Connect with us

Features

Artificial intelligence – the dream, the nightmare and the reality

Published

on

Pulimood Memorial orator, Prof. Shanika Kaarunasekera right) with Visaka Principal Manomi Senevirathne.

The 33rd Susan George Pulimood Memorial Oration

by Prof. Shanika Karunasekera

Before I get to the main topic for my oration today, I would like to briefly touch upon an important topic, which is close to my heart: Empowering Women in Engineering-and-Technology, which I will refer to as, Women in Engineering for brevity from here.

The 2018 Pulimood orator, Professor Mrs Rathnayake, dedicated her oration to this topic. I wish to convey a message, on a particular aspect of the same topic, which I believe is pertinent to this occasion and audience, which consists of many educators who can make an impact, similar to the impact Mrs Pulimood made almost 70 years ago. It is somewhat sad to say, that in this 21st century, engineering remains male-dominated. This is the case both in industry and academia. A significant female under-representation in engineering exists worldwide.

I want to take a moment here to reflect on my journey through engineering. When I chose the physical sciences stream for A/Ls, I did not have any idea of engineering as a profession. I chose Physical Sciences merely for the love of mathematics. I did not want to give up mathematics. That year there was only one physical science class at Visakha, compared to 12 bioscience classes. That is less than 10% of the science cohort chose physical sciences. At that time, it did not occur to me, that I was just starting a lifelong journey in a minority club! It was during my A/L years, thanks to four great teachers, whom I would like to name here, Mrs. Chithra Malalasekera, Mrs Sitha Siriwardena, Mrs. Shyamalee Ariyarathne, Mrs Gunaseeli Wijerathne, that I started appreciating the use of science and mathematics, in real-world applications. This sparked my interest in engineering as a profession.

Upon completing A/Ls, I joined the University of Moratuwa to study engineering. As one of only 23 female students in a cohort of around 230 students, again in the less than 10% minority, I started to wonder if I had made the right choice. Let me give you one simple example of stereotyping in engineering, from my first year at the University. It was often the case, that I ended up being the only female student in the group, when it came to group work, for obvious reasons. However, it was not a coincidence, that my male colleagues assigned me as the note-taker, in every instance, while the male students did the more interesting engineering tasks.

I am not blaming any of my male colleagues here, because most probably they meant well, and thought that the engineering tasks were too hard for females, but this is a stereotype. The expectation of me being the default notetaker, changed in my latter years at the University, after I was able to prove that, I was as good as them in engineering tasks. However, my point here is, that females must always prove themselves in engineering, whereas it is taken for granted that males are good engineers. Now as a mentor to many female engineering students, I remind them that they must not be the default note-taker for their groups – a practice that continues to date in many places.

Fortunately for me, several female role models in engineering inspired me to keep going. Of them, the major inspiration for me was, Professor Mrs Indra Dayawanse, who was the Head of the Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering, at the University of Moratuwa, during that time. She was an exceptional engineering educator, who demonstrated that females not only could succeed in engineering but could also lead and excel.

In my 35-year engineering career, that has spanned four continents, Asia, Europe, North America and Australia, both in industry and academia, being in the under 10% minority by gender most of the time, I have had first-hand experience of the challenges women in engineering face. Despite these challenges, my experience is that, the impact you can make on society as an engineer, gives you great intrinsic rewards and satisfaction, that outweigh all the negatives.

I hope you will not disagree with me if I say that engineers are largely responsible for the advancements that have enhanced our quality of life. The contributions of engineering are evident in all facets of life including communication, transport and healthcare. Engineering involves creativity and problem-solving. Engineers make a profound impact by changing lives and shaping the world. These are areas where females excel and exhibit profound passion. However, it’s disheartening that we haven’t achieved anywhere near parity in Women in Engineering. Consequently, society is deprived of the invaluable female perspective in this field.

Throughout my career, I’ve actively pursued opportunities to advocate for increased female participation in engineering. Introduce engineering as a viable, and appealing, career option for young girls, during their early school years and present girls with female role models in engineering from an early age, especially between the ages of 12 and 16, a critical period, when they contemplate their future subject choices and careers. By doing so, we can inspire the next generation of girls to take up engineering and pave the way, for a more inclusive and innovative future. I believe that the teachers can make a huge positive impact here.

