Features
“From Hollywood Royalty to a Serene Highness:
The story of Princess of Monaco, Grace Kelly.”
by Dahami Samarathunga
Being universally loved, even by generations yet to come, could be a dream for many. But, once a while, some rare specimens are born and would leave their imprints on earth so profoundly, that many seem to struggle of letting them go. Grace Kelly was born on November 12th, 1929, amidst the aftermath of the Wall Street collapse, into a family led by Jack Kelly, a former Olympian, whose fortune remained intact despite the mayhem.
He married Margaret Majer, an educated and ambitious woman of German descent, she was a true matriarch who raised her children with a ‘Teutonic’ approach, earning her the nickname ‘Prussian general mother’ from her children. Despite their lavishes, the Kellys ensured their children remained grounded and the Kelly kids to call her their ‘Prussian general mother’. Despite their lavishes, Kelly’s ensured their children were grounded and weren’t oblivious to the realities of the world.
Grace was first sent to ‘Ravenhill Academy’, where she evoked her passion for acting. Despite her family’s disapproval, she found a confidant in her uncle, Pulitzer price winning playwright George Kelly, who supported her passion. Kelly was later sent to ‘Stevens School ‘in Germantown, as her father believed Ravenhill didn’t emphasize enough on athletics. At Steven’s Grace was dubbed as a bit of a troublemaker, often going on rebellious strikes.
“She always had this interesting dichotomy between wanting to do what her mother and traditional mores told her to do and having this rebellious pull…”, writer James Spada revealed. Growing up in a conservative household, it comes as no surprise that Kelly might’ve felt the urge to tap into her wilder and rebellious side, after frequently succumbing to pressure from her parents throughout her entire life.
In 1947, Grace was enrolled in new York’s American academy of dramatic arts. However, her audition was nothing remarkable, and was noted for her pronounced Philadelphian twang, which the teachers found a bit crass and unusual, for theatre. “So, she developed this almost British way of speaking, very measured, vowels very rounded.” Spada revealed. Shortly after the criticism to work on her accent, Grace’s instructors noticed a change in her dialect and believed that now she had potential to pursue a career in theatre, with the hope of testing the waters of Hollywood. And by 20 years old, Grace was earning a sizeable income as a model who appeared in both magazines and television.
Grace was quite taken aback with her new status as a model, as growing up she has never considered herself as a remarkable beauty. Alice Dodre, a childhood friend of Kelly once revealed ‘We had no idea she was as beautiful as she was, Grace always had a bandana on and the glasses.”, adding, “And when she went to NY and we started to see her on television and we’d see her magazines, it was like ‘my heavens that’s our Grace?'”
In 1949, Kelly’s big break on Broadway came with ‘The Father,’ but the play closed shortly after its release. However, this setback didn’t hinder her career, as she went on to appear in over 60 television dramas within the next two years. Regardless of her success, Kelly wasn’t thrilled with her career direction as she didn’t consider television as a serious form of artistic medium and believed it lacked certain elements and artistic expression that was more profound in theatre or cinema. In 1951 Kelly, starred in her first Hollywood movie, “Fourteen Hours”, but many believed her breakthrough when she was casted in the movie ‘High Moon’ opposite Gary Cooper.
‘High noon’ lifted Kelly from obscurity and put her on the map in Hollywood, which made director John Ford, offer her a role in ‘Mogambo’. However, prior getting the role, MGM demanded her to sign a standard 7-year contract, which she swiftly refused, asserting her authority as someone not to be taken lightly. ‘She wasn’t a girl of hosiery counter or from a small town. She was well provided for so she could be tougher in her negation “, film critic Andrew Sarris once revealed. “She was less dependent on other people’s responses than any actress I’ve met in Hollywood, who was extremely strong willed, but with great politesse”, actress Celeste Holm once said, “She was even more aware of who she was, she was George Kelly’s niece, that’s who. And she knew it.”
During the shooting of “Mogambo” in Africa, Kelly infamously fell in love with her co star Clark Gable. However, despite being romantically linked in Africa, Gable insisted on breaking off their relationship once they arrived in LA, which left her heartbroken. Again, it was easier for a woman to build a reputation in Hollywood and for Kelly the rumour was that she was falling in love with their co stars.
