Features
Lalith and Premadasa assassinated,I make my first foray in politics
Were wires crossed on intercepted LTTE communications?
(Excerpted from vol. 3 of the Sarath Amunugama autbiography)
“On the 14th November 1987 Parliament passed
the 13th amendment to the constitution
and the Provincial Councils Act of 1987
to establish Provincial Councils”
Wikipedia
The DUNF entered the provincial council elections with much hope. We had outstanding leaders in many of the districts that we contested. Lalith contested the Colombo district and his campaign entered high gear though we were constantly warned that he was in danger of an attack by Premadasa’s goons. Premachandra contested Kurunegala and Gamini moved to Kandy with his wife Sirima leading our Nuwara Eliya contingent.
I too decided to contest from Kandy district and was confident of being returned because of the splendid response from my voters. I chose Harispattuwa which was an electorate with a large number of voters though it was equally segmented by Goigama, other caste and Muslim voters. The Buddhist priests in the electorate backed me which worried Hameed who used to gather their votes as a supplementary to his Muslim votes which put him easily over the top.
Then tragedy struck. Lalith who was an indefatigable campaigner was assassinated while addressing a meeting at Kirulapone. Our fears were about his earlier meeting which was held in Hulftsdorp close to Sucharitha – the home of the President. He had worn a bulletproof vest for this meeting but had relaxed after an uneventful finale and had taken it off for the last ill organized meeting at Kirulapone, which was held under lights as it was already dusk when it began. A moving assassin had shot him in the chest and Lalith’s bodyguard had returned fire and wounded him.
But the shooter had disappeared in the melee. As soon as I heard of this disaster I abandoned my campaigning and returned to Colombo to find our party in a state of shock and convinced that the dirty work was the work of the President and his supporters. Our Central Committee met and issued a statement which virtually accused the President of the murder of our leader. This obviously worried Premadasa who denied the charge and at a public meeting soon after made a heartfelt plea to the nation to absolve him. Little did we know that he would, within days, meet a similar fate himself
Lalith’s funeral
Lalith’s funeral shook up the city. There was a massive gathering which followed the cortege to Kanatte. This included a large number of grieving young men and women who had benefitted from his Mahapola scheme. The security forces were lined up along the road to prevent any incidents but there were several skirmishes on the way and the Police fired tear gas at those in the procession. The atmosphere was electric when we entered the cemetery with thousands of sorrowing people crowding round the coffin. Then there was a sight which is engraved in the minds of those who were present that day. High above on the sky was a lone eagle gliding along the clouds and circling the massive crowd that had assembled below.
We were not unaware that our party symbol was a “Rajaliya” or eagle and this dramatic sight added to the highly charged atmosphere when Gamini gave the funeral oration on behalf of the party. We then retired to lick our wounds and plan our next moves in the light of this crippling blow. Gamini had to take over the leadership and we found that Mrs. Bandaranaike was fully supportive of this move. We decided to go back to our districts and keep up the momentum because the election was drawing near. Lalith’s death was particularly poignant for us in Kandy because he was billed to have spent several days in our electorates as our leader supporting DUNF candidates. He was much in demand as an able orator and we were sure that our campaign would get a big boost with his presence. But that was not to be. We were in shellshock and did not really recover in the short time left to election day.
Murder of a President
Little did we know that the election campaign would be again interrupted by a murder. On May Day 1993 President Premadasa was to lead a rally of the UNP which was to climax with his speech at the Galle Face green. No effort was spared to make it a grand occasion. The “buzz” in Colombo was that he was going to clear his name by identifying the real killers of Lalith, thereby putting an end to the feverish speculation of organized murder that was being promoted by Ravaya and Yukthiya weeklies which had a special relationship with Lalith.
Since the DUNF had lost its leader we were not participating in May Day celebrations. The other opposition parties had their token meetings but they were overshadowed by the UNP juggernaut organized by Sirisena Cooray under the personal supervision of the President. As was his wont Premadasa had arranged to flag off the Colombo Central procession from near the Armour street junction. He ignored the warnings of the police and his soothsayers to stay away from such gatherings on that day.
I was campaigning in a village in Udunuwara electorate in the afternoon of May 1 when the DIG of Kandy district sent a police car with a message that the President had been injured. He requested me to terminate the meeting and go home to await further information because there were contradictory reports coming from Colombo and the state TV and radio remained silent.
By the time I reached Nugawela it became clear that the President had been killed by a LTTE bomber named Babu who had been part of his entourage and had even accompanied him on his visits to Kandy. I was deeply grieved by President Premadasa’s death because, despite political differences, he had been fond of me as I had been of him.
