Connect with us

Sports

Hemaka Amarasuriya responds to claims of Thilanga attending ICC Meeting

Published

on

Former Chairman of Sri Lanka Cricket Mr. Hemaka Amarasuriya and the leading sponsor of the sport prior to that at a time when the game was in dire straits has sent us the following response for the article titled ‘Mahanama’s book reveals Ranil backed Thilanga undermining Amarasuriya’ that appeared in last week’s Sunday Island.

“I write with reference to the above article and wish to point out certain misstatements and inaccuracies pertaining to the Book written by former Sri Lanka cricketer Roshan Mahanama – ‘My innings, Retired Hurt to the Best View of the Game’.

The first and second paragraphs of the said article are reproduced below:

‘Among those who follow the gentleman’s game closely, many regard UNP Leader Ranil Wickremesinghe as Mr. Clean. But if they get hold of Roshan Mahnama’s new book, they will have a second opinion. Mahanama in his autobiography ‘My Innings’ goes onto claim that Wickremesinghe as Prime Minister in 2002 stopped then cricket chief Hemaka Amarasuriya from attending an ICC Meeting and instead nominated Thilanga Sumathipala.

“We were appointed to mange Sri Lanka Cricket due to a prevalent issue at the time, till fresh elections appointed a new committee. However, this was a very brief stint as the level of politics involved was contrary to my work ethic and principles. As an example, the Interim Committee decided that the Chairman Hemaka Amarasuriya should attend the ICC annual meeting. However, Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe overruled and said that Thilanga Sumathipala who was not even part of the committee at the time, would attend instead,” writes Mahanama.

I wish to set the record straight that I served as the Chairman of the Interim Committee of Sri Lanka Cricket at the relevant time in 2002 when Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe was the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka.

As the Chairman of the said Interim Committee, I was designated by the Committee to represent Sri Lanka Cricket at the forthcoming meeting of the Directors of the International Cricket Council (ICC) to be held at Lord’s Cricket Grounds, London which was the then Headquarters of ICC.

It was brought to the notice of Sri Lanka Cricket that Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala was lobbying to attend the said meeting of the Directors of the International Cricket Council. Some members of the Interim Committee did resign over this issue.

Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe made it clear that myself as the Chairman of the Interim Committee should attend and requested Sri Lanka Cricket and the then Secretary of the Ministry of Sports to obtain the opinion of the Attorney General Mr. K.C. Kamalasabayson PC, who was the then Attorney General of Sri Lanka.

I consulted my lawyers and it was discovered that there was an interim injunction that was issued by the District Court of Colombo against Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala in a case filed by Mr. Clifford Ratwatte. The interim injunction restrained Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala from taking part in any activities of Sri Lanka Cricket until the hearing and final determination of that pending action. The Interim Committee of Sri Lanka Cricket and the Ministry of Sports officials were aware of the said interim injunction and if Sri Lanka Cricket was to be part and permit Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala in attending the said ICC meeting of the Directors, they would all be guilty of aiding and abetting Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala in violating the interim injunction issued against him.

Accordingly, these factors were brought to the notice of the Honourable Attorney General who opined that Mr. Thilanga Sumathipala can not represent Sri Lanka Cricket as it would be in violation of the interim injunction issued against him.

Accordingly, as endorsed by the Interim Committee, I proceeded to attend the Directors meeting of the ICC, that was held at Lord’s, London.

Thus the first two paragraphs of the said article are misleading and the accounts therein are inaccurate.

Hemaka Amarasuriya

Former Chairman

Sri Lanka Cricket



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

It’s Shafali vs Athapaththu as Sri Lanka seek to stop India juggernaut

Published

on

By

Shafali Verma is in red-hot form, with scores of 64, 68, 40* and 100* in her last four T20Is (BCCI)

It’s a rematch of the 2023 Asian Games final as India meet Sri Lanka with gold on the line once again. Both sides have comfortably made the final. India brushed aside Japan and Bangladesh in the quarter-finals and semi-finals respectively, while Sri Lanka did the same against Malaysia and Pakistan.

