Features
High Jinks at BIA; votes via wage increase; condemnable imports
Incomprehensible; unbelievable, near impossible the way things are done in Free Sri Lanka. Ludicrous too, if you can muster laughter when seeing deplorable and tragic happenings. This was Cassandra’s feelings when she understood what the young local traveller was ranting about in the crowded Katunayake International Airport on Wednesday 1 May. The video of it went viral; TV News picked it up; then explanations were given in The Island of Friday 3 May.
It may all be sorted out by the time you read Cass’ Cry, but this sort of unbelievable act on the part of our government should be highlighted even after the news goes stale. The fracas at the airport and later revelation was that: “In September 2023, the Cabinet of Ministers approved the appointment of an authorised agent for online visa submissions. Sri Lanka switched to a platform operated by the foreign firms IVS–CBS and VFS Global in mid-April from the electronic travel authorisation system operated by the Department of Immigration and Emigration.”
Now here comes the question WHY? Why the switch from the local authorised department to a foreign ‘organisation’, in other words privatisation? The visa granting operation was running smoothly with Sri Lankan emigration/immigration officials anning desks. It is said they processed clients rapidly with no delays. The video that recorded the passenger’s diatribe showed long queues and congestion. A person said the foreign company had advanced technology. The sensible solution would have been for our visa processing department to acquire the technology and train its officers to use it.
The worst is that the visa fee from incoming persons was increased from $50 to 75 with an additional charge. It was said this extra amount was going to the foreign company that was slyly brought in. Not only was Sri Lanka losing on this visa granting business but the increase surely will reduce our earnings consequent to tourists not coming and others stymied by the increased fee.
Cass smelt that stinking rat that moves among Ministers and gnaws in government departments: that rat which is illegal earnings, bribes, commissions et al. Was someone or some bodies making money on this deal which transferred a money making venture of and for the government to a foreign firm to make more money and carry it away.
Cass heard what Minister of Tourism – Harin Fernando – and Minister of Shipping, Aviation, Ports – Nimal S de Silva had to say. They passed the buck “This matter is not under my ministry”; “I am unaware of it”; “Does not come under my purview”; though that precise term was not used – not in their limited vocabs. But they were in the Cabinet that said OK to this move.
Cass cannot bear to think that a money-making venture destined for our country was coolly palmed off to a foreign outfit and no one would have been the wiser if not for that civic-minded, national-feeling young traveller. In these times of such economic difficulty where people are actually starving and children riddled with malnutrition, anyone who makes money through corruption, more especially government Ministers and MPs and officials, should be mercilessly made to pay for their crimes.
The above was written soon after the traveller at the BIA ranted against the delay in issuing visas by the new foreign company/companies in charge; i.e. May 3.
A banker’s nephew gave Cass a positive picture of the change of visa issuing officers. She was perplexed. A Parliament debate ensued; activists spoke; a highly condemning video was sent to Cass. Then came Tuesday 7 May The Island with the editor writing the lead article on Visa muddle, reinforced in much stronger terms by Dr Upul Wijayawardhana in his article headlined Idiocy of new visa arrangements. I sincerely respect The Island editor’s opinions and expressed views. I found Dr UW suspected hanky-panky or to say it in Cass’ crass way – letting the country go to pot to get money into private pockets. This was her first reaction to the TV news of the shouting traveller.
We now know he is Attorney-at-law Sandaru Kumarasinghe, whose Russian girlfriend was initially refused a visa. He is, Cass believes, an expat who comes home to SL on holiday. The Ministry of Public Security was quick to pounce on him, threatening to take him to court. He made a statement to the Katunayake police.
In this whole mess, which may be proved sordid and illicit money making with great damage to the country and its tourism sector which was earning most needed foreign exchange, Cass’ attention is now focused on Mr Sandaru Kumarasinghe. Is it a punishable crime to express doubt and disapproval loudly in a public place like the Katunayake Airport? He only spoke to all and sundry with not even a hint of violence. Don’t parliamentarians act violently in the chamber that should see respectable behaviour and decorum? This incident highlights the usual political reaction: kill the messenger and hide the greater sins. This person brought up front the diabolical change of visa processing by foreign outfits with damage ensuing to bankrupt Sri Lanka; bankrupted by politicians.
Votes before anything else, country included
Elections are still in the future; not one date specified but all attention of every politician is on winning votes. Lots of goodies are promised, even given already. To Cass the worst is President Ranil Wickremasinghe going to a May Day rally of tea plantation workers and announcing their salary will be increased to Rs.1,700 per day. By whose leave did he make this promise? Did he consult the managers of the country’s tea industry before he made this promise? Did he consider at all expense against profits?
