News
Govt. rejects external evidence gathering resolution
Sri Lanka has rejected the resolution 60/L.1/Rev.1 presented to the UN Human Rights Council as the government couldn’t, under any circumstances, agree to external evidence gathering mechanism.
The following is the text of statement made by Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative in Geneva Ambassador Himalee Arunatilaka: “Sri Lanka participated in discussions on this resolution in a spirit of open and constructive engagement that we have demonstrated throughout in our interactions with this Council. We appreciate the core group’s engagement on language amendments proposed by Sri Lanka. We, however, regret that we couldn’t find agreement on certain key concerns for us. While we thank all delegations for their constructive participation on the draft text, Sri Lanka particularly wishes to thank very sincerely, those countries which made positive suggestions during informal consultations and bilateral meetings.
As Sri Lanka had indicated from the beginning to the core group, our fundamental issue with the text is the reference to resolution 51/1 of 2022 denoting the external evidence gathering mechanism on Sri Lanka within the OHCHR, which, in our view, is an unprecedented and ad hoc expansion of the Council´s mandate.
Participating in the Interactive Dialogue on Sri Lanka on 8th September, Minister of Foreign Affairs Vijitha Herath reiterated that Sri Lanka does not accept the external evidence gathering mechanism set up by the OHCHR, which it has labelled as the `Sri Lanka Accountability Project`, at a time when the Government is continuing to strengthen the domestic institutions, based on its genuine commitment to reconciliation and human rights in the interests of our own people. The ongoing domestic processes include strengthening the independent Offices on Missing Persons and Reparations, and the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation, as well as the operationalisation of a truth and reconciliation commission, and an independent Public Prosecutor´s Office.
Sri Lanka, as well as many other countries, have repeatedly questioned the credibility and transparency of how this Project, within the OHCHR, was set up, its work and the budget allocated to it. After four years of its existence, this Council is yet to see any benefits of this Project for the people of Sri Lanka. This is clearly evident from the contents of the High Commissioner’s Report as well. The extension of its mandate will only serve the interests of elements with vested interests seeking to create divisions and polarize the communities in Sri Lanka, and will be counterproductive to the Government’s efforts on promoting unity, reconciliation and human rights.
We firmly believe that genuine nationally owned processes are best placed to address matters relating to human rights. National processes are rooted in the local context, allow for greater ownership, recognise unique sensitivities, and make implementation of action more efficient and effective.
The High Commissioner for Human Rights, who visited Sri Lanka in June this year, had the opportunity to experience firsthand the “momentum of change” across all segments of the Sri Lankan society and the “genuine openness of the Government to address issues”. In his report to this Council, too, the High Commissioner highlighted that there is a historic opportunity in Sri Lanka to implement transformative reforms. As set out by the Minister of Foreign Affairs in his statement to this Council, within a very short time, the Government has taken a series of tangible and decisive steps on reconciliation and human rights. Therefore, it is only fair that Sri Lanka be allowed to seize this opportunity to advance the rights of its own people through domestic processes.
For these reasons, we do not agree with coercive international action, and we reject resolution 60/L.1/Rev.1 presented to this Council.”
News
Surcharge on vehicle imports irks SJB, pleases ex-Finance Minister
Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa has launched a scathing attack on the government for the 50% Customs duty surcharge on vehicle imports, accusing the latter of burdening the public with additional costs, despite its earlier promises to make vehicles more affordable.
Addressing the media in Tissamaharama, on Saturday, Premadasa said those who had once pledged to make a Vitz car available for Rs. 1.2 million had now moved in the opposite direction by increasing duties on vehicles.
Premadasa questioned assurances given by Deputy Finance Minister Dr. Anil Jayantha Fernando that vehicle prices would not significantly increase due to the surcharge, asserting that the President, the government and its 159 Members of Parliament must take responsibility for the consequences of the decision.
The Opposition Leader also voiced concern over the depreciation of the rupee, warning that the local currency was weakening rapidly against the US dollar and that continued depreciation would lead to higher inflation, rising commodity prices and further increases in the cost of living.
He said economic stabilisation could only be achieved through stronger export earnings, growth in the tourism sector, higher foreign remittances and increased Foreign Direct Investments (FDIs).
Premadasa further accused the President, the Finance Minister and the Government of lacking a basic understanding of economics, claiming that repeated policy mistakes had adversely affected the economy and the public.
He called for an increase in subsidies, arguing that rising living costs were placing families under severe financial strain and affecting their ability to look after their families.
Premadasa added that shoring up foreign reserves and arresting the depreciation of the rupee would be critical in meeting debt obligations and safeguarding public welfare.
Meanwhile, the Vehicle Importers Association of Sri Lanka (VIASL) warned that the Customs duty surcharge would lead to steep increases in vehicle prices, further reducing affordability for consumers.
VIASL spokesperson Arosha Rodrigo told the media that the surcharge, introduced through a gazette notification, had come on top of existing customs duties and the depreciation of the rupee against the US dollar.
“Vehicle prices are rising at a rate that no one can afford. The new surcharge on top of this is unbearable for vehicle importers. Many vehicles will increase by Rs. 1.5 million to Rs. 2.5 million,” Rodrigo said.
