Connect with us

News

CEA, Customs fail to take action against importers

Published

on

Toxic waste found in freight containers imported from the UK. (file photo)

CEJ to take up case again

Toxic garbage from the UK

By Rathindra Kuruwita

The Centre for Environmental Justice (CEJ) would refile their case against the illegal import of toxic garbage from the United Kingdom as the Central Environmental Authority (CEA) and the Department of the Customs have not taken legal action against the companies that imported the garbage, CEJ consultant and former Executive Director Hemantha Withanage told The Island yesterday.

The Sri Lanka Customs yesterday shipped out the last 45, out of 243 containers, filled with toxic garbage imported from the United Kingdom. The 243 containers had 3,000 tons of waste in them.

“We were the first to file a case against the garbage. When we filed the case, the CEA contacted the Basel Convention Office in the UK. The Basel Convention is an international treaty designed to reduce the movements of hazardous waste among countries. They agreed to take back the garbage but they said that they could not do so while a court case was on. Therefore, we withdrew the case on two conditions––they would back all the containers and the CEA and the Department of the Customs would institute legal action against the perpetrators under the National Environmental Act and the Customs Ordinance,” he said.

No legal action had been taken against the culprits, and, therefore, the CEJ would file a case again, Withanage said.

Withanage said that the waste containers had been imported by Ceylon Metal Processing (pvt) Ltd in 2017 with the support of Hayley’s group and found in Hayley’s Hub operation location in Katunayaka Free Trade Zone (FTZ) and in the China container terminal in Colombo Harbour.

Although the imported waste was listed as used mattresses, carpets and rugs, the containers also had biowaste from hospitals including body parts from mortuaries.

The containers were imported in violation of Basel Convention, the provisions of the National Environmental Act and the Customs Ordinance. In late 2020, the Court of Appeal ordered repatriation of 243 waste containers imported from the UK. Customs shipped back 112 containers to Britain by the end of 2020. Some 85 containers were sent to Britain on nine occasions in 2021.



News

Creditor receives USD 2.5 mn as Lankan public bears loss from theft of Treasury funds

Published

on

Amidst ongoing accusations that the theft of USD 2.5 mn (nearly 1 bn Rupees) from the Treasury hadn’t been properly investigated, The Island learns that the relevant payments had been made to the actual creditor on the instructions of the Finance Ministry.

Confirming the inquiries made by us, authoritative sources said that payments had been made to several accounts through the US banks. Earlier, Sri Lanka released funds to fake foreign accounts in spite of warnings regarding the suspicions about the process.

The funds were part of a bilateral debt repayment to Australia with a settlement due in September 2025. The payment was part of a $ 22.9 million debt settlement.

The lapses occurred in the wake of far reaching changes regarding the debt management functions. In terms of a particular condition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Sri Lanka’s debt management functions that had been previously handled by the Central Bank were transferred to a new institution established under the General Treasury—the Public Debt Management Office (PDMO).

Sources said that regardless of the loss of USD 2.5 mn, Sri Lanka couldn’t have defaulted and therefore payments had been made.

Sources who closely followed the issue said that the government owed an explanation and public apology regarding the loss of USD 2.5 mn and how fresh payments were made.

Sources said that the USD 2.5 mn paid to fake accounts had been lost and could never be traced. CoPF Chairman Dr. Harsha de Silva has said that the NPP government has told the IMF that stolen USD 2.5 mn would be recovered from the public by introducing an amendment to the budget.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Former Minister Nalin raises defence of double jeopardy

Published

on

Nalin Fernando

The Court of Appeal  yesterday (18) postponed until June 25 the hearing of a petition filed by former Minister Nalin Fernando seeking the dismissal of an indictment brought against him by the Attorney General in connection with the controversial ‘Carrom Boards’ case.

The petition was taken up before a bench comprising Justices P. Kumararatnam and Pradeep Hettiarachchi.

Appearing for the petitioner, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry, instructed by Attorney-at-Law Ramzi Bacha, informed court that Fernando had already been convicted and sentenced to 30 years rigorous imprisonment in a case instituted by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) arising from the same incident.

Counsel argued that the Attorney General had subsequently filed a separate case based on the same set of charges and maintained that subjecting an accused person to a second prosecution for the same offence was contrary to law.

He submitted that preliminary objections on the issue had been raised before the Colombo High Court but were dismissed by the trial judge.

The petitioner has therefore sought a declaration from the Court of Appeal that the indictment filed by the Attorney General is unlawful and requested that the charges be set aside.

The court directed that the matter be called again on June 25, when the Attorney General is expected to present submissions on the petition.

The case stems from allegations that during the 2015 presidential election campaign, 14,000 carrom boards and 11,000 checkers boards were imported and distributed through Lanka Sathosa outlets for allocation to political offices of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, resulting in an estimated loss of Rs. 39 million to the State.

Based on those allegations, the Attorney General has instituted proceedings against Fernando before the Colombo High Court under the Public Property Act.

Continue Reading

News

UNP asks whether govt. obtained findings of FBI probe into 2019 Easter Sunday carnage

Published

on

The UNP yesterday called on the government to clarify whether it had sought access to evidence and documents gathered during a United States investigation into the 2019 Easter Sunday terrorist attacks.

In a statement, the UNP has recalled that then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe requested the U.S. government to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the attacks immediately after they occurred, citing limitations in local investigative capacity. A similar request was also made during a telephone conversation with then U.S. President Donald Trump on April 22, 2019, the statement said.

According to the UNP, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) subsequently carried out an extensive investigation in collaboration with Sri Lankan agencies, including the Criminal Investigation Department (CID), Military Intelligence and the State Intelligence Service. The findings were later submitted to the Sri Lankan authorities and accepted by the relevant institutions.

The party noted that FBI Special Agent Merrilee R. Godwin had filed a 71-page affidavit before the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in November 2020 following a two-year investigation. A criminal case was later instituted in Los Angeles naming suspects who had already been taken into custody in Sri Lanka.

Pointing out that material collected during the U.S. investigation remains in the possession of the FBI and the U.S. Department of Justice, the UNP has asked the government whether it formally requested access to those records after reopening investigations into the attacks.

The UNP has stressed the importance of making the documents available to Sri Lankan judicial authorities, arguing that they could assist efforts to establish the full circumstances surrounding the Easter Sunday attacks.

Continue Reading

Trending