we desperately tried to avert the injustice of an obvious lie,” they said.
The “suicide” ruling was in February after a toxicology report that showed cyanide in the stomach contents of Schaffter. Initially, the cause of death was “strangulation.”
“We are back at the beginning,” the family said in a statement posted on social media. “With the injustice of his murder a reality we can only now begin to mourn.”
News
New Chancellor appointed to General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has appointed Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake (Retd.) as the new Chancellor of General Sir John Kotelawala Defence University.
The letter of appointment was presented to Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake (Retd.) by Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat on Monday (05) afternoon.
Air Chief Marshal Kolitha A. Gunathilake(Retd.) has served as Commander of the Sri Lanka Air Force and as Chief of Defence Staff.
(PMD)
News
Govt. urged to halt ‘illegal’ presidential pardons
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The government is coming under pressure from civil society organisations to formulate a clear ‘mechanism’ to deal with requests for presidential pardons.
Representing civil society organisations, Gamini Viyangoda yesterday flayed the NPP government for the delay in taking action against Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera, after the Supreme Court declared the 2019 presidential pardon granted to him by President Maithripala Sirisena null and void. He said successive Presidents had abused their executive power to release convicted persons from prison.
Purawesi Balaya activist Viyangoda pointed out that the Supreme Court ruled that President Sirisena had acted arbitrarily and failed to independently consider the relevant materials before exercising his executive power.
The Court of Appeal, in August 2018, sentenced Gnanasara Thera, General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS), to six years rigorous imprisonment for contempt of court over his conduct during proceedings concerning missing journalist Prageeth Ekneligoda. Viyangoda said that those who had been affected by the monk’s conduct have the right to know on what basis the President released him, in May 2019.
The Court of Appeal yesterday (05) ordered the relevant authorities to enforce the remaining period of imprisonment imposed on the Thera.
Gnanasara Thera, who had been subject to an open warrant for his arrest, was produced before the Court of Appeal, today, by prison officials.
Having considered the submissions made before it, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remaining period of the sentence imposed on Gnanasara Thera. Police on Saturday (03) apprehended the monk at a forest monastery in Kalutara. The Colombo Magistrate’s Court on Sunday (04) ordered the Thera to be remanded in custody till Monday.
Appearing for Gnanasara Thera, Attorney-at-Law Iresh Seneviratne, together with Attorney-at-Law Pasan Karunaratne, told the court yesterday that his client had been experiencing severe mental distress and had therefore gone to an ‘Aranya Senasanaya’, where he had been staying.
Viyangoda said that examination of presidential pardons, executed over the years, would reveal how successive leaders exploited the executive power to appease their own. Responding to The Island queries, Viyangoda said that Sirisena, in Sept. 2019, just two months before the presidential election, granted Jude Shramantha Jayamaha a Presidential pardon.
Jude Shramantha Jayamaha was sentenced to 12 years by the High Court, but the Court of Appeal revised that sentence to death, in July 2012, which the Supreme Court later upheld. Viyangoda said that though the Supreme Court, in June 2024, declared that the particular Presidential action was illegal and arbitrary, law enoforcement authorities were yet to take tangible measures to enforce the court directive.
Viyangoda stressed that no President should exercise the right to pardon a convicted on his or her own without following laid out procedures. According to him, Sirisena appeared to have simply ordered the monk, and the convicted murderer, released in response to appeals received by him. A comprehensive investigation could identify those who had been involved in these wrongdoings.
News
GL urges cautious handling of Saudi death row case, blasts govt. over BRICS affair
Convenor of Janathawadi Joint Opposition, Prof. G. L. Peiris, yesterday (05) emphasised the responsibility on the part of the government and others to act cautiously when making representations in respect of Sivarasa Anojan facing death sentence in Saudi Arabia over a controversial social media post.
Addressing the media at former President Ranil Wickremesinghe’s Flower Road Office, Prof. Peiris emphasised that whatever representations should be made through the Foreign Ministry.
The one-time External Affairs Minister warned of dire consequences of political party leaders, members of Parliament and civil society making direct representations and trying to get in touch with various Saudi authorities over the phone.
Prof. Peiris said that those who intervened on behalf of Anojan should keep in mind that Sri Lanka should be mindful of the Saudi way of governance and sensitivities.
The former Minister questioned the circumstances Sri Lanka was left out of the recent BRICS summit held in New Delhi. He recalled how former President Wickremesinghe discussed Sri Lanka’s entry into BRICS with Russian President Putin and received an invitation for the Summit there but as a result of the change of government, in Sept. 2024, Sri Lanka ignored that invitation.
That resulted in Sri Lanka being left out from the New Delhi summit, Prof. Peris said.
Prof. Peiris pointed out the absurdity in sending the Foreign Secretary to the BRICS Summit in Russia instead of the President, PM or the Foreign Minister to represent the country.
Referring to the forthcoming conclusion of the current IMF programme, initiated during Wickremesinghe’s time, Prof. Peiris said that Sri Lanka lost a great opportunity to benefit from BRICS by failing to represent the country at a higher level at the Russian summit.
The BRICS nations established the New Development Bank (NDB), originally called the BRICS Development Bank, Prof. Peiris said.
Dismissing NPP government’s explanation regarding Iranian ships awaiting necessary supplies but deprived by US imposed restrictions, the former Minister strongly criticised the administration’s response. According to him, this government responded in a similar manner when the US sank an unarmed Iranian frigate just outside Sri Lankan territorial waters in March this year.
Prof. Peiris declared that the government’s assertion that the US restrictions weren’t only directed at Sri Lanka but all Iranian vessels in other regions as well was not acceptable (SF)
-
Latest News6 days agoGold winner Tharanga gets brand-new Honda Vezel from SLAAJ
-
Features6 days agoWhy Sri Lanka needs an Inclusive Civic Nationalism – urgently
-
News5 days agoUS-assisted ‘Ice’ detection: NPC to examine IGP’s move to transfer drug-busting team
-
Editorial4 days agoColombo Port drug bust: The plot thickens
-
News6 days agoCivil society activist accuses govt. of favouring Ven. Gnanasara
-
Editorial6 days agoWhen crime bosses rise above law and shrines
-
Midweek Review6 days agoDappula’s Easter Sunday ‘grand conspiracy’ claim demolished
-
Editorial5 days agoDrug busting, transfers and trust deficit
