Connect with us

Sports

Are schoolboy ruggerites overworked in a sport where stakes are high?

Published

on

School rugby is so demanding at present and players have to offer their services at both tournament and traditional matches.

by A Special Sports Correspondent

It’s amazing what school rugby has built for itself. Rugby at school level easily tops the list as the most popular discipline in which school children are involved. It could be safe to say that in a cricket crazy nation like Sri Lanka, even school cricket is no match for rugby where stakes are concerned. Just see the number of corporate logos on a school rugby jersey and you’ll understand that rugby at this level (junior under 19) can at times become something too big to handle even for the school authorities.

We saw this happen at the quarterfinals of the President’s trophy knockout tournament when teams like Royal and Trinity pulled out because they have to honour a traditional commitment; the Bradby Shield two-leg annual encounter between the two schools. You might not see this kind of bold decision being taken to pull out of an inter-school tournament in any other sport. Royal and Trinity have built histories in rugby which afford them to break away from the ‘bunch’ and still be counted in the sport played with the oval shaped ball. And still, despite that pullout, the main knockout tournament didn’t lose any of its glory. The best two teams this season – St. Peter’s and Isipatana -are keeping the knockout tournament going despite the upcoming final leg of the Bradby. Rugby in Sri Lanka is such that you can have different rugby cultures within the main culture. This is why when foreigners visiting this island are puzzled why the enthusiasm shown at school rugby doesn’t pour into to national rugby at senior level.

The other factor which showcases the rich rugby heritage of this country is the traditional fixtures between schools which are taking place alongside the main tournaments. When S.Thomas’ and Trinity met in their division 1 segment 1 group ‘A’ league tournament match this season it was also billed as a traditional fixture between the two schools. When Trinity won the game they also took home the Canon R. De Saram Shield for their efforts. The same happened when Royal scrummed down with Isipatana in the super round of the league tournament. Isipatana walked away with the Maj. Milroy Fernando trophy. But the beauty of rugby traditions in Sri Lanka will be seen soon before the season ends this year. That moment will come when the high-ridding Isipatana team has to grant a fixture to minnows Thurstan some time this season because there is a traditional rugby fixture between these two schools which is played for the Abdul Jabbar Shield. If a team doesn’t qualify for division 1 segment 1 and is demoted to segment 2, still traditional fixtures are there to offer schools struggling at rugby a lifeline.

These traditional fixtures might force the school authorities – the Sri Lanka Schools Rugby Football Association – to make compromises with the schools which have deep roots in the sport. This season, Royal and Trinity honored their commitments in the league tournament when they played their super round fixture and decided not to associate it with the two games of the Bradby. (The dates for the two leg Bradby Shield were announced well before the super round games began; hence there was no room for rescheduling the traditional rugby encounter). What was good is that both schools came for this tournament fixture in full strength. Imagine what would have happened to the quality of the league tournament if these two schools rested their key players for the Bradby and fielded second string teams? In the event these two schools played safe and protected their players for the traditional rugby fixture, the school rugby authorities would have had to plead with Royal and Trinity not to kill their tournament.

The other little concerning point in school rugby is the effect of all the overwhelming glory present in school rugby that can be a little too much for a school going child to handle. Basking in the glory of sponsors, rugby related events and all media attention they get can at times make these junior players think like sports professionals and be far removed from the ideology of living the lives of schoolboys who wear white uniforms. Suddenly we have a situation where a schoolboy, serious about his rugby, not being in a position to even have a piece of birthday cake offered to him because that type of junk food is not part of his sports diet anymore.

Also there was a time when some schools couldn’t condition the mind of schoolchildren to accept defeat at matches. This was because the stakes are too high in school rugby and the pressure is severe on the coaches to always be on the winning side. A school rugby coach knows that if his team loses a couple of matches during a season, he would be forced to look for alternative employment; come next season.

School rugby authorities and parents must understand that these are schoolboys who are involved in the sport, though they are ‘trained’ to play like professionals. These players must be taught how to balance their lives and understand the value of completing their education. There is a Sinhalese saying which goes ‘things that must be done and experienced at a specific age shouldn’t be postponed’. Some of the top clubs have already earmarked the cream of these rugby players who are turning out for their respective schools. If these players are not educated they can place their signatures on contracts with rugby playing clubs and end up getting a raw deal. Hence education at school is so important.

S. Thomas’, Isipatana, St. Peter’s and Wesley have found semi-final slots in the schools’ knockout tournament. This rugby columnist has often highlighted the fact that the environment present at some of the inter-school rugby matches is not very healthy due to uncontrollable jealousy and animosity. But we did come to hear of a warming moment in school rugby when some members of the Isipatana College team paid a courtesy call on the injured Peterite rugby player Yumeth Shihara who is in hospital and nursing an injured leg. Such tender moments in a robust game like rugby does help to remind rugby players that the human touch matters over both victory and defeat. If you lose the human touch you lose it all!



