News
Geneva: Prof. Peiris questions Bachelet’s actions, complains of unfair treatment
Accusing the UN of pursuing an agenda inimical to war-winning Sri Lanka, Foreign Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris has faulted the Office of UN Human Rights Commissioner Michelle Bachelet for not releasing Sri Lanka’s response along with Bachelet’s report submitted to the ongoing Geneva sessions.
The following is the text of the Foreign Minister’s statement made at the interactive dialogue on the OHCHR report on Sri Lanka on March 4: “The Resolution 46/1 on Sri Lanka was adopted by a divided vote in this Council. Sri Lanka and other Member States opposed this resolution in fundamental disagreement with its deeply flawed procedure and unacceptable content, in particular its OP para 6 regarding a so-called evidence-gathering mechanism.
The Resolution was directly contrary to the Council’s founding principles of impartiality, objectivity and non-selectivity. It went well beyond the mandate that Member States conferred on it by UNGA Resolution 60/251. I have stated Sri Lanka’s views on this matter to this Council on 01 March.
We also submitted in a timely manner our comments on the High Commissioner’s report.
We note with regret that the Secretariat failed to publish this simultaneously with the High Commissioner’s written update.
Despite our rejection of the resolution, we will continue our voluntary international undertakings on human rights and engage with the United Nations, including with this Council.
As stated by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa of Sri Lanka to our Parliament on 18 January 2022, “We are a nation that respects international laws and conventions”. We have regularly shared our progress and challenges, in a candid and open exchange, with this council, and other relevant organs of the United Nations system.
“We are convinced that there are serious anomalies and weaknesses in the report presented to this Council by the High Commissioner. The fundamental deficiency is its intolerably intrusive character, impinging as it does on core functions and responsibilities of organs of the Sri Lankan State, overwhelmingly mandated by the people of our country at three successive elections. There is, as well, a clearly discernible element of discrimination, in that the Council would certainly not take it upon itself to embark on a similar inquisitorial procedure in respect of other Member States. This, in itself, strikes at the very root of the foundations of the United Nations system. The issue of uniformity and consistency of standards applied by the High Commissioner to Member States, irrespective of their size and influence, and in steadfast conformity with the essential principle relating to the sovereign equality of all members of the United Nations fraternity, is cynically transgressed in several portions of this report.
“To our minds, this is particularly disturbing because the strength and prestige of the United Nations, and especially the Human Rights Council, derive from the widespread regard of the international community, as a whole, for the moral and ethical basis underpinning the attitudes of the Council. We fervently believe that it is vitally important to retain this confidence undiminished, especially having regard to the fate of the Human Rights Commission, the predecessor of this Council. It is a matter for deep regret that numerous instances of unsubstantiated allegations and superficial conclusions insensitive to the complexity of ground situations have found their way into the report. We have commented on these in extensive detail in our written response.
“We are dismayed by the High Commissioner’s unwarranted onslaught on seminal institutions of our country which function under the aegis of Sri Lanka’s Constitution and legal system, emanating from a rich and varied cultural heritage, and are subject to stringent review processes which form an integral part of our tried and tested laws.
“There is also the question of use of limited resources in such a manner as to achieve optimal benefit for all of humanity at a time of unprecedented crisis. The colossal expenditure of millions of dollars in a partisan and specifically targeted pursuit of Sri Lanka is hardly consonant with this obvious imperative. It seems to us a great pity that the report shows scant regard for these considerations which appear to a wide swath of nations to be crucially important at this time.
“The government of Sri Lanka is firmly resolved to maintain the security and stability that we have restored for our people and ensure sustainable progress in an equitable manner. My country reaches out to the international community with the sincere exhortation to join us as partners on a footing of equality and mutual respect to face the challenges ahead.”
News
US embassy won’t comment on IGP’s probe into joint drug raid
… America-Pakistan developed required ‘intel’ for operation
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The US Embassy in Colombo declined to comment on a special police probe into the recent narcotics detection, jointly made at the China-managed Colombo International Container Terminal (CICT) by the US Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka Police..
US Embassy spokesperson said that the mission wouldn’t add to their press release, issued on 2 Sept., in the immediate aftermath of the raid.
Police Headquarters, on 11 Sept., declared that the Central Crime Investigation Bureau (CCIB) was conducting investigations into the recovery of 473 kg of Crystal Methamphetamine (‘Ice’). Police never acknowledged the role played by the US in the operation.
According to Police Headquarters, on a directive given by IGP Priyantha Weerasooriya, the Special Investigation Unit has launched an internal probe into, what it called, shortcomings and irregularities in the Colombo Port raid.
The Island:
Have you (relevant US authorities) received an update of Sri Lanka’s investigations from the Police?
US Embassy:
U.S. and Sri Lankan law enforcement authorities maintain close and ongoing cooperation on counternarcotics matters, including the exchange of information that helps both countries combat transnational drug trafficking. We don’t have anything further to share on communications with Sri Lankan authorities beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.
The Island:
Did the Police seek clarification regarding DEA, New Delhi Country Office role in the successful raid?
US Embassy:
As the Embassy noted publicly following the seizure, cooperation with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration contributed to the Sri Lanka Police Narcotics Bureau’s successful seizure of approximately 463 kilograms of methamphetamine at the Port of Colombo.
The seizure demonstrates the value of close U.S.-Sri Lankan cooperation in disrupting transnational narcotics trafficking.
The Island:
Before we raised this issue were you aware of the internal investigation into the drug bust which was also raised in Parliament last week?
The US Embassy:
We don’t have anything further to share beyond what we’ve already said publicly about the successful operation.
