Sports
High profile cricket committee named
Two of the finest players produced by the country – Kumar Sangakkara and Aravinda de Silva will be part of the newly formed Cricket Committee.
By Rex Clementine
The Sports Ministry yesterday brought Sri Lanka Cricket down a notch by appointing a high profile Cricket Committee. While Cricket Committees in the past used to be an advisory arm for SLC, the role of the body has been diluted in recent times with eminent former players not wanting to be part of the set up.
However, following recent poor showings and a series of on field and off the field controversies, a committee comprising former greats Aravinda de Silva, Roshan Mahanama, Kumar Sangakkara and Muttiah Muralitharan have been brought in to address the slide.
Sources said that the committee will be more than an advisory body and its recommendations will be put into action without any delay or sabotage. The Island learns that during a meeting between SLC officials and Sports Minister Namal Rajapaksa, the former were told to support the Cricket Committee or face the consequences – the appointment of an Interim Committee.
“We are here to look at all cricketing matters. Obviously, we need to restructure First Class cricket, but looking at the sport at grass root levels is equally important. We will come up with short term, mid term and long term solutions to some of the problems we face,” Aravinda de Silva said speaking to The Island.
The Cricket Committee is expected to meet the Sports Minister next week before taking charge.
Introducing a competitive First Class tournament, giving frequent exposure to ‘A’ team, under-23, under-19 team and putting up a structure for women’s cricket are said to be some of the areas the new committee is looking at.
Several former captains had declined offers to take over the national selection panel and sources said that with a high profile Cricket Committee in place now, the trend will change.
Aravinda has been heavily involved in cricket having functioned as Chairman of Selectors and Vice-President of SLC but since 2017, he distanced himself from the sport. Sangakkara had a brief stint as a selector but has been reluctant to get involved in cricket administration. Roshan Mahanama, who stepped down as an ICC Match Referee a few years ago has been a vocal critic of the way the sport had been governed. This is his first stint in administration since quitting as Sri Lanka ‘A’ coach 20 years ago.
Sports
Gill, Rashid lead GT’s demolition of Rajasthan Royals
Gujarat Titans rode their red-hot momentum wave to keep the Rajasthan Royals winless in Jaipur with a 77-run win, marking their biggest ever victory in their relatively short IPL history. Shubman Gill and Sai Sudharsan set up a big total with the bat, before the bowlers ran through the batting lineup to catapult the Titans to second position on the points table with only net run-rate separating them from table-toppers Sunrisers Hyderabad.
Brief Scores:
Gujarat Titans 229/4 in 20 overs [Shubman Gill 84, Sai Sudharsan 55, Washington Sundar 37n.o.; Brijesh Sharma 2-47]
Rajasthan Royals 152 in 16.3 overs [Ravindra Jadeja 38, Vaibhav Sooryavanshi 36; Rashid Khan 4-22, Jason Holder 3-12, Kagiso Rabada 2-33]
Who won GT the match?
It was another day out for the famed Sudharsan-Gill combination. But once again, it was GT’s bowling unit that sealed this contest. On a good batting strip, 230 was certainly not beyond the realms of possibility for RR after yet another blazing Vaibhav Sooryavanshi start. But Kagiso Rabada continued to make hay in the Powerplay, bouncing out Yashasvi Jaiswal and Shimron Hetmyer after Mohammed Siraj dismissed Sooryavanshi off the short ball. The game was still on after the Royals scored 78 in the Powerplay but Rashid Khan cut the middle-order to size to shut the hosts out.
A lengthy opening over spells doom for RR
Perhaps the only thing that went right on the evening for RR was the toss as Yashasvi Jaiswal, standing in for an injured Riyan Parag, elected to field first. The hosts donned an all-pink kit to support a noble cause but their bowling unit, which hadn’t been in the pink of health for a few games, looked far from incisive. And nothing drove home that fact more than an 11-ball opening over from Jofra Archer, who overstepped and bowled multiple wides as he failed to control the swing on offer. Eighteen runs came off the first over and Archer was replaced by Brijesh Sharma in the third over, summing up what was to come for the Royals.
