Connect with us

Features

“Human Animals”

Published

on

by Gamini Seneviratne

Appropriate though they are, the words in the heading do not refer to those who are slaughtering the human beings resident in Gaza and the West Bank. They are the ones used by the Zionist invaders to refer to the people of Palestine.

Indeed, the term “human” is used by them and their fellow criminals in the western world in this context only as an adjunct to ‘shields” employed by Hamas. Incidentally, and there are many such features ‘incidental’ to the completely false Zionist-Euro-American narratives, no evidence has been forthcoming of Hamas shielding itself behind anyone, least of all the people they represent and protect.

As a matter of fact, visible for decades, it was the “Israeli Defense Force” (IDF), so-calling themselves, who employed Palestinian civilians as human shields whenever they entered Gaza. The oh-so-brave chosen race sheltered behind them when they, the ‘IDF’, embarked on their earlier manifestations of bestiality in Palestine.

As for the ‘terrorist’ threat posed by Hamas a few bits of information would lay that to rest.

Not a single apologist for the genocide that’s currently on, not Netanyahu, not Biden, not Blinken (a rabid Zionist-terrorist), nor Sunak, nor Sanders (indeed!), has produced any evidence of “Hamas” murdering 1,200 Israeli civilians nor of sexual assaults (also, as was to be expected of ‘human animals’, extra-brutal), on Israeli women taken hostage by Hamas.

The whole narrative, which Israel and its numerous advocates who keep on spreading these fictions via, let us for convenience say, ‘western’ media, has been exposed by reporters in that region. It has been nailed perhaps most effectively by Professor John Mearsheimer, a distinguished political scientist (Cornell, Harvard and Chicago) who seems to be frequently called on by media that engage in political analysis, in his case on Ukraine (which he characterizes as an ill-advised American ‘policy’ initiative the failure of which the NATO commanders who manufactured that war are scrambling to distance themselves from in the face of an impending Russian victory), Palestine-Israel and the Middle East.

He debunks the numbers (1,200) put out by the Zionist propagandists (he actually laughs at it), indicates that Hamas were intent on taking hostages not killing people and the Israeli civilians killed were shot by the IDF. (The self-same IDF shot dead two Israeli hostages released by Hamas a week or two ago: what, after all, are their weapons for?)

Mearsheimer debunks the myth being put about to account for the assault on the people of Palestine, stating quite clearly that Hamas is “Not an existential threat to Israel”. A few details, given below, on the strength of Israel’s armed force as it was 20 years ago would show that there are no grounds for what Mearsheimer calls “the escalation of conflict” that Israel has engaged in with the further supply of armaments by the USA (to which, must be added the USA’s shamelessness in vetoing UN Security Council resolutions on the ground that they do not blame Hamas for Israel’s merciless program of ethnic cleansing).

As for the treatment of the hostages by Hamas the evidence, as articulated by them, testifies to the humane treatment they had received. An early ‘returnee’ was seen and heard, on record, describing how she and other women taken hostage by Hamas had been handed on to Palestinian women – who had ‘cleaned us up’ and ‘given us the same food as they had’. She proceeds to describe the one meal a day that they all had. After that group of hostages was released by Hamas (in mid-October) an IDF operative could be heard saying “She should have been kept in a room and a statement from her made”.

The hostages handed over more recently have revealed that Hamas procured medicine for them as possible. All that has been described by Alon Bin David, a senior defense correspondent on military matters for the Israeli Channel 13. Ironically, even as Bin-David spoke, Israeli bombers continued to target hospitals, doctors, patients especially children, ambulances and every supporting service – fresh water, electricity, drugs, dressings. Those were early days: by now the Zionists have achieved total success: the people who have yet survived in Gaza have been deprived of access to even a loaf of bread.

Details of what was being done by these Zionist barbarians were spelt out by Dr. Tanya Taj- Hasan, Paediatric Intensive Care specialist with Doctors Without Borders (Medicine Sans Frontiers – MSF). “This was not indiscriminate bombardment – it is targeted, hospitals, health care services, schools, churches, mosques, refugee camps, densely populated in Gaza right now”. She spoke in October and the chances are that the IDF have dealt with her.

Further testimony, by a senior American nurse, Emily Callahan, remained on YouTube for some time. Her account goes from the first days of the ‘operation genocide’. “We lost a nurse on weekend one. He was killed when an ambulance outside the hospital was blown up.” She sketches the process by which the assault was carried out and spells out telling indicators of her personal experience. The “cleansing” included foreign workers: “I know that a thought is being pushed around that anyone who stayed behind was going to be considered as some kind of a threat”.

