Connect with us

News

Cardinal Ranjith expresses more disappointment with govt. over continuing secrecy related to Easter massacres probe

Published

on

Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith

Over 1,500 pages of vital testimonies not given to Church

Archbishop of Colombo Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith has said the government did not make available the testimonies of those who appeared before the Presidential Commission on the Easter Sunday attacks. Those testimonies are on six CDs and run into 1,500 pages, the prelate said so while addressing the First Meeting of the Archdiocesan Presbyterian at the Archbishops House Conference Hall on 11 March.

“A team of our lawyers has sifted through the CD’s and found nearly 70,000 pages of evidence. In any case, we have found out that over 1,500 pages are missing in these CD’s, and we cannot open them. These missing pages contain the evidence given by key witnesses such as Hadiya, the wife of Zahran Hashim, and Sarah Jesmin, one of the leading protagonists who associated closely with the terror group.”

Cardinal Ranjith said 2024 marks the fifth anniversary of the Easter Sunday attacks, which cost 273 lives. There is absolute silence and attempts to mislead the public, he added.

The government gave the Catholic Church CDs containing the volumes of the sittings of the Commission of Inquiry into the Easter Sunday attacks.

“A letter was sent to the President by the National Committee for seeking the truth about the Easter attack on 11th October 2023 signed by me, His Lordship Bishop Harold Anthony Perera, the Bishops of Galle and Kandy and the three Auxiliary Bishops of Colombo, and 28 others, including priests and a group of lawyers, calling for a fresh and independent investigation into these attacks, but not even a letter of acknowledgement was sent to us,” he said.

The government continues to ignore these requests while affirming continuously that 99 percent of the investigations on the attacks were complete, the Cardinal said.

“Now they have filed cases against 23 Muslims who were associated with Zahran and his group and are seeking to turn them into scapegoats while not inquiring into all aspects of the case.”

The Cardinal said, “We will organize many initiatives calling upon the authorities to be sensitive to the demand for a full, independent and fair investigation into these attacks. Besides, no inquiry has been conducted, up until now, on new evidence emerging in the case, like the witness evidence given by Azad Moulana, the Personal Secretary of Shivanesathural Chandrakanthan alias Pillaiyan, a powerful Minister in the present government who alleged that the said Pillaiyan was the go between who assisted the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) to approach Zahran and his group.

“He also affirmed that the said group received money through Pillaiyan from the DMI, which was then headed by Suresh Saleh, the present government’s Director of State Intelligence. There were meetings between Suresh Saleh and Zahran, and a lorry load of suspicious materials was released without being checked on the orders of the present IGP Deshabandu Tennakoon at the Gelanigama exit of the Southern Highway. Its destination was the safe house of Zahran Hashim in Walana, Panadura, and the said lorry belonged to the Avant-Garde Security Services, closely connected to former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, and presumably contained explosives.

“You would ask me why we keep on insisting on this matter so much. Well, the reason for that is our Christian vocation. The Church is, as you know, the Body of Christ, and whenever or wherever in the body pain is experienced, it has to be felt by all.”



Latest News

Sri Lanka Coast Guard commence clearing oil spill in Maduru Oya Reservoir

Published

on

By

The Sri Lanka Coast Guard launched an operation to clear the oil spill  caused by the crash of a Sri Lanka Air Force Bell 212 helicopter into the Maduru Oya Reservoir, during a training flight on 09 May 2025.

The  efforts to clear the oil spill  are ongoing and will continue today, 10 May.

Continue Reading

News

Maduru Oya helicopter crash: Army, Air Force launch probes

Published

on

Rescue teams searching for the missing military personnel after yesterday’s SLAF chopper crash in the Maduru Oya. (Image courtesy Derana)

Bell 212 accident during passing out parade kills six military personnel, injures six others

A Bell 212 helicopter, belonging to the Sri Lanka Air Force (SLAF), crashed into the Maduru Oya reservoir yesterday morning, killing six forces personnel and injuring six others. The helicopter was on a routine mission in support of a Special Forces passing-out parade when it encountered technical difficulties and attempted an emergency landing.

