Connect with us

News

Church and activists demand timely, fair election

Published

on

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith

(UCAN) Church officials in Sri Lanka joined rights activists to demand the government not delay presidential elections and decried attempts to hold a referendum to extend the term of embattled President Ranil Wickremesinghe.

Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith of Colombo said the government’s bid to retain power is contrary to the people’s aspirations and rights.

“Now the politicians are sending out kites to see if they can hold a referendum, then hated politicians can rule this country another two or three years. Absolutely unacceptable,” Ranjith said during a gathering in the national capital on June 11.

Sri Lanka’s top Catholic leader said that the state cannot strip away the rights of the people, nor can it deprive them of freedom, dignity, and the right to vote.

“We have our constitution; it gives the president a five-year term of office. They must go to the polls at the end of those five years. That is our right as citizens. The state can’t take that away from us. …it can’t take away our freedom, dignity, and all the manifestations of that freedom and dignity,” Ranjith said.

Opposition parties and activists have been protesting ever since a top leader of the ruling United National Party hinted at a possible referendum to extend Wickremesinghe’s term.

Wickremesinghe has faced widespread criticism for failing to revive the ailing economy and using power to muzzle dissent.

The party’s general secretary, Palitha Range Bandara, said the government aims to extend the president’s term by two years through the referendum.

“We want to be able to choose our leaders in a free franchise; that is our right, and we demand it,” Ranjith insisted.

The Election Commission recently said the presidential election is scheduled between Sept. 17 and Oct. 17.

Rohana Hettiarachchi, executive director of the advocacy group People’s Action for Free and Fair Elections, said extending the president’s term through a referendum is both illegal and unethical.

Hettiarachchi told reporters on June 11 that even Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, who was ousted in mass protests in 2022, came to power through an election for a term of five years.

Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa and his brother, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, were forced to resign in 2022 when massive protests spiraled out of control following the country’s worst economic crisis.

Wickremesinghe, once considered a rival by the powerful Rajapaksa political dynasty, was appointed acting president with alleged backing from former foes.

He has been accused of covering up massive corruption and rights violations by the Rajapaksa regime since 2005 to strengthen his political future.

Critics see his government as a continuance of the previous regime, which was blamed for pushing Sri Lanka to bankruptcy.

Nuwani Sunimalee, a university student from Colombo, said the government is receiving support from the large number of current parliamentarians who fear losing in a new election.

“They argue that within two-three years, the economy will stabilize, so a referendum is preferred over an election. They are afraid of losing their benefits,” she told UCA News.

Rights activist Raveen Silva said Wickramasinghe’s attempt to continue in power is illegitimate since people have not elected him.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

War of words erupts between Minister Chandrasekar and Archchuna in North

Published

on

This image, captured from video footage, shows Fisheries Minister Ramalingam Chandrasekar engaged in a heated exchange with MP Ramanathan Archuna at yesterday’s DDC meeting in Kilinochchi

A heated argument broke out between Jaffna District MP Archchuna Ramanathan and Fisheries Minister Ramalingam Chandrasekar during the Kilinochchi District Coordination Committee meeting held yesterday (16).

A video footage of the incident shows the MP and the Minister engaging in a heated verbal exchange, following which a physical confrontation appeared to develop when the Minister attempted to grab files reportedly in the possession of MP Ramanathan.

“If you lay a hand on me, I’ll lay a hand on you too… got it?” Ramanathan is heard telling the Minister during the exchange.

Police and officials present at the meeting intervened to prevent the situation from escalating further.

The circumstances that led to the confrontation were not immediately clear.

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal seeks dismissal of Sallay’s petition

Published

on

Cardinal

Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith has filed an intervening petition before the Court of Appeal in connection with a petition filed by former head of the State Intelligence Service, Major General (Retired) Suresh Sallay, challenging his arrest and detention under the Prevention of Terrorism Act over investigations into the Easter Sunday terror attacks.

The Cardinal has sought permission from the court to make submissions in relation to Sallay’s petition and requested that it be dismissed.

Continue Reading

News

Money laundering case against Yoshitha, fixed for pre-trial conference

Published

on

The Colombo High Court yesterday fixed for Aug. 31 the pre-trial conference in the money laundering case filed by the Attorney General against former President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s son, Yoshitha Rajapaksa, and his great-aunt Daisy Forrest.

The case was taken up before Colombo High Court Judge Rashmi Singappuli.

State Counsel Oswald Perera requested court to fix a date for the pre-trial conference and informed the judge that the prosecution would announce its position regarding the second accused, Daisy Forrest, at the conference. He also said the prosecution intended to notify court of amendments to the indictment.

After considering the submissions, Judge Singappuli ordered that the pre-trial conference be held on Aug. 31.

The Attorney General has indicted Yoshitha Rajapaksa and Daisy Forrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, alleging that they deposited nearly Rs. 59 million in bank accounts knowing, or having reason to believe, that the funds had been unlawfully acquired.

Continue Reading

Trending