She continues, “The people I met were some of the most incredible people I’ve met in my life. In the moments of absolute desperation of civilians, they were the ones who were steadfast and calm and said (of her and other workers for MSF and UN agencies) “These people also have no supplies, they have no food and water They are also sleeping outside on the concrete” – and did it in such a beautiful way that they were able to talk them down with love and kindness. There was no violence in their hearts’.

And she had said to them “If I have an ounce of the heart that you have, I’ll die a happy person”. Nurse Callahan is rescued and brought back home to her family and friends in America and interviewed. Asked by Anderson Cooper on TV whether she’d go back to Gaza she replies, “In a heartbeat. My heart is in Gaza it will stay in Gaza”.

This brings to mind the words of the best-known British explorer of Arabia, Wilfred Thesiger, writing in the 1940s, around the time the Zionist ‘state’ was being set up: “I went to the ‘Empty Quarter’ with a belief in my own racial superiority, but in their tents I felt like an uncouth, inarticulate barbarian, an intruder from a shoddy and materialistic world”.

It has long been a transparent ploy of the Zionists and their supporters to project ‘Hamas’ as a goni-billa, the evil group of terrorists in and around the-never-promised-by anyone – man or god or beast – land. Hence, to the surprise of nobody but the western media and their clients, ‘Hamas’ are projected not merely as fair game but the necessary and lawful target of all the people in Gaza, especially women and children.

In his novel set in Israel “Little Drummer Girl” Le Carre mentions Israeli operations 50 years ago: Le Carre writes, “Israeli jets bombed the crowded Palestinian quarter in Beirut on the pretext that it was intended ‘to destroy the leadership’, – “though there were no leaders at all among the several hundred dead, unless, of course, there were future leaders among the many children killed.”

By the turn of this century Israel already had 180,000 heavily armed regular troops in their “defense” forces, 140,000 conscripts, 4,300 impenetrable Merkava battle tanks, 10,000 light tanks and armored cars, 500 missile-laden fighter jets, 1,340 helicopters, three submarines, three destroyers and smaller warships. And, as has been undeniable even by ‘America’, the full might of that Israeli military force was projected into the tiny space of Gaza during the three-week period from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009.

It’s far more barbaric this time round. And there’s a quantum escalation, if those are the right terms, between Zionist brutality then and now. By way of example: a few days ago, IDF soldiers in the West Bank waited till a Palestinian mother left her home evidently for provisions leaving her children in. What did the IDF warriors do? – they soldered the door of that house shut with the children inside.

And. in the midst of the carnage being visited on the Palestinians, US President Biden has offered the Zionist barbarians, over $700 million worth of military hardware. Oh, and yes, he has also offered. via USAID, a sum of $ 10 million to Palestine. To be channeled through Israel. Naturally. Biden, in whom people located hopes for humanitarian governance has, after all, done no more than confirm that America has no shame.

Quite early in the long-planned, rationale and all, Israeli genocidal assault on Gaza, it emerged that the bullets used to kill the Israeli civilians three months ago had been supplied by the USA. Biden et al have continued to parrot the slogan “Israel’ s right to self-defense” and continued to arm these criminals. Last week, acting under an authority delegated to him by President Biden, Antony Blinken bypassed Congress and approved the sale of high explosive artillery shells and related equipment to Israel.

Blinken pushed through the 147million dollar deal by declaring it an “Emergency”. He had made a similar decision just a month ago on December 9, approving a 106 million dollar “sale” of tank ammunition for Israel. During his first visit as Netanyahu launched his genocidal attacks in Gaza, Blinken appears to be in love with him and wishing maybe to become Netanyahu’s fourth wife.

Let us look at what the engagement of the rulers of America (its military-industrial coalition) with Israel translates into. In February 2009, investigative journalist Conn Hallinan was to describe Gaza as “Death’s Laboratory”. Israel’s new weapons had caused injuries never before seen in the hospitals of Gaza. Many of these were the result of the widespread use of a new class of weapons called Dense Inert Metal Explosive (DIME). These were initially developed by the US Air Force and scientists from the University of California’s Lawrence Livermore Laboratory in 2000.