He explained that customs duties on all vehicles, whether imported privately or through dealerships, would rise due to the duty surcharge.
Responding to mounting criticism, Deputy Finance Minister Dr. Anil Jayantha urged the public not to be misled by what he described as false claims that vehicle prices would rise by 150% due to the surcharge.
Dr. Jayantha said misinformation was being circulated regarding the surcharge and insisted that claims of a 150% increase in taxes or vehicle prices were “completely false.”
He explained that the temporary three-month surcharge was intended to delay non-essential private vehicle imports and reduce pressure on foreign exchange reserves during a period of economic uncertainty.
“The message we are giving is simple: if you can postpone importing a vehicle for personal use, please do so. This is not a move intended to increase vehicle prices,” he said.
According to the Deputy Minister, existing taxes on vehicle imports were already at approximately 130%, and the newly announced surcharge mechanism had been widely misunderstood in public discourse.
He further clarified that vehicles imported under Letters of Credit opened on or before May 15, 2026, would not be affected by the revised tax structure.
“Even if those vehicles arrive months later, they will continue to be taxed under the previous rates. The new tax structure only applies to LCs opened after May 15,” Dr. Jayantha said.
He also stressed that there was no reason for consumers to rush to purchase vehicles, fearing price increases.
Dr. Jayantha noted that motorcycles, three-wheelers and vehicles imported for commercial purposes had been excluded from the temporary measure.
He maintained that the policy was aimed at managing pressure on foreign exchange reserves, maintaining economic stability and curbing unnecessary import demand during the three-month period.
Meanwhile, former Finance Minister Ali Sabry, in a social media post, has endorsed the government’s decision to impose a 50% Customs duty surcharge on vehicle imports, calling a timely intervention to protect the country’s foreign currency reserves. He has said it is a necessary safeguard.
“The Government’s decision to impose a 50% surcharge on the import of vehicles, in the midst of escalating global uncertainty and external pressures, is a prudent and timely measure aimed at protecting Sri Lanka’s fragile external sector and preserving scarce foreign exchange reserves,” Sabry said in a statement on social media.
He has also praised the government’s decision to exempt the Letters of Credit opened on or before May 15, 2026, from the surcharge. “It avoids unnecessary uncertainty, prevents retrospective complications, and protects already embattled importers from further hardship and arbitrary administrative difficulties. In times of crisis, clarity, consistency, and fairness in implementation are just as important as the policy itself,” the former Minister has said, warning that Sri Lanka’s recovery remains vulnerable to global conflicts that disrupt energy markets, trade routes, supply chains, investor confidence, tourism, and financing conditions.
News
Bill to repeal Chief of Defence Staff Act gazetted
A Bill seeking to repeal the Chief of Defence Staff Act No. 35 of 2009 has been published in an extraordinary gazette notification, paving the way for the abolition of the post of Chief of Defence Staff.
The draft legislation, titled the “Repeal of the Chief of Defence Staff Act, 2026,” was published in the Government Gazette on May 15 under instructions of the Minister of Defence, according to official sources.
The Bill seeks to repeal the existing law and provide for matters connected with and incidental to its repeal.
Under the proposed legislation, the office of the Chief of Defence Staff will cease to exist from the date the new Act comes into operation. The incumbent holding the post will thereafter be reassigned to the respective armed service to which he belongs.
The draft Bill further stipulates that all movable and immovable property belonging to the Office of the Chief of Defence Staff will be vested in the Ministry in charge of the subject of defence once the Act takes effect.
News
Preventing teenage pregnancies: Police ask parents to pay more attention to children’s emotional needs
Police have raised concerns over a growing number of teenage pregnancies in Sri Lanka, urging parents and communities to strengthen family bonds and remain vigilant to protect children from exploitation and abuse.
Issuing a public awareness statement, the Police Media Division has identified the weakening of emotional bonds within families as a key sociological factor contributing to the increase in teenage pregnancies.
Police have said that increasingly demanding lifestyles have reduced the amount of time some parents spend with their children, understanding the latter’s emotional needs, daily activities and personal concerns, particularly those of young girls.
According to complaints received by police stations, some girls seek affection, care and emotional support from individuals outside the family when they feel neglected or deprived of attention at home.
“In many cases, girls turn to mobile phones and social media as a substitute for emotional support when they become distant from their parents,” police have said.
Parents and children are urged to report incidents of abuse, exploitation or harm to the nearest police station or through emergency hotlines 119, 118, 109 and 107.
-
News5 days agoEx-SriLankan CEO’s death: Controversy surrounds execution of bail bond
-
Features1 day agoSri Lankan Airlines Airbus Scandal and the Death of Kapila Chandrasena and my Brother Rajeewa
-
Features6 days agoHigh Stakes in Pursuing corruption cases
-
Features6 days agoWhen University systems fail:Supreme Court’s landmark intervention in sexual harassment case
-
News2 days agoLanka’s eligibility to draw next IMF tranche of USD 700 mn hinges on ‘restoration of cost-recovery pricing for electricity and fuel’
-
Midweek Review5 days agoA victory that can never be forgotten
-
Features3 days agoMysterious Death of United Nations Secretary General Hammarskjöld
-
Opinion4 days agoElectricity tariffs have skyrocketed: Can further increases be prevented?
