Sports
Senior Australia players hold off Cricket Australia deal amid BBL pay frustration
At least five senior Australia players have been left unimpressed by the initial 2026-27 Cricket Australia contract offers they have received in recent days and are yet to commit to signing them.
Meanwhile, a larger group of BBL stars are considering whether to play overseas during the summer after the stuttering BBL privatisation proposal stalled pay re-negotiations that would have redressed the fact that they have been earning between A$100-200,000 less than overseas players in the league in recent years.
First reported by Code Sports on Saturday, ESPNcricinfo understands a handful of Australian players were unimpressed by the initial CA contract offers that were tabled to them in the last week.
This follows reporting in the Age on Thursday that Test and ODI captain Pat Cummins had been offered A$4 million per year over the next three years, much of which was reported to be guaranteed money.
Under the current MoU (Australian players pay deal between CA and the Australian Cricketers Association), which runs until mid-2028, up to 24 national contracts are given out by national selectors for the 2026-27 financial year (July 1, 2026 to June 30, 2027) and those players share A$21,916,257 in the year in base salaries.
Players are ranked and receive contracts based on importance and the number of games they are likely to play in the cycle, with the lowest player earning a base of $360,645. In addition, players also earn nearly A$19,000 per Test appearance, nearly $8000 per ODI and nearly $5000 per T20I in match payments on top of the base. There are win bonuses on top, with a Test win worth roughly $30,000 per player in total. There is also a CA marketing pool, which contracted players share depending on appearances with commercial partners.
Player pay was already an issue in Australia and at the heart of the BBL privatisation debate. The rising money on offer in the franchise world has led players to consider whether locking themselves into a 12-month CA deal would cost them money over the year.
Players like Marcus Stoinis and Tim David have not had CA deals in recent years, knowing they would qualify for a base upgrade by playing the minimum number of T20Is in a year (six), whilst being able to sign franchise deals freely without the need for NOCs, to maximise earnings elsewhere.
CA got creative this year by offering contracts for only 21 players for for 2026-27 so that fewer players could share more of the unchanged pool despite Australia being set to play an unprecedented 17 Tests (possibly 18) in the financial year. They will only play nine ODIs and five T20Is in the period.
But the priority of paying Test players has been a source of tension for the white-ball players, who feel they can earn more than the offered CA deal if they went freelance. Meanwhile, there are three-format players concerned about what they are missing out on if they have to rest from certain series, or if more minor bilateral series are being played while lucrative franchise tournaments are on.
Cummins articulated this concern in March around playing two Tests against Bangladesh in August this year while letting go of the chance to earn upwards of A$675,000 (US$485,000) to play in the Hundred.
How the issue gets resolved in the short term remains unclear. Australia have two white-ball tours of Pakistan and Bangladesh coming up but they fall in the previous contract cycle. The first games of the 2026-27 cycle are the home Bangladesh Tests in August.
Meanwhile, a group of a dozen high-profile Australian BBL players are understood to be furious over the stalled privatisation proposal. The players had set up a WhatsApp group last October to discuss their long-term options after spending three years frustrated at CA over the pay disparity between them and overseas players. The introduction of the draft and the platinum signing of A$420,000 meant the likes of Luke Wood and Mohammad Rizwan were paid significantly more than Australian players with significantly better T20 records, who were on $200,000-$300,000.
CA was set to renegotiate the MOU with the ACA if they could move to the next phase of their privatisation plan but that fell over when two states did not want to proceed. A hybrid plan is now being devised but discussions with the players have been set aside for the moment.
The BBL stars are now considering their options. It is a unique season coming with the ILT20 moving to November before the BBL. There are Australian players who have been offered A$500,000 to play in the UAE.
Meanwhile, the SA20, which is seen as the major threat to the BBL, is rumoured to start on January 17.
The BBL is likely to run from mid-December until the last weekend in January, as it did last year. It does mean Australian players could play both but would need an NOC to go and would miss the first week of the SA20. It would lead to the farcical situation that happened a couple of years ago when several Australian players benefited from their BBL teams not making finals, which meant they could get to South Africa earlier and earn more money, as contracts are generally prorated on a games played basis. Australia’s Test players, however, would not be available for either as they have a five-Test tour of India that runs from mid-January to early March that immediately follows a four-Test home series against New Zealand in December and early January.
Australian players were furious when Dewald Brevis and Aiden Markram were bought for R16.5 million (A$1.3 million or US$940,000 approximately) at the SA20 auction last year, four to five times more than some of the top Australian contracts in the BBL.
