Connect with us

Sports

Bearding the lion in its own den

Published

on

36th Anniversary of Sri Lanka’s first ever Test match at Lord’s – Part 2

by Rohan Wijeyaratna

By now it was clear Gower and the selectors had grievously erred in under estimating the visitors, while over-estimating themselves. Far from being overawed, Sri Lanka had risen to the occasion and set in motion a prolonged leather hunt, that was fast becoming an embarrassment to England. As they drearily dragged themselves on to the field for the third successive day at Lord’s, the truth slowly dawned upon all, that England hadn’t seen off even half the visiting side yet.

The only wicket for the day

But let’s not get too far ahead of the story. The wicket of Ranatunga midway through the second afternoon was the only success England enjoyed on day two. Possessing a composure and temperament that was well beyond his years, Ranatunga played a commendable hand for one so young in consolidating the Sri Lankan middle order. He enjoyed some luck along the way when Gower spilled him in the gully when on 66, but by lunch on day two, Sri Lanka were healthily placed at 271 for three, with Ranatunga on 74 and Wettimuny on 137. England had toiled hard in the morning session for no return.

Reputedly, the English crowds are the fairest in the world. It is a repute they wear very well. On this occasion they were genuine in their appreciation of the Lankan batting, even though it was at the expense of their own team. Tragically, with a Test hundred at Lord’s beckoning him, Ranatunga playing forward to Agnew, allowed a shaft of light to remain between bat and pad and was castled through it. He had made 84 in 248 minutes of batting, having added 148 for the fourth wicket. Sri Lanka were 292 for four, when Duleep Mendis walked in.

 

 

Unfinished business

 

Mendis knew he had some unfinished business in England. As previously mentioned (The Island – 23rd May, 2020), he could have won his side a famous victory nine years before, in the inaugural Prudential World Cup, but by knocking himself out via his own outer edge to a Thomson ‘screamer’ at a time when he had the Australian attack by its throat, he failed to fulfill that dream. That was when fate intervened and prevented what threatened to be a major tournament upset, when he and Sunil Wettimuny were involved in a furious attack on Ian Chappell’s men. Now at Lord’s, Mendis had Sunil’s younger brother for company and the stage could not have been better set for him to deliver a vintage ‘Mendis Special’. The wicket held no terrors; the bowling was near pedestrian; his team was well placed, and the man at the other end was looking like the Rock of Gibraltar by the minute! In short, Mendis could not have asked for a better setting to make the stage, indubitably his!

 

A man apart

 

England on the other hand seemed reminded that Mendis met his nemesis in 1975 whilst hooking. Thanks possibly to some old rope well swallowed, their bowlers determined they would give him a working over, with the short ball. Accordingly, Allott began with a hurried delivery that pitched and arrived head high to Mendis on an inconvenient off stump trajectory. Somewhat taken aback and definitely hurried, the batsman managed a reflex hook down to long leg – a shot of no great conviction. This encouraged all other leather flingers to smack their lips, dreaming of possibilities. Soon it was Agnew pitching short at Mendis. Back and across went the portly skipper, picking up the ball from his off and hooking it down to long leg for four. Agnew bowled slightly short again and Mendis – now going back, smoked it venomously wide of extra cover for four, to bring up the 300. With each shot he now played, Mendis assumed greater authority. Agnew next bowled a more fullish length and Mendis drilled it right back at him, like a blast from a cannon. It was a stinging blow and technically a chance, though Agnew had no hope in hell of catching it. A back footed square slash to a wide, short, Agnew delivery seemed almost violently dismissive. Everyone by now had come to realize they were watching a very special passage of play in the match, and a very special person enacting it. Everyone had also begun to realize that Duleep Mendis was a man apart, from those who preceded him.

But England hadn’t still lost hope. On came England’s man for all seasons – Ian Botham; now specifically tasked to remove this bothersome Mendis. It took no great intelligence to figure Botham would try and bounce out Mendis, and it took no even greater intelligence to figure, Mendis would accept the challenge. The crowd was expectant. The moment of truth had arrived.

