Sports
Concussion in rugby: Players with worrying brain scans ‘should be forced to retire’
Players showing signs of serious brain injury should be forced to retire, former Wales forward Alix Popham says.Popham, who retired in 2011, was diagnosed with early onset dementia and probable chronic traumatic encephalopathy in 2019.He says he regularly speaks to current players about their own conditions.
“I’ve had them in my kitchen, they’ve had brain scans and they aren’t great,” Popham, 42, told the Sports Desk Podcast.
Popham added: “I’m not a doctor but if it was me I would take it the decision of continuing to play from them and it shouldn’t be their decision.”
Lawyers representing more than 185 former rugby union players, including Popham, have begun legal proceedings against governing bodies the Rugby Football Union, the Welsh Rugby Union and World Rugby over brain damage suffered by their clients. The group of players, represented by law firm Rylands Legal, are suing for negligence, claiming that playing the sport caused brain damage.
Popham and former England World Cup winner Steve Thompson were among six other former players who first started the process of a claim in December 2020.When the legal action was launched, the sport’s authorities stressed they “care deeply about all our players” and “never stand still when it comes to welfare”.
They have also highlighted their safeguarding strategies designed “to prevent, identify and manage head injuries”.
However, a World Rugby spokesperson told BBC Sport: “We have not yet been served with the details of the claims against us and as such it is not possible for us to comment further at this time.”
In the week the domestic professional rugby union season started, Popham also told BBC Sport about his ongoing conversations with ex-players.
“It’s quite tough sometimes when I have phone calls from players I used to play with and against and they’re in a really dark place,” he added on the podcast.
“There have been a few where we’ve had to get professional help to their house on a Sunday evening.
“This is the real coalface that we’re dealing with with some of these players. If I help one person, I know we have helped – but there’s a lot more out there.
“And that’s why we are doing this. We need to draw a line in the sand, realise the mistakes that were made and move forward, because otherwise the sport is going to die.”
World Rugby defended its record on concussion and pointed to new protocols reacting to ongoing research, including this season’s roll-out of smart mouthguards that can measure the frequency and nature of head contact and accelerations, in matches and training.
Players do not regularly have brain scans, but World Rugby’s chief medical officer Dr Eanna Falvey said if a player had “decreasing neurological function” doctors would be “obliged to investigate”.
He added: “If you have somebody who has defined evidence of decreasing neurological function they would not be continuing to play. Absolutely not.”
The governing body’s current protocols in place to try to limit head injuries include:
= head injury assessments used during matches to see if a player is fit to continue
= rest weeks introduced for internationals to limit their game time
= concussed players have a minimum period of 12 days out of action after new rules were brought in this summer
The new protocols follow the latest rugby-specific research by World Rugby’s independent concussion working group.
Dr Falvey said: “Am I convinced that we are doing as much as we can right now? I absolutely am.
“With the data that we’ve got, we’re acting on all the information that we have. Not only that, we’re creating our own data. We’re the only sport that has done this type of work with instrumented mouthguards.
“We have offered instrumented mouthguards to all the teams in the Premiership, all the teams in the women’s top tier AP15. We’ll be doing the same in the Currie Cup and the Farah Palmer Cup next year.
(BBC Sport)
Sports
Gura: The unsung hero
The autobiography of Mr. Ranjit Fernando, launched last month, offers a fascinating peek behind the curtain into how a clutch of Sri Lanka’s finest cricketers were groomed in their formative years. Mr. Fernando was in charge when the Sri Lanka Under-19 side toured Australia in 1984 under the captaincy of Aravinda de Silva, a team that read like a who’s who of future stars, featuring Roshan Mahanama, Asanka Gurusinha and Jerome Jayaratne among others. The Aussies had Mark Taylor, the Waugh brothers and Craig McDermott.
As Mr. Fernando kept a watchful eye on his young charges, there was mischief brewing beneath the surface. At the book launch at the Galle Face Hotel, Aravinda let the cat out of the bag. Gurusinha, it turns out, had masterminded a daring escape plan, players sneaking out through the hotel window, climbing onto the roof and sliding down a pole to freedom to enjoy the night life in Brisbane..
Mr. Fernando, ever the hawk-eyed disciplinarian, caught wind of the escapade. Yet in a twist that raised a few eyebrows, it was Gurusinha who was handed the captaincy for the next Under-19 tour to England. Some insist Fernando had missed the mischief; others, who know him better, reckon he was playing a long game, setting a thief to catch thieves, backing a natural leader who could keep the dressing room in check.
Fast forward to 1996 and Gurusinha found himself cast in a very different role on cricket’s biggest stage. During Sri Lanka’s victorious World Cup campaign, he was often seen as the quiet man at the crease, a grafter in a team of dashers. To the untrained eye, his batting seemed workmanlike, even pedestrian. Fans, spoilt for choice with the pyrotechnics of Sanath Jayasuriya, Romesh Kaluwitharana and Aravinda de Silva, wanted fireworks, not forward defence. In a line-up full of strokemakers, many wondered what Gurusinha brought to the table.
