Connect with us

Sports

Let’s hope that SLSRFA considers reverting back to old rugby format

Published

on

The schools league rugby tournament was well-contested last season and teams were allowed to host matches without being forced to play at neutral venues.

By A Special Sports Correspondent

The schools’ rugby season has faced a storm due to a vibe generated by top rugby playing schools who are frowning upon a decision taken by the Sri Lanka Schools Rugby Football Association (SLSRFA) to hold the Super Round matches of the inter-school league tournament at neutral venues.

The super round is the ‘second round’ of the league rugby tournament and venues are set according to a ‘home and away’ system. This system has been in practice since rugby was introduced to this little island; first to clubs and then to schools. One team that hosts the match this year will travel to the other school as ‘guests’ the next year and no one has complained about this arrangement. But it seems the SLSRFA wishes to change this tradition. The schools section of Sri Lanka Rugby (SLR) maintains that this change will be implemented with the motive of preserving the quality of the tournament and avoiding any team enjoying undue benefits in terms of playing on familiar ground conditions. The SLSRFA affirms that it has no intention of taking home the gate collection generated from these second round matches. The SLSRFA also intends to conduct the super round of the league tournament in a ‘knockout basis’ which is a total contrast to how this stage of the tournament was conducted last season. Many schools have already voiced their disapproval as to how the format of the schools rugby tournament has been subject to change.

From the surface this decision by the SLSRFA seems logical, but we need to think deep from a rugby tradition point of view. Just imagine if ‘Bradby Shield’ brothers Royal and Trinity are grouped in a manner that they meet in the super round of this tournament! Luckily these two teams are not pooled in the same group this season and they can only meet if they qualify for the super round stage of the league tournament. If that happens at least one leg of the Brady Shield will be played at a neutral venue. Going by the history of these two schools, neither Royal nor Trinity would agree to this. The solution to this issue might come in the form of both schools pulling out of the schools rugby tournament midway during this much looked forward to sporting event. This would be very bad for rugby and the spirit of sport.

The schools rugby tournament has been subject to several changes since more schools playing the sport entered the fray and the SLSRFA became an authority in rugby. The tournament format till last season was fair for all top division rugby playing schools grouped in Division 1 Segment 1. This writer says this because the old format allowed the best teams in the tournament to make a comeback even after a surprise loss and still be in contention of the ‘plum’. This opportunity no longer exists with the schools rugby authorities demanding the introduction of a ‘sudden death’ or knockout flavor to the tournament. This is the other issue causing concerns to school teams this season.

Many rugby critics and veterans who have played the game have already opined that this would be too much of a change for schoolboys. Unlike clubs, most schools need time to settle down and play their best rugby. There have been some schools in the past which came back strongly midway during the season. In the year 1988, Ananda and especially Isipatana made strong comebacks in to the schools’ tournament after mediocre performances at the start. Isipatana lost around four games at the start of the league tournament, but made amends as the season progressed to finish on a high.

The schools section of the SLR back then hardly interfered in the conduct of the league tournament. Schools were free to pick their opponents and each school had to play seven games to be in contention of the league title. But at present there are too many regulations being imposed; which might dampen the spirit of the game.

The SLSRFA has affirmed that it’ll not stake a claim to the entire gate collection that’ll be generated during the super round of the tournament.

Many top rugby playing schools have already sent protest letters to the SLSRFA airing their grievances about the new format of the tournament. Let’s hope that the schools’ tournament doesn’t run into a snag because if a school that’s affected by this format change seeks legal assistance there could be a delay in starting the tournament.



Sports

Why are we avoiding Test matches like the plague

Published

on

After a decade in Test cricket, Dhananjaya de Silva has featured in only 65 Tests, which is less than seven Tests a year.

There’s a glut of riveting Test cricket going on around the world, the kind that warms most fans hearts. Joe Root has finally bagged his maiden hundred in Australia after a 12-year vigil – meaning Matthew Hayden no longer has to stroll around the MCG in nothing but his cowboy hat. The big man had vowed to walk naked in Melbourne if Root didn’t reach three figures this Ashes. Elsewhere, the West Indies are digging in to save a game against New Zealand, while Temba Bavuma’s South Africans have just handed India a 2-0 hiding in their own backyard.

Ordinarily, December is when cricket reporters hop from Wellington to Brisbane to Cape Town, chasing Tests like fielders patrolling the rope. Instead, this year we’re stuck at home, glued to the television, wondering why Sri Lanka are treating the longest format like a bouncer to the helmet — duck first, ask questions later.

The numbers make for grim reading. Sri Lanka have played just four Tests this year — one fewer than England and Australia will cram into seven frenetic weeks between November and December. And the plot thickens: the next Sri Lanka Test isn’t until June 2026. For specialists like Dhananjaya de Silva and Dinesh Chandimal, that’s not a gap between series — that’s an ice age. What motivation can you muster when your next red-ball assignment is two monsoons away?

