Connect with us

Opinion

Letters from the past

Published

on

File Photo of Ban Ki-moon, UN SG with President Mahinda Rajapaksa

By Prof. Rajiva Wijesinha

In the context of Lord Naseby’s recent launch of his book about Sri Lanka, where which G L Peiris delivered an uncharacteristically passionate attack on the hypocrisy of the British government, I thought I should look here at how we blundered endlessly in dealing with the major political problem this country has faced for the last decade, namely the publication of the Darusman Report and our failure to respond to it clearly.

As soon as it came out, I told the Foreign Ministry to take up its substance with the UN, but that was when they were pretending that nothing untoward had happened. Instead of answering allegations, Gotabaya and Basil Rajapaksa went their separate ways in recording their views as to what had happened, with no substantial arguments to refute allegations. When I told Gotabaya this, when he asked me to comment on the text his people had prepared, he agreed that something should be done but that it was not his business. He said he had delegated that to the Chief of Defence Staff, Roshan Goonetilleke, who however told me that he had received no such commission, but, in any case, he did not have the resources to do this.

And, so, the criticism of our actions turned into gospel truth.

Over the years that followed I tried to stir our lethargic officials into action, but nothing came of this letter, sent to the then Secretary of the Ministry of External Affairs, at the same time as I wrote to several others. I have collated it with the rest, in a document that I sent to Shamindra Ferdinando, the only journalist who then and now tried consistently to stir government into action, from the perspective of someone who had followed the war closely and understood how unfair the allegations were – but who also increasingly despaired of the lethargy of government.

I had drafted the queries for the Ministry of External Affairs, but it was not interested and told me to send them myself. I did pass them on to the Resident Coordinator, but I had no status and, though he told me he had passed them on, there was of course no response from Ban Ki-moon.

Why Mahinda Rajapaksa, who had fought the war ably, did nothing to defend the country from these attacks, still beggars belief. But he had surrounded himself with people who believed that by reassuring him they could enhance their own positions.

As the queries make clear, there was enough evidence from internal UN records – which the Darusman Panel ignored – to make clear that their allegations were made up of selective reports from minor personnel.

From a letter sent to the Ministry of External Affairs in July 2011

It will be helpful, for the sake of reconciliation alone, to challenge the impact created by these events. In particular, I believe that we should ensure correction of those aspects that are clearly misleading of what is erroneously referred to as a UN report. At the same time, we should treat seriously aspects that are not inaccurate and that create an adverse impression.

This can be done more easily if we have made sure that errors are eradicated and clarification provided with regard to matters that are obscure or suggest inadequate understanding of realities. I have in several publications drawn attention to errors, and I believe a summation of these should be brought to the attention of the UN Secretary General. At the same time, he should be asked to respond to the queries on the attached page, since they bear on the credibility of the report as it has been compiled. I have several others, following close scrutiny of the report, but these will be enough for the moment.

I raise these because I believe we have not responded effectively to slurs that can irretrievably damage the reconciliation process if allowed to go unchecked. At present we simply react to relentless criticisms, without addressing its root causes. While I can understand reluctance to respond to the substance of an inappropriate report, there is nothing to prevent us questioning the methodology used.

I hope very much that you will be able to proceed on these lines or similar ones. Yours sincerely

1. Did the Panel consult the heads of UN agencies in Sri Lanka with regard to the various allegations contained in the Panel report, and in particular those concerning

a) Alleged rape

b) Deliberate deprival of humanitarian assistance

c) Unnecessary suffering for the displaced

d) Lack of information about rehabilitation sites?

It would be useful to ask the UN Secretary General to circulate the letter of the UN Resident Coordinator with regard to conditions at the camps, and request reports from him as well as the heads of the WFP and UNHCR with regard to these matters. In particular the UN Secretary General should be asked to share with the panel the reports of the various protection agencies that functioned during this period.

2. Did the Panel consult the head of the ICRC with regard to the various allegations contained in the Panel report, and in particular those concerning

a) Transportation of the wounded and others from conflict areas to government hospitals, and the treatment received by these

b) Transportation of food and other supplies to the conflict area

c) Information provided by the ICRC to government about conditions in the conflict area, and in particular the establishment and operation of medical centres

It would be useful to ask the UN Secretary General to circulate the letter of the ICRC head to the navy regarding its support for ICRC operations, and to request reports from him with regard to these matters.

3. Were there reports prepared by the UN or the ICRC which were shared with the panel, but which were not provided to government?