Trailblazers like Mrs Pulimood have done an outstanding job, promoting STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) among girls, which has made a difference in the biological sciences. However, more work is still needed in the physical sciences. Let us lead like Mrs Pulimood, to promote engineering and technology to the next generation of girls, to make a real change. In my opinion, that is the best tribute we can pay to Mrs Pulimood.

Mrs. Susan George Pulimood.

Let me now get to the main topic for today: Artificial Intelligence: The Dream, The Nightmare and The Reality. Artificial intelligence, commonly referred to as AI, is receiving widespread attention, and generating a spectrum of emotions among individuals. While some embrace it with excitement, others approach it with suspicion or even concern. My aim today is to address the diverse range of sentiments, and misconceptions, surrounding AI, and shed light on this transformative technology, to give you a better understanding of its potential implications.

Considering the mixed audience here today, I will keep my presentation mostly non-technical. I hope everyone will be able to follow it. During this talk, I will use the terms Artificial Intelligence and AI interchangeably.

AI has become ubiquitous, seamlessly integrating into our daily lives, whether we are aware of it or not. I will introduce AI with simple examples, which I believe most of you in the audience can relate to. Many of you, I believe, would have gone to YouTube to watch videos. Some others, who are avid movie lovers, nowadays subscribe to services like NetFlix to watch movies. In both these cases, when you access the service using the web, you enter a page, called the Homepage. The Homepage shows videos that the system automatically recommends for you. Have you ever noticed that the videos that are recommended to you, are different to what others get recommended? This is AI helping them. The service has learnt their preferences. This is an example of machine learning the foundation of AI.

Another simple example is AI-based navigation applications, such as Google Navigation application, which many of you may already be using. It can give you directions, to a desired destination from a starting location and also the travel times. These travel times normally are quite accurate. In fact, more accurate than what you could estimate yourself. While these estimates account for typical uncertainties in traffic, Google is also able to update the estimates dynamically, if something major unexpected happens on the road. In this case, not only does Google do this task more accurately than you could do, but it does it way more efficiently. That is another example of AI.

Let me now take you through the journey of AI, starting from the very beginning. At the time, Artificial Intelligence was just a dream! Although the concept of mimicing, or exceeding human intelligence, seems to have fascinated humans for centuries, machine intelligence, which is the basis of current AI, was only envisioned in the 1950s. Here is how it all started. Alan Turing is a British Computer Scientist, who is considered the father of Computer Science. In 1950, he envisioned the possibility of:

“A human, interacting with another human, and a computer, without knowing which one is which, and being unable to differentiate them from their responses”.

This test, then referred to as the Imitation Game, is now called the Turing Test, named after Alan Turing. This is the earliest known definition of machine intelligence, which came about around the same time computers were invented. The Turing Award considered the Nobel Prize in Computer Science, is named after this great scientist.

Another key milestone in this journey of AI, was the American Computer Scientist, John McCathy, coining the term Artificial Intelligence in 1956; John McCarthy is recognized as the father of Artificial Intelligence. He defined AI as: “The science and engineering of making intelligent machines”.

This seminal definition encapsulates the essence of AI, marking the beginning of the journey of AI. John McCarthy was awarded the Turing Award in 1971 for his work on AI. Since its introduction, the journey of AI has been characterized by, cycles of rapid advancement, referred to as “Booms”, followed by periods of stagnation, often referred to as “AI winters”. AI is currently in its third boom, marked by unprecedented progress, and widespread adoption of AI technologies.

Boom 1, in the very early days of computing, was about the programming and processing power of computers, being able to deliver intelligence. This approach is now referred to as “Good Old Fashioned AI”. Despite this being the early days, during this period there were a few bold predictions such as:

Within ten years a digital computer:

– “would become the world’s chess champion”,

– “discover and prove important new mathematical theorems” and

– “will even write music”.

and more.

Similar to today there was significant concern about AI and automation being a major risk to the American economy and society; people feared job losses. However, these bold predictions were not delivered during Boom 1, resulting in the first AI Winter! The second boom started in the 1980s. There was a shift in approach to achieving AI.