It is understood that the senior BBL stars do not expect that type of money in the BBL in the short term but were hoping to close the gap significantly this year before privatisation redressed the situation in 2027-28.
It is understood that part of CA’s proposal to the states was to increase the salary cap by up to A$1.5 million. The issue for Australia’s players is that the bottom-end players in the BBL earn a minimum of A$52,000, whereas it is only roughly A$17,000 in the SA20, with the two salary caps reasonably similar at around A$3.2 million.
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Shree Charani, Prema Rawat spin Pakistan out for 55 in one-sided contest
Pakistan were bowled out for 55, their lowest total in T20I cricke. A collapse where they lost six wickets for eight runs in 29 balls set them so far back that they couldn’t even bat out 20 overs. Harmanpreet Kaur, who broke new ground by becoming the first player – male or female – to lead her team 150 times in T20Is, had the time of her life celebrating each wicket and eventually scoring the winning runs as well.
Shree Charani shines
Old-fashioned left-arm spin is having a resurgence. India men have found Manav Suthar. India women already had N Shree Charanin. The No. 1-ranked T20I bowler in the world picked up two wickets in her first over on Saturday.
The flight on the ball drew Gull Feroza out of her crease. The drift in had her looking leg side. The dip and the turn resulted in a leading edge and a simple catch to point. The bowler did everything right. The batter did everything wrong. Shawaal Zulfiqar was the only Pakistan batter to put any kind of pressure on India. Charani had her lbw for 14 off 14 and from there it was a procession.
Pakistan’s batting troubles
Playing their 200th T20I, Pakistan went from 27 for 0 to 35 for 6 before the innings was halfway done. They could not find a risk-free way to score runs, absorbing long periods of dot balls and trying to get out of it by playing low-percentage shots, often against the turn, on a Dubai pitch that was offering plenty of it. Only the openers got to double digits and only Zulfiqar was able to score a run a ball.
Rawat’s support act
Prema Rawat finished with figures of 4-0-9-3. Nineteen of her 24 balls were dots. All of that is remarkable considering she is a legspinner, whose release points tend to be just shy of the perpendicular. Like Shane Warne. From there, they turn their wrist over and it can either be awesome or awful. Rawat’s release point is perpendicular, maybe even beyond it, like Rashid Khan’s. And she doesn’t turn her wrist. For the most part, she just flicks the ball out the front of her hand. This gives her better control at the cost of big turn and in T20Is, that trade-off is well worth it. Nobody could hit Rawat off her line and length and when Sadaf Shamas tried, she got bowled off her pads.
A simple enough chase
Scores:
India Women 57 for 3 in 8.4 overs (Shafali Verma 12, Harmanpreet Kaur 18*, Deepti Sharma 12*; Fatima Sana 3-17) beat Pakistan Women in 18.1 overs 55 (Muneesha Ali 13, Shawal Zulfiqar 14, Shafali Verma 1-10, Shree Charani 3-07, Deepti Sharma 2-05, Prema Rawat 3-09) by seven wickets
(Cricinfo)
Latest News
Tharanga creates history with Diamond League crown in Brussels
Rumesh Tharanga created history in emphatic fashion, winning the men’s javelin at the Diamond League Final in Brussels to become the country’s first Diamond League champion.
The recently crowned Commonwealth champion sealed the prestigious Diamond Trophy with a superb third-round throw of 89.04 metres, producing yet another major performance on the biggest stage.
Tharanga became the first Sri Lakan to win a top position at a global competition conducted under the auspice of World Athletics.
The victory also extended Tharanga’s extraordinary run of form, giving him his 12th victory in his last 13 competitions. His only defeat during that sequence came earlier in the season, underlining the consistency that has made him one of the outstanding performers in world javelin this year.
Tharanga’s winning effort was enough to keep a determined international field at bay, with Poland’s Dawid Wegner producing a lifetime best of 87.47m to take the silver medal. Trinidad and Tobago’s Keshorn Walcott completed the podium in third place.
Sports
Taking the weight off Kamindu
by Rex Clementine
There is a growing sense of disappointment that, after all that early promise, Kamindu Mendis has faded away somewhat. A player who brings such a multidimensional skill set should by now have cemented his place in Sri Lanka’s white ball sides. But part of the problem with our cricket has been a chronic lack of patience, compounded by some awful choices.