Cass remembers the consternation created among estate superintendents, managers, agency houses et al when workers daily wage was raised to Rs 1,000. Tea was thriving then, markets were good and foreign exchange was earned for the country by the plantations. But the fear was that with increase of payments to labour, earning profits may not be possible. Then came the elected SLPP Prez, G. Rajapaksa, who with his ban on chemical agriculture products dealt a grievous blow to the tea industry along with a near death swipe to rice farmers, vegetable growers and others in agriculture.
When that disaster was met, overcoming it attempted and money earned, there gallops gallant Ranil (actually helicopters) Gotabaya’s successor Prez of the same SLPP Party, to please the estate workers. Their salaries raised a hefty 70% with not a thought to how the plantation sector will run. The Planters’ Association threatened legal action; certainly not in retaliation but to save the industry as a foreign exchange earner for the good of the country after it was bankrupted by governments and politicians.
And the mighty RW’s reactionary order? All hands, meaning lawyers and the judiciary, to save the workers and give them their Rs.1,700, never mind the country getting further mired in poverty and debt.
One cannot comprehend how matters work in this island which was reputed to be Paradise. The snake named Vice is far too active. The apple of votes is too tempting to politicians so they even lose their senses. I and Me before Country!
Imports that stink (of corruption)
Cassandra fell back in horror when her domestic brought home from a Keels outlet Bombay or big onions the size of small coconuts and devilish red in colour. Phoned two friends and was assured that was the kind available all over, imported from India. In addition to their humongous size, they tasted nothing like the real Sri Lankan big onion; rather did its addition to a cutlet mixture give it a watery, glutinous texture.
Cass remembers very clearly about three or four weeks ago seeing open lorries filled with bags of big onions, clearly seen and said to be from Jaffna which had a bumper crop. Where did all those onions go so this country had to import this commodity? She also recalls seeing vegetables and items such as onions being collected by machine-operated large spades as they were rotten, in collecting centres like Dambulla.
For goodness sake why import? Why spend precious foreign exchange (FE) on things such as onions. People can manage for a while without these items. Didn’t we do this to a largish extent when Sirimavo B’s government banned imports in a bid to save FE and our outside reserves rose?
Cass’s functioning brain tells her that artificial shortages are created; imports brought over from India – whatever their quality – and we are forced to buy suspect eggs, nonedible rice and now big enormous onions. Why? There lies the pivotal point. To enrich unscrupulous parasitic traders, dubious and duplicitous importers and unpatriotic hyenas in high posts in the government bureaucracy who are encouraged and facilitated by rapacious, totally unpatriotic MPs and Cabinet Ministers. A most heinous crime at this juncture when the bankrupt country is trying to rise up, at least ensure further loans through pleasing IMF supervisors after debt restructuring.
A usual criminal kills one or more individuals and harms a family. Those in the import racket of bringing below grade stuff from India harm the majority of the people and the country itself. And all for money earned easy and fast. Such inhuman ghouls should be skinned and their carcasses strung along the inner road leading to Parliament. This should-be-given punishment is spelt out by Cass notwithstanding the fact she spreads metta each night and early morning. The crimes mentioned, though economic and not blood-letting nor maiming humans, are heinous. Thus punishments must be horrific too.
Features
The challenge of being positive about SAARC
It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.
Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.
However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?
There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.
The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.
Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.
Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.
The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.
On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.
In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.
Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.
Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.
The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.
These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.
Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.
There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.
However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.
Features
OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways
A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.
The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.
The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.
In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.
Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.
While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.
He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.
Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.
Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.
The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.
Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.
Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.
The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.
Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.
Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.
He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.
Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.
Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.
Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.
Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.
He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.
The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.
The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.
The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.
Features
Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka
Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.
In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.
“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”
Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.
She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.
“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”
Of course, music has taken her far.
One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.
She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.
Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.
Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.
Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”
Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.
“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”
However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.
Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.
“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.
“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”
-
News7 days agoHerath warns prospective migrant workers not to get fleeced by racketeers
-
Features5 days agoPrison riots and politics: NPP’s biggest challenge and Sri Lanka’s biggest opportunity
-
Editorial6 days agoWhat’s the world coming to?
-
Foreign News7 days agoTensions erupt in Indian state after 11-year-old raped and murdered
-
Features7 days agoDevanesan Annan – in Memoriam
-
Editorial7 days agoPunishment in hellholes
-
Features2 days agoDirty Money
-
Editorial5 days agoMuch ado about crime: Fish or cut bait