DIME weapons consist of a high explosive core around which is wrapped powdered tungsten alloy in a carbon fibre container. On detonation, the tungsten sprays out explosively over a ten-meter radius shredding everything in its field. The resultant injuries are truly shocking. Norwegian doctor Mads Gilbert commented: “The muscles are sort of split from the bones, hanging loose, and you also have quite severe burns. . . Those inside the perimeter of this weapon’s power zone will be torn completely apart.

Good for us, eh, Biden, Blinken …. ?

Considering the no-holds-barred attacks, all orchestrated by the Zionist hit squad (known as American Israel Public Affairs Committee – AIPAC) on high profile academics in the USA (including the President of Harvard who was forced out of office a few days ago) and on numerous journalists the following words from John Pilger the Aussie journalist who died last week become more pertinent indeed: “Journalism is nothing if it’s not about humanity – it has to be about people’s lives”. And, given the venom of Biden’s America in the matter, we must recall here Pilger’s statement on Julian Assange: “A truth teller who has committed no crime but revealed government crimes and lies on a vast scale”.

Many public personalities have been punished by AIPAC operatives in the corporate world, notably the print media and the film industry. Maha Dakhil, celebrated Hollywood agent who represented Anne Hathaway, Tom Cruise and other celebrities was forced to step down from her leadership positions in the industry. Her crime? She had written: “What’s more heartbreaking than witnessing genocide? Witnessing the denial that genocide is happening.”

Another to be sidelined was Susan Sarandon who had encouraged others to keep speaking up in support of Palestinians. “People are questioning, people are standing up, people are educating themselves, people are stepping away from brainwashing that started when they were kids.” Yet another, Melissa Barrera, had described Israel as committing genocide, and “brutally killing innocent Palestinians, mothers and children, under the pretense of destroying Hamas”.

I conclude this with some words of Sinead O’Connor, the Irish singer, song-writer and savant who died a few months ago and is revered by millions of people throughout the English and Irish speaking world. In September 2014, only a few months after a bloody Israeli war on the Gaza Strip, she canceled a concert in Caesarea, a town located halfway between Tel Aviv and Haifa. Speaking with Hot Press at the time to explain her stance, O’Connor said: “Nobody with any sanity would have anything but sympathy for the Palestinian plight There’s not a sane person on earth who in any way sanctions what the f**k the Israeli authorities are doing,”.

I recall too at this point the hope expressed by the late Ian Goonetileke that writers would pursue “the interests of truth, justice, equality, and the overpowering need to bear witness”. The last he translated, in Goethe’s words, as being “a primary responsibility of the creative writer: One must repeat from time to time what one believes in, proclaim what one agrees with and what one condemns”.

In this context it should be mentioned that, to its eternal credit, our Island newspaper published three years ago an article headed “Has Israel a Right to Exist?”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

A long-running identity conflict flares into full-blown war

Published

on

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei / President Donald Trump

It was Iran’s first spiritual head of state, the late Ayatollah Khomeini, who singled out and castigated the US as the ‘Great Satan’ in the revolutionary turmoil of the late seventies of the last century that ushered in the Islamic Republic of Iran. The core issue driving the long-running confrontation between Islamic Iran and the West has been religious identity and the seasoned observer cannot be faulted for seeing the explosive emergence of the current war in the Middle East as having the elements of a religious conflict.

The current crisis in the Middle East which was triggered off by the recent killing of Iranian spiritual head of state Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a combined US-Israel military strike is multi-dimensional and highly complex in nature but when the history of relations between Islamic Iran and the West, read the US, is focused on the religious substratum in the conflict cannot be glossed over.

In fact it is not by accident that US President Donald Trump resorts to Biblical language when describing Iran in his denunciations of the latter. Iran, from Trump’s viewpoint, is a primordial source of ‘evil’ and if the Middle East has collapsed into a full-blown regional war today it is because of the ‘evil’ influence and doings of Iran; so runs Trump’s narrative. It is a language that stands on par with that used by the architects of the Iranian revolution in the crucial seventies decade.

In other words, it is a conflict between ‘good’ and ‘evil’ and who is ‘good’ and who is ‘evil’ in the confrontation is determined mainly by the observer’s partialities and loyalties which may not be entirely political in kind. It should not be forgotten that one of President Trump’s support bases is the Christian Right in the US and in the rest of the West and the Trump administration’s policy outlook and actions should not be divorced from the needs of this segment of supporters to be fully made sense of.