Indeed he had been instrumental in fashioning my destiny when he had me transferred to Colombo as the Director of Information as described in Volume One of my autobiography. He was a sincere and deeply committed “man of the people” and the fate of Sri Lanka would have been different had he lived. He was easily the most hard working political leader that I have been privileged to serve.
Inside story
I have often wondered about the “inside story” of Premadasa’s assassination. There were several loose ends which have to be tied up. The most significant are statements by several senior government officials who later interacted with the LTTE. They insist that they were told that the LTTE had nothing to do with the killing.
Another important factor was that by this time Premadasa had antagonized most of the top secret services of the world. He hated RAW and had made many disparaging remarks about India and her leaders. He displeased MI5 by declaring Gladstone – the British High Commissioner “persona non grata” and expelling him from the country. He antagonized Mossad by publicly accusing Israel of supporting Lalith and Gamini and appointing a Commission of Inquiry hoping to dig up some dirt. Even if these agencies were in the know of conspiracies against Premadasa it is unlikely that they would have blown the whistle or gone out of their way to warn their local counterparts.
But perhaps I could now divulge some information which was conveyed to me by Sirisena Cooray which can add to the conundrum of the Premadasa murder. Since we were good friends I asked Siri to tell me of this event since the Ravaya, and other weeklies accused him of planning Lalith’s murder and had itemized circumstantial evidence which they freely disseminated week after week.
Insisting that both murders were planned and executed by the LTTE, Cooray told me that they had intercepted LTTE communications soon after Lalith’s death. One such message said that target number one [Lalith] had been hit and they would now immediately go for target number two. According to Cooray they assumed that target number two was Gamini. Perhaps that was the “secret” that Premadasa alluded to and was planning to divulge on Galle Face green.
Only later after Premadasa’s death did they wise up to the fact that target number two was the President himself. His confidence in appearing nonchalantly in Armour street, despite pleas not to expose himself to danger, may have been because he thought he knew who target number two was [He thought it was Gamini] and that he was safe. [I must digress here to divulge that both Lakshman Kadirgamar and Jeyaraj Fernandopulle who were killed by the LTTE had similarly believed that they were not LTTE targets because they had got assurances from sources close to the LTTE leadership that they would be spared.]
Though we continued with our electoral campaigning the two recent assassinations completely changed the nature of the election. It had unexpected consequences for the DUNF, Gamini and me.
The aftermath
With the death of Premadasa the UNP had to reorient itself in the absence of its charismatic and ruthless leader. DB Wijetunga, my friend and former minister, who was a “stop gap” PM in Premadasa’s designs was unanimously elected President for the rest of the late President’s term of office. Though many expected Sirisena Cooray to succeed as PM that position went to Ranil Wickremesinghe who had been the Leader of the House. Cooray, who attributed his reluctance to be the PM to his shock at his late leaders demise, may have later regretted it because he was systematically maneuvered out of his office and position in the party by Wickremesinghe and Wijetunga.
It must be stated here that Ranil displayed great skill in effecting a smooth transition. He secured Wijetunga’s position as the new President who in turn appointed Ranil as the Prime Minister. The Premadasa faction which was led by the ambitious widow Hema Premadasa was outmaneuvered as Ranil was determined to be the leader of Colombo district notwithstanding the Premadasa voting machine which dominated Colombo Central and thereby the district as a whole.
What could have led to a dogfight for UNP leadership was averted and Wijetunga’s simplicity and early decision to dismantle some of his predecessors draconian laws made him popular among the Colombo elite who approved of the journalistic description of him as “Dearly Beloved”. He had the support of the UNPs steamroller majority of MPs who were now relieved of their fear of Premadasa’s frequent wrath.
The ascent of Wijetunga helped the UNP to win the Central Provincial Council election comfortably. The Kandy district results were as follows;
UNP: 16 seats
SLFP: 09 seats
DUNF: 05 seats
The provincial councillors elected from DUNF on the basis of proportional representation were;
1. Gamini Dissanayake
2. Sarath Amunugama
3. Keheliya Rambukwella
4. D Samaratunga
5. “Samanala” Shafie
On analyzing the results of this election we of the DUNF had to come to several political conclusions. With the elevation of Wijetunga to the Presidency the hill country remained anchored to the UNP. WB Dissanayake, a former acolyte of Gamini, led the UNP to victory and became the Chief Minister. In other provinces the verdict was not so clear. In the Western and North Western provinces the combined strength of the SLFP and DUNF gave them a majority.