The crash occurred at approximately 8:17 a.m., after the helicopter took off from the SLAF Base Hingurakgoda, at 6:47 a.m., and picked up Army personnel in Maduru Oya around 7:08 a.m. According to the SLAF, the aircraft was conducting a heli-rappelling drill as part of a military demonstration when it suffered a technical malfunction shortly after takeoff.

The aircraft was carrying 12 individuals—six from the Army and six from the Air Force, including two pilots. Initial rescue efforts led to all passengers being retrieved alive and transported to the Aralaganwila Regional Hospital, with eight later transferred to the Polonnaruwa General Hospital due to the severity of their injuries.

Despite emergency medical care, six of the personnel succumbed to their injuries—four Army Special Forces soldiers and two Air Force members. Among the deceased were helicopter gunmen and elite Special Forces troops.

In the wake of the tragedy, both the Army and Air Force have launched separate investigations to determine the cause of the crash. Air Force Commander Air Marshal Bandu Edirisinghe has appointed a nine-member inquiry committee, while Army Commander Lieutenant General Lasantha Rodrigo confirmed that expert teams have been dispatched to the crash site to gather evidence.

Air Force spokesperson Group Captain Eranda Geeganage said the crash occurred during a drill demonstration at the training school and that the exact cause of the accident remains unknown at this time.The remaining six injured personnel are still receiving treatment, with their conditions being closely monitored.

 By Norman Palihawadane

Continue Reading

News

Cardinal Prevost becomes Pope Leo XIV

Published

on

Pope Leo XIV

Nearly half a century has passed since the Catholic Church last had an Italian Pope. In the hallowed corridors of the Vatican, as the Conclave began deliberations to elect a successor to Pope Francis, several Italian names were whispered with increasing frequency. Chief among them was Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State, a seasoned diplomat, and well-known among the electors. Others, like Cardinals Pierbattista Pizzaballa and Matteo Zuppi, also had their share of admirers.

Yet, when the white smoke rose above the Sistine Chapel, it was not an Italian who emerged. Instead, the Cardinals turned to an unheralded American – Robert Francis Prevost, a canon law professor and lifelong missionary – electing him as successor to St. Peter. He has taken the name Pope Leo XIV.

Though born in the United States, Pope Leo’s spiritual and pastoral heart lies in Peru, where he spent much of his life in missionary service. His elevation comes as a surprise to many as he had been made a Cardinal just two years earlier, appointed by Pope Francis himself. A relative newcomer in the College of Cardinals, he was seen by many as a wildcard – yet perhaps that’s exactly what the Church needed.

At 69, Pope Leo is poised for what could be a lengthy pontificate – time enough, perhaps, to carry forward the reforms initiated by his predecessor. It’s no secret that Pope Francis saw in him a leader fit for the challenges of global Catholicism. When Prevost returned from Peru to head the Augustinian Order – a role he held for 12 years – it was Francis who sent him back across continents, appointing him Bishop of Chiclayo and entrusting him with pastoral care once more in Peru.

Those close to the new Pontiff describe him as deeply spiritual, a steady hand, and a bridge-builder, qualities sorely needed in a Church increasingly split between traditionalists and reformists. He is expected to offer a more measured, balanced approach on key issues, fostering dialogue rather than division.

In many ways, this Conclave echoed the dramatic scenes of October 1978, when an unknown outsider from Poland – Karol Wojtyla – was chosen as Pope John Paul II. Like then, the Cardinals have once again looked beyond the obvious front-runners. But, unlike 1978, when it took eight ballots to break the deadlock and settle on a compromise, this time it took just four.

That speed speaks volumes. The Cardinals were not merely settling – they were convinced that here’s the man to take the Church forward. In Cardinal Prevost, they found a shepherd capable of steering the Church through a time of transition, someone who could temper Franciscan reform with pastoral wisdom and unite a divided flock under the banner of faith and humility.

By Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Trending