Connect with us

News

House imbroglio: CPA, IPU urged to intervene

Published

on

The Opposition has written to the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association (CPA) and Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) seeking their intervention to prevent Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena from conducting parliamentary proceedings in a manner politically beneficial to the SLPP-UNP government.

Among the signatories are Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa, SLMC leader Rauff Hakeem, Tamil Progressive Alliance Leader Mano Ganeshan, SLPP rebel group senior Prof. G. L. Pieris, Yuthukama leader Gevindu Cumaratunga and Pivithuru Hela Urumaya Leader Udaya Gammanpila Referring to the parliamentary traditions and practices here, the Opposition has told the CPA and IPU: “The essential balance between the government and Opposition , the entitlement of all members of parliament to equal dignity and consideration , opportunity for articulation of diverse points of view in parliamentary debates , fairness to recourse to procedures , fidelity to commitments and an environment of comity and mutual respect are, in our view necessary ingredients of a functioning parliamentary democracy.

“We believe that these are not solely ensured by legal provisions, be they contained in the Constitution or in delegated legislation such as the Standing Orders of Parliament.

“No less important, we are convinced, are the concepts of equity, decency and fair dealing which form the very core of the parliamentary process.

“The robust quality of this culture depends, principally, on the role of the Speaker of Parliament. His Office has evolved, historically, as the custodian of the rights and privileges of Parliament and represents the ultimate bulwark against erosion of parliamentary authority by the executive or any other external agency.

“The critical significance of this function is nowhere set out in greater emphasis than in the inspiring words of Speaker Lenthall of House of Commons in England, addressed to King Charles I at the height of a civil war. This classic assertion has resonated down the ages and forms the wellspring of parliamentary authority across the Commonwealth.

“It is against this backdrop that we feel acute concern about some current developments regarding the behaviour and attitude of Hon Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena, the Speaker of Parliament.

“A series of situations indicative of sustained bias and partisanship culminated in the deeply disturbing actions of the Speaker on the occasion of the debate in Parliament, on Saturday, July 01, on the government’s proposals in respect of domestic debt restructuring.

“At a meeting of the parliamentary Business Committee, consisting of party leaders, held on the preceding, Friday 30th June, it was decided that the debate would commence at 9 am on the following day and that the vote would be taken at 7.30 pm, subject to the time being extended if the list of speakers on the published list submitted by the Government and Opposition Whips had not been exhausted at that time.

“Taking the House by surprise, however, the Speaker, at the allotted hour, abruptly brought the proceedings to an end and called for the vote to be taken, dismissing in cavalier fashion vehement protests by the Leader of the Opposition and other members of the House that the letter and the spirit of the agreement arrived at on the previous day, was being flagrantly violated. Regrettably, their pleas fell on deaf ears.

“Look upon this lapse, very much in line with similar arbitrary and prejudiced decisions made by the Speaker constantly in recent months, as a grave infringement of the legitimate rights and privileges of the Opposition in Parliament.

“The substance of this debate, involving as it did the fate of superannuation funds and the monetary entitlements of hundreds of thousands of working people, was of the highest importance to the public.

“Sadly, these considerations received short shrift at the hands of the Speaker whose recurring conduct strikes at the root of objectivity and impartiality, and deprives the proceedings of parliament of the gravitas which we have hitherto taken for granted.

“We consider it our duty to bring to your notice these unfortunate trends, destructive of seminal democratic values which have defined the foundations of our democratic way of life. They seriously diminish, in our view, the esteem of the public for the integrity and stature of the institution of parliament.

“It is our hope and expectation that you will use your good offices, in an appropriate manner, to do all you can to ensure the survival, and hopefully the further strengthening, of sound parliamentary traditions which, up to now, have been a source of amply deserved pride to us all.”



News

Police open fire on speeding van in Jaffna: 17-year-old driver killed

Published

on

The van shot by the police

Police are investigating the circumstances under which its men, manning a checkpoint, opened fire on a vehicle, killing a 17-year-old boy in Jaffna, in the early hours of yesterday (10).

Police said that they opened fire at a van that ignored orders to stop at the checkpoint. The dead youth was identified as Albino Arul Bias, a resident of Vaddukoddai. Bias was identified as the driver of the vehicle.

Sources said that the incident happened at a checkpoint at the Alaipiddy junction, along the Jaffna–Urkavalthurai road.

After the vehicle was brought to a stop, the teenage boy, who had been inside, was found to have sustained critical gunshot injuries. He was subsequently transported to the Jaffna Teaching Hospital for emergency treatment. Despite medical intervention, he later succumbed to his injuries.

