Connect with us

News

Forced disappearances, a contentious issue warranting NPP’s attention – FSP

Published

on

Pubudu Jayagoda

Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) spokesperson Pubudu Jayagoda said that in spite of repeated assurances given to the Geneva-based Human Rights Council and some members of the international community regarding disappearances during the conflict and after successive governments hadn’t been genuine in their efforts to address the issue.

The JVP-led National People’s Power (NPP) seemed to be no exception, Jayagoda alleged, urging the incumbent government to pay special attention to what he called disappearance issue. Jayagoda said that different governments caused thousands of disappearances during the southern insurgency and north-east conflict.

Although the issue had been taken up specially during national elections and promises made to the electorate, families of the victims as well as other concerned parties were disappointed with the way the issue was addressed.

Jayagoda said that the FSP wouldn’t under any circumstances give up its fight for Lalith Kumar Weeraraju and Kugan Muruganandan whose disappearance on Human Rights Day Dec 10, 14 years ago received public attention both here and abroad.

Pointing out that those disappearances took place two years after the end of war during Mahinda Rajapaksa’s second term, Jayagoda said that those responsible were yet to be brought to justice.

JVP dissidents officially formed FSP in early April 2012, about five months after the disappearance of Weeraraju and Muruganandan last seen on the evening of Dec 09 as they left Muragananda’s home at Avarangal, Jaffna. However, the split happened in September 2011, about three months before the Jaffna disappearances.

Jaffna Magistrate court directed the then Defence Secretary Gotabaya Rajapaksa who served as the President from Nov 2019 to July 2022 to furnish an affidavit to court on 6 February, 2026 regarding his inability to appear in Jaffna court in view of the death threats on his life.

Referring to countrywide disappearances during the conflicts and post-conflict periods, Jayagoda cited the disappearance of Weeraraju and Kugan to highlight Sri Lanka’s overall response to forced disappearances. Responding to The Island queries, Jayagoda underscored the need to examine the role of the Office of the Missing Persons (OMP) established through an Act of Parliament in line with understanding and agreement with the HRC. Had it been able to expedite the process and restore confidence among the public with regard to addressing long standing cases, Jayagoda said, appealing to the powers that be not to side-step the issue.

Jayagoda alleged that the NPP hadn’t acted on the issue as anticipated by those who voted for the party at presidential and parliamentary polls last year. The NPP couldn’t forget that the party won lion’s share of votes at both national elections in the northern and eastern provinces because Tamil speaking people believed their sincerity in addressing accountability issues.

Justice Maxwell Paranagama’s Presidential Commission Report on disappearances estimated the number of disappeared at over 25,000, Jayagoda said. Instead of taking tangible measures regarding the disclosures, observations and recommendations made by Justice Paranagama, successive governments muddied the water.

Jayagoda said that the government couldn’t delay taking action to bring closure to disappearances. Declaring that the country was in dire straits due to massive destruction caused by cyclone Ditwah recently and early recovery seemed impossible, Jayagoda emphasized that shouldn’t be an excuse for the government to turn a blind eye to other contentious issues.

Responding to another query, the ex-JVPer said that the JVP should be deeply concerned about the issue as during the 1971 and the late 80s insurgencies the party too lost so many members.

By Shamindra Ferdinando ✍️



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ to be launched on 30 October to Modernise the Agricultural Sector Through Digitalisation

Published

on

By

A discussion on the official launch of the ‘AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ programme was held at the Presidential Secretariat on Tuesday  (13) morning between Secretary to the President Dr. Nandika Sanath Kumanayake and a delegation led by Gevorg Sargsyan, World Bank Group Manager for Sri Lanka and the Maldives.

The discussion focused on the official launch of the ‘AgriConnect Sri Lanka’ programme, scheduled to take place on 30 October at TRACE Expert City.

The World Bank delegation provided a comprehensive briefing on the programme and emphasised that Sri Lanka is set to become the first country in South Asia to join this global initiative of the World Bank Group, marking a significant milestone.

