Connect with us

News

Ex-AG backs IMF bailout conditions

Published

on

reminds how Yahapalanaya diluted National Audit Bill to appease corrupt lot

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Former Auditor General Gamini Wijesinghe yesterday (06) said that the weakening of the National Audit Bill, before Parliament endorsed the new law in early July 2018, too, had contributed to the collapse of the national economy. Alleging that the then Sirisena-Wickremesinghe coalition and influential public servants sabotaged their efforts to introduce a new law that could have been effectively used against corruption at all levels, Wijesinghe pointed out that the recently issued IMF’s Governance Diagnostic Assessment report on Sri Lanka demanded that the National Audit Act should be amended.

Although the Act provided for the powers, duties and functions of the Audit Service Commission and the establishment of the National Audit Office and the Sri Lanka State Audit Service and specified the role of the Auditor General over public finance, the then government ensured it lacked key provisions to deal with public sector waste, corruption, irregularities and mismanagement, Wijesinghe said.The IMF’s 16-point preconditions for the resumption and continuation of USD 2.9 bn bailout package exposed our entirely corrupt political party and public administration system, the retired Auditor General said. Those in Opposition couldn’t exploit the IMF’s demands for their advantage because they, too, were responsible for ruination of the national economy.

Wijesinghe said so responding to SJB lawmaker Dr. Harsha de Silva’s declaration that the failure on the part of the government to address deep-rooted corruption hampered financial recovery. Wijesinghe, who served as the AG from Nov. 2015 to April 2019, emphasized that economist Harsha represented the UNP at the time that party sabotaged the National Audit Bill. “What was finally enacted by the UNP and SLFP combine didn’t address primary concerns,” the outspoken official said, adding that the original Bill was meant to rein in top public sector management responsible for massive corruption.

Responding to another query, Wijesinghe said that the enactment of the new National Audit Bill was a key pledge made by the UNP-led coalition that backed Maithripala Sirisena at the 2015 January presidential election. Actually, it was to be introduced on 19 Feb., 2015, at the commencement of their 100-day Yahapalana programme, the present day civil society activist said, adding that the UNP and those who now represented the main Opposition SJB and the then divided UPFA worked against their effort.

Wijesinghe alleged that major political parties feared offending the public service. According to Wijesinghe, political parties pursued strategies in collaboration with the top management of the public administration for their benefit. “The position taken by the IMF should be appreciated and supported though the country was humiliated”, but such external pressure from lending bodies and bilateral donors were required to compel the parliament to take remedial measures the ex-AG said.

Declaring whatever the lame excuse trotted out by the government the IMF had suspended the second tranche amounting to USD 330 mn pending fresh staff-level agreement with Sri Lanka, Wijesinghe said that regardless the country being in such a precarious situation, the Parliament continued to turn a blind eye. “Allegations traded by government and Opposition members do not serve any purpose.

Whatever happens they are still committed to continue with the same system,” Wijesinghe said, pointing out that no political leader had the courage to tackle corruption. Referring to Treasury bond scams that had been perpetrated in Feb. 2015 and March 2016, the former Auditor General said that the Parliament’s response proved the public couldn’t depend on the legislature. Wijesinghe said that Sri Lanka should have acted two decades ago when corruption emerged as a major threat to political, economic and social stability.

The IMF’s demands (1) Establishment of an Advisory Committee by November 2023 to nominate commissioners for the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC), (2) Disclosure of asset declarations of senior officials by July 2024, (3) Enactment of proceeds of crime legislation by April 2024, (4) Amendment of the National Audit Act, (5) Finalization of implementation of regulations for beneficial ownership information and creating a public registry by April 2024, (6) Enactment of Public Procurement Law by December 2024, (7) Publishing reports on increasing competitive tendered procurement contracts, targeting agencies with low levels of competition, (8) Requiring the publication of all public procurement contracts above LKRs 1 billion, (9) Implementing the State-Owned Enterprise Reform Policy to ensure ethical management, (10) Abolishing or suspending the Strategic Development Projects Office Act until a transparent process for evaluating proposals is established, (11) Amending tax legislation to prevent unilateral tax changes without parliamentary approval, (12) Implementing short-term anti-corruption measures within revenue departments to enhance oversight and sanctions, (13) Exploring options for new management arrangements for the Employees Provident Fund to avoid conflicts of interest, (14) Revising legislation, regulations, and processes for stronger oversight in the banking sector, (15) Establishing an online digital land registry and ensuring progress in registering/titling-state land and (16) Expanding the resources and skills available to the Judicial Services Commission to strengthen justice.



Latest News

Sun directly overhead Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura at about 12.10 noon today (31)

Published

on

By

The sun is going to be directly over the latitudes of Sri Lanka from  28th of August to 07th of September due to its apparent southward relative motion.

The nearest places of Sri Lanka over which the sun is overhead today (31) are Neriyakulam, Punewa, Kebithigollewa, Pankulam and Sinhapura about 12.10 noon.

Continue Reading

News

BASL takes exception to Justice Ganepola being denied a place in SC

Published

on

… highlights injustice caused to Justice R. Gurusinghe

The Bar Association of Sri Lanka (BASL) has alleged that due to the failure on the part of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake to fill the existing vacancies in the Supreme Court, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled. The BASL pointed out at the time of Ganepola’s retirement there were four vacancies in the Supreme Court.