The reasons for the strong policy tie-up between Rightist administrations in the US in particular and Israel could be better comprehended when the above religious backdrop is taken into consideration. Israel is the principal actor in the ‘Old Testament’ of the Bible and is seen as ‘the Chosen People of God’ and this characterization of Israel ought to explain the partialities of the Republican Right in particular towards Israel. Among other things, this partiality accounts for the strong defence of Israel by the US.

For the purposes of clarity it needs to be mentioned here that the Bible consists of two parts, an ‘Old’ and ‘New Testament’ , and that the ‘New Testament’ or ‘Message’ embodies the teachings of Jesus Christ and the latter teachings are seen as completing and in a sense giving greater substance to the ‘Old Testament’. However, Judaism is based mainly on ‘Old Testament’ teachings and Judaism is distinct from Christianity.

To be sure, the above theological explanation does not exhaust all the reasons for the war in the Middle East but the observer will be allowing an important dimension to the war to slip past if its importance is underestimated.

It is not sufficiently realized that the Iranian Islamic Revolution of 1979 utterly changed international politics and re-wrote as it were the basic parameters that must be brought to bear in understanding it. So important is the Islamic factor in contemporary world politics that it helped define to a considerable degree the new international political order that came into existence with the collapsing of the Cold War and the disintegration of the USSR .

Since the latter developments ‘political Islam’ could be seen as a chief shaping influence of international politics. For example, it accounts considerably for the 9/11 calamity that led to the emergence of fresh polarities in world politics and ushered in political terrorism of a most destructive kind that is today disquietingly visible the world over.

It does not follow from the foregoing that Islam, correctly understood, inspires terrorism of any kind. Islam proclaims peace but some of its adherents with political aims interpret the religion in misleading, divisive ways that run contrary to the peaceful intents of the faith. This is a matter of the first importance that sincere adherents of the faith need to address.

However, there is no denying that the Islamic Revolution in Iran of 1979 has been over the past decades a great shaper of international politics and needs to be seen as such by those sections that are desirous of changing the course of the world for the better. The revolution’s importance is such that it led to US political scientist Dr. Samuel P. Huntingdon to formulate his historic thesis that a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ is upon the world currently.

If the above thesis is to be adopted in comprehending the principal trends in contemporary world politics it could be said that Islam, misleadingly interpreted by some, is pitting a good part of the Southern hemisphere against the West, which is also misleadingly seen by some, as homogeneously Christian in orientation. Whereas, the truth is otherwise. The West is not necessarily entirely synonymous with Christianity, correctly understood.

Right now, what is immediately needed in the Middle East is a ceasefire, followed up by a negotiated peace based on humanistic principles. Turning ‘Spears into Ploughshares’ is a long gestation project but the warring sides should pay considerable attention to former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami’s memorable thesis that the world needs to transition from a ‘Clash of Civilizations’ to a ‘Dialogue of Civilizations’. Hopefully, there would emerge from the main divides leaders who could courageously take up the latter challenge.

It ought to be plain to see that the current regional war in the Middle East is jeopardising the best interests of the totality of publics. Those Americans who are for peace need to not only stand up and be counted but bring pressure on the Trump administration to make peace and not continue on the present destructive course that will render the world a far more dangerous place than it is now.

In the Middle East region a durable peace could be ushered if only the just needs of all sides to the conflict are constructively considered. The Palestinians and Arabs have their needs, so does Israel. It cannot be stressed enough that unless and until the security needs of the latter are met there could be no enduring peace in the Middle East.

Continue Reading

Features

The art and science of communicating with your little child

Published

on

The two input gateways of communication, sight and sound, are quite well developed at birth. In fact, the auditory system becomes functional around 24 weeks in the womb, and the normal newborn can hear quite well after birth. However, the newborn’s vision is a little blurry at birth, and the baby sees the world in shades of grey, while being able only to focus on things 20 to 30 cm (8–12 inches) away. Coincidentally, this is perhaps the exact distance to a mother’s face during breastfeeding. By 2-3 months, there are colour vision capabilities and the ability to track. By 5-8 months, there is depth perception, and by 12 months, there is adult clarity of vision.

By the time a child turns five, his or her brain has already reached 90% of its adult size. This astonishing physical growth is not just happening on its own; it is, to a certain extent, fuelled by experience, and the most vital experience a young child can have is communication with his or her parents.

Modern developmental neuroscience has shifted our understanding of how children learn. We used to think babies were passive sponges, slowly absorbing the world. We now know they are active characters from day one, constantly seeking interaction to build the architecture of their minds. This architecture is not built by apps, vocabulary flashcards, or educational television. It is built through simple, loving, back-and-forth interactions with anyone they come across, but mostly their parents.