Victor Anthonypillai, Senior Country Officer of the International Finance Corporation (IFC), Tomas Ricardo Rosada Villamar Practice Manager at the World Bank, Felipe F. Dizon, Senior Economist and Athula Senaratne, Senior Agriculture Specialist, also attended the meeting. The Presidential Secretariat was represented by Senior Assistant Secretary to the President Dr Danushka Perera and Assistant Secretary to the President R. A. Ruwanpathirana.

President’s Media Division (PMD)

Continue Reading

News

Prison rules to be revised over monks’ attire

Published

on

Harshana

Appointment of committee eyewash, says UNP

The government is considering changes to prison regulations pertaining to the treatment of Buddhist monks serving jail terms, including their right to wear monastic robes when taken outside prison.

Justice and National Integration Minister Harshana Nanayakkara announced the proposed changes yesterday (14) following the submission of an interim report by a committee appointed to review the rules and procedures governing prisons.

The report was handed over to Secretary to the President Dr Nandika Sanath Kumanayake at the Presidential Secretariat.

One of the key recommendations is to amend Prison Standing Order 356 by introducing a new provision, 356(A). The proposed revision would require prison authorities to consult the Department of Buddhist Affairs on the removal of a monk’s robes upon admission to prison. The Commissioner of Prisons would be allowed 10 days to notify the department and take the necessary steps.

A separate amendment to Departmental Order 550 would allow Buddhist monks to wear their robes whenever they are taken outside prison, unless their respective Nikaya formally requests that the privilege be withdrawn.

The committee has also recommended extending similar arrangements, with suitable modifications, to members of other religious clergy who are imprisoned.

The proposals follow concerns raised over the treatment of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera after he was taken into custody. President Anura Kumara Dissanayake subsequently held discussions with representatives of the three main Buddhist Nikayas and appointed the committee to examine the existing legal framework.

Nanayakkara said the interim report had been forwarded to the Acting Commissioner General of Prisons, along with instructions to revise the relevant standing orders in accordance with its recommendations.

The proposed amendments have yet to be confirmed as formally implemented.

Meanwhile, the UNP yesterday criticised the government’s decision to appoint a committee to make recommendations on the attire to be worn by imprisoned Buddhist monks and other religious leaders when taken outside prison, describing the move as unnecessary.

In a statement issued yesterday (14), the UNP said the procedures governing the matter were already clearly set out in the Department of Prisons’ Standing Orders, making the appointment of a separate committee unwarranted.

The party cited remarks by Professor G.L. Peiris, Convenor of the Janathawadi Joint Opposition, who had described the committee’s appointment as a

“complete eyewash” and questioned the need for such a move.

Referring to Standing Order 550 of the Prisons Department, the UNP said convicted prisoners appearing before court for legal proceedings should not be required to wear prison uniforms.

It further stated that the regulations allowed prisoners to wear civilian clothing consistent with what they wore before imprisonment, including attire appropriate to their cultural and religious backgrounds.

The UNP accused the government of unnecessarily prolonging the issue by appointing a committee, despite the existence of regulations governing prisoners’ attire.

The party also called on the government to seek forgiveness from the Mahanayake Thera and the Sangha Council of the Kotte Sri Kalyani Samagri Dharma Maha Sangha Sabha of the Siyam Maha Nikaya over the decision concerning the religious attire of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera.

Continue Reading

News

AC President recuses himself from hearing prison attire case pertaining to Gnanasara Thera

Published

on

Court of Appeal President Justice Rohantha Abeysuriya yesterday withdrew from the bench hearing petitions challenging the decision by prison authorities to require Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire following his imprisonment.

The decision was announced when the petitions seeking to invalidate the prison authorities’ decision were taken up for consideration on October 14.

Following his withdrawal, a three-judge bench was appointed to hear the petitions.

The petitions relate to the prison authorities’ decision to require Gnanasara Thera to wear prison attire after he was taken into custody to serve the remainder of his sentence for contempt of court.

In September this year, the Supreme Court annulled the presidential pardon granted to Gnanasara Thera by former President Maithripala Sirisena in May 2019.

Following the ruling, the Court of Appeal directed the Commissioner General of Prisons to take the necessary steps to enforce the remainder of the monk’s prison sentence.

Gnanasara Thera had originally been sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for contempt of court but had served only around nine months before receiving the presidential pardon in 2019.

Continue Reading

Trending