Gura was no mug with the bat. He could clear the ropes and put bowlers to the sword when the situation demanded. But in that 1996 campaign, every cog in the wheel had a purpose. His job was to drop anchor, bat time and allow the strokemakers to play with freedom around him. It was a role that demanded discipline, selflessness and a thick skin, especially when the crowd was baying for boundaries.
While others were flaying attacks and ending the careers of bowlers like Manoj Prabhakar and Richard Illingworth, Gura was content to rotate the strike, even if it meant playing second fiddle. The fans, unaware of the team’s blueprint, were not always appreciative. Their impatience did not go unnoticed.
At one point, a frustrated Gurusinha had had enough. He approached captain Arjuna Ranatunga and Manager Duleep Mendis, keen to throw off the shackles and play his natural game. But the think tank stood firm, urging him to see the bigger picture, to play for the team, not the gallery. Gurusinha bought in, rolled up his sleeves and stuck to the script. The rest, as they say, is history.
As Sri Lanka marked the 30th anniversary of that famous triumph this week, Gurusinha reflected on the campaign in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, offering fresh insight into the tactical nous that underpinned their success.
Sri Lanka’s batting line-up featured four left-handers in the top seven, no accident, but a calculated move. The plan was clear: take on Shane Warne, Australia’s trump card and knock him off his rhythm.
The Australians had a well-worn blueprint, build pressure through dot balls, squeeze the scoring and force batters into mistakes. Sri Lanka were determined not to fall into that trap. At that stage of his career, Warne was still developing his armoury and did not possess a reliable wrong’un to trouble left-handers.
When Jayasuriya fell early in the final, the baton passed to Gurusinha. True to plan, he stepped up, using his feet, unsettling Warne and disrupting Australia’s chokehold. It was a knock that didn’t grab headlines but played a crucial hand in tilting the contest Sri Lanka’s way.
For many, the World Cup win was life-changing; lucrative contracts for players, solid match fees and financial security followed. But Gurusinha’s story took a different turn. He walked away from the game the very same year, at just 29, missing out on the financial rewards that came in the aftermath.
Cricket, however, remembers more than just numbers and pay cheques. It remembers moments, roles played under pressure and men who put the team before self.In that sense, Asanka Gurusinha remains what every great side needs but few celebrate, the glue that held it all together. An unsung hero, in every sense of the word.
by Rex Clementine
Sports
British School out to retain Sohail Memorial Trophy
The British School in Colombo will look to retain the Hasan Sohail Memorial Trophy when they take on traditional rivals Colombo International School (CIS) in their annual limited overs cricket encounter on Sunday at the Sri Lanka Land Development Corporation Grounds in Nawala.
The British School in Colombo are the current holders of the Hasan Sohail Memorial Trophy after they edged out CIS by one run in a thrilling match played last year at the same venue.
On that occasion the British School in Colombo piled up 183 for three in 25 overs after they were invited to bat first and then restricted their opponents to 182 for four in 25 overs.
This rivalry between the British School in Colombo and CIS began in 2023 with a Twenty20 match, where CIS claimed victory at the same venue. However, the 2024 encounter was washed out due to bad weather.
Lesith Semika will lead the CIS team while Thisath Ganegoda will captain the British School in Colombo.
Sports
Mabarana, Pehesara steady Mahinda after Rajapakshe five-for
Mahinda College fought back strongly to reach 90 for two wickets at stumps in reply to Richmond College’s 315 on day two of the Lovers’ Quarrel Big Match at the Galle International Stadium on Friday.
In a similar pattern to their arch rivals’ start, Mahinda suffered an early setback, losing two quick wickets in the opening phase of their innings. However, the third-wicket pair of Randula Mabarana and Dineth Pehesara restored stability with a composed stand, ensuring the team closed the day without further damage.
Earlier in the day, spinner Manitha Rajapakshe delivered a standout performance, claiming a five-wicket haul to bring an end to Richmond’s marathon first innings, which extended from day one into the post-lunch session on the second day.
Richmond had recovered impressively from early trouble after slipping to 11 for two on the opening morning. A patient and resilient 173-run partnership for the third wicket between Ravinu Randinu and Ameesha Rasanjana laid the foundation for their competitive total. The duo batted through the bulk of day one and looked set for bigger scores before both were dismissed in the 80s by Sadew Nethmina and Kaveesha Githmal.
Further contributions from Nethusha Nimsara, Nethuja Basitha and Punal Hansajith helped Richmond consolidate, particularly as they faced a sustained and threatening spell from Rajapakshe, who bowled tirelessly to keep Mahinda in the contest.With Mahinda still trailing but having wickets in hand, the match remains finely poised heading into the third day.
-
Business6 days agoBrowns EV launches fast-charging BAW E7 Pro at Rs. 5.8 million
-
News4 days agoCIABOC questions Ex-President GR on house for CJ’s maid
-
News5 days agoSri Lankan marine scientist Asha de Vos honoured at UNGA opening
-
Features6 days agoAchievements of the Hunduwa!
-
News5 days agoAustralian HC debunks misleading travel risk claims for Sri Lanka
-
Latest News6 days agoWednesdays declared a government holiday with effect from 18th March
-
News3 days agoPay hike demand: CEB workers climb down from 40 % to 15–20%
-
News3 days agoBailey Bridge inaugurated at Chilaw


