Connect with us

News

MP Sumanthiran: President has committed impeachable offence

Published

on

MA Sumanthiran

By Saman Indrajith

TNA Jaffna District MP MA Sumanthiran told Parliament on Saturday that an impeachment motion could be brought against President Ranil Wickremesinghe for using the latter’s parliamentary time to violate the provisions of the Constitution.

Participating in the debate on Budget 2024 under the expenditure heads of the Ministry of Justice, Sumanthiran said that the President had stated in Parliament on 24 Nov., that the Constitutional Council was under the purview of the executive branch of government. “This is wrong and it is a deliberate attempt to violate the Constitution and that amounts to an offence on which the President could be impeached,” Sumanthiran said.

MP Sumanthiran said the President came to the Chamber on 24 Nov., and read from some Supreme Court determinations, claiming that the Constitutional Council was a part of the executive. “I spoke on the same matter on the same day, but the President did not remain in the House. He left. Two days later he came to the Chamber again and replied to me. And then he left again.

While the Opposition Leader was asking him to stay, he left the Chamber. The President before leaving told this House that as per the 17th Amendment to the Constitution, the CC was a part of the executive. He said that he, KN Choksy and Karu Jayasuriya drafted that law. That is also wrong. It was brought at the insistence of the JVP.

The President was actually talking about the 18th and 19th Amendments which were aborted in this House. They wrote them during his tenure as the Prime Minister to clip the wings of the executive presidency. He was reading from those determinations, and claimed that those readings were from the 17th Amendment.

He also claimed that I provided counseling to those deliberations before the Supreme Court. That too was wrong. I was not in the country then and I was reading for my Masters elsewhere.  Chief Justice Sarath Silva giving the determination on the 17th Amendment to the Constitution stated that the establishment of the CC was the core of the 17th Amendment.

The provisions pertaining to the CC are in the Chapter 7 (A). The Leader of the House too on the day the President spoke said that it seems the CC comes under the executive. Executive powers are in Chapter 7 and a new chapter was created as 7 (A). It is a sui generis [unique] chapter stating that the CC is neither part of the executive nor the legislature. On the day of my intervention, I did not state that the CC was a part of the legislature but it was a part of the legislative structure. That is what the determination of the 17th Amendment says. The CC is a body separated from the executive, separated from the legislature but is under the aegis of Parliament.

President comes here and says what he wants. The half-baked arguments go unchallenged. That is not democracy. When someone challenges his claim, he gets up and walks away.

The 17th Amendment was brought for good governance. Subsequent amendments took good qualities away and brought them back to the Constitution. But the President behaves as if there were no checks and balances and thinks that the CC should accept his nominations. That is wrong. That was not the intention of Parliament when it implemented these amendments which sought to curtail untrammeled powers of the executive.

Now, we have come to a crisis of governance. This has implications on economic recovery as well. This has been highlighted by the IMF too. The President has violated the Constitution in this House for the second time within a month. This is deliberate offence on which he could be impeached,” Sumanthiran said.



News

Fuel crunch looms

Published

on

Govt. tells fuel distributors to maintain stocks to ensure uninterrupted supplies

by Saman Indrajith and Norman Palihawadane

The government had instructed private fuel distributors to maintain minimum stocks and ensure uninterrupted supplies to the market, Energy Minister Anura Karunathilaka told Parliament yesterday (06).

Karunathilaka said the Ministry of Energy Secretary had notified the relevant companies of the requirement, following a reduction in supplies by some private distributors, amid higher international fuel prices.

The Minister said private companies had informed the government that they were facing losses because international prices had risen while fuel was being sold, locally, at prevailing prices. As a result, some companies had reduced the volumes released to the market.

The reduced supplies had increased the burden on the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC), whose share of the diesel market had risen from about 54% to 82%, the Minister said.

“The CPC currently holds an 82% share of the market,” he said, adding that it had increased its supplies, compared with February, to compensate for the reduction by private distributors.