There is plenty of familiarity too, with the sides having met less than ten days ago in the Women’s Asia Cup final. India cruised to a 72 run victory  that day and will again start as favourites to defend their Asian Games gold.

If Sri Lanka are to find a weakness in this India batting line-up, it may lie in the middle order. Harmanpreet Kaur scored 40 in the semi-final but has struggled for fluency of late, while G Kamalini and Bharti Fulmali have returned underwhelming numbers despite getting opportunities higher up the order. Getting to them, though, means finding a way past Smriti Mandhana and Shafali Verma,  both of whom have form and recent centuries on their side, while Richa Ghosh remains capable of changing an innings quickly down the order.

Chamari Athapaththu remains Sri Lanka’s biggest match-winner, but she has received more support from the top order recently, with Hasini Perera contributing a 26-ball 42 against Pakistan, Kavisha Dilhari a 27-ball 44* against Malaysia and Harshitha Samarawickrama quick cameos in both games. How Sri Lanka handle India’s spinners could be central to the final, particularly with Deepti Sharma and Shree Charani among the wickets, and before that there is Nandani Sharma’s new-ball threat to negotiate.

Sri Lanka know what happens when India are allowed to dictate a game. Their best chance in Nagoya may come from putting India under pressure early on, and whether that’s with bat or ball will depend on which way the coin falls at the toss.

Should the game be a washout, like the men’s final in 2023 was, the higher-seeded team (India) will take the gold medal.

The two teams have met 32 times in T20Is, with India winning 26 games, Sri Lanka winning five, and one match having no result. Sri Lanka have lost their last seven T20Is against India and won only once in their last 11 meetings.

The two most destructive batters on either side could have an outsize influence on the final. Athapaththu has smacked 63 and 83 not out in her two outings at these Asian Games while also returning figures of 2 for 3 and 1 for 30. Shafali had scores of 64 and 68 in her last two outings before the Asian Games, and has followed those up with unbeaten scores of 40, in a chase of 57 against Japan, and 100 against Bangladesh. Given the dimensions of the ground in Nisshin, either could quickly take the final away from the opposition.

Both teams have fully fit squads, and fielded their first-choice XIs in the semi-finals.

India (probable): Smriti Mandhana,  Shafali Verma,  G Kamalini,  Harmanpreet Kaur (capt),  Richa Ghosh (wk),  Bharti Fulmali,  Deepti Sharma, Shreyanka Patil, Kranti Gaud,  N Shree Charani,  Nandani Sharma.

Sri Lanka (probable):  Imesha Dulani,  Chamari Athapaththu (capt),  Hasini Perera,  Kavisha Dilhari,  Harshitha Samarawickrama,  Hansima Karunaratne,  Kaushini Nuthyangana (wk),  Rashmika Sewwandi,  Mithali Ayodhya,  Chamudi Praboda,  Sugandika Kumari.

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

Sports

Trophy row unlikely to repeat in Japan

Published

on

By

The Indian women’s team, like the men’s side a year ago, refused to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi in Dubai [Cricbuzz]
Will the Asia Cup trophy fiasco play out in the Asian Games? That is the obvious question on everyone’s mind as the Indian women’s team, favourites for the gold medal, prepare to take on Sri Lanka. The Indian women’s team, like the men’s side a year ago, refused to accept the trophy from Mohsin Naqvi in Dubai last week.
There is always a chance that Naqvi, by virtue of being the president of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC), could be an invitee at the Games. Will he be accorded the privilege of presenting the medals in Nagoya? Chances are that he may, well, not be.
With India having strong diplomatic relations with Japan, Dubai is unlikely to be repeated in Nagoya. The two countries recently announced special measures to commemorate 75 years of friendship. As part of this, India, the World’s No. 1 side, agreed to play Japan.
For the reigning world champions to take on an associate nation, ranked 41st, is no ordinary gesture. It involved the governments of the two countries, besides, of course, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Japan Cricket Association (JCA) to work out the fixture. The September 22 game, thus, is far from being a routine bilateral match.

