Connect with us

Sports

‘Boks’ come out to play!

Published

on

by Rajitha Ratwatte

The second game in the final round of the rugby championship takes precedence as far as reporting goes for the simple reason that it was one of the best games of Rugby union seen in a long time. The Springbok – All Black rivalry is legendary, and this game was second to none. The referee Mathew Carley of England was up to the task and kept a firm hold on the game, made good decisions on the field and got sucked in by insidious professional fouls only as often as the situation warranted when making decisions at speed.

 The Africans opened scoring with some slick handling of the ball by Lukhanyo Am (no13) sending their no 12 Damian de Allende over mid-right. Handre Pollard couldn’t convert and 0–5. Jordie Barret pulled a penalty back for the ABs’ from far left of the field 3–5. The ABs’ conceded another kickable penalty soon enough (as was the situation through the game) taking the score to 3–8. Willie Le Roux had a forgettable game for the ‘Boks dropping the ball off the next kick off and giving the Abs’ a good attacking position which they capitalised on when Seevu Reece went over the line in spite of brilliant cover defence from no 8 Vermeulen. Only five points and the scores tied up eight all. The first scrum of the game took place in the 18th minute and the ‘Bok tight five began to dominate and complement the great work of their third row with skipper Salesi playing his usual inspirational game. Akira Ioane was pinged for offside right in front of the posts and gifted another three points to Pollard and the lead to the Africans 8–11. The ABs’ picked up the pace of the game and this was the only period in which they seemed to have the Springboks on the back foot. Ardie Savea went over the line with a rather dramatic dive off a break made by Rikko Ioane with Seevu Reece joining the line and covering good ground. Jordie Barret converted, and the All Blacks were back in the lead 15–11. At this stage we were into 30 minutes of the first half and Jordie Barret broke the Springbok line covered good ground and the Blacks won a line out on the ‘Bok throw (a very rare occasion in this game) and Brad Webber wormed his way over the line and scored extreme left. The kick was too much for the youngest Barret and the score read 20–11.

The Africans regained their dominance of the line out and Handre Pollard’s boot brought them back into the game 20–14. We were just five minutes from halftime and the ‘Boks replaced their entire front row! A tactic not seen before and the commencement of what was prove to be total dominance by the ‘Bok tight five in all aspects of the game. A notable happening just before halftime was the referee giving the South African “water boy” a severe dressing down for attempting to intimidate the touch judge by chasing after him and yelling at him and trying to influence a decision.

The second half started with another penalty conceded to the Africans taking the score to 20–17. The renewed energy and commitment shown by the Africans in the second half was not matched by the ABs’ and even Beauden Barret seemed to be suffering from what can only be described as a “brain freeze” when he forgot the 50–22 rule which is being trialled and conceded a line out throw to the ‘Boks.! (When a kick made by the team in their own half lands in the field of play and goes out inside the opposition 22, the team who kicked the ball is rewarded with a line out.)

The All Black defence was caught out of position by probing kicks and even guilty of simply watching and conceding territory. The ‘Boks went back into the lead after a scrum penalty won by them was turned into three points by Pollard 20–22. There was some rather “sophisticated” lying on players by the ‘Boks in loose play that fooled the referee for a while but either with or without off-field help he got onto it, but only after a couple of penalties were awarded. One such penalty resulted in a further extension of the lead to 20–25. A late tackle to Jordie Barret resulted in three points off his boot and the All Blacks got within two points 23–25. Another penalty taken by the youngest Barret in the 73rd minute took the ABs’ back into the lead 26–25 but there wasn’t time for spectators to even think before Elton Jantjies on as a sub for Pollard slotted a drop goal and took the ‘Boks’ back in front 26–28. The ‘Boks were playing under a penalty advantage and the commentators wondered if this was actually a mistake as they could have run the clock down further if the place kick was taken. With around two minutes remaining in the game, Jordie Barret got a chance to try and repeat history with a penalty and he duly obliged 29–28 to the New Zealanders. Elton almost ruined his brilliant drop goal by fluffing the kick-off and conceding a 50-meter scrum to the ABs’ with less than a minute to go. However, the dominance of the African tight five prevailed, they won a penalty gained territory and the New Zealanders who seem to concede a penalty every time for their defenders coming up too soon and being caught offside did so again giving the substitute no 10 a golden opportunity to win the game for his side with an unmissable penalty right in front of the sticks. He did what was expected and the side with the better forwards won a real “humdinger” of a game of Rugby Football 29–31.

