Connect with us

Foreign News

Colorado Supreme Court kicks Trump off ballot, citing ‘insurrection’

Published

on

Donald Trump (pic BBC)

Colorado’s Supreme Court has ruled that Donald Trump cannot run for president next year in the state, citing a constitutional insurrection clause.

In a landmark decision, the court ruled 4-3 that Trump is not an eligible candidate.

It is the first time that Section 3 of the US Constitution’s 14th Amendment has been used to disqualify a presidential candidate. Several attempts to kick Trump off the ballot in other states have failed.

Tuesday’s decision – which has been placed on hold pending appeal until next month – does not apply to states outside Colorado. The ruling only applies to the state’s primary election on 5 March, when Republican voters will choose their preferred candidate for president, though it could have an effect on the general election in November.

The justices wrote in their ruling: “We do not reach these conclusions lightly. We are mindful of the magnitude and weight of the questions now before us. We are likewise mindful of our solemn duty to apply the law, without fear or favor, and without being swayed by public reaction to the decisions that the law mandates we reach.”

The decision reverses an earlier one from a Colorado judge, who ruled that the 14th Amendment’s insurrection ban did not apply to presidents because the section does not explicitly name them. That same lower court judge also found that Mr Trump had participated in an insurrection in the 2021 US Capitol riot. His supporters stormed Congress on that day while lawmakers were certifying President Joe Biden’s election victory.

The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision does not go into effect until at least 4 January 2024. That is the eve of the deadline for the state to print its presidential primary ballots.

In a statement, Steven Cheung, a spokesman for the Trump campaign, called the ruling “completely flawed” and lambasted the justices, who were all appointed by Democratic governors. “Democrat Party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing, dominant lead President Trump has amassed in the polls,”  Cheung said. “They have lost faith in the failed Biden presidency and are now doing everything they can to stop the American voters from throwing them out of office next November.” Cheung added that Mr Trump’s legal team would “swiftly file an appeal” to the US Supreme Court, where conservatives hold a 6 to 3 majority.

Representatives for Biden’s re-election campaign declined to comment on the Colorado ruling. But a senior Democrat affiliated with the campaign told CBS News, the BBC’s US partner, that the decision would help Democrats by supporting their argument that the US Capitol riot was an attempted insurrection.

The source said it would also aid Democrats in showcasing “the stark differences” between Mr Trump and Mr Biden.

Republican lawmakers condemned the decision, including House of Representatives Speaker Mike Johnson, who called it “a thinly veiled partisan attack”. “Regardless of political affiliation, every citizen registered to vote should not be denied the right to support our former president and the individual who is the leader in every poll of the Republican primary,” he said.

On the campaign trail Mr Trump’s primary rivals also assailed the ruling, with Vivek Ramaswamy pledging to withdraw his name from the ballot if Mr Trump’s candidacy is not re-instated.

Mr Trump, speaking at a campaign event in Iowa after the verdict was announced, did not address the ruling. But a fundraising email sent by his campaign to supporters argued “this is how dictatorships are born”.

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew), the group that brought the case, welcomed the ruling. “It is not only historic and justified, but is necessary to protect the future of democracy in our country,” the group’s president, Noah Bookbinder, said in a statement.

Similar lawsuits in New Hampshire, Minnesota and Michigan have failed.

The 14th Amendment was ratified after the American Civil War. Section 3 was intended to block secessionists from returning to previous government roles once southern states re-joined the Union. It was used against Confederate president Jefferson Davis and his vice-president Alexander Stephens, both of whom had served in Congress. It has seldom been invoked since.

Mr Trump lost the state of Colorado by a wide margin in the last presidential election. But if courts in more competitive states followed suit on Tuesday’s ruling, Mr Trump’s White House bid could face serious problems.

During a one-week trial in Colorado last month, the former president’s lawyers argued he should not be disqualified because he did not bear responsibility for the US Capitol riot. But in its Tuesday ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court majority disagreed. They said Mr Trump’s messages before the riot were “a call to his supporters to fight and… his supporters responded to that call”.

Carlos Samour, one of three justices who dissented, argued the government could not “deprive someone of the right to hold public office without due process of law”. “Even if we are convinced that a candidate committed horrible acts in the past – dare I say, engaged in insurrection – there must be procedural due process before we can declare that individual disqualified from holding public office,” he wrote.

Mr Trump is facing four criminal cases, including one federal and one state case in Georgia related to his alleged election subversion efforts.