Neighbours Nepal, who have been a rising team in world cricket, have not had the opportunity of playing India in a bilateral international so far. Japan has been given such a significant opportunity, and unlikely the country will allow any embarrassment for the Indian side. The Naqvi-led ACC will have little say.
“That is my reading,” said a member of the ACC. “I think Japan will not allow it. India’s gesture of playing Japan will not go unacknowledged.”
The decision on the chief guest for the medal event will, of course, be the prerogative of the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA), but the Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC) and the Aichi-Nagoya Asian Games and Asian Para Games Organizing Committee (AINAGOC) will have a major say in the matter. Both bodies are expected to be mindful of India’s concerns.
The BCCI has stayed clear of the issue. After Friday’s AGM, Devajit Saikia said he would refrain from commenting on a hypothetical situation of India being on the podium and Naqvi presenting the medals. “The teams have to first reach the podium. We will take a call then, taking into account all prevailing factors at that moment. We will cross the bridge only when we reach it,” the BCCI secretary told ToI.
A delegation of the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) is in Nagoya, but sources within the IOA declined to discuss the matter. It is unlikely that the IOA has made a representation to the OCA, JOC or AINAGOC on the issue.
There is also no immediate information on whether Naqvi will travel to Japan at all. A spokesman for the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) told Cricbuzz that his visit to Japan is doubtful. “I don’t think so,” he replied to a query from this website. It may well be that the PCB spokesman may not have the travel plans of the country’s Interior Minister. In any case, Naqvi is known to make decisions at the last minute. He landed in Dubai just about 30 minutes before the Women’s Asia Cup final was due to end last Sunday.
The BCCI officials, however, will be there in Nagoya. Saikia himself confirmed that he would travel to Japan on October 1 and stay on for the men’s final, which will be held on October 3. The Indian men’s cricket team is scheduled to travel to Japan late on Saturday night. The two finals are on September 22 (women’s) and October 3.
As previously reported by Cricbuzz on August 12, India and Pakistan teams – both in men and women – are drawn to meet only in a medal contest – either for the gold or for bronze. There is also a possibility that there may be no India-Pakistan matches in Japan at all.
Continue Reading

Latest News

Ellis and Inglis break Zimbabwe hearts to secure one-wicket thriller

Published

on

By

Australia concluded their first Zimbabwe tour after 12 years with a clean sweep of the hosts, who were unable to deliver a consolation win to a festive Harare crowd, as Nathan Ellis held his nerve alongside No. 11 Spencer Johnson in a match-winning tenth-wicket stand of 27. Zimbabwe do not have any internationals at home for the rest of the 2026 and, after posting their second-highest total batting first against Australia, saw the match slip from their grasp in the dramatic closing stages.

Pressure changed sides throughout the last quarter of the contest. Australia were cruising on 162 for 3 in the 26th over, when Brad Evans removed Alex Carey for the third of his four wickets and set the cat among the pigeons as wickets fell regularly. Josh Inglis was holding the chase together with his second ODI hundred but when he fell 45 were still needed. Then Ellis, who had earlier taken 3 for 50, put together a superbly-measured 36 not out to secure a thrilling win.

Their chase was built largely on the efforts of Inglis, who was the third Australian to reach a hundred in the series, after Matt Renshaw in the opening match and Travis Head in game two. In contrast, Zimbabwe did not have a century-marker, though Sikandar Raza and Craig Ervine  scored two fifties each, including in this match and were the leading run scorers across the three matches.

Zimbabwe also had two of the three top bowlers and will know that it was in moments, not personnel terms, that they lost to Australia. In this match, there were four major ones. The first came when Innocent Kaia, batting well on 55, had to retire hurt with what looked like a hamstring injury to interrupt an 80-run fourth wicket stand with Ervine and stall Zimbabwe. The second was when Ervine, on 59, tried to accelerate with 10 overs left to go and holed out to long-on to spark a collapse of 4 for 22 which left Zimbabwe short of the 300 that was in their sights.

 

Then, in the field, Inglis, on 48, cut Ernest Masuku in the air to backward point and Wessly Madhevere leapt to his right but could not hold on. The drop proved costly even though Madhevere took a stunner to dismiss Carey. Madhevere’s biggest mistake was still to come. In the penultimate over when Ellis launched Masuku to deep midwicket, Madhevere got under the ball and spilled the chance.