Scientists began exploring the idea of, encoding all human knowledge into programmable rules in a computer. This approach, known as Expert Systems, may be a term some of you in this audience have encountered. A notable achievement in Boom 2 was, IBM’s Chess Playing Computer, known as Deep Blue, defeating the reigning world chess champion, Garry Kasparov, in a highly publicized competition in 1997. I doubt this is a milestone Kasporov celebrates in his chess career, but this is a significant milestone in AI and machine learning. However, it happened almost 40 years after the initial prediction!

Despite this success, this approach to AI ultimately proved limited in its capabilities and failed to deliver sustained progress. As you can imagine, feeding the universal human knowledge, as rules to a computer proved impractical, leading to a second AI winter.

Let us now transport ourselves to 2016, during the era known as Boom 3. In a monumental event, Google’s computer program, known as AlphaGo, defeated the world champion Lee Sedol, in a complex strategy game, called Go. This is another significant milestone in the history of AI.

You might now be questioning: Is AI merely a champion of games? What is the big deal? But unlike the previous chess victory, this victory marked a pivotal moment that started a new era in AI. Scientists had unveiled a revolutionary AI technology, that could solve real-world challenges beyond games.

As one example, Google repurposed the computer program, that was originally used to win the Go competition, into a program called AlphaFold, to achieve a completely different objective. In 2020, AlphaFold made a breakthrough in a complex problem, that had challenged the scientific community for many decades: the protein-folding problem. Proteins are the building blocks of our body, which are responsible for many bodily functions. Currently, there are over 200 million known proteins, and more are being discovered daily. Understanding the structure of these proteins is vital for disease detection, drug discovery, and a myriad of other medical applications. AlphaFold, the AI-based solution, was able to rapidly and cost-effectively, understand the structure of a protein. Before this breakthrough, understanding the protein structure used to cost millions of dollars and years of research. This a pioneering leap in scientific discovery, a milestone duly recognised with publication in Nature, the premier journal at the forefront of scientific inquiry.

(To be continued)

(The orator, an alumnus of the Moratuwa University and a Ph.D Cambridge, is Professor of Software Engineering and School of Information Systems serving as Deputy Dean Academic, Faculty of Engineering and School of Computing Information Technology, University of Melbourne.)



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

Revolt in the Temple: Poverty as Structural Control

Published

on

The underlying issue in Anuradhapura is a struggle between a few families who, for years, have waged a quiet cold war over control of the Udamaluwa. Similar situations exist in Mihintale as well. These places, among others, are treated as treasures of Buddhism but, in practice, function as tightly controlled economic centres. The same pattern repeats in Kandy around the Temple of the Sacred Tooth Relic and in Kataragama at the shrine of God Kataragama. Variations of it exist across religious spaces of Islam, Catholicism, and Hinduism too, where institutional authority becomes indistinguishable from localised power networks. What is presented as sacred order often operates as inherited control.

It is indeed devastating to see situations where parents have no alternative but to expose their children to predators in robes for survival. This has nothing to do with religion itself, but with human pathology in the context of survival. These are the questions that demand answers, not superficial responses that treat symptoms while ignoring the conditions that produce them. What is more shocking and disturbing is not the tragedy itself, but the reactions to it. Social media has overwhelmed us, not towards understanding, but towards a fragmented cognitive state with no exit route.

A friend of mine in Nairobi used to keep all his electronic devices at home and go into the forest once a month, spending days there before returning. He called it “detoxification”, but in reality it was an escape from a system that no longer allows uninterrupted thought. Daily life is now saturated with unnecessary content, and attention itself has become a commodity extracted, processed, and sold back to us. This is where we have become unable to understand what really drives certain tragedies we endlessly react to, while remaining blind to the systems that quietly manufacture them.

Multi-dimensional poverty

Poverty is structural, poverty is political, and poverty is functional; it is a tool and a manoeuvring force of power. The question is no longer whether poverty exists, but who benefits from its persistence, and who is forced to survive within it. From education to medicine to basic food supply chains, countries like Sri Lanka are not simply mismanaged; they are structurally captured by a small number of actors who remain stable regardless of who is formally in power. Small-scale enterprises and NGO circuits that circulate foreign funding to “solve structural issues” often operate as hollow administrative performances, producing reports rather than transformation.