Our focus remains on the strong U.S.-Sri Lanka law enforcement partnership and the concrete results our cooperation can deliver—disrupting transnational criminal organisations, cutting off the profits that fuel illicit drug trafficking, and protecting our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.
The US Embassy attributed the success of the counternarcotics operation to the US-Sri Lanka partnership
The US Embassy statement, dated 2 Sept: The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) New Delhi Country Office and Sri Lanka’s Police Narcotics Bureau (PNB) conducted a successful joint operation disrupting a Pakistan-based narcotrafficking network attempting to smuggle crystal methamphetamine through Sri Lanka to international markets.
Acting on intelligence developed by DEA’s Foreign Counterparts Unit Pakistan Anti-Narcotics Force Special Investigations Cell between August 14–29 on suspicious maritime containers moving from Pakistan to Colombo, PNB seized approximately 463 kg of crystal methamphetamine with a street value of $21 million, concealed in bath towels, and arrested several suspects, including Pakistani nationals. This operation underscores the strength of the U.S.-Sri Lanka partnership in dismantling transnational criminal organisations that fund terrorism and threaten communities in both our countries. This cooperation builds on long-standing training and technical assistance provided through the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) to the Sri Lanka Police and Customs. The United States remains committed to working with Sri Lanka and regional partners to aggressively pursue transnational criminal organizations, deny them the revenue from illicit drug trafficking, and protect our citizens from the dangers of narcotrafficking.”
SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa, in Parliament, raised questions about the internal investigation into the raid. However, Rajapaksa, too, hasn’t mentioned the US role in the operation. The Special Investigation Unit has recorded a statement from Senior DIG Ranmal Kodituwakku regarding the Colombo Port raid.
MP Rajapaksa questioned the rationale behind questioning the officer who led the raid against the backdrop of controversial releasing of 323 containers from the Colombo Port in January 2025. The failure to question those responsible for the releasing of 323 containers indicated who was behind that operation, MP Rajapaksa told Parliament.
News
Gnanasara Thera declares outside High Court that he wouldn’t flee
Bodu Bala Sena (BBS) General Secretary Ven. Galagodaaththe Gnanasara Thera appeared before the Colombo High Court yesterday in a case filed by the Attorney General over statements allegedly insulting Islam.
The case was taken up before Colombo High Court Judge Buddhika C. Ragala, who ordered that it be called again on September 30.
His appearance came six days after the Supreme Court invalidated the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in 2019.
Speaking to journalists outside the court, Gnanasara Thera said he was prepared to face the legal process and would abide by the law, rejecting reports that he had gone into hiding following the Supreme Court judgment.
“It is the weak who disappear and flee. We worked for the country and are facing the consequences for that. We are not afraid and will not flee,” he said, noting that he would surrender to the court and face whatever legal consequences following the Supreme Court decision.
The Supreme Court, on September 10, ruled that the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by Sirisena was invalid. The judgment followed fundamental rights petitions challenging the legality of the pardon. A three-judge bench, comprising Justices Janak de Silva, Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath Abeykoon, delivered the ruling.
Gnanasara Thera was convicted by the Court of Appeal in 2018 for contempt of court and sentenced to a total of 19 years’ imprisonment to run concurrently as six years. The conviction related to his conduct during proceedings at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court concerning the disappearance of Prageeth Eknaligoda.
He was released from Welikada Prison on May 23, 2019, after then President Maithripala Sirisena had granted him a presidential pardon.
The Supreme Court found the pardon to be arbitrary and invalid in law, following its consideration of the petitions challenging the exercise of the presidential power of clemency.
Meanwhile, police have said they are awaiting the Supreme Court judgment before determining what further action should be taken following the invalidation of the pardon.
The proceedings before the Colombo High Court yesterday are separate from the contempt of court case that resulted in the six-year sentence. They concern alleged statements made by Gnanasara Thera regarding Islam.
In June this year, the Colombo High Court rejected an appeal by Gnanasara Thera against a nine-month prison sentence imposed by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court in connection with statements made at a 2016 media briefing that were found to have disrupted religious coexistence.
The latest High Court proceedings, therefore, form part of separate legal action concerning his alleged remarks about Islam, while the Supreme Court ruling relates specifically to the legality of the 2019 presidential pardon granted in connection with his contempt of court conviction.
The case before the Colombo High Court will be called again on September 30.
News
Namal further remanded
Colombo Fort Magistrate Pasan Amarasena yesterday (16) ordered SLPP National Organiser Namal Rajapaksa, MP, to be further remanded, until September 23. The Magistrate issued the order when Rajapaksa was produced before the court as a suspect in an investigation into an alleged USD 2 million bribe case connected to the acquisition of aircraft for SriLankan Airlines.
The Magistrate issued the order following the submissions made by Deputy Solicitor General Janaka Bandara, appearing on behalf of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID).
President’s Counsel Anil Silva, along with other attorneys representing Rajapaksa, also made submissions before the court.
The Magistrate also announced that a decision on Rajapaksa’s bail application would be announced on 23 September.
-
Sports6 days agoDDS set to lose Test captaincy
-
News6 days agoSri Lanka faces new grid challenge as rooftop solar surges: former CEB GM
-
Latest News6 days agoShafali, Deepti power India into sixth T20 Asia Cup final
-
News4 days agoGnanasara Thero absconding after SC ruling
-
Latest News5 days agoSri Lanka thwart Fatima Sana challenge to secure Asia Cup final spot
-
News5 days agoAmmunition cache found in old Kandy bungalow
-
Editorial6 days agoA flight of fancy
-
News5 days agoGreen Climate Fund (GCF) Regional Dialogue for East and South Asia will be held from 14 to 17 September 2026 at Cinnamon Life at City of Dreams Hotel, Colombo