 

Mendis versus Botham

 

A languid drive from Wettimuny to deep point brought him on to 154; the highest score by any batsman in his country’s first Test in England. It also brought Mendis on strike. Botham resuming, ran in and delivered. It was a mean bouncer on the off stump and curving in; head high and rising. There was a flurry of activity and in the blink of an eye the ball had disappeared into the Mound stand backward of square for six! The momentarily stunned crowd now broke into loud cheer. Not to be outdone, Wettimuny in the next over from Ellison, gloriously executed a cracking cover drive off his back foot to bring up his best score in Test cricket – 160 off 383 balls in 514 minutes of batting. The ball was now back in Botham’s hand for the following over.

Botham with his best days of pace behind him, was still, stubborn as a mule. He hadn’t probably heard that in the far outposts of the great empire, there were men who were no respecters of reputations. Possibly with such a bulldog mindset, Botham ran in and bounced again. Out came the hook shot in a flash; six more over square leg and into the Mound Stand! Although visibly wounded, Botham was still not ready to give up. Repositioning the two men he already had for the shot on the leg side boundary, he bounced one last time. It was on a middle and leg line and inconveniently close to Mendis’ head. Mendis undaunted, hooked yet again! The ball evaded the two men on the fence and ended up in the Mound stand for a third successive time. A visibly angry Botham was now seen muttering some ‘unprintables’ at his captain, for no doubt persisting with this daft idea of bouncing Mendis out. The Lankan skipper had now moved to 49, hammering three sixes off Botham in two overs and leaving no one in any doubt as to who was bossing the show in this particular contest. With each of his blows over the ropes, the crowd erupted, and with the third, the cheering rose to a crescendo. This was sensational stuff! Duleep Mendis the Lankan lion had bearded the British lion in its own den! At tea, Sri Lanka were 370 for four with Mendis on 52 and Wettimuny on 173.

 

Ran ‘em ragged

 

It took only 14 balls after tea for play to be suspended through bad light for 94 long minutes. Hence when play resumed, close of play was extended well beyond six o’clock. Between Mendis’ arrival and the eventual close of play, the score had surged by another 142 runs with Mendis making exactly one hundred of them. They came off 112 deliveries and mostly in fading light; sometimes almost too dark to recognize the dusky Sri Lankan skipper from 22 yards away! Thrice Mendis refused the offer of light and finally when he accepted, it was only after he had reached three figures. By now he had shown that between him and those that came before, there was a clear distinction. While most of the others applied grace and beauty from a bygone era around their technical correctness, Mendis’ method remained simple. He either blocked it or smashed it. And there was nothing vulgar about it at all. It was just that when in the mood he had this god given ability to reduce any bowling attack to pulp, without slogging. Simply put, Mendis ran England ragged. He was without doubt, the master of all he surveyed, that afternoon.



Latest News

Last over in multi-day cricket to continue despite a wicket after latest amendments to Laws

Published

on

By

"It was felt unfair that, if a fielding side takes a wicket in the final over of the day, the batting side does not have to send out a new batter." [Cricinfo]

The final over of the day’s play in multi-day cricket, including potentially in Tests, will not end if there is a wicket. As per the new edition of the Laws of Cricket, which were announced by the MCC on Tuesday, the over will be completed, and a new batter will need to walk in.

That is one of the significant changes the MCC has carried out in the Laws, which also includes allowing laminated bats in adult recreational cricket, improvising the understanding and definition of hit wicket, and simplifying the definition of overthrows. Overall, the MCC said in a media statement on Tuesday that it has carried out “73 material changes” to the Laws, along with some “linguistic changes”.

This is the third time the MCC’s Laws sub-committee has edited the Laws since the 2017 Code came into effect: first in 2019, and again in 2022. While the latest changes to Laws will be effective from October 1, 2026, they will be also be discussed by the ICC’s Cricket Committee at its next meeting to ratify the new tweaks to be included in the international Playing Conditions.

The MCC has also left it for the national governing boards to decide on whether they will adopt changes to the Laws in their playing conditions in their domestic cricket.

Last over to continue despite a wicket

One of the key reasons the MCC’s Laws sub-committee felt the last over of the day could not be carried forward to the next morning in case a wicket fell was that not only was it favourable to the batting team but it also robbed the match of some “drama”.