Poverty is not merely the absence of money. It is the absence of bandwidth, absence of protection, absence of time, and absence of cognitive stability. As Sendhil Mullainathan and Eldar Shafir state, “Scarcity captures the mind. Just as the starving subjects had food on their mind, when we experience scarcity of any kind, we become absorbed by it.” This is a description of how human cognition is structurally reorganized under constraint. Scarcity does not sit outside the person; it occupies them.

They also state, “Scarcity leads us to borrow and pushes us deeper into scarcity.” That is the mechanism that must be confronted without euphemism. Poverty is not only deprivation; it is a self-reinforcing trap in which survival decisions generate the next layer of crisis. Once a society crosses a certain threshold of scarcity, it stops producing long-term reasoning as a default condition. It produces short-term survival logic, often mistaken by outsiders for irrationality.

It is precisely here that public discourse becomes intellectually dishonest. Everything is translated into moral language because moral language is easier than structural analysis. But morality without structure becomes theatre. It produces outrage, not understanding, and repetition, not reform.

It is indeed brutal when an individual wearing religious insignia—whether robe, symbol, or institutional identity—is accused of acts that fundamentally contradict the moral authority attached to that position. It is equally brutal when institutions that depend entirely on trust begin to function as shields rather than safeguards. But the deeper question is not shock. The deeper question is what kind of social condition produces families who see placement within such institutions not only as devotion, but as a survival strategy under constraint.

Ethical decision-making

That is where the argument collapses into its most uncomfortable form. Poverty does not produce ethical decision-making environments. It produces constrained optimization under pressure. When food insecurity, debt, and social instability converge, institutional spaces that appear stable become transactional destinations for survival rather than moral choices. To interpret this as purely cultural failure is to deliberately ignore the structural compression of options.

Mullainathan and Shafir describe this clearly: “Instead of saying that scarcity ‘focuses,’ we could just as easily say that scarcity causes us to tunnel: to focus single-mindedly on managing the scarcity at hand.” That tunnelling effect is not abstract. It is visible wherever long-term planning collapses under immediate pressure. Systems then misread this as irresponsibility, when it is in fact cognitive overload produced by structure.

What is rarely acknowledged is how deeply this extends into governance itself. Institutions increasingly operate as if they are managing rational, unconstrained individuals. In reality, they are interacting with populations whose cognitive bandwidth is already structurally taxed. The result is policy failure interpreted as public non-compliance, enforcement interpreted as moral correction, and reform interpreted as communication failure rather than design failure.

Social media has intensified this distortion. It does not merely spread information; it destroys sequencing. Structural problems require temporal depth. Social media removes that depth and replaces it with instantaneous judgment. Every event becomes a surface object, detached from causality. The outcome is a society permanently reacting and never diagnosing.

Poverty, in this environment, becomes invisible in its real form. It is not seen as a continuous structural condition but as episodic failure. A scandal appears, is consumed, and disappears. Another replaces it. Nothing accumulates into understanding because attention itself is exhausted before synthesis can occur.

Modern Condition

The modern condition reflects a reversal of earlier social organization, where human relationships are embedded within abstract systems of finance, law, and administration that often fail to recognize the lived constraints of those they govern. In this disembedded state, institutions increasingly misinterpret human behaviour as their capacity for structural understanding weakens. At the same time, attempts to resolve systemic failures through expanding administrative complexity produce diminishing returns: more regulation, oversight, and reporting generate less coherence. Over time, institutions shift from functional effectiveness to symbolic performance, maintaining the appearance of control rather than achieving it.

This is why public outrage repeatedly fails to translate into structural change. Outrage is not a tool of reconstruction. It is a signal of system fatigue. It circulates, intensifies, and dissipates without altering the underlying architecture. Meanwhile, the conditions that produce repetition remain intact.

The most persistent illusion is that these are separate problems: poverty here, institutional misuse there, media distortion elsewhere. They are not separate. They are expressions of a single condition in which scarcity, complexity, symbolic authority, and fragmented enforcement interact without coordination. The system does not fail in one place; it fails in the gaps between these layers.