Her close ones believed Kelly couldn’t quite comprehend how relationships in Hollywood functioned and the duality of its repercussions. Shortly after the heartbreak, Kelly received a call from Alfred Hitchcock, who was searching for his next leading lady for his upcoming project,” Dial M for Murder’ as his leading actress Ingrid Bergman had taken a career hiatus. Hitchcock was distraught over Bergman’s absence, but sensed fire under Kelly’s often regal and sensual image which propelled him to make her his muse. And it was safe to say that Kelly eventually ended up becoming his saving Grace.
Hitchcock praised Kelly for the subtlety and the level of sophistication she brought to the screen, revealing his fascination with her, comparing her to a ‘’A snow covered volcano ‘. He visioned her as someone ‘that was ladylike, elemental and was suggestive of icy Olympian height, that wasn’t uncovered by autonomy yet. And throughout their collaborations, he emphasized these characteristics and enshrined her as an archetype that was vastly different from the “bimbo” type of characters, other actresses were forced to play.
After the release of her movie “Rear Window” in 1953, Kelly was looking for roles to finally showcase her dramatic prowess instead of her sexual appeal. She found a project that she felt could finally showcase her full artistic flair in the movie ‘Country Girl’, which was a character that was the opposite of her previous breezy heroin roles. Kelly was determined to take on the offer, as she had never played such an unglamorous role, but the studios were against her decision, fearing it might hinder her status in Hollywood as one of its most sought stars.
William Halden, her co star in ‘Country Girl’ once revealed how Grace overcame the disapproval of studio bosses to star in ‘Country Girl’ by standing on her ground, threatening to leave the studio, saying, “I’ll tell you what I will do. I’ll give you my address so you will know where to send your Christmas cards.’, Halden also revealed that less than 20 minutes after the call, she finally had the part.
Kelly’s compelling performance in “Country Girl” landed her an Oscar in 1955 with critics praising her for her selectiveness when it came her movies. “No movie star ever had a great script like Kelly.” they said.
In year 1955 Grace attend the Cannes, and on May 6th she was invited to near by Monaco palace to meet its Prince Renier, to spend the afternoon and pose for photographs, which was a decision that altered the course of her life. After reluctantly agreed to a photo session with the prince, Kelly was given a tour of palace garden and zoo, where the two posed together for press. The meeting certainly brought a lot of attention to Monaco due to Kelly’s fame and later that evening, it was said that she reported to a friend that she found her prince charming, as their chemistry was undeniable.
It’s been revealed that Marilyn Monroe was one of the first choices they had in mind when searching a bride for Renier, as Greek shipping magnate Aristotle who was a close friend of Reinier, suggested to improve the image of Monaco by marrying a Hollywood star, as it would increase tourism to the now cash-poor destination. Although Monroe wasn’t interested in Reinier, she was certain that upon their meeting, ‘he’d fall head over heels for her’.
However, at the time Monroe was going through her own personal turmoil and was in an uphill battle against Hollywood, who were exploiting her for her fame. Besides, the chaplains of Monaco later voiced apprehension that Monroe’s status as a global sex symbol might overshadow their public image as a royal couple, which propelled them to look for other options. However, on the day of Kelly’s wedding, Monroe was one of the firsts to send her well wishes, sending a telegram that read: “I’m so happy you found a way out of this business.”
No matter the fame and recognition, the likes of Monroe and Kelly knew that with the course of time, the inevitable would eventually occur. Kelly was now of course at peak of her career, but she wasn’t sure about how long it would last before, she too could possibly fade into the shadows of show business as it had happened to starlets before her time due to Hollywood’s unkind treatment of women. Also, Her father had initially refused to consider acting as a noble career for his daughter, viewing it as a profession “a slim cut above streetwalker”, which often lingered in the back of her mind.
Kelly’s parents were finally impressed with her choice of a partner in Reiner and bestowed their blessings upon their marriage. “What better son in law l for a social climbing man, than a prince.” Spada once said on Jack Kelly’s joy on his daughter and Reinier’s union. “He was roman Catholic; he (Reinier) had never been married or divorced.”
Despite the premise and resemblance of a fairytale, their marriage was carried to fruition under the French law, which relied Monaco’s survival as a principality on prince producing an heir. It was reported that Grace was submitted to a medical examination ensuring she could supply a successor to the prince, which put an extra pressure on her. An according to ancient tradition, it was revealed that her parents had to provide a sizeable dowry, which had said to “left a sour taste in their mouth”.