 The old adage in golf when one “drives for show but putts for dough” when translated into Rugby parlance should read something like “backs are for show but the tight five make things glow”! The presence of Sam Whitelock, Dan Coles (unknown reasons) and the early exit due to injury of Scott Barret were sadly missed and the team with superior commitment and on-field nouse (ability to think on their feet) won a game that removed many doubts about the South Africans’ right to be ranked among the top teams in the world.

fromoutsidethepearl@gmail.com



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

Pakistan seek revenge, Sri Lanka eye another Asia Cup final

Published

on

By

Fatima Sana has picked up five wickets in three matches in the Asia Cup (Asian Cricket Council)

Will the Women’s T20 Asia Cup  semi-final against Sri Lanka  be a full-circle moment for Pakistan ?

Sri Lanka beat Pakistan in the semi final 9f the 2024 edition  to qualify for their first Asia Cup final since 2008. Now Pakistan enter this contest having not been at an Asia Cup final since 2016. Moreover, the two teams played a bilateral series only last month. So there is enough familiarity.

Sri Lanka are unbeaten in this tournament, notching up easy wins over UAE and Indonesia before being pushed hard by Bangladesh.Chamari Athapaththu has topped the  wickets tally, this time, her seven-for against Indonesia providing a reminder of what she can do in spin-friendly conditions at the Dubai International Cricket Stadium. Her pairing with Imesha Dulani at the top of the batting order has given Sri Lanka a close-to-ideal combination. Nilakshika Silva’s half-century from a tricky spot against Indonesia, and Harshitha Samarawickrama’s composure in a tight chase against Bangladesh have instilled confidence in their batting order.

Pakistan, on the other hand, are slightly short on batting confidence. They posted 119/9 against Thailand and were bowled out for 55 against India. It was only thanks to their bowlers that they could brush Tailand aside. Pakistan also lost the three-match bilateral series against Sri Lanka last month, though they did not have Fatima Sana’s services then.

Shawaal Zulfiqar’s presence at the top allows them to start at a higher gear, and Muneeba Ali’s experience only adds to the heft. Both are yet to fire together in this tournament, and Pakistan would hope it comes in the semi-final in order to end their finals drought.

Being Sri Lanka’s trailblazer, there is so much focus on Athapaththu that it is easy to miss that Harshitha Samarawickrema, still only 28, has already completed a decade in international cricket. She is the vice-captain, and almost the captain-in-waiting when Athapaththu decides to relinquish the role. Samarawickrama has grown in consistently winning games for Sri Lanka. Her unbeaten 48 off 37 against Bangladesh on Sunday is a case in point. Moreover, that knock has also highlighted her versatility. Primarily a top-order bat, she was moved down to No. 5 in order to accommodate Vishmi Gunaratne in the middle-order. She batted in that spot at home against Pakistan last month and finished the chase. Expect Samarawickrama to sit easy under the spotlight against Pakistan in a win-or-go-home contest.

Fatima Sana’s  407 T20I runs in 2026 have come at a strike rate of 150.74, the fourth best this year  (minimum 300 runs). There were calls for her to bat higher up than her usual Nos. 7 and 8. Add to it, she has picked up 23 wickets, the most for Pakistan. While she has taken five wickets in the Asia Cup thus far, she is yet to show off her batting might. That is partly down to the surfaces in Dubai. Sri Lanka, though, would be a little wary of her considering she can bash spin, and strikes at 143.24 against them.

Team news

With both teams coming off wins, they are likely to go in with the same teams. Sri Lanka might be tempted to play slinger Mithali Ayodhya since it is a knockout match

Sri Lanka (probable): Imesha Dulani,  Chamari Athapaththu (capt),  Sanjana Kavindi, Vishmi Gunaratne,  Harsthitha Samarawickrama,  Kavisha Dilhari,  Nilakshika Silva,  Kaushini Nuthyangana (wk),  Sugandika Kumari,  Chethana Vimukthi/Mithali Ayodhya,  Chamudi Praboda