The Foundation: Serve and Return (0–12 Months)

Communication with an infant from birth to one year of age begins long before they speak their first word. In the first year, the goal is to master a phenomenon called Serve and Return. This is a basic scenario picked up from the game of tennis. At the start of each game of a set in tennis, a player serves, and the opponent returns the serve. Just imagine a tennis match, where a baby “serves” by making a sound, making eye contact, reaching for a toy, or crying. The job of anyone in the vicinity, who very often are the parents of the baby, is to “return” the ball. If they babble, you babble back. If they point at a cat, you look and say, “Yes, that’s a furry cat!” This simple act does two things. The first is Brain Building, which creates and strengthens neural pathways in the language and emotional centres of the brain. The other is Emotional Security, a thing which teaches a baby that he or she has some help in the learning processes. The baby absorbs the notion that when he or she signals a need, his or her world will respond. This forms the basis of a secure attachment. Scientists have advocated that during this stage, people, especially the parents of a baby, should embrace what is called ‘parentese’. It is the use of a somewhat high-pitched, exaggerated voice. Research has shown that babies pay more attention to parentese than to regular adult speech, helping them to map the sounds of their native language more quickly.

The Language Explosion: Toddlers (1–3 Years)

When a child starts speaking words, the game changes considerably and quite profoundly. This period is defined by a rapid increase in his or her vocabulary and the beginning of grammar. It is very important to narrate everything. The people around, especially the parents, need to become kind of sports commentators for your life. While dressing them, one could say, “First we put on the red sock. After that, we put the other red sock on your left foot.” What we are doing by this is to give them the labels for the world they see.

It is also important to expand, but not truly correct, whatever the child says. If a toddler points to a car and says “Car!”, don’t just say “Yes.” Expand on it: “Yes, that is a big, fast, red car!” You are adding a new vocabulary and grammatical structure through a natural process. If the child says “Me go,” respond with, “Yes, you are going!” rather than correcting and saying “No…, you should say ‘I am going’.”

Toddlers love reading the same book, even one hundred times. While it may be tedious for those around the baby, it is important to realise that such repetition is vital for their learning. They are predicting what comes next, which is a core cognitive skill.

The Preschooler: Building Stories and Logic (3–5 Years)

By age three, the focus shifts from “what” to “why.” Preschoolers are beginning to understand complex emotions, time, and causality. This is the age at which it is best to ask questions which require thought and understanding. Such indirect open-ended questions would sound like “What was the best part of the park today?” or “How do you think that character in the story is feeling?

A preschooler’s world is full of “big feelings” they cannot yet manage. When they are upset because they cannot have a cookie, avoid saying “Don’t cry over nothing.” Instead, name the emotion: “Don’t cry, you can have a cookie after dinner“. This teaches them emotional literacy. Parents and others around in the home could share stories about when they were little, or make up fantasy tales together. Storytelling teaches sequential logic (beginning, middle, end) and strengthens their imagination.

The Absolute Master Class: Learning Through Play

If communication is the fuel for brain development, play is the engine. For a child under five, play is not a break from learning; play is learning. It is how they explore physics (stacking blocks), mathematics (sorting shapes), social dynamics (sharing toys), and language (pretend play). We can boost their development exponentially by weaving communication into their play.

When a child is playing with blocks, dough, or puzzles, they are building fine motor skills and spatial awareness. It is also useful to use three-dimensional words: “Can you put the blue block on top of the red one?” “The puzzle piece is next to your knee.” One could also ask them to describe the texture: “Is the dough soft or hard?

Pretend play, such as acting as a doctor, an engineer, a chef, or a superhero, is one of the most cognitively demanding things a child can do. It requires them to understand symbolic thought and to take on another person’s perspective. Join their world as a supporting character, not the director. If they are the doctor, ask, “Doctor, my teddy bear’s tummy hurts. What should I do?” This encourages them to use vocabulary relevant to the scenario and practice complex social problem-solving.

Playing with water, sand, slime, or safe food products allows children to process sensory information. This is the perfect time for descriptive vocabulary. Use contrasting words: wet/dry, hot/cold, sticky/smooth, loud/quiet.

A few special words for parents. You do not need an expensive degree or specialised toys to build your child’s brain. The most powerful tool you have is your own responsiveness. Modern science tells us that the basic recipe for a thriving child is simple: Look at them when they signal you. Respond with warmth and words. Narrate their world and Join their play.