However, they eventually relented after Grace’s pleading and offer to pay a half of the dowry by herself, making sure her siblings weren’t left short handed. After going public with their union, Kelly was still under contract with MGM was set to star in the movie “High Society”. As the public was left with the question whether Kelly will resume her career after tying the knot, Reinier was firm on his stance announcing that “High Society’ would indeed be Grace Kelly’s final motion picture.
19th April 1956 Grace Kelly became her serene highness princess grace of Monaco. The wedding was televised live to over 30 million people, marking a milestone in media history. Barbara Walters recalled interviewing Kelly about her impending wedding in 1956 and noted Kelly’s struggle to answer questions, which she believed might’ve ‘caught her off guard’- ‘Every question was difficult for her”, she said, “when the interview is over, she almost broke down in tears,” implying that the reality might’ve hit Kelly that her fate was on the verge of undergoing a drastic change.
Kelly gave birth to a daughter and son in years 1957 and 1958 and with her fame, their tourism increased tremendously, with Monaco bursting into the global consciousness, with Kelly taking the center stage, captivating the world’s attention.
In 1962, Kelly received a message stating that Hitchcock wanted her to star in his upcoming movie, “Marnie.”, which showed her demand in the industry, despite leaving Hollywood almost a decade ago. Her closed ones knew she yearned of returning Hollywood, especially once her children grow older as she always felt she couldn’t end her career on her own terms.
It was rumoured that Reinier initially didn’t show any disdain to the idea of Kelly’s return to silver screen, which’s why many believed she was distraught when he objected the offer at the last minute, causing her to withdraw from the movie.
It was reported that Kelly was offered a staggering 1 million for the movie, but her closed ones knew, it wasn’t the prospect of wealth that flattered her, but the opportunity to reclaim the independence, earning power and agency she felt she had lost in her marriage. In 1965 she was ecstatic with the birth of her 3rd child Stephanie, as she believed her daughter’s arrival made it easier for her to shift her attention elsewhere over her personal and career heartache.
By the 70s it was said that Kelly and Reinier had grown apart, with rumours speculating that Rainier had been unfaithful to her. During the rough patch, making the best of the situation, Kelly transformed Monaco’s red cross society into one of the generous and powerful units in the world, creating the “Princess Grace Foundation’ to assist international artists, who needed a helping hand. During this time, she dedicated herself wholeheartedly to philanthropy, travelling across the globe, championing cases close to her heart.
But again, this was once a movie star, who had won an Oscar at 26 years old and had abruptly ended her career, during what many considered to be her prime. In 1976, Kelly’s wistful thinking of returning to Hollywood became a reality, as she made a rare appearance at the Edinburgh Film Festival and performed in a poetry recital, proving she could still very well move an audience.
In 1976 Kelly sat down for an interview with Merv, where she reflected on career, humanitarian work, and life as a royal. When she was asked about her earliest memory of Monaco, she recalled how uneasy she felt during the shooting of one of her movies, where she had to drive at the narrow hillside in Monte Carlo and couldn’t focus as she was fearful of losing control of her vehicle. “I had to drive a car and go on a very tricky little turn and had to stop by a Bush this far from the edge.
I think I was more worried about that and less able to take in the beautiful scenery”. She said. Ironically, this would become a premonition of her untimely death, as it was eerily similar to what would be her tragic end six years later, as she was killed in a car accident in the hillside of Monte Carlo, while driving with her youngest daughter, who survived the crash.
Grace Kelly’s journey, from Hollywood royalty to serene highness of Monaco, was something for storybooks. For her, becoming a royal was her toughest role yet, as the public of Monaco seemed even harder to impress and more judgmental than those of Hollywood. However, in the end, the public believed she had more than fulfilled her promise, exceeding their expectations of those who scoffed at her for marrying a prince. She redefined and was a blueprint for modern day princess and served as an inspiration for the likes of princess Diana, whom she had formed a kinship, due their similar upbring as commoners, marrying into royalty. “The idea of my life as a fairy tale is itself a fairy tale”, Kelly once said.
It was known that her role as a princess prevented her from indulging in the joys she once found in her younger years as she had to uphold her image as the princess of Monaco, which left her feeling shattered. But Kelly often made no secret that, she preferred ‘good memories to regrets”, and was committed to succeed in her role as a royal, just like she did in Hollywood, as it became her ‘self fulfilling prophecy’. “I’ve had happy moments in my life, but I don’t think that happiness, is a perpetual state that anyone can be in.” Kelly once said. “Life isn’t that way.”