Accordingly we threw our support to CBK to be the Chief Minister of the Western Province. She thereby entered national politics with a bang leading to her achieving much higher office later on in her career. In exchange we negotiated with Mrs. B to get SLFP support for Premachandra of the DUNF to be Chief Minister of the NWP, even though they had more seats in the council.
CBK’s appointment again threw the SLFP into confusion leading to the exit of Anura from his mother’s party. He accepted the invitation from the UNP to join its Cabinet as Minister of Higher Education. The background to Anura’s volte face” was the plot hatched by the new leaders of the party – Ranil, Cooray and Wijetunga – to prevent Gamini from returning to the UNP.
By this time the rank and file of the UNP wanted a national leader with “star quality” and outstanding oratorical skills. None of the three above mentioned had those attributes and the induction of Anura was meant to forestall a demand for Gamini by UNPers and thereby keep him at bay. With Anura’s hasty decision to cross over, the Anura-Mahinda Rajapaksa alliance was broken as the latter refused to join his “lokka” in the UNP fold. It was a fateful and strategic decision because Anura was then moved out of contention for SLFP leadership and the way forward for Mahinda, as the legatee of the Anura faction, in the SLFP became apparent.
Mahinda’s smart move eliminated Anura from the SLFP leadership struggle and made him the rival and challenger of CBK. It was the beginning of Mahinda’s ascent to power. In the future the dominance of the Bandaranaikes of Horagolla in local politics was to be replaced by the Rajapaksas of Medamulana.
(Volume three of the Sarath Amunugama autobiography covering 1992-2022 is available at the Vijitha Yapa Bookshop)
Features
Rethinking global order in the precincts of Nalanda
It has become fashionable to criticise the US for its recent conduct toward Iran. This is not an attempt to defend or rationalise the US’s actions. Rather, it seeks to inject perspective into an increasingly a historical debate. What is often missing is institutional memory: An understanding of how the present international order was constructed and the conditions under which it emerged.
The “rules-based order” was forged in the aftermath of two catastrophic wars. Earlier efforts had faltered. Woodrow Wilson’s proposal for a League of Nations after World War I was rejected by the US Senate. Yet, it introduced a lasting premise: International order could be consciously designed, not left solely to shifting power balances. That premise returned after World War II. The Dumbarton Oaks process laid the groundwork for the UN, while Bretton Woods established the global financial architecture.
These frameworks shaped modern norms of security, finance, trade, and governance. The US played the central role in this design, providing leadership even as it engaged selectively- remaining outside certain frameworks while shaping others. This underscored a central reality: Power and principle have always coexisted uneasily within it.
This order most be understood against the destruction that preceded it. Industrial warfare, aerial bombardment, and weapons capable of unprecedented devastation reshaped both the ethics and limits of conflict. The post-war system emerged from this trauma, anchored in a fragile consensus of “never again”, even as authority remained concentrated among five powers.
The rise of China, the re-emergence of India, and the growing assertiveness of Russia and regional powers are reshaping the global balance. Technological disruption and renewed competition over energy and resources are transforming the nature of power. In this environment, some American strategists argue that the US risks strategic drift Iran, in this view, becomes more than a regional issue; it serves as a platform for signalling resolve – not only to Tehran, but to Beijing and beyond. Actions taken in one theatre are intended to shape perceptions of credibility across multiple fronts.
Recent actions suggest that while the US retains unmatched military reach, it has exercised a level of restraint. The avoidance of escalation into the most extreme forms of warfare indicates that certain thresholds in great-power conflict remain intact. If current trends persist-where power increasingly substitutes for principle — this won’t remain a uniquely American dilemma.
Other major powers may face similar choices. As capabilities expand, the temptation to act outside established norms may grow. What begins as a context-specific deviation can harden into accepted practice. This is the paradox of great power transition: What begins as an exception risk becoming a precedent The question now is whether existing systems are capable of renewal. Ad hoc frameworks may stabilise the present, but risk orphaning the future. Without a broader framework, they risk managing disorder rather than designing order. The Dumbarton Oaks process was a structured diplomatic effort shaped by competing visions and compromise. A contemporary equivalent would be more complex, reflecting a more diffuse distribution of power and lower levels of trust Such an effort must include the US, China, India, the EU, Russia, and other key powers.
