Connect with us

Sports

England manager on decision to stay, World Cup & human rights

Published

on

Gareth Southgate considered stepping down as England boss because of criticism he faced before the World Cup, saying: “The last thing you want as a manager is that your presence is divisive and inhibits performance.”

England were knocked out of the tournament by France in the quarter-finals, 18 months after losing the Euro 2020 final to Italy on penalties at Wembley.The team were booed off in June following a 4-0 defeat against Hungary at Molineux in the Nations League – part of a generally poor series of results leading into the winter World Cup.

Explaining for the first time how he reached the decision to stay in his job, he told BBC Sport: “I never want to be in a position where my presence is affecting the team in a negative way.

“I didn’t believe that was the case, but I just wanted a period after the World Cup to reflect and make sure that was still how it felt.”

The 52-year-old said he asked himself: “Is it the right thing to keep taking this project on? I wanted to make sure I’m still fresh and hungry for that challenge.”

Describing his role as “the greatest privilege of my life”, he said the decision to stay was ultimately “not difficult” because of “the quality of performances and the progress that we’re making”.

“The team are still improving. We’re all gaining belief in what we’re doing,” he said.

In a wide-ranging interview conducted at the team’s training base St George’s Park, Southgate:

strongly suggested he considered announcing last year that Qatar would be his final tournament to “free that narrative up so the support is behind the team, and not debating whether the manager should be there or not”

said getting knocked out in the quarter-final was “really difficult to take” but the support from players and fans “definitely lifts you”

revealed he was “comfortable” with his tactics during the defeat to France and had no regrets

insisted England are “really competitive against everybody now” and is “very confident” about their chances at next year’s European Championship in Germany

Pre-Qatar doubts

In the immediate aftermath of his team’s defeat to France six weeks ago, Southgate said he felt “conflicted” about his future, having “found large parts of the last 18 months difficult”.

England went into the World Cup on the back of relegation from their Nations League group and during the Hungary defeat some England fans chanted “you don’t know what you’re doing” at the manager.

After failing to match both the semi-final he led England to in the 2018 World Cup and the final of Euro 2020, Southgate said he would “review and reflect”.

But a week later the FA announced he would see out the remaining two years of his contract. Now, in his first public comments since that decision, Southgate has opened up on the effect the criticism he received following the Hungary defeat had on him.

“I was worried after that game the team would be affected by the narrative about whether the manager stay or go, and when we went into the games in September we were a little bit anxious.

“At Wembley against Germany the crowd weren’t against their team but they were waiting to see what happened.

“I’ve been around teams where that can inhibit performance, and the last thing you want as a manager is that your presence is divisive and inhibits performance.

“I knew I had support with the players and [the FA], there are bigger things at stake with England than just [that].

“My only concern… was when it feels like there might be division between what the fans want and where my position might have been, that can affect the team, and I was conscious of that leading into the World Cup.

“I felt we had great support, but I was conscious… how would things be during and after?”

Southgate says his team recovered before the World Cup, but that he wanted to be sure after the tournament that staying was the right thing for his side.

“You need to give yourself time in these situations to make good decisions,” he said.

“I think it’s easy to rush things when emotions are high, and very often you have to sleep a little bit more and come to the right conclusions.

“The question for me was… ‘is it the right thing to keep taking this project on?’ Because it’s not just the six years I’ve been with the seniors – I’ve been here 10 years with developing everything as well. So I wanted to make sure I’m still fresh and hungry for that challenge.”

‘Trying to break through history’

In an indication of how close he had come to announcing before the World Cup that he would step down following the tournament, Southgate said: “My thinking is always around, ‘How does this affect the team?’

“Is this going to give the team the best chance going into the World Cup?” he added.

“Do we need to free that narrative up so the support is behind the team, and not debating whether the manager should be there or not? But I think we came through that period.”

Asked whether he wavered as he weighed up whether to stay, Southgate said: “Not after the World Cup. In the lead-in that was a little bit different.

“I wasn’t quite sure how things would play out, and I think it’s always right to judge an international manager on their tournaments.

“Our performances were good. With France, across the flow of the game, we should win. But football is a low-scoring game where small margins make a difference.

“And we have to make sure now those small margins are turned in our favour. We’re much closer now to really having that belief to win. We’ve still got a small step to take – I saw progress in the team from our performances in the Euros.

“We’re trying to break through history here as well as against opponents that are high-level. I feel we’re really competitive against everybody now.

“Outside of France, and you could argue Croatia, we’ve probably been as consistent as any team in terms of our finishes. And I think people have enjoyed that journey with us.”

Asked how it would have felt to see someone else take over, Southgate replied: “I’m never worried about somebody else taking over and benefiting, that’s how it should work.

“We’re talking about building a future for England for now, for the next tournament, but also beyond that.”

‘Exit was difficult to take’

Southgate said the support he received from players and fans after the France defeat “definitely lifts you”.

“The moment you depart is really difficult to take, and you know the steps you have to take for the next one,” he said.

“But I don’t think you can make decisions as a manager just on having support from everybody because you’re never going to have support of everybody.”