A case in point is Dunith Wellalage. Not many people realise that he made his Test debut two years before his T20I debut. Pramodya Wickramasinghe was the man who made that call and interestingly, he has been heavily involved in selection panels over the last decade, most of them as chairman. No wonder Sri Lankan cricket has spent so much time in the doldrums.
That is not to suggest Kapila Wijegunawardene has arrived as some sort of godsend either. In his fantasy world, Niroshan Dickwella is Alan Knott and Lahiru Kumara is Malcolm Marshall.
Coming back to Kamindu, there was a time early in his Test career when he could do no wrong. At one stage, he reached 1,000 Test runs in 13 innings, equalling Don Bradman’s remarkable feat. During that purple patch, he also scored hundreds in each innings of a Test, something Aravinda de Silva, Sri Lanka’s finest, achieved in the prime of his career.
After that spectacular start, however, Kamindu has been brought back down to earth.
The Indians worked him over with a barrage of short balls. Kamindu succeeded in depositing a few over mid-wicket, but India’s quicks refused to abandon the plan. Their persistence eventually paid off when he was caught in the deep attempting another pull.
When Kamindu fell with Sri Lanka following on, there was criticism that the stroke was unwarranted given the precarious situation the team found itself in. That criticism intensified when a bunch of younger players subsequently dug in, kept India on the field for 240 overs and denied them victory to secure a hard fought draw.
Head Coach Gary Kirsten later elaborated on the freedom given to players to play the strokes that bring them runs without fear of failure. Kirsten’s view was that a player could perhaps minimise the risk involved, but certainly should not completely put away a productive stroke.
Given the prolific start he had made in Test cricket and the package he offered as an all-rounder in the white ball formats, it was only natural that an IPL deal came his way. Kamindu signed up with Sunrisers Hyderabad and made a handful of appearances for them.
It was around this period, however, that some began to notice a change. His attitude was considered indifferent in certain quarters and by last year, there were concerns that he had become something of a disruptive influence within the side. Authorities identified him as one of the key instigators pushing for the team to leave Pakistan despite repeated security assurances from the Pakistani government.
That episode cost his schoolmate the captaincy of the national team, while Kamindu himself was dropped from the T20 side before earning a recall shortly before the World Cup.
At training, though, Kamindu is said to be meticulous. He pays attention to the smallest details and is extremely organised in his preparation. In the middle of a white ball series, for instance, if the entire team is working on the sweep, Kamindu will still find extra time to go through his own routine in addition to whatever the batting coach has prescribed.
He is also not afraid to experiment.
This domestic season, Kamindu opted to move up the order rather than remain in the middle order and the results have been spectacular. Opening the batting on Thursday, he smashed 139 for CCC against Tamil Union.
It remains to be seen whether that domestic experiment will be carried all the way to Southampton in a week’s time, particularly with Kusal Mendis ruled out of the T20 leg of the tour.
Sri Lanka’s planning when it comes to leadership has been equally baffling. In recent years, there has been no proper succession plan for the captaincy. For some strange reason, the practice of naming a vice-captain was abandoned for a period, hardly clever planning when the idea should have been to groom future leaders.
Dhananjaya de Silva, for example, is Test captain almost by default rather than because he possesses any exceptional leadership qualities. Now, when he comes under pressure, you look around and there is hardly an obvious successor waiting in the wings.
Even next year, once the current World Test Championship cycle concludes, the cupboard looks bare. There is no clear candidate ready to take over the Test captaincy.
That was why it appeared a sensible move when the selectors named Kamindu deputy across all three formats for the tour of the West Indies in June. Yet, barely three months later, ahead of the tour of the UK, he has been replaced.
Back comes Charith Asalanka, less than a year after being sacked as captain.
It appears the selectors were concerned that the additional responsibility might affect Kamindu’s batting. He has therefore been relieved of leadership duties, with the expectation that freeing his mind will bring greater consistency with the bat.
-
Features6 days agoWhen Sri Lankan stories find their own voice
-
News6 days agoBASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC
-
News3 days agoDenied of promotion to SC despite vacancies, justice Gurusinghe retires
-
Latest News4 days agoGrade 5 scholarship exam results released
-
News3 days ago22A: SC urged to suspend hearing, appoint full bench
-
Midweek Review4 days agoThe local and global dynamics of Sri Lanka’s 22nd Amendment
-
Business6 days agoADB-funded Thalaiyadi plant serves as blueprint for vulnerable dry zones in Sri Lanka
-
News4 days agoAi-CHA expands Lankan footprint with new Negombo outlet