4. Did the UN set up a ‘networks of observers who were operational in LTTE-controlled areas’, as claimed in the report. Was this with the authority of the UN Resident Coordinator, and how did it fit within the UN mandate? With whom were its reports shared?

5. Did the UN obtain other reports from international UN employees in Sri Lanka, and were these with the authority of the UN Resident Coordinator? How did these fit within the UN mandate? If these reports were intended to improve the condition of affected Sri Lankans, why were they not shared at the time with government?

6. Did the Panel consult the UN Special Representative on the Rights of the Displaced, Prof Walter Kalin, and use the reports he published? Were they aware that he visited Sri Lanka three times during this period?

7. Will the Panel explain errors such as the attribution to government of actions relating to the LTTE (Footnote 92), the attribution to government of an inappropriate response (at the end of January) to an ICRC statement issued on February 1st, the assumption that food was only sent to the conflict zone through the ICRC, the attribution (though obscurely) to the terrorist associated Tamil Rehabilitation Organization of the claim that individuals died of starvation, the claim that Manik Farm did not have its own water source, the claim that psychological support was not allowed by the Ministry of Social Services, etc?

8. Will the Panel study the analysis of its claims with regard to attacks on hospitals, in the light of claims made at the time, and in the context of official ICRC documentation of what was conveyed to government?

9. Will the Panel explain its selective characterization of participants in the conflict, including its description of the LTTE as disciplined, while bribery is attributed to the military as a whole, with positive actions being attributed to individuals?

10. Will the Panel provide sources for the various estimates mentioned in Para 133, as well as all alternative estimates with regard to the given figures? Will it also explain the sentence ‘Depending on the ratio of injuries to deaths, estimated at various times to be 1:2 or 1:3, this could point to a much higher casualty figure’ and how it relates to the figure of 75,000 given immediately afterwards?

11. Will the Panel explain what it means when it uses the word ‘Government’, and in particular its source for various critical comments such as those in Paras, 131 and 136 and Footnote 77?

12. Has the Panel studied the reports of UN committees which make clear the reluctance of agencies entrusted with funds for the benefit of Sri Lankan displaced citizens to upgrade facilities at Manik Farm despite numerous requests, as well as the manner in which funding was squandered on international personnel who were unable to ensure adherence to national and international standards with regard to sanitation?



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Beware of Yanks bearing gifts

Published

on

Helicopters from the US. (Pic courtesy SLAF)

The US Government has gifted 10 Bell 206, Sea Ranger Helicopters to the SLAF for Training and Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief (HADR) purposes. The full specifications are as follows.

Contractor:

Bell Helicopter Textron
Date Deployed: First flight: 1961; Operational: 1968
Propulsion: One Allison 250-C20BJ turbofan engine
Length: Fuselage – 31 feet (9.44 meters); Rotors turning – 39 feet (11.9 meters)
Height: 10 feet (3.04 meters)
Rotor Diameter: 35 feet 4 inches (10.78 meters)
Weight: 1595 pounds (725kg) empty, 3200 pounds (1455 kg) maximum take-off
Airspeed: 138 miles (222 km) per hour maximum; 117 miles (188 km) per hour cruising
Ceiling: 18,900 feet (5,761 meters)
Range: 368 nautical miles (420 statute miles, 676 km)
Crew: One pilot, four students

While they are good for training, I have my serious doubts whether these helicopters are ideal for HADR. As they have only a single engine and They can’t even operate into high rise helipads in hospitals and hotels in Colombo. The law requires twin engine helicopters! What happens if there is an engine failure while operating over the sea or in a mountainous area? There will be hell to pay!

Three twin engine versions would have been better.

How many helicopter pilots does the SLAF require anyway?

Will we be stuck with junk? Like two Russian KA -26’s during the Sirimavo Government and French Aerospatiale Dauphins SLAF acquired. which were not ‘tropicalised’, during the JRJ Government.

Will the Sea Ranger Spares support be available, free of charge?

I doubt it.

There will also be other Geopolitical strings attached. There is no such thing as a free lunch.

Guwan Seeya

Continue Reading

Opinion

Will AI kill solar and wind energy?

Published

on

Global warming policies were expected to drive a rapid shift toward a renewables-based energy system dominated by wind and solar. While growth in these sources did occur, it has not matched the pace that was widely anticipated. In the United States, the rise of cheap and abundant shale natural gas significantly reshaped the energy mix, displacing coal and limiting the relative share of wind and solar in electricity generation. In China and India, the situation has been different.