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Wrong time for musical chairs in cricket

Published

on

Moves are underway to replace former opening batter Upul Tharanga as Chairman of Selectors, the latest in a series of shake-ups that have gathered pace alarmingly close to the showpiece event.

With just six weeks to go for the World Cup that Sri Lanka will co-host, the ground appears to be shifting under the selectors’ feet. Moves are underway to replace former opening batter Upul Tharanga as Chairman of Selectors, the latest in a series of shake-ups that have gathered pace alarmingly close to the showpiece event.

First came the reshuffling of the coaching staff. Then there were strong signals that captain Charith Asalanka could be moved aside. Now the selection panel itself is set for an overhaul. One is tempted to ask whether all this chopping and changing is really necessary with the tournament looming large on the horizon.

It is true that the selectors’ term will expire by the book, a new panel must take guard. But with less than two months left before the World Cup, common sense would suggest to let the status quo remain.

Tharanga’s panel has not been flawless, but it has hardly been a basket case either. Recent weeks have produced some sobering results, including a 3-0 ODI whitewash in Pakistan and an embarrassing T20 loss to Zimbabwe. Yet the team showed resilience, regrouped and fought their way into the finals, where they eventually went down to Pakistan.

There were tangible gains too. Sri Lanka climbed to fourth in the ODI rankings and even pulled off a Test victory over England. The wheels came off mainly in the T20 format, where they failed to progress beyond the first round of the last World Cup — a shortcoming that cannot be pinned on selection alone.

If there must be a changing of the guard, logic dictates that it should wait until after the World Cup. Midstream changes at the top rarely help steady a ship already sailing in choppy waters.

What is more troubling is the prospect of a familiar face returning to the hot seat — someone under whose watch Sri Lanka endured disastrous returns. During that previous tenure, selections were muddled and knee-jerk. A poor series often meant wholesale culling, with players axed almost as soon as they were drafted in, leaving no room for continuity or confidence.

There were baffling calls too: Maheesh Theekshana fast-tracked into Test cricket on the strength of his white-ball exploits, while Dunith Wellalage was handed a Test debut before even playing a T20 International. Such horses-for-courses thinking, taken to extremes, left Sri Lanka without a clear road map.

The end result was grim. Sri Lanka finished ninth at the 2023 World Cup, failed to qualify for the Champions Trophy and for the first time in their history, missed out on an ICC event altogether.

Sri Lanka Cricket’s deeper problem is a lack of willing candidates. Few former players are keen to step into the firing line of selection, a role that guarantees brickbats regardless of results. Cornered, the board has repeatedly turned to recycled hands — men who have done the job before, with precious little to show for it.

With the World Cup just around the bend, Sri Lanka can ill afford to keep moving the goalposts. Stability, not another roll of the dice, may yet be their best play.

by Rex Clementine

Continue Reading

Sports

Seneviratne five-for blows Nepal away

Published

on

Sethmika Seneviratne was the Player of the Match for bagging 5 for 25.(ACC)

It was a run-out that started it all after Sri Lanka Under-19s captain Vimath Dinsara asked Nepal Under-19s to bat first in their Group B game at the Under-19s Asia Cup. Nepal were steady at 30 without loss, but come the eighth over, Dinsara combined with wicketkeeper Aadham Hilmy to run Niraj Kumar Yadav out for 10. That started a slide, and Nepal never recovered thereafter.

Sethmika Seneviratne had Sahil Patel caught for 12 in the ninth over, bowled Vansh Chhetri for a duck in the 11th, and then had Dilsad Ali caught without scoring in the 13th. Sri Lanka reduced Nepal to 37 for 4, with the four wickets gone for the addition of just seven runs within six overs.

‎At that stage, Nepal’s captain Ashok Dhami joined Cibrin Shrestha. Just when they looked set to help Nepal find a way back, Rasith Nimsara broke the 24-run stand by having Dhami caught behind for 9 to start the 21st over. Soon, 61 for 4 became 82 all out. Vigneshwaran Akash struck next to dismiss Shrestha for 18, which was Nepal’s highest score.

No Nepal batter after Shreshta even got into double figures, while Seneviratne got two lower-order batters to complete his five-for. Seneviratne finished with 5 for 25, and left Sri Lanka’s batters with little to do.

Although Nepal had Sri Lanka at 25 for 2 in the 83 chase, that only seemed like consolation. Dimantha Mahavithana (39*) and Kavija Gamage (24*) wiped Nepal out with an unbroken stand of 59, as Sri Lanka won with eight wickets and a massive 35.1 overs to spare.