Consider this: Joe Root debuted a year after Chandimal. Root has strutted out 160 times in Test cricket; Chandimal, just 90. Same era, different calendars — and Sri Lanka’s one looks very disappointing.

The World Test Championship was supposed to be a level playing field, but smaller nations often get the short end of the stick. Unless Sri Lanka are up against England, three-match series have become as rare as hat-tricks in Test cricket. With two-match rubbers becoming the norm, it’s almost impossible for teams like Sri Lanka to rack up ten Tests a year. A conscious push is needed to keep the red-ball flame alive.

To their credit, Sri Lanka Cricket have tried to plug the gaps by scheduling Tests outside the WTC — Afghanistan last year, Ireland the year before. Useful, yes, but still not nearly enough to prevent the longer format from slipping through to oblivion.

Let’s be blunt: there’s not much money in Test cricket. Unless the opposition is India or England, hosting a Test barely breaks even. But sport isn’t merely a cash register with stumps — not every moment of entertainment needs to pay for itself.

There are solutions. Each WTC cycle gives nine teams six series — three home, three away. Add just one series against a non-WTC Test nation and the tally improves. Make it mandatory that at least two of those six series must feature a minimum of three Tests, and suddenly the calendar looks healthier.

We often hear about shifting player priorities, how franchise leagues offer life-changing fortunes. Fair enough — but administrators can’t simply shrug and hope loyalty will magically return. If the suits don’t stage regular Test cricket, the players can hardly be blamed for choosing the shortest queue to a payday.

Test cricket is the game’s heartbeat. Ignore it long enough and the sport risks flatlining.

by Rex Clementine ✍️

Continue Reading

Sports

Wolvaardt 115*, all-round Luus set up South Africa’s thumping win over Ireland

Published

on

By

Laura Wolvaardt scored her second T20I hundred at Newlands against Ireland [Cricket South Africa]

Laura Wolvaardt’s 56-ball 115 and an all-round show from Sune Luus helped South Africa beat Ireland in thefirst Women’s T20I by 105 runs, their joint third biggest win by runs, at Newlands.

Batting at No. 3, Wolvaardt scored a 52-ball century, the fastest for South Africa and the joint sixth quickest in T20Is, and was involved in a 176-run second-wicket partnership with Luus as the hosts posted their highest T20I total of 220 for 2. Having opened the batting, Luus also took the new ball and struck twice in the first over to dismiss Amy Hunter and allrounder Orla Prendergast. That effectively derailed Ireland early from what would have been an unlikely chase..

Luus and Wolvaardt got together after South Africa opted to bat and lost Faye Tunnicliffe in the second over. They started steadily before stepping on the pedal in the last two overs of the powerplay, taking 32 including a 20-run over from Lara McBride. Wolvaardt was the aggressor and she romped past fifty in just 24 balls, beating Lizelle Lee’s mark of 26 balls for the fastest T20I half century for South Africa.

Aided by plenty of misfields from Ireland, South Africa raced past 100 in the tenth over, thanks to another 20-run over, this time from Louise Little in which Wolvaardt went 6, 4, 4, 4. South Africa’s best second-wicket stand ended when Luus, on her career-best 81, tried an ungainly reverse hit against seamer Ava Canning, Ireland’s best bowler on the day, and was bowled.

That brought Dane van Niekerk, playing her first international since September 2021, to the middle. She saw Wolvaardt complete her second T20I hundred before unleashing an array of strokes to finish 21 not out of just eight balls, a strike rate of 262.50.

Only captain Gaby Lewis and Leah Paul offered a semblance of resistance for the tourists with a 42-run partnership off 39 balls. Once both of them fell in the space of 22 balls, Ireland folded quickly, losing nine wickets to spin. Luus returned as the pick of the bowlers with 4 for 22 while both left-arm spinners Nonkululeko Mlaba and Chloe Tryon took two apiece.

Brief scores:
South Africa Women  220 for 2 in 20 overs (Laura Wolvaardt 115*, Sune Luus 81, Dane van Niekerk 21*; Jane Maguire 1-52, Ava Canning 1-33) beat Ireland Women  115 in 18 overs (Leah Paul 34, Gaby Lewis 30, Laura Delany 13, Louis Little 13; Sune Luus 4-22, Nonkululeko Mlaba 2-09, Nadine de Klerk 1-13, Chloe Tryon 2-14, Nondumiso Shangase 1-13 ) by 105 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Justin Greaves 202*, Kemar Roach 58* anchor West Indies to epic draw

Published

on

By

An epic stonewall from Justin Greaves had him face more than half the deliveries of his 12-Test career in this one innings alone, as West Indies pocketed their first points in their sixth Test of the 2025-27 World Test Championship cycle in Christchurch. The 163.3 overs they eventually faced is the longest fourth-innings in Tests for West Indies in 95 years.

Having played the supporting role to Shai Hope through their 196-run stand that rescued West Indies from 92 for 4 on Day 3, Greaves became the heartbeat of the innings once Hope (140) and Tevin Imlach fell in quick succession.