Symbolic systems

What makes this condition more severe is that symbolic systems continue to operate at full strength even when structural systems degrade. Religious identity remains powerful. Political rhetoric remains strong. Cultural symbolism remains intact. But enforcement capacity, institutional coherence, and social trust degrade beneath them. That gap is where instability grows. Until that gap is addressed at the level of structure rather than sentiment, repetition remains inevitable. New scandals will emerge, new interpretations will circulate, and new cycles of outrage will follow. Nothing resolves because nothing is being reconstructed beneath the surface of reaction.

This is no longer repairable through adjustment or rhetoric. It is a form of decay that persists until it exhausts itself, because the mechanisms meant to correct it are now part of the same failure. It continues until rupture, not reform. At that point, instability ceases to be episodic and becomes structural. Pressure will accumulate into breakdown, and what follows will not be managed transition but forced reversal. The responsibility lies with those who govern these institutions to prevent that trajectory, not through language, but through change. The drama is ending; farce is over; what we are witnessing is tragedy unfolding with unprecedented consequences.

by Nilantha Ilangamuwa

Continue Reading

Features

Are threats to Buddha Sasana external or from within?

Published

on

As Sri Lanka celebrates the birth, Enlightenment and the Parinibbana of the Buddha, almost a month after the rest of the Buddhist-world did so, there is widespread discussion about threats to Buddha Sasana provoked by some recent incidents. Regarding the views expressed about postponing Vesak celebrations in my article ‘May Day and postponement Vesak 2026’ (The Island, 25 May), my very good friend Dr Upali Abeysiri has sent me the following comments: “The Mahanayakas have a good reason to postpone Vesak. The dawning of the full moon has to be on the same constellation (nekatha) as when the Buddha was born and attained enlightenment. Although Adhi Poya is reckoned as the second full moon arising in the same calendar month, this is supposed to be an odd exception.” Though it would have been ideal if a consensus could have been reached prior to the split of celebrations, perhaps, it does not matter very much as celebrations occur on a symbolic rather than an actual date, there being no historical or archaeological evidence confirming exact dates.

Whilst there are no direct threats to Buddha Dhamma, as the expanding horizons of science continue to confirm the fundamentals of Buddha Dhamma, there is no doubt whatsoever that there are threats to Buddha Sasana. However, these threats become important as the Buddha Sasana performs the pivotal role in protecting and propagating the Dhamma and, hence, become an indirect threat to Dhamma itself. Therefore, it should be the concern of all Buddhists and it is in this spirit I am making some comments which some may interpret as disrespectful to the Maha Sangha. I can reassure that my intentions are entirely directed towards the preservation of the Buddha Dhamma and Sasana. Though the Buddha proclaimed that the Sasana consists of Bhikkhu, Bhikkhuni, Upasaka and Upasika, for all practical purposes Sasana had been led by Bhikkhus, often at the expense of others.

There is hardly any doubt that there are external forces at play in Sri Lanka and even some Buddhists seem to object to Sri Lanka being called a Buddhist country. Interestingly, no one seems to object to countries like the UK and the USA being called Christian counties. I

There is no registration or baptism in Buddhism and there are no rewards for Buddhists for conversions. As I pointed out in a previous article, ‘How does the Buddha differ’ (The Island, 1 May) unlike most other religions, Buddhism is not a ‘high-demand’ religion, nor ‘law-based’ religion and is not exclusivist. Perhaps, it is this liberalism, pacifism and gentleness, which are the real strengths, that are being exploited as weaknesses by others.

There will always be external threats and the Buddha too faced many during his lifetime. Before addressing those, is it not more important to address the threats within? One of the most important problems seems to be the breakdown of discipline. Bhikkhus are bound by Vinaya rules, laid down by the Buddha and some recent incidents highlight total deviations. Though there were many previous incidents like unsubstantiated claims of Arahanthood, Bhikkhus attacking each other on YouTube and Bhikkhus conducting YouTube channels, not for the propagation of the Dhamma but for the accumulation of rupees, attention was focused after the detection of 22 young monks carrying narcotic drugs.

Though many commentators were quick to condemn the Sangha on this account, we need to go deeper. Narcotic menace has become a huge problem in Sri Lanka and it looks as if the drug lords would resort to anything to achieve their objectives. Though it looks as if some gullible young monks had been duped by drug lords, we need to question why it was possible. Is it due to the lack of supervision of these novices by their seniors that allowed them to accept a request in a WhatsApp group? Should there be checks and balances on foreign travel by Bhikkhus?