With nine runs needed off the last six balls, Raza then gave Madhevere the ball, even though Graeme Cremer had an over in hand having caused problems in his first ODI in 2018. The first ball went for six and left Madhevere inconsolable at the end.

Inglis was in early after Evans struck twice in his first two overs. He had Head caught at deep backward square when he flicked off his pads and then found Mitchell Marsh’s inside edge to leave Australia were 25 for 2 in the fourth over. Inglis announced himself with a swivel pull that went for four and was brutal through the point area. He greeted Cremer’s return by sending his first ball – a full toss – through mid-on for four. But Cremer came back well and bowled Cooper Connolly with a classic leg break to announce his return in some style.

Inglis and Carey put on 85 for the fourth-wicket to keep Australia in control and Inglis’ big challenge came when Australia started to wobble. They were on 203 for 5 after 35 overs, 69 runs away from victory, and in the space of two overs Raza had Ollie Peake out lbw and Cremer got Xavier Bartlett with a googly. Then, Blessing Muzarabani was brought back to keep Australia under pressure and bounced Ellis, who fended him skywards but the chance fell out of Brendan Taylor’s reach. Muzarabani finished the series wicketless.

Inglis reached his century with a strong sweep against Cremer off his 94th ball and victory was still 55 runs away. When Raza bowled Inglis in the 42nd over, Zimbabwe were ahead in the contest but the management of their attack towards the end will raise questions. Muzarabani was bowled out after 44 overs and Evans with two overs to go. Cremer, despite his experience, was overlooked for his final over.

That won’t be the only area Zimbabwe will leave with questions. Their batting line-up underwhelmed in parts, especially after they chose to put runs on the board in the final match. They started off reasonably well and were on 34 without loss after six overs before their opening pair gave way.

Ben Curran’s poor returns in white-ball cricket continued when he gloved Johnson down leg and was caught behind for 7. His partner Brian Bennett didn’t fare much better. After showing promise with classy flicks off the pads and crunching pulls off short balls, Bennett skied a Ellis delivery to Head at midwicket to depart for 30. Bennett has not crossed 40 in his last eight ODI innings, despite getting several starts. Zimbabwe were 57 for 2 at the end of the powerplay.

Taylor took his time to get to a 16-ball nine before he was bowled by an Adam Zampa flipper and his form will also be a concern. Kaia, whose first runs had come off a thick inside edge, offered a chance on 27 when he was out of his crease early as Renshaw fired in a delivery down leg. Inglis fumbled and recovered but could not stump Kaia, who put the early jitters aside to play some classy strokes. He drove Renshaw through mid-on and pulled Johnson flat and hard to bisect the fielders in the deep. His fifty came just after the innings’ halfway mark, off 59 balls, and marked the first time he had crossed the milestone in 12 innings, since January 2023.

Kaia and Ervine got Zimbabwe into a good position and when Kaia retired on 148 for 3, it was up to Raza and Ervine to accelerate. They brought up the Zimbabwean 200 with 10 overs to go but the final flourish never came. Ervine was eager to up the ante but could not clear Renshaw at long-on and Madhevere sent an Ellis slower ball to cover to give Australia two wickets in two overs.

Evans showed glimpses of his finishing skills with back to back fours off Johnson but then top-edged a short ball to give Johnson a second wicket and Cremer was out lbw to a pinpoint Ellis yorker. Raza reached fifty soon after that and farmed strike for the final five overs to end unbeaten on 81 which gave Zimbabwe a competitive total, but agonisingly not quite enough.

Scores:
Australia 272 for 9 in 49.5 overs  (Josh Inglis 103; Brad Evans 4-47, Graeme Cremer 2-53, Sikandar Raza 2-42) beat Zimbabwe 271 for 8 in 50 overs (Innocent Kaia 55 retired hurt,Craig Ervine 59, Sikandar Raza 81*; Spencer Johnson 2-50, Nathan Ellis 3-50, Adam Zampa 2-53) by one wicket

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Trending