Coal remains dominant because it is widely available domestically, while natural gas is more limited or expensive to secure at scale. As a result, coal has retained its central role in both countries’ power systems. Solar and wind always provide intermittent, variable power. It was widely assumed that a cost-effective, utility-scale electricity storage solution would emerge to solve this problem, but that has not yet happened at the scale originally expected. In the pre-AI era, solar and wind were typically integrated into power systems alongside more reliable sources such as coal, natural gas, and nuclear energy.

For example, if the sun was shining on a Monday, electricity demand could be met largely by solar power during the day. At night, coal, natural gas, or nuclear plants would supply the required electricity. If the following Tuesday was cloudy or gloomy, generation would shift back toward coal, gas, or nuclear to maintain supply. AI introduces a new and more demanding challenge. AI data centers require continuous, high-quality, always-on electricity, which solar and wind alone struggle to guarantee without large-scale storage or back-up systems. In addition, they require very large amounts of power.

As a result, the AI industry is now actively searching for new and expanded sources of reliable electricity. One of the major challenges in powering AI systems is electricity transmission. High-voltage transmission lines are expensive, slow to build, and often face regulatory and land-use constraints. As a result, some companies are exploring more localized power solutions, sometimes referred to as microgrids. These are self-contained energy systems that can operate independently from the main electricity grid. Technologies such as small modular nuclear reactors are an example of such microgrids.

In such isolated systems, the focus is on highly reliable, always available power generated close to the point of use. In this context, solar and wind are expected to play a limited role because their output is variable and depends on weather conditions, making them less suited as primary sources in fully self-contained AI-focused microgrids. The pace of AI infrastructure development is extremely rapid in both the United States and China. AI systems are widely seen as transformative technologies that promise significant new wealth creation, which is driving aggressive and sustained investment. As a result, development is moving quickly, without waiting for long-term solutions such as large-scale energy storage to mature alongside renewable energy systems.

In this environment, electricity demand is rising faster than new infrastructure can be built. In the United States, this reinforces the role of natural gas as the dominant source of reliable power. In China and India, where coal remains more established and readily available, it is likely to continue playing a central role in meeting growing demand. In India, AI data centers have not yet been built at the scale seen in the United States and China. When India does reach that stage, it will need to supply large amounts of reliable electricity. India has placed strong emphasis on solar energy in particular and has had some success in meeting the needs of ordinary consumers through renewable expansion. However, the key question is what choices will be made when large-scale AI data centers begin to arrive.

Will India rely more on coal generation, which is relatively cheap, widely available, and highly reliable, or on solar power, which is intermittent, variable, and often more expensive when reliability is taken into account? My view is that India is more likely to turn to coal to meet this demand, given its existing infrastructure and the need for dependable electricity supply. Then there is an overall question. Solar and wind were already struggling in the pre-AI days to displace coal and natural gas at the system level, despite strong expectations that they would become dominant sources of electricity. Now that AI is here and electricity demand is rising rapidly, will they push solar and wind further behind in the energy mix? (The Statesman)

(The writer is an expert on energy and contributes regularly to publications in India and overseas.)

by SUNIL SHARAN

Continue Reading

Opinion

An Adulation to a Titan of Humanity

Published

on

Dr. Neomal Gunaratna

Celebrating the Life and Legacy of Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna 10 January 1931 – 07 May 2026

When a colossus of human virtue departs this earthly theatre, the silence left in its wake is not merely the absence of sound, but a profound, resonant reverberation that echoes through the very corridors of our souls. On that most distressing 07 of May, 2026, the mortal final curtain fell upon the magnificent, multi-faceted tapestry of a life lived to its exquisite pinnacle. Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna, having completed a glorious earthly sojourn of ninety-five years, surrendered his gentle spirit to the infinite, leaving behind a world demonstrably poorer for his departure.

To speak of him is to speak of an absolute gem of humanity, a mortal who walked among us with the quiet majesty of a king, the tender heart of a saint, and the flawless grace of a true nobleman. He was a Consultant Paediatrician of peerless distinction. Yet for all that, well above and beyond the glittering accolades of his noble vocation, he was, in the truest and most sublime sense of the phrase, a human being par excellence.

In attempting to encapsulate the vast depth of Naomal’s character, even the richness of the English language feels frustratingly inadequate, compelling one to search for words forged in the fires of profoundest reverence. He was a grandee possessed of sterling qualities so rare in this modern transactional era that his presence felt like an exquisite anachronism; a beautiful remainder of an age when honour was a man’s sanctuary, and integrity was his unwavering Northern Star. His uniqueness did not stem from an assertive, ostentatious display of superiority. It blossomed from the quiet, luminous radiance of an authentic soul. To have been counted among his close friends is a privilege of such monumental proportions that it stands as one of the most radiant blessings of my own life. Our bond was not woven from the fragile threads of casual acquaintance, but forged in the durable crucible of mutual respect, shared ideals, and a deep, unspoken understanding of the beauty inherent in lives dedicated to the service of others.