What shocked Buddhists was what followed next; the arrest of the Nayaka of Atamasthana for allegedly having sex with a minor. Anuradhapura was our first capital and Sri Maha Bodhi is the longest surviving authenticated tree in the world. Ruwanweliseya and Jetawanaramaya were among the ten tallest man-made structures in the ancient world, Jetawanaramaya still holding the Guiness record for the largest stupa in the world. Cyberspace is full of theories. Whilst some have condemned the Nayaka Thero even before the conclusion of inquiries whilst others claim that this was a coup by another Nayaka Thera in an attempt of succession.

I was intrigued, reading in a Sri Lankan newspaper about the 80th birthday celebrations of a Nayaka priest, who was convicted in London in 2012 of historical child sex abuse and sentenced to seven years in prison. I remember the case very well as he was the head of the Vihara, we had our first contact on relocating to the UK. I also remember his devotees, who believed that he was wrongly accused, collecting over £50,000 for an appeal. In spite of being represented by one of the top Barristers in the UK, the conviction was upheld but the jail-term was reduced by a year. His name is still on the sex-offenders register in the UK and he is permanently prevented from association with children. One can argue that as he has served the sentence and not reoffended, this should not be held against him but what baffled me is that he is still being referred to as the Chief Sangha Nayaka. Should a person on the sex-offenders register be the Chief Sangha Nayaka?

It is high time we put our own house in order before fighting the external enemies. It is reported that the former president CBK has written to the Mahanayakas requesting urgent reform and we should be obliged to her for taking the lead.

There are many aspects that need urgent reform, the first being removal of caste barriers practiced by some Nikayas, which is the greatest insult to the Buddha who promoted equality. The second is the active encouragement of Bhikkhuni Sasana which has not happened in spite of the landmark ruling by the supreme court. The third is the establishment of proper disciplinary processes under a single Adhikarana Sangha Nayaka with powers and support than allowing the government to take over the control of even non-criminal Vinaya matters.

There are many other issues that need settlement like the controversy of the land of Buddha’s birth which seems to linger on. An expert committee should hear all evidence and settle this issue once and for all.

As I have pointed out on many occasions in these columns, it is high time a Dhamma Sangayana was held, as the last one was 70 years ago. Ideally, it should be different with active participation of lay experts as well. It is the duty of us Buddhists to ensure that the words of wisdom of the Buddha continue to enlighten generations to come.

By Dr Upul Wijayawardhana

Continue Reading

Features

Vijaya Kumar: Academic, Activist & Genial Fellow-Traveller

Published

on

Professor Vijaya Kumar

The University of Ceylon, Peradeniya, was in our time, a less-crowded residential university, where everybody knew everybody else or at least knew of everybody else.

I knew of Emeritus Professor Vijaya Kumar of the Department of Chemistry at Peradeniya, or Kumar, as we referred to him fondly, before I got to know him. His dear wife Savitri, also a member of the academic staff of the Department of Chemistry, was nicknamed Kumee, by some of their students (of which vintage is unknown to me) and the duo were thereafter referred to affectionately as Kumar and Kumee.

The Faculty of Science became a regular haunt of mine as I would go there in the company of my batchmates to attend lectures on Basic Mathematics given by Professor Maheswaran, as it was a requirement for our General Arts Qualifying Examinations. I would also go there to listen to some excellent talks under a programme that was held in the auditorium of the Science Faculty referred to as “Popular Science Gossip”. The “gossip” at these talks were not confined solely to science but were broad enough to include Literature, History and other branches of knowledge as well. I would often spot Kumar in the audience at these talks or bump into him in the corridors of the Science Faculty. But I got to know him personally only after he became the Warden of Arunachalam, my hall of residence, during my undergraduate years initially, and later, as a member of the academic staff of the Department of English.

Our Science Faculty undergraduate contemporaries, especially those at Arunachalam Hall and its immediate neighbour, Jayatilaka Hall, both within a stone’s throw away from the Science Faculty, shared many an anecdote about Kumar and their other lecturers. One of these anecdotes, had to do with a spectacular (motor car) driving feat of Kumar’s. Legend has it that he drove from his university bungalow-home to the Faculty of Science deploying only the reverse gear of his car! Kumar, on hearing of this, had told certain of his student friends, including some who became his colleagues later on, that this story is one of the biggest yarns he had heard in his life!