(BBC)



Foreign News

Cuba says 32 Cuban fighters killed in US raids on Venezuela

Published

on

By

People attend a rally opposing US military action against Venezuela, on the day several similar rallies are being held in different cities, in Havana, Cuba, December 6, 2025 [Aljazeera]

Cuba has announced the death of 32 ⁠of its ​citizens during the United States military operation to abduct and detain Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in Caracas.

Havana said on Sunday that there would be two days of mourning on ‌January 5 and ‌6 in ⁠honour of those killed and that ‌funeral arrangements would be announced.

The state-run Prensa Latina agency said the Cuban “fighters” were killed while “carrying out missions” on behalf of the country’s military, at the request of the Venezuelan government.

The agency said the slain Cubans “fell in direct combat against the attackers or as a result of the bombing of the facilities” after offering “fierce resistance”.

Cuba is a close ally of Venezuela’s government, and has sent military and police forces to assist in operations in the Latin American country for years.

Maduro and his wife have been flown to New York following the US operation to face prosecution on drug-related charges. The 63-year-old Venezuelan leader is due to appear in court on Monday.

He has previously denied criminal involvement.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Venezuela’s abducted leader, Nicolas Maduro, and wife appear in NYC court

Published

on

By

A man holds a picture of abducted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas on Monday [Aljazeera]

Venezuelan President Nicholas Maduro,  recently abducted with his wife by US special forces from his home, has appeared in a federal courtroom in New York City for a hearing on alleged ‘narcoterrorism’ and other charges.

Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, were brought before US District Judge Alvin K Hellerstein at 12pm (17:00 GMT) on Monday for a brief legal proceeding that kicks off a long legal battle over whether they can face trial in the United States.

Handcuffed and wearing blue jail uniforms, Maduro and his wife were led into the court by officers, and both put on headsets to hear the English-language proceeding as it was translated into Spanish.

Maduro pleaded not guilty, telling the judge, “I was kidnapped. I am innocent and a decent man, the president of my country.”

Across the street from the court, the police separated a small but growing group of protesters from about a dozen pro-intervention demonstrators, including one man who pulled a Venezuelan flag away from those protesting the US abduction.

The left-wing leader, his wife, son and three others could face life in prison if convicted of working with drug cartels to facilitate the shipment of thousands of tonnes of cocaine into the country. Some observers say there is no evidence linking Maduro to cartels.

Maduro’s lawyers said they will contest the legality of his arrest, arguing he is immune from prosecution as a sovereign head of a foreign state, though he is not recognised as Venezuela’s legitimate leader by the US and other nations.

Flores also pleaded not guilty to US charges against her during the arraignment. Hellerstein ordered the Venezuelan leader to appear in court for a hearing on March 17.

INTERACTIVE - US attacks on Venezuela map-1767437429

Near the end of the hearing, Maduro’s lawyer, Barry J Pollack, said his client “is head of a sovereign state and entitled to the privilege” that the status ensures.

Pollack said there were “questions about the legality of his military abduction”, and there will be “voluminous” pretrial filings to address those legal challenges.

Earlier, images showed the pair being led handcuffed and under heavy guard from a helicopter en route from a detention facility to the court, two days after they were forcibly removed from Caracas in a brazen US special forces operation.

At an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council earlier on Monday, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed concern that Washington’s capture of Maduro violated international law.

“I remain deeply concerned that rules of international law have not been respected with regard to the 3 January military action. The Charter enshrines the prohibition of the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state,” Guterres said, referring to the UN’s founding document.

“The maintenance of international peace and security depends on the continued commitment of all member states to adhere to all the provisions of the Charter.”

Samuel Moncada, Venezuela’s ambassador to the UN, accused the US of carrying out an illegal armed attack against his country.

Venezuela was subjected to bombing, destruction of civilian infrastructure, the loss of civilian and military lives, and the “kidnapping” of Maduro and his wife, Moncada said.

The abduction of a sitting head of state breached a core norm of international law, the personal immunity of leaders in office, he added, warning that such actions set a dangerous precedent for all countries.

Russia and China, Venezuela’s most powerful allies, strongly condemned Maduro’s abduction and called for his release.

US allies France and Colombia also notably voiced concern, saying Washington’s military operation had undermined international law.

The US ambassador to the UN, Mike Waltz, defended Maduro’s abduction, describing it as a “law enforcement operation”.

“The United States arrested a narcotrafficker who is now going to stand trial in the United States,” Waltz said.