While most of Southgate’s selections paid off in Qatar, and his team showed more attacking intent than previously, there was some criticism that he waited until the 85th minute against France to introduce in-form Manchester United striker Marcus Rashford.

When asked if he had any regrets about the match, he said: “I don’t really. What I’ve learned in this job, whenever the result doesn’t go as you hope then the solution is always the things you didn’t do, because of course nobody knows what they might look like.

“So I’m comfortable with that. I think we used the squad well. There can always be an argument for a different player providing something at a different time.”

‘Gaining belief’

When it was suggested to Southgate that some fans feel a new manager is needed to help deliver silverware for England, he said: “I think if our performances weren’t at the level they had been, then I think there would be a little bit more legitimacy in that argument.

(BBC Sports)



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Can West Indies make up for bowling gulf in virtual quarter-final against India?

Published

on

By

Suryakumar Yadav and Tilak Varma prepare for India's match against West Indies [Cricinfo]

This fixture was, of course, known in advance, but the stakes are somewhat surprising. Neither was it expected that India could be knocked out of their own party if they lose to West Indies nor was it expected that West Indies could go to the semi-finals if they win this match.

The expected result still is for India to overcome that one blip against South Africa and make it to the semi-finals. Then again, jeopardy and unpredictability are at the heart of this format.

The path to get here has been similar for both teams: a thumping loss to South Africa and a resounding win over Zimbabwe. Even their scores against Zimbabwe were nearly identical.

West Indies are one team India haven’t faced in their dominant run starting with the 2024 T20 World Cup. They are, in fact, the last team to have beaten India in a series way back in August 2023.

Both sides have improved since then. India are a well-oiled domination machine, West Indies have put together scary six-hitters who have happened to hit form. They have hit more sixes than any side at any T20 World Cup, and India are three behind them with 63 so far.

It is with the ball that India hold an advantage. India’s bowlers are match-winners. They have pace and mystery. It gives them room for error. West Indies are a strictly defensive bowling unit. They’ll need everything to go their way to get the better of India.

He might have taken just 26 balls to get there against Zimbabwe, but it was Abhishek Sharma’s  second-slowest fifty in T20Is. That’s because he had scored just 15 runs in the first four matches, which made him take his time against offspin, scoring just 13 off 17 balls against that style of bowling. That makes Roston Chase an important player even though he went for 46 against South Africa. He is the only spinner in the West Indies squad who takes his stock ball away from left-hand batters; India have five of them in their top eight.

Rinku Singh lost his father after the match against Zimbabwe, which he missed with India bringing in Sanju Samson to break up the left-hand batters in the top order. He is expected to join the squad on Saturday night but isn’t expected to play.

India (probable):  Abhishek Sharma,  Sanju Samson (wk), Ishan Kishan, Tilak Varma,  Suryakumar Yadav (capt),  Hardik Pandya, Shivam Dube,  Axar Patel,  Arshdeep Singh,  Jasprit Bumrah,  Varun Chakravarthy.

Brandon King, who had sustained an injury against South Africa, is fit and available, which should suggest no changes for West Indies.

West Indies (probable):  Brandon King, Shai Hope (capt & wk),  Shimron Hetmyer,  Rovman Powell,  Roston Chase, Sherfane Rutherford,  Romario Shepherd,  Jason Holder, Matthew Forde,  Gudakesh Motie,  Shamar Joseph.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

South Africa put spotless record on the line in all-African clash

Published

on

By

Corbin Bosch has been sensational in the death [Cricinfo]

South Africa have had a near-perfect tournament so far. Fifty games in, they are the only unbeaten side in this 20-team T20 World Cup and are poised to enter the semi-finals with a spotless record. On Sunday, Aiden Markram’s men will meet their neighbours Zimbabwe, who last beat South Africa in international cricket way back in 2000. Overall, Zimbabwe have beaten South Africa just twice in 58 completed international matches.

Apart from history, the conditions and recent form are also against Zimbabwe. After toppling Australia and Sri Lanka in Sri Lanka, Zimbabwe have struggled across the board in India. Having suffered back-to-back defeats on flatter pitches at the Wankhede and Chepauk, Zimbabwe were knocked out of contention for the semi-finals.

Their bowlers conceded back-to-back 250-plus totals against West Indies and India. The indiscipline has seeped into their fielding as well: after dropping just one catch in the group stage, Zimbabwe have shelled at least five chances in two matches in the Super Eight. Yet they have had plenty of reasons to celebrate, including avoiding going through the qualifiers for the 2028 T20 World Cup.

South Africa may rest some of their key players as they did earlier in another dead rubber against UAE in Delhi.

A late bloomer in international cricket, allrounder Corbin Bosch has barely been needed with the bat in this competition, but has been South Africa’s go-to bowler in the death overs. He has bowled 54 balls between overs 16 and 20, conceding just 56 runs while taking three wickets. Lungi Ngidi’s variations have grabbed the headlines, but Bosch has certainly played his part with variations of his own, especially the yorker.