Gill, Sudharsan make merry
The bowling was shoddy and for a pair that has mastered the art of percentage batting, Gill and Sudharsan were not going to miss out. Tushar Deshpande speared too many outside leg stump to the left-hander, who was the dominator early on before Gill put on an exhibition of aesthetic power-hitting, launching Archer down the ground with effortless ease. An 82-run Powerplay marked GT’s most productive phase of the season. Both batters eventually brought up their fifties – off 30 balls each.
Did RR pull things back?
Head coach Kumar Sangakkara had an animated chat with his players during the timeout that followed the Powerplay. It seemed to work to some extent as the spin duo of Ravindra Jadeja and Yash Raj Punja tightened the screws, combining for 2/71 off their eight overs. The steady slowdown told on Sudharsan as he miscued a slot delivery off Punja to long on, before Buttler shanked a 107.2 kph Jadeja delivery to long off. On the back of the spinners’ success, Jaiswal turned to an over of part-time spin from Donovan Ferreira but once the pacers returned, they travelled again. Gill found an able ally in Washington Sundar, who kept the momentum going with regular hits to the fence.
Archer endured an off day so bad that he did not even bowl his fourth over. Gill missed out on a hundred and Brijesh sent down a four-run 19th over, but Sundar and Rahul Tewatia peeled off three sixes off Deshpande’s final over to wrest momentum back in the Titans’ favor as they finished on 229.
Sooryavanshi tees off again
A breezy but entertaining blitz this time. Little surprise that he struck a six off the first ball he faced from Siraj, although he jammed an inswinging yorker onto his right ankle, demanding the physio’s attention. He visibly struggled with his running and there were a couple of streaky shots that followed, but it did not seem to affect him as he smashed a couple of sixes off Rabada. His skill was on full display with a late cut through backward point and a drill straight back past Siraj, but a well-directed bumper at the body got the better of him as Siraj let out a huge roar.
Rashid Khan closes out the game
Dhruv Jurel attacked the pacers in the Powerplay, underlined by a 22-run over off Siraj. But once Rashid was introduced, Jurel’s recent woes against spin surfaced again. He was cleaned up by a googly before Donovan Ferreira was bamboozled by the leg-break a couple of deliveries later. Rashid was impeccable with his lengths and would go on to nab two more including Ravindra Jadeja, who showed positive intent early on with a six and a four off his first two balls but eventually had too much on his plate. Closing it out – fittingly with a bunch of short-pitched deliveries – was Jason Holder, who continued his rich vein of form with the ball as RR were bundled out inside the 17th over.
Where do the teams go next?
GT fly back home to face SRH on Tuesday (May 12) in a contest that could hand the winner a foot in the playoffs. RR are set for another long break and do not play for the next week, taking the field against Delhi Capitals in Delhi on Sunday (May 17).
Latest News
Bangladesh announce Women’s T20 World Cup squad, pick only two pacers
Sports
Senior Australia players hold off Cricket Australia deal amid BBL pay frustration
At least five senior Australia players have been left unimpressed by the initial 2026-27 Cricket Australia contract offers they have received in recent days and are yet to commit to signing them.
Meanwhile, a larger group of BBL stars are considering whether to play overseas during the summer after the stuttering BBL privatisation proposal stalled pay re-negotiations that would have redressed the fact that they have been earning between A$100-200,000 less than overseas players in the league in recent years.
First reported by Code Sports on Saturday, ESPNcricinfo understands a handful of Australian players were unimpressed by the initial CA contract offers that were tabled to them in the last week.
This follows reporting in the Age on Thursday that Test and ODI captain Pat Cummins had been offered A$4 million per year over the next three years, much of which was reported to be guaranteed money.
Under the current MoU (Australian players pay deal between CA and the Australian Cricketers Association), which runs until mid-2028, up to 24 national contracts are given out by national selectors for the 2026-27 financial year (July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027) and those players share A$21,916,257 in the year in base salaries.
Players are ranked and receive contracts based on importance and the number of games they are likely to play in the cycle, with the lowest player earning a base of $360,645. In addition, players also earn nearly A$19,000 per Test appearance, nearly $8000 per ODI and nearly $5000 per T20I in match payments on top of the base. There are win bonuses on top, with a Test win worth roughly $30,000 per player in total. There is also a CA marketing pool, which contracted players share depending on appearances with commercial partners.