Waltz accused Maduro of being “responsible for attacks against the people of the United States, for destabilising the Western Hemisphere, and illegitimately repressing the people of Venezuela”.

All eyes are on Venezuela’s response to the swiftly moving events after US President Donald Trump said late on Sunday that the US is “in charge” of the South American nation, which has the world’s largest oil reserves.

Vice President Delcy Rodriguez, meanwhile, was officially sworn in as interim president on Monday.

Rodriguez, a 56-year-old labour lawyer known for close connections to the private sector and her devotion to the governing party, was sworn in by ​her brother, Jorge, ‌who is the head of the National Assembly legislature.

Delcy Rodriguez initially took a defiant stand against the seizure of the president, in what some observers labelled a return to “US gunboat diplomacy”. But she has now offered to colaborate with Washington.

One analyst said that Venezuela’s opposition appreciates the US intervention to remove Maduro from power, but is alarmed by Trump’s comments about US plans to “run” Venezuela, apparently with members of his government.

“Trump doesn’t recognise the decision of the Venezuelan people. We are not a colony of the US. We are an independent country,” Jose Manuel Puente, a professor at the Instituto de Estudios Superiores de Administracion, a private university in Caracas, told Al Jazeera.

“We want to initiate a transition to democracy, to rebuild the institutions, to rebuild the economy, to rebuild the oil sector. And we don’t see that from Trump until now.”

Venezuela’s National Assembly opened on Monday with lawmakers chanting “Let’s go, Nico!” as they denounced his abduction.

“The president of the United States, Mr Trump, claims to be the prosecutor, the judge, and the policeman of the world,” senior lawmaker Fernando Soto Rojas told the assembly. “We say, you will not succeed, and we will ultimately deploy all our solidarity so that our legitimate president, Nicolas Maduro, returns victorious to Miraflores”, the presidential palace, he added.

Rodriguez has served as Maduro’s vice president since 2018, overseeing much of Venezuela’s oil dependent economy and its feared intelligence service, and was next in the presidential line of succession.

She is part of a band of senior officials in Maduro’s administration who now appear to control Venezuela, even as Trump and other US officials say they will pressure the government to fall in line with their vision for the oil-rich nation.

On Sunday, some 2,000 Maduro supporters, including rifle-wielding men on motorcycles, rallied in Caracas with crowds shouting and waving Venezuelan flags. The Venezuelan military, loyal to Maduro, announced it recognised Rodriguez and urged calm.

The White House indicated on Sunday that it does not want regime change, only Maduro’s removal and a pliant new government that will enable US companies to exploit the country’s oil reserves, even if the government is filled with his former associates.

[Aljazeera]

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Two people killed in magnitude 6.5 earthquake in Mexico

Published

on

By

The inside of a house damaged by the quake in San Marcos, Guerrero state, Mexico (BBC)

At least two people have died after a powerful earthquake hit southern and central Mexico on Friday.

The epicentre of the 6.5 magnitude earthquake was near the popular tourist town of Acapulco, near San Marcos in the south-western state of Guerrero, which suffered moderate damage.

A 50-year-old woman died in Guerrero, the state’s governor Evelyn Salgado said, while Clara Brugada, Mexico City’s mayor, confirmed the death of a 60-year-old man and said 12 others had been injured in the capital.

Mexico is situated in one of the world’s most seismically active areas, sitting at the meeting point of four tectonic plates.

Late on Friday night, Brugada said power has been restored to “98% of the failures reported” in Mexico City.

Two structures were being evaluated for risk of collapse, she said, while 34 buildings and five homes were being inspected as a preventative measure.

Damage assessments are under way in Mexico City after roads and hospitals were impacted, according to news agency Reuters, while authorities noted various landslides on highways around the Guerrero state.

Mexico’s seismological service had registered 420 aftershocks by midday local time (18:00 GMT).

President Claudia Sheinbaum was holding her first press conference of the year when the earthquake struck.

In a video capturing the moment, Sheinbaum can be heard saying “it’s shaking” as an earthquake alert system rings in the background. She then tells the media to “all get out calmly”.

Additional footage shows buildings shaking in Mexico City and cars trembling in Acapulco.

After hearing the Mexican Seismic Alert System early on Friday, residents and tourists rushed into the streets of Mexico City and Acapulco.

The seismic system was put into place following the deadly 1985 earthquake that claimed more than 10,000 lives.

In 2017, a 7.1 magnitude quake, killed more than 200 people and toppled dozens of buildings in Mexico City.

(BBC)

Continue Reading

Trending