In an age where the ethical landscape is all too often obscured by the shifting mists of compromise and moral ambivalence, Naomal stood like an unyielding granite cliff against the turbulent seas of opportunism. His rectitude was absolute, non-negotiable, and entirely independent of an audience. He did what was right, not for the fleeting warmth of public adulation, but because his internal moral compass was tuned to an otherworldly frequency. His word was a sacred covenant, an unbreakable bond that required no legal seal or written witness. In his professional life as a Consultant Paediatrician, this supreme integrity manifested as an unswerving commitment to the highest principles of Hippocratic devotion. He was a healer who could neither be bought nor swayed by the seductive allure of material gain or institutional politics. He wielded his stethoscope not as an instrument of commerce, but as a sacred conduit of compassion, bridging the divide between clinical expertise and the tender vulnerabilities of human suffering.

How can one adequately depict the soft, enveloping warmth of a heart that beats in perpetual symphony with the distress of others? Naomal’s benevolence was not a performative gesture, nor was it a duty executed with cold, clinical precision. It was an effusive, spontaneous overflow of pure, unadulterated love. It was a kindness that possessed its own unique atmosphere, a soothing gentleness that disarmed fear and banished despair. When he entered a room, the emotional temperature invariably rose, thawed by the genuine, sparkling warmth of his magnificent smile. His eyes, windows to a soul completely devoid of malice, mirrored a profound empathy that could diagnose a broken spirit as swiftly as a physical ailment.

He was brought up in his early days at De Mazenod College in Kandana, St Peter’s College Colombo, Royal College Colombo, and during the period of World War II, in Glendale College, Bandarawela. In a glittering career that followed specialisation in paediatrics, he has worked in the Government Hospital in Gampaha and Kuliyapitiya, the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Peradeniya, North Colombo Medical College in Ragama and then at the Department of Paediatrics of the University of Kelaniya. To the thousands of children who passed through his healing hands across the decades, he was not merely a doctor in a sterile white coat; he was a grand, benevolent guardian angel, a comforting presence whose very touch possessed an alchemy that turned terror into tranquillity and tears into triumphant laughter. To scores of his students, he was a father figure, a mentor and a brilliant teacher. In the years gone by, he was the President of the Sri Lanka Paediatric Association, which is now the Sri Lanka College of Paediatricians, President of the Vaccines and Infectious Diseases Forum of Sri Lanka and a much-valued Council Member of the Independent Medical Practitioners Association (IMPA). The unblemished finesse that he exhibited in these positions is indeed an abiding lesson to all and sundry.

As a Consultant Paediatrician, Naomal’s brilliance was legendary, a beacon of excellence that illuminated the medical fraternity. Yet, his profound intellect was beautifully balanced by an equal measure of humility. He possessed the rare ability to untangle the most knotty, complex medical conundrums with a swift, intuitive diagnostic precision, all while maintaining a bedside manner that was as gentle as a summer breeze. He understood, with a depth that bypassed mere textbook knowledge, that a sick child is a fragile ecosystem, intertwined with the agonising anxieties of distraught parents. Consequently, his consultations were masterclasses in holistic healing. He did not merely treat a disease; he cradled a family. He would spend hours patiently explaining clinical intricacies to frightened mothers, his voice a calm, reassuring anchor in the midst of their emotional storms. He treated the children of royalty and the children of peasants, with the same meticulous care, the same overflowing affection, and the same absolute dedication, recognising the identical, priceless spark of divinity within each innocent soul.

A personal anecdote goes to show the most admirable and true spirit of the man. I did not know Naomal from Adam till 1990. In January of 1990, following my tenure of office in General Hospital Badulla, General Hospital Ratnapura and General Hospital Kurunegala, I was posted as the Consultant Paediatrician to Kalubowila Hospital by the Ministry of Health. Both Naomal and I did our Private Consultations at Asiri Medical Hospital. We worked on the same floor and became really close friends. He had loads of patients, while I had extremely few, as I was totally unknown. Most of the time, I was seated in my Consulting Room, twiddling my thumbs and waiting for some tangible work with children.