Brad  Evans also has a good slower ball in his repertoire, but didn’t find grip at Wankhede or Chepauk. His slower ones slid onto the bat, making it easier for batters to line him up. Can he find a way to be more potent in these conditions and sign off on a high?

With not much riding on this fixture, South Africa may empty their bench again and keep some of their first-choice players fresh for the knockouts. Jason Smith, Kwena Maphaka, George Linde and Anrich Nortje all could add to their caps.

South Africa (probable): Aiden Markram (capt),  Quinton de Kock (wk),  Ryan Rickelton,  Dewald Brevis, Jason Smith/David Miller,  Tristan Stubbs,  Marco Jansen/Kwena Maphaka, Corbin Bosch,  Kagiso Rabada,  Keshav Maharaj/George Linde, Lungi Ngidi/Anrich Nortje

The presence of four left-handers in South Africa’s top seven may keep left-arm fingerspinner Wellington Masakadza on the bench. Zimbabwe, though, may consider bringing wristspinner Graeme Cremer back in place of medium-pacer Tinotenda Maposa.

Zimbabwe (probable): Brian Bennett, Tadiwanashe Marumani (wk), Dion Myers, Ryan Burl, Sikandar Raza (capt),  Tony Munyonga, Tashinga Musekiwa, Brad Evans,  Graeme Cremer,  Blessing Muzarabani, Richard Ngarava

Continue Reading

Sports

A World Cup wake-up call

Published

on

Those of us who have earned our bread and butter from this grand old game have a duty to guard its gates. Cricket has been our benefactor; we cannot now let the grass grow under our feet and drift into mediocrity. Wednesday night’s painful exit from the T20 World Cup left 35,000 fans at the ground shell-shocked, while millions more switched off their televisions hoping it was all a bad dream. Sri Lanka are better than this.

When Pramodya Wickramasinghe and Dasun Shanaka were brought back to spearhead the national selection panel and the team respectively, there were murmurs in cricketing corridors that the move could boomerang. Those warnings were brushed aside. Today, the heat is being felt in the boardrooms.

Shanaka’s elevation never quite passed the straight-face test. He had been dropped for poor returns and since his comeback was scrapping to hold onto his place in the XI. To fast-track him to the captaincy was a gamble that has now backfired. The argument that he was “trustworthy” and “obedient” to the authorities hardly forms the blueprint of great leadership.

Sri Lanka’s finest skippers – Bandula Warnapura, Arjuna Ranatunga, Mahela Jayawardene and Kumar Sangakkara – were never nodding puppets. They did not always see eye to eye with administrators, but strong leaders seldom do. That friction, at times, sharpened the blade rather than blunt it.

It was widely known that Shanaka’s tactical acumen would be tested under fire. What has startled many, even within his own establishment, is the decision to bowl first in a must-win clash against New Zealand, a call that raised eyebrows and in some quarters, questions about judgment and conviction. On surfaces where scoreboard pressure is king, Sri Lanka blinked first. You never bowl first at RPS. It’s always a bat first track.

The selectors, too, must front up over the late drama surrounding Dhananjaya de Silva’s inclusion on the eve of the tournament. It smacked of muddled thinking. When tried and tested policies are abandoned at the eleventh hour, you often end up padding up without a plan. An opportunity to back clarity and continuity was squandered.

To be fair, Sri Lanka Cricket faced a Hobson’s choice in appointing a chief selector, with few eager to walk into a thankless job. Yet stability might have served them better. Upul Tharanga had steadied the ship and deserved a longer rope rather than another shake up that unsettled the dressing room.

Finger pointing, however, will not mend broken campaigns. If the game we cherish is to thrive, solutions must replace soundbites. The recurring injury cloud is a glaring concern. This is not the first global event Wanindu Hasaranga has missed and as former captain Marvan Atapattu queried in these columns, should SLC rethink the volume of No Objection Certificates handed out for franchise leagues? You cannot flog your thoroughbreds year-round and expect them fresh for the big dance.

Playing spin has long been Sri Lanka’s Achilles heel. The emergence of Pavan Rathnayake has offered a glimmer of hope, his nimble footwork and soft hands suggesting a player cut from sturdier cloth. But one swallow does not make a summer. The talent pool must be widened and deepened.

Then there is the Lanka Premier League, a tournament that has promised much but delivered in fits and starts. Constant ownership changes and questionable investors have left it looking like a ship without a steady captain. SLC cannot have their cake and eat it. If the LPL is merely a cash cow, the national side will pay the price. If it is to be a genuine pathway to the Sri Lanka cap, then profits may need trimming in favour of purpose. The bigger picture is preparing cricketers hardened enough for the global arena.

Finally, the idea of a fully-fledged Cricket Academy deserves some thinking. Former cricket chief Hemaka Amarasuriya was keen on such a venture, not merely to polish cover drives and yorkers, but to mould character. Cricketing education must extend beyond the boundary rope. Discipline, resilience and decision-making are as vital as strike rates and economy figures.

by Rex Clementine

 

Continue Reading

Trending