Connect with us

Latest News

Elon Musk’s Tesla recalls two million cars in US over Autopilot defect

Published

on

Tesla is recalling more than two million cars after the US regulator found its driver assistance system, Autopilot, was partly defective.

It follows a two year investigation into crashes which occurred when the tech was in use.

The recall applies to almost every Tesla sold in the US since the Autopilot feature was launched in 2015.

Tesla, owned by billionaire Elon Musk, said it would send a software update “over the air” to fix the issue. The update happens automatically and does not require a visit to a dealership or garage, but is still referred to by the US regulator as a recall.

The UK Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency said it was not aware of any safety issues involving Teslas in the UK, noting that cars sold in the UK are not equipped with all of the same features as cars in the US. “Teslas sold in the UK market are not self-driving and are not approved to do so,” a spokesperson said, adding that the agency would continue to monitor the situation.

Autopilot is meant to help with steering, acceleration and braking – but, despite the name, the car still requires driver input.

Tesla’s software is supposed to make sure that drivers are paying attention and that the feature is only in use in appropriate conditions, such as driving on highways.

But the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said a two-year investigation of 956 Tesla crashes found that “the prominence and scope of the feature’s controls may not be sufficient to prevent driver misuse. Automated technology holds great promise for improving safety but only when it is deployed responsibly”, the NHTSA wrote, adding it would continue to monitor the software once it was updated.

Tesla did not respond to a request for comment.

According to the recall notice, the company did not concur with the agency’s analysis but agreed to add new features to resolve the concerns, including additional checks on turning on the self-driving features.

The recall comes a week aftera former Tesla employee told BBC he believed the technology was not safe. Lukasz Krupski, speaking after winning the Blueprint Prize which recognises whistleblowers, told the BBC: “I don’t think the hardware is ready and the software is ready. It affects all of us because we are essentially experiments in public roads”, he claimed.

Reacting to the news of the recall Mr Krupski told the BBC it was “a step in the right direction” but pointed out it was not just a problem in the US. “The hardware is the same in all the Teslas in the US, China etc.”, he said

Safety metrics

On Tuesday, Tesla defended the safety of Autopilot in a post on X (formerly Twitter) in response to a Washington Post article.

“Safety metrics are emphatically stronger when Autopilot is engaged than when not engaged” it wrote, pointing to statistics that suggested there were fewer crashes when the system was used.

Jack Stilgoe, associate professor at University College London, who researches autonomous vehicles, said Tesla should have spent more time developing the system in the first place. “The conventional way of ensuring safety is to check that a car is safe when it leaves the factory”, he told the BBC.

But despite this being the second recall this year affecting Tesla vehicles, Susannah Streeter of investment company Hargreaves Lansdown, said her assessment was that it should not check the carmaker’s momentum too greatly:

“This recall of 2 million cars on its own is not likely to seriously quash enthusiasm. The share price has dropped back slightly, but it doesn’t look like it’ll be hit by a bad bout of skidding. “After all, recalls in the car industry are far from unusual and the group also has the financial ability to invest in fixes”, she added.

Tesla has heavily promoted the technology in its cars and says remaining at the cutting edge of self-driving is key to its future growth.

Goldman Sachs analysts estimated this month that Tesla’s most advanced Autopilot offering, full self driving, could end up generating more than $50bn a year in revenue by 2030, up from $1bn-$3bn presently.

In the US, the full-self driving package costs $12,000, or a $199 monthly subscription fee.

“Autonomy is really where it’s at,” Mr Musk told investors this summer.

Additional alerts

Critics have said Tesla has misled customers about its software’s capabilities, contributing to risks.

The carmaker is facing other government investigations, as well as a number of lawsuits in the US in relation to crashes involving the software.

But a jury in one of the first cases to go to trial found that Tesla’s autopilot technology was not to blame.

The new controls that Tesla has agreed to do should help limit drivers from using Autopilot unsafely, said Professor Missy Cummings, director of the Autonomy and Robotics Center at George Mason University. But she added that there was “an opportunity missed” for regulators to require Tesla to make Autopilot features unavailable in places where it is not supposed to be used.

The recall centres on a part of Autopilot called Autosteer.

Autosteer helps keep a car in the correct lane in conjunction with “traffic-aware cruise control” which matches the speed of the car to that of the surrounding traffic. The driver is expected to have their hands on wheel and be ready to take over from the assistive system when required.

When Autosteer is on, systems in the car monitor that the driver is paying attention. If it detects the driver isn’t there are warning alerts. There are also alerts if the driver tries to use Autosteer in inappropriate circumstances.

According to the NHTSA recall report,  the “over the air update” will include additional alerts and monitoring “to encourage the driver to adhere to their continuous driving responsibility whenever Autosteer is engaged.”