In a letter dated 17 August, 2026, addressed to President Dissanayake, the BASL declared that the failure to promote and recognise Ganepola’s distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

A top BASL spokesman told The Island yesterday (30) that the Bar Council, over the weekend, had decided to release the hitherto confidential letter.

The official said that they also wanted to remind the President of his assurance given to BASL, on 12 August, 2026, that vacancies in the Supreme Court and Court of Appeal would be filled as soon as possible, within a month.

The following is the text of the BASL letter, signed by  Rajeev Amarasuriya, President, BASL, and its Secretary Nalin De Silva: “We write further to our letters dated 29th December 2025 and 30th June 2026 in relation to the above, to which we have not received any response.

We also refer to our meeting with Your Excellency on 12th August. As discussed during the meeting, there have been vacancies in the Supreme Court since May 2025, and the number of vacancies has now increased to four (04). There are also four (04) vacancies in the Court of Appeal. These are all matters we have already written to Your Excellency about.

Your Excellency informed the BASL Delegation when we met that you would be taking steps to make recommendations to fill these vacancies as soon as possible, within a month.

We write to reiterate the importance of giving due consideration to the criteria set out in our aforesaid letter dated 29th December 2025. We also wish to emphasise that, in making judicial appointments and promotions, seniority should be given due priority, in keeping with longstanding practice, until such time there are objective and defensible guidelines governing the assessment of merit.

The only justifiable departure to this criterion would be where there exists a specific and recognized demerit in respect of the particular Judge concerned or such other known compelling circumstances that are objectively identifiable such as where a Judge has previously been overlooked for promotion unfairly or conversely, where a Judge has been unfairly previously granted promotions above others.

This approach will safeguard both the integrity of the Judiciary and the trust reposed in it by the public.

Further, while there has been considerable discussion and representation by the Government regarding the importance of retaining experienced judges, as reminded to Your Excellency at our said meeting that, only a few months ago on 8th May 2026, a Senior Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice Dhammika Ganepola, retired at the age of 63 without being considered for, or granted, a promotion to the Supreme Court, to which he was well entitled, and in which there were four vacancies at the time.

The failure to promote and recognise his distinguished judicial service, resulting in his retirement at the age of 63, is indeed a loss to the Judiciary.

We also drew Your Excellency’s attention at the said meeting to the fact that the Senior-most Justice of the Court of Appeal, Justice R. Gurusinghe, who joined the Judicial Service in 1996, who also Acted in the Office of President of the Court of Appeal (appointed by Your Excellency) on 11th May 2026, is due to retire at the end of this month. In fact, we learnt through the Media that Her Ladyship then Chief Justice Justice Murdu Fernando, PC, had previously in July 2025 recommended to Your Excellency the promotion of Justice R. Gurusinghe to the Supreme Court, but the same is pending from that time.

 He too is well deserving of promotion to the Supreme Court and has already been recommended by the former Chief Justice, and his case must also receive due and urgent consideration before his impending retirement.

We hope that Your Excellency will take due note of and give due regard to the concerns of the Bar, as well as to the established principles, practices and conventions governing judicial appointments, when taking steps to fill these vacancies.

On this, Your Excellency is already open to the accusation that these vacancies have been kept open, to fill with favourites of the Government which is yet another serious indictment on the independence of the judiciary which accusation would be confirmed if recommendations are made outside established practice.

Moreover, the BASL expresses grave concern that withholding promotions of Judicial Officers for extended periods of time places undue pressure on Judicial Officers in the discharge of their duties and constitutes both directly and indirectly, interference with the independence of the Judiciary, in addition to the strain obviously caused to the dispensation of justice in other Courts and the stifling and delay of career progression of Judges legitimately entitled to promotions.

We do hope that Your Excellency would take due note and cognizance of the foregoing when effecting these judicial promotions which have been long overdue and which have already adversely impacted the efficiency and effectiveness of the administration of justice.”

The BASL has copied the letter to Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickremaratne, Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa and all members of the Constitutional Council.

Continue Reading

News

Sajith challenges govt. to hold PC polls

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa on Saturday (29) challenged the government to hold the long-delayed Provincial Council elections, saying the polls would provide an opportunity to gauge the level of public support enjoyed by the administration.

Addressing a farmers’ meeting in Tissamaharama, Hambantota, Premadasa also criticised the latest Rs. 17 per kilogram increase in wheat flour prices, warning that it would push up the prices of bread, bakery products and other flour-based food items and place further pressure on households already struggling with the rising cost of living.

He said Sri Lanka ranked 120th among 130 countries in an international comparison of minimum wages, arguing that wages remained inadequate to meet the escalating cost of living.

Premadasa also questioned official assessments of living standards, asking whether a person could survive for an entire month on Rs. 17,315, a figure he attributed to the Department of Census and Statistics.

He claimed that between 30 and 40 percent of the population was living in poverty and called for a clear programme to help affected families improve their economic conditions.

Turning to the proposed 22nd Amendment to the Constitution, which seeks to increase the retirement age of superior court judges, the Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to undermine judicial independence and interfere with democratic institutions.

He also criticised the government’s handling of poverty, employment, agriculture, healthcare and investment, saying more effective measures were needed to provide relief to people facing economic hardships.Premadasa called for stronger policies to attract foreign direct investment and urged the government to formulate a national strategy for developing the tourism industry.

Continue Reading

Trending