Pakistan (probable): Muneeba Ali (wk),  Shawaal Zulfiqar,  Gull Feroza,  Ayesha Zafar,  Sadaf Shamas, Fatima Sana (capt),  Umm-e-Hani, Eyman Fatima,  Tuba Hassan,  Nashra Sandhu,  Sadia Iqbal

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

Foreign News

Protesters mistake Pakistan’s U-19 team for asylum seekers in Portsmouth

Published

on

By

[pic Cricinfo]

A Pakistan Under-19 cricket team suddenly became the centre of focus when it was mistaken for a group of asylum seekers in Portsmouth. A group of protesters gathered outside the Marriott Hotel in Portsmouth after reports that asylum seekers were staying there. The situation had to be later diffused when it was ascertained that the hotel was hosting the Pakistan Under-19 team.

According to the Guardian, the situation became tense when a crowd gathered outside the Marriott hotel after reports that about 40 men who did not seem to be English arrived at the hotel. George Madgwick, a Reform councillor, called the hotel to mediate between the Pakistan Under-19 staff and the assembled crowd, following which the crowd dispersed.

“I spoke to the coach of the team, who was very understanding,” Madgwick told the Guardian. “I went out to the protesters and told them, ‘You’ve got it wrong guys, it’s a cricket club.’ They left within a couple of minutes. It was a massively unfortunate incident.

“From the perspective of the people of Portsmouth who are already on high alert, this was a coach from the same company which was turning up with about 40 foreign men.”

The ECB has been in touch with the Pakistan management following the incident and is reviewing security arrangements.

The Pakistan Under-19 team played a four-day game against England Under-19 in Arundel from September 2 to 5, which they lost by ten runs. The two teams faced off in a Youth ODI on September 9, with Pakistan winning by 177 runs. Pakistan’s senior men’s team are also playing the third and final Test against England at Edgbaston.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Sports

Selectors play it safe, perhaps too safe

Published

on

Chairman of Selectors Kapila Wijegunawardene addresses the media at Sri Lanka Cricket headquarters yesterday.

by Rex Clementine

Sri Lanka’s Chairman of Selectors Kapila Wijegunawardene held his first media briefing yesterday since assuming office four months ago, a period in which several decisions have left the cricketing fraternity scratching their heads.

To his credit, the Chief Selector admitted that picking Lahiru Kumara for the tour of the Caribbean without first proving his fitness had been a mistake. It proved a costly one too, with the fast bowler breaking down after sending down just one over.

The former medium pacer was considerably more guarded when confronted with other contentious issues, including Dhananjaya de Silva’s defensive captaincy and the decision to recall Niroshan Dickwella after more than three years in the wilderness.

“We learned a tough lesson after what happened in the Caribbean with Lahiru Kumara and now we have made it mandatory for players to prove their fitness in domestic cricket when they come back from injuries,” Wijegunawardene told reporters.

That perhaps summed up the philosophy of this selection panel. Having burned their fingers once, caution appears to be the watchword. There seems little appetite for bold calls – the sort Duleep Mendis made when he gave Sanath Jayasuriya and Romesh Kaluwitharana licence to tear into attacks during the field restrictions, or Sidath Wettimuny when he entrusted the vice-captaincy to a 22-year-old Mahela Jayawardene.

Ironically, as Wijegunawardene addressed the media, NCC were taking on Moors in a domestic T20 quarter-final right in front of his eyes at the SSC. One of those making an impression was seam bowling all-rounder Milan Rathnayake, who dismissed Dickwella for a second ball duck.

Wijegunawardene was duly asked why Milan had not been considered for the forthcoming tour of England.

Until now, the impression had been that the selectors were investing in Milan, giving the all-rounder sufficient international exposure with an eye on next year’s World Cup in South Africa. Suddenly, however, it appears to be back to square one, with Wijegunawardene indicating that the selectors have turned again to Dasun Shanaka for the all-rounder’s slot.

Shanaka has not played an ODI for more than two and a half years and has earned his recall largely on the strength of his T20 form. Yet he has repeatedly struggled to convince in the 50 over format, particularly if the selectors view him primarily as a batting all rounder.

This is where the selectors appear to have failed to do their homework. A proper analysis of Shanaka’s record would tell them that his batting has seldom been reliable enough in ODI cricket. The numbers tell that story quite clearly.

What the numbers will not tell you is that Dasun has instigated more bloodless coups than General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf put together.

Continue Reading

Trending