Some of his one-time younger colleagues, now in retirement like Kumar, tell me that Kumar exuded warmth and friendliness in all of his professional and administrative interactions with others in the wider university community. But there was no warmth or mercy for those who indulged in the unsavoury pastime of student ‘ragging’. He was a very strong proponent of the need to ensure to all freshers an environment free of the menace of ‘ragging’. He remained ever-vigilant during the ‘ragging’ season. There are stories of his chasing ‘raggers’ and catching them. Professor Maheswaran, who later became an intimate friend and remains so after more than half a century, was another who was fiercely opposed to ‘ragging’. I was a personal witness to Mahes chasing a ‘ragger’ up and down the stairs of the main library to nab him. Yet another of his students has noted that Kumar’s office room in the Faculty was a total mess at all times. It had tables, piled so high with books and documents that one could not easily spot Kumar at his desk. He, however, had the knack of pulling out from amidst the clutter, any document that he needed at any given time. If anybody were to volunteer to help tidy his desk, Kumar would respond firmly with “Don’t you touch my desk!”.

Kumar, like several of his colleagues in the other faculties as well, had his own eccentricities. According to information received from reliable sources, Kumar who taught Organic Chemistry used to carry his lecture notes in his shirt or trouser pocket with ‘the entire lecture condensed in point form on a half-sheet or half of a half-sheet of paper’. The way he rummaged through his sling bag filled to the brim with stuff to find an item that he needed was another ritual that amused onlookers.

Kumar, interestingly enough is a Royal-cum-Thomian product, in that he had his primary education at S.Thomas’ Prep School, Kollupitiya and the entirety of his secondary education at Royal College, which he entered in 1953. In a note written by Kumar himself, he notes that despite having had excellent teachers at Royal, his was not a notable school career. He goes on to say that “the only achievement I could boast of was my being the joint-winner of the school General Knowledge Prize”. However, he had been active in a Scout Group outside of school (1st Port of Colombo, Sea Scouts) where he “was Queen’s Scout, Patrol leader, and later, Assistant Scout Master”.

Kumar entered the Faculty of Science of the University of Ceylon in 1961 and secured from it an honours degree in Chemistry in 1965. He joined the academic staff of the Department of Chemistry in the Faculty of Science, University of Ceylon, Peradeniya in 1965 and left the following year for Magdalen College at Oxford University, from which institution he obtained his doctorate in Chemistry. His entire teaching career was at Peradeniya, where in the period 2003-2006 he served as the Dean of the Faculty of Science, a position that his late father-in-law had held a few decades earlier.

Among the other highlights of his career are: Chairman of the Industrial Technology Institute (formerly the Ceylon Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, CISIR); Member (representing Sri Lanka) of the Geneva-based UN Commission on Science and Technology from 1999 to 2007 and its President from 2001-2003; President of the Sri Lanka Estate Workers Union from 1989 onwards; Member of the Politburo of the Lanka Sama Samaja Party from 1988 to 2014 and currently, a member of the Executive Committee of the National People’s Power (NPP).

Vijaya and Savitri Kumar are parents of daughters Shamala and Ramya, who are following in the footsteps of their parents: with the former teaching in the Department of Agricultural Economics in the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya and the latter, in the Department of Community Medicine at the University of Jaffna.

(I wish to thank the following who assisted me in the writing of this brief essay: Mr. Bandula Warnakulasuriya, Emeritus Professor Ratnayake Bandara, Professor Mahinda Wickramaratne, Professor Swarna Wimalasiri and Mr. Manik de Silva).

*Editor’s note: Prof. Vijaya Kumar, a member of the NPP’s National Executive Committee and is still active in politics turns 84 today. This article by Tissa Jayatilaka, former Executive Director of the United States – Sri Lanka Fulbright Commission for Mutual Academic Exchange, was written for an upcoming collection of essays on Kumar’s life by his friends.

(Colombo Telegraph)

By Tissa Jayatilaka

Continue Reading

Trending