Karunathilaka said the government could not, under the existing agreements with private companies, specify the quantities they should supply to individual filling stations. However, it could require them to maintain minimum stocks in the country.

The Minister said the Energy Ministry had already instructed companies that had failed to maintain the required stocks to take steps to prevent supply disruptions.

The Minister attributed the queues reported at some filling stations to reduced supplies from private distributors, as well as normal variations in fuel distribution. He also said demand for CPC fuel had increased because private companies generally did not provide fuel to dealers on credit, while the CPC offered a three-day credit facility.

“We expect that, as the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation takes on this additional burden, the problem will ease to some extent by Wednesday or Thursday,” Karunathilaka said.

He said instructions had also been issued to increase supplies to CPC filling stations. A special discussion on the issue is scheduled for today (07), with officials of the Energy Ministry and CPC expected to participate,

along with President Anura Kumara Dissanayake.

Meanwhile, Petroleum Dealers’ Association officials have called for an early solution to the supply issue. Association Chairman D.V. Shantha Silva said queues had been reported at many filling stations, mainly those operated by private distributors.

He said the situation was not due to an overall shortage of fuel, but was linked to reduced orders by Lanka IOC, Sinopec and R.M. Parks amid concerns over losses incurred on fuel sales.

The Ceylon Petroleum Private Tanker Owners Association has urged motorists to refrain from panic buying, saying there was no nationwide disruption to fuel supplies.

The government earlier increased fuel prices and introduced a per-litre diesel subsidy following concerns raised by distributors over rising international prices.

Continue Reading

News

Gnansara Thera to be assigned to prison printing section: Officials

Published

on

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera, who was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court. He appeared before the court in layman’s clothes. Pic by Nishan S. Priyantha.

by Norman Palihawadane

Bodu Bala Sena General Secretary Ven. Galagodaatte Gnanasara Thera, who has been ordered by the court to serve the remainder of his prison sentence, is to be assigned to the prison ‘printing work party’, prison officials said yesterday.

The monk was produced before the Colombo High Court yesterday by prison officials in connection with a warrant issued by the court.

He appeared before the court in civilian attire.

Prison sources said arrangements were being finalised for his detention and that he would subsequently be assigned to the printing work party.

The Thera initially objected when prison officials instructed him to change from his robes into the attire worn by convicted prisoners.

He later agreed to wear the prescribed prison clothes, sources said.

The Supreme Court, in September, annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera in 2019. He had been serving a six-year prison sentence imposed following his conviction for contempt of court but had served only about nine months when then President Maithripala Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon in May 2019.

Following the Supreme Court ruling, the Thera was required to serve the remainder of his sentence. He was subsequently reported missing, prompting the Court of Appeal to issue an open warrant for his arrest.

The Court of Appeal on Monday ordered the authorities to enforce the remainder of his prison sentence.

Continue Reading

News

Speaker rejects Ajith Perera’s privilege complaint

Published

on

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne yesterday ruled that a privilege complaint submitted by SJB Kalutara District MP Ajith P. Perera did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege.

The ruling was made in response to a notice of privilege submitted by Perera on October 02.

Perera alleged that his parliamentary privileges had been breached over the failure to take formal action or reach a final decision on a written request submitted on August 03 by 18 Opposition MPs seeking the appointment of a Special Select Committee to investigate delays in the judicial system and prison overcrowding.

He had also requested that the matter be referred to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges for investigation and recommendations.

In his ruling, Speaker Wickramaratne said the Speaker, as the Presiding Authority and guardian of the powers, rights and privileges of Parliament, could not be subjected to a privilege complaint or disciplinary inquiry by a committee subordinate to the Chair in respect of actions taken in an official capacity.

He said that, under the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to independently determine whether a prima facie case of breach of privilege existed.

Referring a complaint against the Speaker to a committee functioning under the Speaker’s authority would, therefore, create a procedural contradiction, he said.

Accordingly, the Speaker ruled that Perera’s notice did not constitute a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege and disallowed the request to refer the matter to the Committee on Ethics and Privileges.

Continue Reading

Trending