Features
Cricket and the National Interest
The appointment of former minister Eran Wickremaratne to chair the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee is significant for more than the future of cricket. It signals a possible shift in the culture of governance even as it offers Sri Lankan cricket a fighting possibility to get out of the doldrums of failure. There have been glorious patches for the national cricket team since the epochal 1996 World Cup triumph. But these patches of brightness have been few and far between and virtually non-existent over the past decade. At the centre of this disaster has been the failures of governance within Sri Lanka Cricket which are not unlike the larger failures of governance within the country itself. The appointment of a new reform oriented committee therefore carries significance beyond cricket. It reflects the wider challenge facing the country which is to restore trust in public institutions for better management.
The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne brings a professional administrator with a proven track record into the cricket arena. He has several strengths that many of his immediate predecessors lacked. Before the ascent of the present government leadership to positions of power, Eran Wickremaratne was among the handful of government ministers who did not have allegations of corruption attached to their names. His reputation for financial professionalism and integrity has remained intact over many years in public life. With him in the Cricket Transformation Committee are also respected former cricketers Kumar Sangakkara, Roshan Mahanama and Sidath Wettimuny together with professionals from legal and business backgrounds. They have been tasked with introducing structural reforms and improving transparency and accountability within cricket administration.
A second reason for this appointment to be significant is that this is possibly the first occasion on which the NPP government has reached out to someone associated with the opposition to obtain assistance in an area of national importance. The commitment to bipartisanship has been a constant demand from politically non-partisan civic groups and political analysts. They have voiced the opinion that the government needs to be more inclusive in its choice of appointments to decision making authorities. The NPP government’s practice so far has largely been to limit appointments to those within the ruling party or those considered loyalists even at the cost of proven expertise. The government’s decision in this case therefore marks a potentially important departure.
National Interest
There are areas of public life where national interest should transcend party divisions and cricket, beloved of the people, is one of them. Sri Lanka cannot afford to continue treating every institution as an arena for political competition when institutions themselves are in crisis and public confidence has become fragile. It is therefore unfortunate that when the government has moved positively in the direction of drawing on expertise from outside its own ranks there should be a negative response from sections of the opposition. This is indicative of the absence of a culture of bipartisanship even on issues that concern the national interest. The SJB, of which the newly appointed cricket committee chairman was a member objected on the grounds that politicians should not hold positions in sports administration and asked him to resign from the party. There is a need to recognise the distinction between partisan political control and the temporary use of experienced administrators to carry out reform and institutional restructuring. In other countries those in politics often join academia and civil society on a temporary basis and vice versa.
More disturbing has been the insidious campaign carried out against the new cricket committee and its chairman on the grounds of religious affiliation. This is an unacceptable denial of the reality that Sri Lanka is a plural, multi ethnic and multi religious society. The interim committee reflects this diversity to a reasonable extent. The country’s long history of ethnic conflict should have taught all political actors the dangers of mobilising communal prejudice for short term political gain. Sri Lanka paid a very heavy price for decades of mistrust and division. It would be tragic if even cricket administration became another arena for communal suspicion and hostility. The present government represents an important departure from the sectarian rhetoric that was employed by previous governments. They have repeatedly pledged to protect the equal rights of all citizens and not permit discrimination or extremism in any form.
The recent international peace march in Sri Lanka led by the Venerable Bhikkhu Thich Paññākāra from Vietnam with its message of loving kindness and mindfulness to all resonated strongly with the masses of people as seen by the crowds who thronged the roadsides to obtain blessings and show respect. This message stands in contrast to the sectarian resentment manifested by those who seek to use the cricket appointments as a weapon to attack the government at the present time. The challenges before the Sri Lanka Cricket Transformation Committee parallel the larger challenges before the government in developing the national economy and respecting ethnic and religious diversity. Plugging the leaks and restoring systems will take time and effort. It cannot be done overnight and it cannot succeed without public patience and support.
New Recognition
There is also a need for realism. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee does not guarantee success. Reforming deeply flawed institutions is always difficult. Besides, Sri Lanka is a small country with a relatively small population compared to many other cricket playing nations. It is also a country still recovering from the economic breakdown of 2022 which pushed the majority of people into hardship and severely weakened public institutions. The country continues to face unprecedented challenges including the damage caused by Cyclone Ditwah and the wider global economic uncertainties linked to conflict in the Middle East. Under these difficult circumstances Sri Lanka has fewer resources than many larger countries to devote to both cricket and economic development.