Player pay was already an issue in Australia and at the heart of the BBL privatisation debate. The rising money on offer in the franchise world has led players to consider whether locking themselves into a 12-month CA deal would cost them money over the year.
Players like Marcus Stoinis and Tim David have not had CA deals in recent years, knowing they would qualify for a base upgrade by playing the minimum number of T20Is in a year (six), whilst being able to sign franchise deals freely without the need for NOCs, to maximise earnings elsewhere.
CA got creative this year by offering contracts for only 21 players for for 2026-27 so that fewer players could share more of the unchanged pool despite Australia being set to play an unprecedented 17 Tests (possibly 18) in the financial year. They will only play nine ODIs and five T20Is in the period.
But the priority of paying Test players has been a source of tension for the white-ball players, who feel they can earn more than the offered CA deal if they went freelance. Meanwhile, there are three-format players concerned about what they are missing out on if they have to rest from certain series, or if more minor bilateral series are being played while lucrative franchise tournaments are on.
Cummins articulated this concern in March around playing two Tests against Bangladesh in August this year while letting go of the chance to earn upwards of A$675,000 (US$485,000) to play in the Hundred.
How the issue gets resolved in the short term remains unclear. Australia have two white-ball tours of Pakistan and Bangladesh coming up but they fall in the previous contract cycle. The first games of the 2026-27 cycle are the home Bangladesh Tests in August.
Meanwhile, a group of a dozen high-profile Australian BBL players are understood to be furious over the stalled privatisation proposal. The players had set up a WhatsApp group last October to discuss their long-term options after spending three years frustrated at CA over the pay disparity between them and overseas players. The introduction of the draft and the platinum signing of A$420,000 meant the likes of Luke Wood and Mohammad Rizwan were paid significantly more than Australian players with significantly better T20 records, who were on $200,000-$300,000.
CA was set to renegotiate the MOU with the ACA if they could move to the next phase of their privatisation plan but that fell over when two states did not want to proceed. A hybrid plan is now being devised but discussions with the players have been set aside for the moment.
The BBL stars are now considering their options. It is a unique season coming with the ILT20 moving to November before the BBL. There are Australian players who have been offered A$500,000 to play in the UAE.
Meanwhile, the SA20, which is seen as the major threat to the BBL, is rumoured to start on January 17.
The BBL is likely to run from mid-December until the last weekend in January, as it did last year. It does mean Australian players could play both but would need an NOC to go and would miss the first week of the SA20. It would lead to the farcical situation that happened a couple of years ago when several Australian players benefited from their BBL teams not making finals, which meant they could get to South Africa earlier and earn more money, as contracts are generally prorated on a games played basis. Australia’s Test players, however, would not be available for either as they have a five-Test tour of India that runs from mid-January to early March that immediately follows a four-Test home series against New Zealand in December and early January.
Australian players were furious when Dewald Brevis and Aiden Markram were bought for R16.5 million (A$1.3 million or US$940,000 approximately) at the SA20 auction last year, four to five times more than some of the top Australian contracts in the BBL.
It is understood that the senior BBL stars do not expect that type of money in the BBL in the short term but were hoping to close the gap significantly this year before privatisation redressed the situation in 2027-28.
It is understood that part of CA’s proposal to the states was to increase the salary cap by up to A$1.5 million. The issue for Australia’s players is that the bottom-end players in the BBL earn a minimum of A$52,000, whereas it is only roughly A$17,000 in the SA20, with the two salary caps reasonably similar at around A$3.2 million.
[Cricinfo]
-
News4 days agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News6 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News7 days agoUSD 3.7 bn H’tota refinery: China won’t launch project without bigger local market share
-
Editorial4 days agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
-
News24 hours agoLanka Port City officials to meet investors in Dubai
-
Editorial7 days agoDeliver or perish
-
Opinion6 days agoSecurity, perception, and trust: Sri Lanka’s delicate balancing act
-
Editorial3 days agoThe Vijay factor