Two other individuals, who were inside the vehicle, have been taken into custody by police. Authorities have stated that one of those arrested is from the Vaddukoddai area, while the other is from Nallur.

Assistant Superintendent of Police, Attorney-at-Law, F. U. Wootler said that the men had no option but to open fire as they were suspicious of the vehicle. “The incident happened around 1 am in the morning and their failure to heed the police order couldn’t be justified under any circumstances,” the spokesman said (SF)

Continue Reading

News

HRCSL employee protests demanding justice, takes swipe at Presidential Secretariat

Published

on

Ayanthini Shiromini protests opposite HRCSL main office at R.A. de Mel Mawatha yesterday (10) pic by Nishan S. Priyantha

‘There is no basis for her accusations’- HRCSL

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Permanent employee of Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka (HRCSL) Ayanthini Shiromini yesterday (10) protested outside its main office at No 14, R.A. de Mel Mawatha, formerly Duplication road, in a bid to draw the attention of the Presidential Secretariat to her plight.

At the protest site, Shiromini told The Island that she had been relentlessly targeted since 2018 and the situation took a turn for worse in 2023 over her protest against the appointment of a particular member to an internal interview board and an incident pertaining to a complaint lodged against the then IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon.

Responding to a query regarding the 2018 developments, Shiromini said that she met with a near fatal accident in 2014 while engaged in official duty and depended on crutches for eight years and was recommended by a medical board to grant the opportunity for suitable work. Mother of two and post graduate social science in Kelaniya University and human rights at the Colombo University alleged that the HRCSL changed her status regardless of the recommendation made by the medical board.

Having failed to convince the top HRCSL administration to treat her fairly, Shiromi said that she sought the intervention of the Presidential Secretariat in late July 2025 to rectify the problems experienced by her.

She alleged that the Presidential Secretariat sided with the HRCSL and did absolutely nothing. “Instead of taking remedial measures, the Presidential Secretariat sent the file submitted by me against the HRCSL top management back to them. They shouldn’t have done that,” Shiromini said.

Shiromini staged a protest opposite HRCSL main office on the world human rights day on Dec 10, last year to highlight what she called injustice done to her by the HRCSL and the Presidential Secretariat. Shiromi said that she called off the protest after receiving an assurance from the Presidential Secretariat that two committees would be appointed to inquire into issues raised by her. “I had no option but to protest again as the Presidential Secretariat did nothing to address her grievances.”

A top spokesperson for HRCSL said that her allegations didn’t hold legal weight. The Parliamentary Ombudsman inquired into her accusations and the HRCSL fully explained the developments since the 2014 accident that took place in the Balangoda area.

The official said that after the accident she was granted the opportunity to work from home and other relief. “But we couldn’t have continued with the same indefinitely and she reacted angrily after a decision was made to treat her like a normal employee after the recovery,” the official said.

Shiromini has served the HRCSL since 2005. The official strongly denied allegations that Shiromini had been mistreated and harassed by a section of the HRCSL staff. “Of course, there had been a series of clashes with other employees and incidents provoked by the disgruntled worker but the HRCSL tried to address the issues in a systematic way,” the official said.

The official alleged that Shiromini exploited the post-Aragalaya situation for her advantage.

Shiromini said that she intended to continue the protest until the Presidential Secretariat ordered an investigation into the conduct of HRCSL top management. In a lengthy letter addressed to members of parliament, Shiromini named the Presidential Secretariat personnel who mishandled her case.

The HRCSL official said that in spite of her being a long-standing employee of the institution she seemed to be unaware that the President couldn’t appoint a committee to inquire into the HRCSL. “We do not have anything to hide,” the official said, calling the lone protester a quarrelsome employee.

Continue Reading

News

SL-EU Jt. Commission meeting tomorrow

Published

on

Sri Lanka and the European Union (EU) will hold the 27th Session of the EU-Sri Lanka Joint Commission in Colombo tomorrow (12). This high-level meeting will bring together senior officials from both sides to review and strengthen partnership across several areas, including governance, human rights, trade, development cooperation, and other bilateral and regional priorities.

The Joint Commission will be co-chaired by Ms. Aruni Ranaraja, Secretary to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Employment and Tourism of Sri Lanka, and Ms. Paola Pampaloni, Acting Managing Director for Asia and the Pacific of the European External Action Service (EEAS).

The visiting EU delegation will also meet senior Sri Lankan dignitaries to discuss collaborative approaches and concrete next steps to strengthen the ongoing partnership.

Continue Reading

Trending