When resources are scarce they cannot be wasted through corruption or incompetence. Drawing upon the strengths of all those who are competent for the tasks at hand regardless of party affiliation or ethnic or religious identity is necessary if improvement is to come sooner rather than later. The burden of rebuilding the country cannot rest only on the government. The crisis facing the country is too deep for any single party or government to solve alone. National recovery requires capable individuals from across society and from different sectors such as business and civil society to work together in areas where the national interest transcends party politics. There is also a responsibility on opposition political parties to support initiatives that are politically neutral and genuinely in the national interest. Not every issue needs to become a partisan battle.
Sri Lanka cricket occupies a special place in the national consciousness. At its best it once united the country and gave Sri Lankans a sense of pride and international recognition. Restoring integrity and professionalism to cricket administration can therefore become part of the larger task of national renewal. The appointment of Eran Wickremaratne and the new committee, while it does not guarantee success, is a sign that the political leadership and people of the country may be beginning to mature in their approach to governance. In recognising the need for competence, integrity and bipartisan cooperation and extending it beyond cricket into other areas of national life, Sri Lanka may find the way towards more stable and successful governance..
by Jehan Perera
Features
From Dhaka to Sri Lanka, three wheels that drive our economies
Court vacation this year came with an unexpected lesson, not from a courtroom but from the streets of Dhaka — a city that moves, quite literally, on three wheels.
Above the traffic, a modern metro line glides past concrete pillars and crowded rooftops. It is efficient, clean and frequently cited as a symbol of progress in Bangladesh. For a visitor from Sri Lanka, it inevitably brings to mind our own abandoned light rail plans — a project debated, politicised and ultimately set aside.
But Dhaka’s real story is not in the air. It is on the ground.
Beneath the elevated tracks, the streets belong to three-wheelers. Known locally as CNGs, they cluster at junctions, line the edges of markets and pour into narrow roads that larger vehicles avoid. Even with a functioning rail system, these three-wheelers remain the city’s most dependable form of everyday transport.
Within hours of arriving, their importance becomes obvious. The train may take you across the city, but the journey does not end there. The last mile — often the most complicated part — belongs entirely to the three-wheeler. It is the vehicle that gets you home, to a meeting or simply through streets that no bus route properly serves.
There is a rhythm to using them. A destination is mentioned, a price is suggested and a brief negotiation follows. Then the ride begins, edging into traffic that feels permanently compressed. Drivers move with instinct, adjusting routes and squeezing through gaps with a confidence built over years.
It is not polished. But it works.
And that is where the comparison with Sri Lanka becomes less about what we lack and more about what we already have.
Back home, the three-wheeler has long been part of daily life — so familiar that it is often discussed only in terms of its problems. There are frequent complaints about fares, refusals or the absence of meters. More recently, the industry itself has become entangled in politics — from fuel subsidies to regulatory debates, from election-time promises to periodic crackdowns.
In that process, the conversation has shifted. The three-wheeler is often treated as a problem to be managed, rather than a service to be strengthened.
Yet, seen through the experience of Dhaka, Sri Lanka’s system begins to look far more settled — and, in many ways, ahead.
There is a growing structure in place. Meters, while not perfect, are widely recognised. Ride-hailing apps have added transparency and reduced uncertainty for passengers. There are clearer expectations on both sides — driver and commuter alike. Even small details, such as designated parking areas in parts of Colombo or the increasing standard of vehicles, point to an industry slowly moving towards professionalism.
Just as importantly, there is a human element that remains intact.
In Sri Lanka, a three-wheeler ride is rarely just a transaction. Drivers talk. They offer directions, comment on the day’s news, or share local knowledge. The ride becomes part of the social fabric, not just a means of getting from one point to another.
In Dhaka, the scale of the city leaves less room for that. The interaction is quicker, more direct, shaped by urgency. The service is essential, but it is under constant pressure.
What stands out, across both countries, is that the three-wheeler is not a temporary or outdated mode of transport. It is a necessity in dense, fast-growing Asian cities — one that fills gaps no rail or bus system can fully address.
Large infrastructure projects, like light rail, are important. They bring efficiency and long-term capacity. But they cannot replace the flexibility of a three-wheeler. They cannot reach into narrow streets, respond instantly to demand or provide that crucial last-mile connection.