(BBC)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Ben Stokes four-for, Ben Duckett hundred as England roar back

Published

on

By

Ben Duckett raced through to an 88-ball hundred [Cricinfo]

As well as things had gone for New Zealand on day one at Trent Bridge, they went badly on day two. England,  led by a four-wicket haul from Ben Stokes, completed their turnaround with the ball to cap the visitors at 438 – having been 317 for 0 – and Ben Duckett then rattled off his first international hundred in more than a year to launch the reply.

Duckett was given a life on 8, dropped in the slips by Henry Nicholls, but went on to form a second-wicket partnership worth 179 at exactly a run a ball with Jacob Bethell,  who was eyeing a hundred of his own by the close of another scorching day in Nottingham.

New Zealand’s problems were compounded by a concussion suffered by Blair Tickner, who was struck on the side of the helmet by Jofra Archer while batting and, despite initially being cleared to continue and delivering a three-over spell before tea, did not emerge for the evening session. He was eventually replaced by Zak Foulkes.

With Tickner, Mitchell Santner and Ben Sears – the three changes from New Zealand’s victorious XI at The Oval – all leaking runs at upwards of five an over, things began to unravel for the tourists. When Duckett brought up an 88-ball hundred midway through the evening session, the game had almost completely flipped in trajectory from 24 hours earlier, when Tom Latham and Devon Conway were amassing 150s during their triple-century opening stand.

Having taken two wickets with the last two balls on day one, England continued their fightback on the second morning. Stokes claimed three in the session during an eight-over spell, as New Zealand’s middle order struggled to build on the foundation laid for them, before two in an over from Shoaib Bashir helped wrap the innings up.

It meant New Zealand had suffered a collapse of 10 for 121 and their total of 438, while respectable, was nevertheless the third-lowest in Test history for any innings featuring a 300-run partnership – behind England’s 407 against India at Edgbaston last summer, and the 431 made by West Indies at Sabina Park in 1999 – and the lowest when those runs had been scored by the openers.

England’s momentum was briefly checked when Will O’Rourke had Emilio Gay caught down the leg side for a five-ball duck in the second over. They should have been 8 for 2 when Nathan Smith found Duckett’s outside edge, only for Nicholls to make a hash of the catch at third slip.

Duckett, who had twice drilled Smith for fours in his opening over, was in the mood to make New Zealand pay for such generosity. His next ball also disappeared through the covers, and he used the knowledge of his home ground to good effect, cutting, pulling and clipping his way to ten boundaries in a 40-ball fifty.

With Bethell recovering from a scratchy start against O’Rourke and the probing Smith, England went on to make New Zealand sweat in the field in much the same way they had through two-and-a-half sessions on day one.

Runs flowed in the passage after tea. Santner wasn’t allowed to settle, picked off for five boundaries in his first four overs by Duckett – although one of those, a thick outside edge, might have been held by Daryl Mitchell at slip had he not been stood so wide. From the other end, Sears was pulled and driven by Bethell, leaking 23 runs from three overs as England raced into three figures.

Latham was forced to go back to O’Rourke and, while Santner began to find some rhythm in his first Test appearance in ten months, Bethell worked him leg side for a single to bring up his first half-century in a home Test – and first such score in the first innings, having made all of his previous four in the second dig.

Duckett was by now in the 90s and quickly homed in on the milestone, his seventh hundred in Tests and first since the India series last year – ending a barren run of 22 innings in which he had only passed 50 three times. It was also his fourth 50-plus score in four innings at his home ground and although he was bowled shortly after, dragging on against Smith, Joe Root joined Bethell to steer England to the close two down.

New Zealand had added 77 to their overnight 361 for 4, Blundell’s 30 the only score of note as they fell well short of 500 – a total that looked all but inevitable when Latham and Conway were cashing in after opting to bat in baking conditions. Their frustration at being pegged back perhaps added to a sense of grievance around the dismissals of Mitchell and Santner, with both given out by the third umpire, Adrian Holdstock, after reviews.

The mercury was still rising on the second morning, with temperatures in the mid-30s C again forecast. New Zealand made a largely circumspect start in the knowledge that another long day in the field for England would only strengthen their hand in this deciding Test – only for Stokes to once again wrest the game his way during a tenacious spell with the ball.

O’Rourke, the nightwatcher, provided the main impetus for New Zealand inside the first hour as he advanced to his highest score in first-class cricket – beating the 17 not out he had made for Canterbury against Otago in March 2023. He managed boundaries off Archer, Josh Tongue and Stokes, comfortably eclipsing his previous Test best of 5 not out – and England then fluffed their first chance of a breakthrough as Jamie Smith dived across first slip in pursuit of a thick outside edge, but only managed to fingertip the ball out of Root’s grasp.