He brought up a stunning maiden Test double ton in the penultimate over when he sliced Jacob Duffy over backward point to pocket what was to be only his second boundary in all of the final session as his colleagues stood up to give him a standing ovation.

He finished 202 not out, having faced 388 deliveries, turning an innings that began with the typical artistic flair and flamboyance into a steely knock full of purpose and grit. Greaves wore more blows on the body than he could count, batted more deliveries than he had in his career, and reined in his natural instincts with single-minded purpose and determination.

His effort led to an astonishing turnaround from the first hour of the day, when West Indies stumbled to 277 for 6 in a mammoth chase of 531. A depleted New Zealand attack down to two weary frontline pacers in Zak Foulkes and Jacob Duffy, fancied their chances. But Greaves found an able ally in Kemar Roach, the 37-year-old veteran, who batted like his life depended on it in his comeback Test.

Roach made 58 not out – his highest first-class score – while facing 233 deliveries himself. Astonishingly, he made just 5 off the last 104 deliveries he faced during a dramatic final two hours of play even as the sun baked down hard on an increasingly docile Hagley Oval surface. Yet that should not take away from the epic rearguard from Hope, Greaves, and Roach.

The frustration of not being able to separate Greaves and Roach during the second and third sessions was evident, as New Zealand’s bowlers were ground into the dust. They would also have felt robbed when Roach appeared to have nicked Michael Bracewell to Tom Latham behind the stumps – though perhaps only having themselves to blame for burning all their reviews.

Even so, it was the thinnest of spikes that made it all the more challenging for Alex Wharf, the on-field umpire, who only a few minutes earlier made a cracking decision by turning down what everyone believed was an obvious inside-edge onto the pad to the slips, again off Bracewell. Replays showed Wharf had made a terrific call.

As admirably as Roach played, he also maximised his opportunities. On 30, he was put down by Foulkes at backward square leg when he attempted an expansive sweep off Bracewell. On 35, Blair Tickner, subbing for Matt Henry, missed a direct hit at the bowler’s end from a few yards away at short mid-on as Roach was misjudging a run.

Then on 47 came the most obvious chance, when Roach attempted to loft Bracewell had him nearly hole out to mid-on. Except, Glenn Phillips, the other sub, saw Tickner looking to intercept the ball from mid-off and palm it away.

With those three chances firmly behind him, Roach buckled down and offered a dead bat to anything that came his way against Bracewell. Foulkes and Duffy tried to ruffle him with the short ball from around the wicket, only for him to duck and weave.

Going into the final session, it became increasingly evident West Indies weren’t going to be enticed by the prospect of chasing down the 132 runs they needed in 31 possible overs. This clarity allowed them to approach the session with dead defence being the sole primary aim, even as Greaves began to tire and suffer cramps that needed medical attention at different times.

Not even the possibility of an impending double century enticed Greaves into attempting anything loose, even if Tom Latham gave him the open invitation to drive Bracewell against the turn through the covers. This wasn’t perhaps a risk not worth taking given how easily West Indies’ lower order collapsed in the first innings.

But long before a draw became the only possibility, even as New Zealand tried to attack with six fielders around the bat in the final session, Hope and Greaves pocketed runs at every available opportunity as the hosts rushed through their first six overs with part-time spin in a bid to take the second new ball quickly.

But even after they took it, there was hardly any assistance for the bowlers. Hope defended comfortably off a length with neither Foulkes nor Duffy consistently able to challenge the outside edge consistently. The occasional misfields, like – Rachin Ravindra letting one through his legs for four, or Will Young overrunning a throw while backing up – added to the sense of raggedness New Zealand had begun to feel.

A breakthrough lifted them shortly after drinks when Duffy dug in a short ball down leg, which Hope gloved behind, only for Latham to throw himself to his left and pluck a stunner from his webbing to end a marathon. Then came a second when Imlach was trapped by a nip-backer.

They may have thought then it was just a matter of time. It could’ve been had they not reprieved Roach, but those reprieves proved even more costly given they only had two fast bowlers and two part-timers available – all of them going full throttle to the limit – despite not getting much out of the surface.

In the end, the manner in which West Indies earned the draw may prove far more valuable. Above all, it was a day that reminded everyone of the slow-burn magic only Test cricket could deliver.

Brief scores:
West Indies 167 (Shai Hope 56, Tagenarine  Chanderpaul 5; Matt Henry 3-43, Zak Foulkes 2-32, Jacob Duffy 5-34)  and  457 for 6 (Justin Greaves 202*, Shai Hope 140, Kemar Roach 58*; Jacob Duffy 3-122) drew with New Zealand 231 (Kane Williamson 52, Michaell Bracewell 47, Jayden Seales 2-44, Kemar  Roach 2-47, Ojay Shields 2-34, Justin Graves 2-35) and 466 for 8 dec (Ravindra 176, Tom Latham 145; Kemar Roach 5-78, Ojay Shields 2-74)

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Trending