That is why, even in a city that has invested heavily in modern rail, Dhaka still runs on three wheels.
For Sri Lanka, the lesson is not simply about what could have been built, but about what should be better managed and valued.
The three-wheeler industry does not need to be politicised at every turn. It needs steady regulation — clear fare systems, proper licensing, safety standards — alongside encouragement and recognition. It needs to be seen as part of the solution to urban transport, not as a side issue.
Because for thousands of drivers, it is a livelihood. And for millions of passengers, it is the most immediate and reliable form of mobility.
The tuk-tuk may not feature in grand policy speeches or infrastructure blueprints. It does not run on elevated tracks or attract international attention. But on the ground, where daily life unfolds, it continues to do what larger systems often struggle to do — show up, adapt and keep moving.
And after watching Dhaka’s streets — crowded, relentless, yet functioning — that small, three-wheeled vehicle feels less like something to argue over and more like something to get right.
(The writer is an Attorney-at-Law with over a decade of experience specialising in civil law, a former Board Member of the Office of Missing Persons and a former Legal Director of the Central Cultural Fund. He holds an LLM in International Business Law)
by Sampath Perera recently in Dhaka, Bangladesh
Features
Dubai scene … opening up
According to reports coming my way, the entertainment scene, in Dubai, is very much opening up, and buzzing again!
After a quieter few months, May is packed with entertainment and the whole scene, they say, is shifting back into full swing.
The Seven Notes band, made up of Sri Lankans, based in Dubai, are back in the spotlight, after a short hiatus, due to the ongoing Middle East problems.
On 18th April they did Legends Night at Mercure Hotel Dubai Barsha Heights; on Thursday, 9th May, they will be at the Sports Bar of the Mercure Hotel for 70s/80s Retro Night; on 6th June, they will be at Al Jadaf Dubai to provide the music for Sandun Perera live in concert … and with more dates to follow.
These events are expected to showcase the band’s evolving sound, tighter stage coordination, and stronger audience engagement.
With each performance, the band aims to refine its identity and build a loyal following within Dubai’s vibrant nightlife and event scene.

Pasindu Umayanga: The group’s new vocalist
What makes Seven Notes standout is their versatility which has made the band a dynamic and promising act.
With a growing performance calendar, new talent integration, and international ambitions, the band is definitely entering a defining phase of its journey.
Dubai’s music industry, I’m told, thrives on diversity, energy, and audience connection, with live bands playing a crucial role in elevating events—from corporate shows to private concerts. Against this backdrop, Seven Notes is positioning itself not just as another band, but as a performance-driven musical unit focused on consistency and growth.
Adding fresh momentum to the group is Pasindu Umayanga who joins Seven Notes as their new vocalist. This move signals a strategic upgrade—not just filling a role, but strengthening the band’s front-line presence.
Looking beyond local stages, Seven Notes is preparing for an international tour, to Korea, in July.

Bassist Niluk Uswaththa: Spokesperson for Seven Notes
According to bassist Niluk Uswaththa, taking a band abroad means: Your sound must hold up against unfamiliar audiences, your performance must translate beyond language, and your discipline must be at a professional level.
“If executed well, this tour could redefine Seven Notes from a local band into an emerging international act,” added Niluk.
He went on to say that Dubai is not an easy market. It’s saturated with highly experienced, multi-genre bands that can adapt instantly to any crowd.
“To stand out consistently you need to have tight rehearsal discipline, unique sound identity (not just covers), strong stage chemistry, audience retention – not just applause.”
No doubt, Seven Notes is entering a critical growth phase—new member, multiple shows, and an international tour on the horizon. The opportunity is real, but so is the pressure.
However, there is talk that Seven Notes will soon be a recognised name in the regional music scene.
-
News6 days agoTreasury chief’s citizenship details sought from Australia
-
News5 days agoRooftop Solar at Crossroads as Sri Lanka Shifts to Distributed Energy Future
-
News4 days ago“Three-in-one blood pressure pill can significantly reduce risk of recurrent strokes”
-
News6 days agoCentral Province one before last in AL results
-
Sports6 days agoWell done AKD!
-
News4 days agoAlarm raised over plan to share Lanka’s biometric data with blacklisted Indian firm
-
News2 days agoEaster Sunday Case: Ex-SIS Chief concealed intel, former Defence Secy tells court
-
News4 days agoUSD 2.5 mn fraud probe: Interdicted MoF official found dead at home