You are not just talking to your child; you are building his or her future, even via just one conversation at a time. So, go on talking to your child and even make him or her a real-life chatterbox.

Dr B. J. C. Perera

MBBS(Cey), DCH(Cey), DCH(Eng), MD(Paediatrics), MRCP(UK), FRCP(Edin), FRCP(Lond), FRCPCH(UK), FSLCPaed, FCCP, Hony. FRCPCH(UK), Hony. FCGP(SL)

Specialist Consultant Paediatrician and Honorary Senior Fellow, Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka.

Continue Reading

Features

Promoting our beauty and culture to the world

Published

on

Tourism is very much in the news these days and it’s certainly a good sign to see lots of foreigners checking out Sri Lanka.

With this in mind, Ruki’s Model Academy & Agency recently had a spectacular event to select Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka in order to promote Sri Lanka in the international scene.

Nimesha Premachandra was crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026.

She says she owes her success to Ruki (Rukmal Senanayake), the National Director and model trainer, and personality and advocacy trainer Tharaka Gurukanda.

Nimesha is a school teacher by profession, an actress and TV presenter by passion, and an entrepreneur by spirit.

She believes in balancing grace with purpose, and using her platform to inspire women, while promoting the beauty and culture of Sri Lanka to the world. And this is how our Chit-Chat went:

Nimesha Premachandra: Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026

01. How would you describe yourself?

I am a passionate, disciplined, and people-oriented person. I love learning, performing, and guiding others, especially young minds, through education.

02. If you could change one thing about yourself, what would it be?

I would probably try to be less self-critical and allow myself to celebrate achievements more often.

03. If you could change one thing about your family, what would it be?

Nothing major. I am grateful for my family’s love and support, which has shaped who I am today.

04. Is Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka your very first pageant?

No. I have been part of pageants before, but Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka is very special because it represents purpose, culture, and global representation.

05. What made you take part in this contest?

I wanted to represent Sri Lanka internationally and use this platform to promote tourism, culture, and women’s empowerment.

06. Obviously, you must be excited about participating in the grand finale, in Vietnam; any special plans for this big event?

Yes, I am extremely excited. My focus is to showcase Sri Lankan elegance, hospitality, and authenticity, while building meaningful connections with participants from around the world.

07. How do you intend promoting tourism, in Sri Lanka, during your rein?

I plan to highlight Sri Lanka’s diverse experiences in culture, heritage, wellness, nature, and local hospitality through media appearances, digital storytelling, and tourism collaborations.

08. School?

Kaluthara Balika. School life played a big role in shaping me. I actively participated in sports and performing arts, which later helped me build confidence as an actress and presenter.

09. Happiest moment?

Being crowned Mrs. Tourism Sri Lanka 2026 and seeing the pride in my family’s eyes – definitely one of my happiest moments.

10. What is your idea of perfect happiness?

Peace of mind, good health, and being surrounded by the people I love while doing work that has meaning.

11. Which living person do you most admire?

I most admire Angelina Jolie because she beautifully balances her work as an actress with meaningful humanitarian efforts. She uses her global platform to support refugees, advocate for human rights, and inspire women to be strong, compassionate, and independent.

12. Which is your most treasured possession?

My memories and experiences because they remind me how far I’ve come, and keep me grounded.

13. Your most embarrassing moment?

Like everyone, I’ve had small on-stage mishaps, but they always taught me to laugh at myself and move forward confidently.

14. Done anything daring?

Participating in pageants while balancing teaching, media work, and family life has been one of the boldest and most rewarding decisions I’ve made.

Keen to use her title to promote Sri Lanka globally

15. Your ideal vacation?

A peaceful destination surrounded by nature; somewhere I can relax, reconnect, and experience local culture.

16. What kind of music are you into?

I enjoy soft, soulful music because it helps me relax and stay inspired.

17. Favourite radio station:

I enjoy stations that blend good music with meaningful conversation and positive energy.

18. Favourite TV station:

Sri Lanka Rupavahini Corporation. It’s where it all began for me. It played a significant role in my journey as a TV presenter and helped shape my confidence and passion for media.

19 What would you like to be born as in your next life?

Someone who continues to inspire others because making a positive impact is what matters most.

20. Any major plans for the future?

I hope to expand my work in media and entrepreneurship while continuing my role as an educator and using my title to promote Sri Lanka globally.

Continue Reading

Trending