Stokes, already a shade of beetroot, threw his arms up in anger but bent himself to the task and extracted Mitchell an over later. Umpire Nitin Menon did not initially grant the appeal as Stokes nipped one past the bat, but UltraEdge detected a feather of an outside edge; Mitchell, however, seemed to think the sound was his bat hitting his front pad as he pushed forward.

O’Rourke was dismissed after the drinks break without having added to his score, and Stokes then chipped out his third of the session, and 250th in Tests, when Santner ducked into a bouncer and ballooned a catch to Bethell in the gully. Santner reviewed, gesturing that the ball had struck him on the arm guard. But Holdstock, in the TV umpire seat, took barely 30 seconds to examine one front-on replay before concluding that there was also contact with the strap of his glove, and upholding the on-field call.

After lunch, Bashir bounced back from dropping Blundell at deep backward square leg – a tough chance off Archer, but one he should have held having made up the ground. Archer’s chagrin appeared to extend to not joining the huddle to celebrate Bashir’s breakthrough a few balls later, when Smith drilled a return catch back – at least until Stokes made a point of calling the fast bowler up from fine leg.

Bashir made it two in four balls when Blundell missed a reverse-hoick at a delivery from round the wicket, which ball-tracking showed had pitched in line on review. With Nos. 10 and 11 at the crease, Archer had Tickner ducking and diving before delivering a full, straight one to pin Sears in front of leg stump first ball.

Scores:
England 223 for 2 in 45 overs (Ben Duckett 113, Jacob Bethell 74*) trail New Zealand 438 in 114.5 overs (Tom Latham 151, Devon Conway 157; Ben  Stokes 4-70) by 215 runs

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

Venezuela shaken by magnitude 4.9 tremor days after major earthquakes

Published

on

By

A new earthquake has been detected off the northern coast of Venezuela, registering as magnitude 4.9 on the Richter scale.

The tremor on Friday comes days after a pair of powerful earthquakes struck the country on Wednesday evening, killing at least 920 people and leaving parts of the capital of Caracas devastated.

The earthquake tracker organisation EMSC said in a social media post that the latest earthquake took place 61 kilometres (36 miles) northwest of Maracay in northern Venezuela.

Additional details are not yet known, but the news service Reuters reported that tremors from Friday’s earthquake were felt in Maracay and Caracas, citing local witnesses.

The South American nation is still reeling from the two earthquakes on Wednesday, one which registered 7.2 and the other 7.5 on the nine-point Richter scale.

The death toll is expected to climb, with the US Geological Survey estimating that the number of casualties could exceed 10,000.

At least 3,360 people have been reported injured, and more than 172 people remain trapped beneath the rubble. The number of missing has surpassed 50,000, according to the Venezuelan government.

On Friday, Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello announced that there would be restricted access to some of the areas hardest hit by the earthquake in the state of La Guaira.

Residents have been organising to collect supplies and search for survivors. Some have even used their vehicles as improvised ambulances.

The Venezuelan government, meanwhile, has loosened restrictions on social media platforms like X, which were blocked in the wake of the disputed 2024 presidential election.

That, in turn, has allowed community members to share information about missing loved ones.

“It’s the community that has managed to get people out alive,” said 25-year-old Jennifer Palacios, whose six-year-old son is buried beneath the rubble along with five relatives. “We need them to bring cranes to move the slabs. There are still people trapped.”

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Latest News

US strikes Iran in response to drone strike on commercial ship

Published

on

By

US President Donald Trump, pictured in the Oval Office on June 26, has called the attack on the Ever Lovely a violation of the June memorandum of understanding [Aljazeera]

The United States has renewed its attacks against Iran in response to an incident a day earlier when a cargo vessel was struck by an Iranian drone.

On Friday, the US Central Command, which oversees military operations in the Middle East, said it had issued a “powerful response to yesterday’s attack”.

“US aircraft struck Iranian missile and drone storage locations and coastal radar sites,” CENTCOM said in a statement.

“Iran’s dangerous behavior undermined freedom of navigation as commerce increasingly flows through the vital international trade corridor.”

US strikes were reported near the southern Iranian port of Sirik after the announcement.

Afterwards, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said it responded with attacks against US military installations in the region.

In a statement to the government news service IRNA, the IRGC warned, “In the event of repeated aggression, our response will be more extensive than this.”

The exchange of fire has left questions swirling over whether a June 17 memorandum of understanding (MoU) signed between the US and Iran will hold.

Each side has accused the other of violating the deal, which included a ceasefire.

The document called for a “permanent” end to “military operations on all fronts, including in Lebanon”, effectively pausing the war the US and Israel had launched against Iran on February 28.

The memorandum was not final but was rather framed as a precursor to further negotiations, including over traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global trade.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Trending