“The final over of a day’s play will not end if there is a wicket,” the MCC said, expanding on the reason for tweaking Law 12.5.2. “This is a significant change that will impact multi-day cricket. It was felt unfair that, if a fielding side takes a wicket in the final over of the day, the batting side does not have to send out a new batter.

“This doesn’t save time (which is the case at lunch and tea) as the remaining balls need to be made up the next day, and it takes the drama out of the game, while letting the incoming batter off the hook – at a time when the conditions are often more favourable to bowling. The new change means that the final over of the day will be bowled fully, even if a wicket falls during it (assuming conditions remain fit).”

Laminated bats

The MCC has also authorised that laminated bats can be used in adult recreational cricket. A laminated bat is a combination of different types of wood which significantly reduces the cost of a bat compared to a bat made of pure high-quality willow. With an English willow tree usually taking 15-plus years to mature and the demand for the bats rising exponentially, the MCC has been doing research on laminated bats for a long time.

In 2017, it approved the used of laminated bats in junior cricket. And now having coordinated closely with bat manufacturers globally, including holding a conference last October at Lord’s, the MCC has approved laminated bats are good for use by adults in club cricket.

The MCC said allowing laminated bats was “part of an attempt to slow the rising costs” of bats globally. It is for the NGBs (National Governing Bodies) to decide at what level laminated bats, which the MCC has called Type D bats, will be used.

“Laminated bats can use up to three pieces of wood, allowing for more of the best quality willow trees to be used, and for lower quality willow to be glued to a high-quality face,” the MCC said. According to the MCC, laminated bats did not offer any “performance advantage” over the normal bats.

Hit Wicket Law

There are two changes to the Hit Wicket Law (35.1.1 and 35.2). Firstly, the MCC has defined a batter is hit wicket if they fall onto the stumps while attempting to find the balance well after receiving the ball. The MCC said “receiving the ball lasts until the batter has gained control of their balance after playing the ball. If the batter is off balance because of the shot they played, hops around for a few steps, and falls onto their stumps, that is as a result of the action they took to receive the ball. The ball may be long gone, but the striker is still out Hit wicket”.

Strikers, though, wouldn’t be declared Hit Wicket when they, while regaining balance, come into contact with a fielder who pushes them onto the stumps. “If, however, the contact with the fielder is purely incidental – perhaps they are falling onto the stumps – and in doing so their bat brushes the wicketkeeper, that will not protect them. If a part of the batter’s equipment becomes detached and makes any contact with another player before hitting the stumps, then they cannot be out Hit wicket. So if the batter accidentally lets go of the bat, and it hits the wicket, the batter will be out Hit wicket. However, if the bat hits the wicketkeeper and then the wicket, it will be Not out.”

Overthrows Law

The MCC has essentially discarded its “vague” wording used in Law 19.8, which deals with overthrows, and thus created a distinction with misfield. The updated version defines an overthrow as an “attempt to direct the ball towards the stumps to stop run-scoring or attempt a Run out”.

Whereas for a misfield, the MCC said, “whether an attempt to stop the ball or pass it to another fielder close to the boundary – should not be treated as an overthrow.”

Ball ‘finally settled’

No longer does the ball need to be in the bowler or the wicketkeeper’s hand for it to become dead. The MCC pointed out this was “quite a big” change in the Law (20.1.1.1), wherein the umpire will have “much greater leeway to determine whether a ball is finally settled, which can often be extremely important, particularly on the final ball of a close game”.

The MCC said: “The ball no longer has to be in the bowler or wicketkeeper’s hands to be finally settled. It can be in the hands of any fielder, or stationary on the ground. This allows umpires the freedom to make reasonable decisions on when the ball is Dead, even if one fielder, or one batter, is still attempting to play on.

The two previous clauses – regarding the ball being finally settled and clear to the umpire that none of the players regard it as being in play – have been combined into one place.”

The updated Laws and other tweaks have been published on the MCC website. The MCC said the new edition of Laws was drafted on two principles: firstly, they are “fit for the modern game”, and that they are “inclusive” for everyone.