Then one day, Naomal came to my room and said that he needed to go abroad for an extended period of about six to eight months and asked me whether I could look after his patients. I was very happy to do it as at that time, as it was like ‘manna from heaven’ for me. So, it went on, I looked after his little patients, and I was financially the richer for it.

Then, when Naomal came back after all those months, I told all his patients that I was only covering up his work and that they should go back to him. However, some of them wanted to stay with me. I told them that the only way in which I would continue to look after their children was for them to get a note to that effect from Dr Naomal Gunaratna. I was quite sure that it would not come to pass that way. They went to him and told him what I said, and Naomal, most nonchalantly, graciously and with the greatest pleasure, issued a little note to each of them in which he had written “My dear BJC, please be kind enough to take over the care of this child“. Need I say more? What a man? What a fantastic person who showed by his quiet deeds that his values transcended petty considerations and monetary reflections?

The longevity of ninety-five years is a milestone granted only to a few. For Naomal, these nine decades plus were not merely a passive accumulation of days but a grand, purposeful march through time. He aged with an unparalleled, majestic dignity, his wisdom deepening like a fine vintage, while his youthful enthusiasm for life remained entirely unextinguished by the passing years. Even as his physical frame grew frail under the inevitable weight of time, his mind remained a brilliant, caerulean laboratory of thought, and his spirit retained its effervescent, childlike joy. He never allowed the cynicism of an evolving world to pollute the pristine waters of his optimism. To sit with him in his twilight years was to drink from a fountain of pure, unvarnished wisdom. He looked back upon his long journey not with the wistful regrets of a man mourning, but with the serene, tranquil satisfaction of an accomplished master craftsman who looks upon a masterpiece and knows he has given it his all, in the finest sense of the phrase.

We must also celebrate the quiet, understated grandeur of his private universe. Naomal was a man of exquisite tastes, an intellectual who found solace in the harmony of great literature, the majesty of classical arts, and the quiet contemplation of nature’s wonders. Yet, his greatest joy was found in the warmth of human connections. He was a loyal, fiercely protective friend, a steadfast pillar of strength upon whom one could lean with absolute confidence, even during life’s most turbulent seasons. In an era dominated by superficial relationships and digital illusions, his friendship was a solid, tangible sanctuary. His conversations were never trivial; they were rich and multi-layered tapestries woven with historical anecdotes, medical philosophies, gentle humour, and profound spiritual insights. To converse with him was to be elevated, and to be challenged to think more deeply, love more expansively, and live more honourably.

On that day of his departure from this mortal world, the world lost an exceptional treasure. The medical profession lost one of its most venerable elder statesmen, humanity lost an exemplary ambassador, and I lost a cherished brother of the heart. The grief we feel is heavy, a dark and suffocating shroud that threatens to overwhelm us. Yet, as we stand in the shadow of this monumental loss, we must not weep as those who have no hope. Naomal’s demise is not an absolute end but a glorious transition. It is the triumphant homecoming of a soul that has magnificently fulfilled its earthly mandate. The physical vessel which carried his inner being may return to the dust from which it came, but the essence of who he was, the kindness he disseminated, the lives he saved, the love he kindled, and the pristine integrity he modelled remain forever immortalised in the fabric of our realities.

He has crossed the ultimate horizon, entering that everlasting realm where pain is obsolete, and peace reigns eternal. We can almost see him now, walking through fields of everlasting light, his countenance radiant, his step light and free, greeted by a chorus of godly beings and even the grateful souls of the children he mended but who preceded him into eternity. The man has fought the good fight, he has finished the race, he has kept the faith with absolute, unyielding fidelity. His life was a beautiful, symphonic ensemble dedicated to the upliftment of humans, and its final stanza, though hushed in death, is an abiding opus which leaves an eternal melody playing in our hearts.

Farewell, my dearly beloved friend; goodbye, Dr Naomal P. S. Gunaratna. You were an absolute gem of a person, a human being par excellence, and a star that burned with a brilliant, comforting light in our earthly sky. Though you have gone away from our sight, your luminescence will continue to guide our steps through the gathering shadows until that glorious dawn when we shall meet again on the farther shore.

May your most beautiful, noble soul rest in eternal, serene, and uninterrupted peace. May you attain eternal bliss!

I conclude with the immortal words, as depicted by the great bard William Shakespeare in Julius Caesar (Act V, Scene 5) “His life was gentle, and the elements so mixed in him that nature might stand up and say to all the world, This was a man.”

By Dr B. J. C. Perera
Specialist Consultant Paediatrician

Continue Reading

Trending