Scores

‎Sri Lanka U-19s 84 for 2 (Mahavithana 39n.o., Kavija Gamage 24n.o., Mandal 1-16)

Nepal U-19s 82 (Shrestha 18, Seneviratne 5-25, Sigera 1-3)

Continue Reading

Latest News

Arshdeep, Harshit set the tone in seam-friendly Dharamsala as India go 2-1 up

Published

on

By

Early seam and swing caused a lot of damage for South Africa (Cricinfo)

India reclaimed the series lead by bowling South Africa  out for 117 in seam-friendly conditions in Dharamsala. Arshdeep Singh and Harshit Rana, the latter playing in the absence of Jasprit Bumrah, who was on leave for personal reasons, set the tone with three early wickets, and the support bowlers never let up. Aiden Markram kept South Africa in the fight with a half-century, but they were at least 20 runs short of what could have been a fighting total, keeping in mind their strong seam attack. Once Abhishek Sharma scored 35 off 18 balls, India could afford a wobble in the rest of the chase.

Hardik Pandya and Shivam Dube cashed in on the conditions with a wicket each in their first overs, but it was Varun Chakravarth’s four overs for 11 runs and two wickets that denied South Africa any chance of creeping back into the match. One of his victims was Donovon Ferreira, the only other recognised batter to reach double digits.

Arshdeep went for 0 for 54 in the last match, bowled an unending over, and was now without Bumrah. His first over was an example of how to bowl if you get that rare pitch that helps you in T20 cricket. He bowled three balls to Reeza Hendricks, all on a similar good length on middle and leg. Two of them seamed away to beat his outside edge, and the third nipped back in to trap him in front.

Rana swung the ball late, got some seam movement as well, but his wickets were slightly inexplicable. Quinton de Kock missed a straight and full delivery, and Dewald Brevis dragged on a long wide half volley, making it 7 for 3 in 3.1 overs.

Markram and Tristan Stubbs saw through the rest of the powerplay, but Stubbs never looked at home. In his first over, Pandya drew just enough nibble to take Stubbs’ outside edge to make it 30 for 4. Corbin Bosch, one of the three batters dropped in the field, missed the first ball from Dube by a long way: a 124kph length ball that nipped back to hit the top of middle.

In the 12th over of the innings, Ferreira hit a Kuldeep wrong’un for a no-look six, the first boundary of the innings by a batter not named Markram. This was the first time India had to deal with two threatening batters. The sixth wicket added 25 runs, but Varun got rid of Ferreira with a wrong’un that he missed by a mile. Varun repeated that dismissal in his next over, this time to a defensive push from Marco Jansen.

Dube had two catches missed off his bowling. While Ferreira couldn’t cause much damage, Markram went on to punish Rana in the 18th over, thus bringing up his fifty and taking South Africa past 100. It was all on Markram’s bat now to take South Africa to 140, a total they could have been competitive with. However, he ended up edging a slot ball from Arshdeep in the 19th over, leaving Kuldeep two tailend wickets to feast on in the last over.

Swivelling inside the line of the first ball and pulling Lungi Ngidi over fine leg for a six, Abhishek set the tone for the chase. He charged at Ngidi for a four in the same over, and went one better with a six off Jansen in the next. When Abhishek hit Ottneil Baartman for a six in the fifth over, he brought up India’s fifty and went to 44 sixes in the first six overs of T20I innings, level with KL Rahul, who did so in more than twice than the matches. Rohit Sharma is the only Indian with more sixes in the first six overs.

The low target allowed Abhishek’s opening partner Shubman Gill time to play himself in, but neither he nor Tilak Varma ever looked set with plenty of seam movement available. Suryakumar Yadav hit two fours, but managed only 12 off 11 balls. When Abhishek was at the wicket, 60 runs came in 5.2 overs; the rest of the match featured 177 in 30.3 overs. Twenty more runs for South Africa, and/or an early departure for Abhishek could have made this a much closer affair.

Brief scores:

India 120 for 3 in 15.5 overs  (Abhishek  Sharma 35, Shubman Gill 28, Tilak Varma 26*,  Suryakumar Yadav 12, Shivam Dube 10*;  Lungi Ngidi  1-23, Marco Jansen  1-24, Corbin Bosch 1-18) beat South Africa 117 in 20 overs  (Aiden Markram 61, Donovan Ferreira 20, Anrich Nortje 12; Varun Chakravarthy  2-11, Kuldeep Yadav 2-12, Arshdeep Singh 2-13, Harshit Rana 2-34, Hardik Pandya 1-23, Shivam Dube1-21) by seven wickets

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

Trending