“Cricket is a fast-evolving sport, and this edition is drafted with the modern game in mind, as we are constantly looking to ensure that the Laws, which the Club has administered since being founded in 1787, are fit for all levels of cricket across the globe,” Fraser Stewart, the MCC Laws Manager, said in the media statement.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

England will bat first in 3rd ODI

Published

on

By

England won the toss and elected to bat first in the 3rd T20I in Pallekelle.

Sri Lanka: Pathum Nissanka, Kamil Mishara, Kusal Mendis (wk), Pavan Rathnayake,  Kamindu Mendis, Dasun Shanaka (capt),  Janith Liyanage, Dunith Wellalage, Maheesh Theekshana,  Dushmantha Chameera,  Matheesha Pathirana

England: Ben Duckett, Jos Buttler (wk),  Jacob Bethell, Tom Banton,  Harry Brook (capt), Sam Curran, Will Jacks,  Jamie Overton,  Liam Dawson, Adil Rashid,  Luke Wood

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

Sri Lanka aim to overcome disarray and end trophy drought

Published

on

By

Pathum Nissanka is proper pedigree at the top of Sri Lanka's batting line-up [Cricinfo]

Where in other formats, Sri Lanka have had brief shining moments in the past few years, their T20I returns have been consistently modest. Since the start of 2022, there has not been a single calendar year in which Sri Lanka have won more T20Is than they have lost. This, despite some of their oppositions through this period not being especially highly-ranked.

(Sri Lanka arrive at this World Cup in now customary disarray. A captain has been switched. Or more accurately, circled back to [Dasun Shanaka had led Sri Lanka before, but had given up the captaincy to Charith Asalanka, who in turn was ousted to make way for Shanaka’s return.]  Selectors have tried options out of nowhere and ditched them almost as fast. The coach and support staff are operating under pressure. In the last few months they have been beaten by Zimbabwe, trounced by Pakistan and in their most recent series, at home, England have been all over them.

When discussing Sri Lanka men’s teams of this era, you are frequently left discussing what could be rather than what is. Members of this top order – Pathum Nissanka, especially – have the potential to light up a global tournament. Wanidu Hasaranga’s quality is known, even if his recent returns have not been stellar. Dunith Wellalage has the broad skillset to impose himself in home conditions. And Dushmantha Chameera – when in good rhythm – is a reliable leader of the seam attack.

But together, these players have not put together winning performances. Glimmers of brilliance. Patches where the Lankan batters dominate attacks. A penetrative opening burst followed by an opposition resurgence through the middle overs. These have been the general trends. Up against the T20I pedigree other teams are bringing to this event, Sri Lanka are again in the position of hoping for magical inspiration.

Between 2009 and 2014, Sri Lanka made the semi-final of four men’s T20I World Cups, winning the championship in Dhaka. They have not progressed to the knockouts in any tournament since.

They have just lost a series to England on the back of drawing one against Pakistan, both at home.

Pathum Nissanka is one of the few batters in the world with an ODI double-hundred and a T20I century. That his triple-figure score in the shortest format came against India in an Asia Cup gives you a sense of his ceiling. There are also few batters who take on the short ball as effectively as he does.

Also making a charge is Pavan Rathnayake who struck an excellent ODI hundred and has shown signs of an enterprising style in T20Is as well.

This World Cup is likely to be the last for Kusal Perera. This is the only format he plays internationally and it is the one most suited to his batting, although in what has been an unusual, injury-riddled career, he is probably better known for that sublime Test innings – the 153 not out in South Africa. Kusal is not an automatic starter in the Sri Lanka XI (he has not played a T20I since November), particularly following Rathnayake’s arrival. But he will likely be required at some stage in this campaign.

Best XI

Pathum Nissanka, Kamil Mishara,  Kusal Mendis (wk),  Pavan Rathnayake, Charith Asalanka/Kusal Perera,  Dasun Shanaka (capt.),  Dunith Wellalage,  Wanindu Hasaranga,  Dushmantha Chameera,  Eshan Malinga/Maheesh Theekshana,  Matheesha Pathirana
[Cricinfo]
Continue Reading

Trending