India could serve as a credible convenor capable of bridging divides. Its position -engaged with multiple powers yet not formally aligned – gives it a degree of convening legitimacy. Nalanda-the world’s first university – offers an appropriate symbolic setting for such dialogue, evoking knowledge exchange across civilisations rather than competition among them.
Milinda Moragoda is a former cabinet minister and diplomat from Sri Lanka and founder of the Pathfinder Foundation, a strategic affairs think tank could be contacted atemail@milinda.org. This article was published in Hindustan Times on 2026.04.19)
By Milinda Moragoda
Features
Father and daughter … and now Section 8
The combination of father and daughter, Shafi and Jana, as a duo, turned out to be a very rewarding experience, indeed, and now they have advanced to Section 8 – a high-energy, funk-driven, jazz-oriented live band, blending pop, rock, funk, country, and jazz.
Guitar wizard Shafi is a highly accomplished lead guitarist with extensive international experience, having performed across Germany, Australia, the Maldives, Canada, and multiple global destinations.
He is best known as a lead guitarist of Wildfire, one of Sri Lanka’s most recognised bands, while Jana is a dynamic and captivating lead vocalist with over a decade of professional performing experience.
Jana’s musical journey started early, through choir, laying the foundation for her strong vocal control and confident stage presence.
Having also performed with various local bands, and collaborated with seasoned musicians, Jana has developed a versatile style that blends energy, emotion, and audience connection.
The father and daughter combination performed in the Maldives for two years and then returned home and formed Section 8, combining international stage experience with a sharp understanding of what it takes to move a crowd.
In fact, Shafi and Jana performed together, as a duo, for over seven years, including long-term overseas contracts, building a strong musical partnership and a deep understanding of international audiences and live entertainment standards.
Section 8 is relatively new to the scene – just two years old – but the outfit has already built a strong reputation, performing at private events, weddings, bars, and concerts.
The band is known for its adaptability, professionalism, and engaging stage presence, and consistently delivers a premium live entertainment experience, focused on energy, groove, and audience connection.
Section 8 is also a popular name across Sri Lanka’s live music circuit, regularly performing at venues such as Gatz, Jazzabel, Honey Beach, and The Main Sports Bar, as well as across the southern coast, including Hikkaduwa, Ahangama, Mirissa, and Galle.
What’s more, they performed two consecutive years at Petti Mirissa for their New Year’s gala, captivating international audiences present with high-energy performance, specially designed for large-scale celebrations.
With a strong following among international visitors, the band has become a standout act within the tourist entertainment scene, as well.
Their performances are tailored to diverse audiences, blending international hits with dance-driven sets, while also incorporating strong jazz influences that add depth, musicianship, and versatility to their sound.
The rest of the members of Section 8 are also extremely talented and experienced musicians:
Suresh – Drummer, with over 20 years of international experience.
Dimantha – Keyboardist, with global exposure across multiple countries.
Dilhara – Bassist and multi-instrumentalist, also a composer and producer, with technical expertise.
Features
Celebrations … in a unique way
Rajiv Sebastian could be classified as an innovative performer.
Yes, he certainly has plenty of surprises up his sleeves and that’s what makes him extremely popular with his fans.
Rajiv & The Clan are now 35 years in the showbiz scene and Rajiv says he has plans to celebrate this special occasion … in a unique way!
According to Rajiv, the memories of Clarence, Neville, Baig, Rukmani, Wally and many more, in its original flavour, will be relived on 14th July.
“We will be celebrating our anniversary at the Grand Maitland (in front of the SSC playground) on 14th July, at 7.00pm, and you will feel the inspiration of an amazing night you’ve never seen before,” says Rajiv, adding that all the performers will be dressed up in the beautiful sixties attire, and use musical instruments never seen before.
In fact, Rajiv left for London, last week, and is scheduled to perform at four different venues, and at each venue his outfit is going to be different, he says, with the sarong being very much a part of the scene.
-
Business4 days agoHarnessing nature’s wisdom: Experts highlight “Resist–Align” path to resilience
-
News6 days agoPNS TAIMUR & ASLAT set sail from Colombo
-
News4 days agoGratiaen Trust announces longlist for the 33rd Annual Gratiaen Prize
-
News3 days agoFrom Nuwara Eliya to Dubai: Isha Holdings markets Agri products abroad
-
News17 hours agoRs 13 bn NDB fraud: Int’l forensic audit ordered
-
News4 days agoHeroin haul transported on 50-million-rupee contract
-
Opinion2 days agoShutting roof top solar panels – a crime
-
Latest News5 days agoSingapore Zoo’s first Sri Lankan leopard cubs make their public debut


