Features
Harry & Meghan – final three episodes of six episode documentary
by Nanda Pethiyagoda
The final three episodes of the six episodes of Meghan’s and Harry’s string of complaints in interviews were released by Netflix on Thursday December 15, one week after the release of the first three. As I mentioned in my comment on the first three parts, the series was directed by Liz Garbus and produced in conjunction with the production company of Prince Harry and Meghan.
I give my comment plain and simple by letting you know I watched the last three episodes with complete lack of enthusiasm; which is a judgment on the so called documentary. Thursday Dec. 15 came and went and I watched the first of the final three episodes only on the Saturday. I was turned off by Episode four but willed myself to watch the remaining two episodes. This in very sharp contrast to how I watched the series of The Crown – the mostly true and part fictionalized life of Queen Elizabeth from her engagement to Prince Philip through family travails and British history up until 2000.
I watched many episodes at one and the same sitting and once Part 3 was over, waited ever so impatiently for the next two parts released more than a year later. Watching Harry & Meghan was desultory, unenthusiastic, punctuated by several yawns. I even asked myself what I was doing and switched over to watching movies like absorbingly interesting Letters from Mother Teresa.
Content of three episodes
Episode 4 starts with their wedding; the squabble with father Markle and his not attending the wedding. This had Meghan walk up the aisle alone to be conducted the last section by Prince Charles. The birth of Archie came next and the couple’s break in traditions by not consenting to the usual royal photoshoot of the new parents leaving hospital with their new born.
Travels to Australia, South Africa and New York are documented where receptions were rapturous. Meghan accompanies the Queen on an official trip and both show pleasure. Meghan has the grace to say her grandma-in-law made her feel comfortable with gestures such as sharing a warm knee-covering while they rode a car. However, comments of the two are often ridiculous. Meghan says about her wedding: “I don’t know how I was so calm” and about crowds: “Look at all these people” – the pretend ingénue. About Harry looking at her as she comes to him at the altar: “He seems to say, ’look what I got!’”
Harry comments adversely right through. He even brings in the words jealousy and envy, ascribing them to Prince William in reference to the couple’s increasing popularity.
Then come the tiffs and Meghan doing a Diana act of feeling depressed, lonely, and suicidal. She says she thought “All this will stop if I’m not here” I sniffed with disdain when her mother makes much of it. Meghan schemed to get Harry to all appearances so she should have known what she was coming in for. Harry expresses mea culpa: “I did not do enough for her. I could not protect her” about “What the family was doing to her.” “What she needed was more than I could give her.” This comes across as so phony since Meghan is definitely a tough cookie.
Again the emphasizing of the similarity between Diana and Meghan by Harry. My comment here is: they won’t even allow Diana to lie quiet.
Episode 5 shows a deterioration in the solidarity of the Royal Family aka the Firm; the distancing of te two brothers and H&M moving temporarily to Vancouver and contemplating a break with the Royal Family. They felt insecure and Harry mentions their security, paid for by the British Govt, was withdrawn. Subsequently it was mentioned by the royal household that this was not true.
Episode 6 – the last – has Meghan stressed over her father and a letter of hers to him being sold to the press. The stress is so great she suffers a miscarriage. The paparazzi hound them so they move to a friend’s home in Los Angeles. Then they move to their own palatial place in California; are happy; give a no holds barred interview to Oprah Winfrey (which I read somewhere Oprah later said she regretted); Prince Philip dies and Harry goes for the funeral, Meghan not accompanying him as she is pregnant; the birth of Lillibet Diana. The British justifiably faulted them for this naming as the couple had not asked for, nor got permission from the Queen to use her ‘pet’ name. Meghan wins a case against the royal household.
The series ends on the emphasis of their undying, deep love with an appropriate song sung while Harry drives to the city centre. Finally Meghan reads out a statement she made just before she got married – a fairy tale of a young woman meeting a man in 2016 and the two loving each other so strong that nothing else mattered. Another love song accompanies them as they walk to the beach closely clinging to each other.
It was a good ending. However, I wondered how their lives would continue. Would Meghan be ever satisfied; would she get her stressed despondency off and on; would Harry miss Britain, his friends and even brother and father?
The series on the whole was carefully planned to show similarity of Meghan to Diana. Meghan could win an Oscar since she acts right through. The so called documentary is a continuous wail of complaint of a self centered woman and a man who just follows her. He loves her deeply and never refers to her by name but as ‘my wife’. The complaints – loud and clear as enunciated by H&M are against the media and Mr Markle. The complaints against the Royal Family, more especially against Prince Charles, Prince William and Katherine, are voiced by friends and commentators. However, many grouses are implied by the two themselves. Not one complaint about the Queen, who most definitely would have not been amused by their antics and going against tradition. Meghan, the real director of the series, knew that complaints against the Queen would be disastrous at this moment in time.
It is said that much of the rancour of Meghan, echoed by dutiful Harry, was because of her being dubbed a ‘biracial American actress’. What else for goodness sake is she or was she? She was received by the royals; allowed to conduct an all black wedding; much else and she faults them. Not an iota of gratitude shown. I also heard the title of Prince was not bestowed on Archie by the Queen. How could it be, when the couple said they would not undertake any royal duties and broke away to live elsewhere.
Much of the six episodes were scenes and incidents captured on film earlier. The ‘documentary’ was supposed to gain sympathy and of course fame and money for H&M. I for one am certain it has backfired.My final comment is that the entire so called documentary was a Big Bad Bore. A foreign critic went to the extent of saying she regretted the hours she wasted watching the series. I end with a lament: Poor Harry! He knows not what he does. To break away from family is ultimately regrettable.
Features
Mannar’s silent skies: Migratory Flamingos fall victim to power lines amid Wind Farm dispute
By Ifham Nizam
A fresh wave of concern has gripped conservationists following the reported deaths of migratory flamingos within the Vankalai Sanctuary—a globally recognised bird habitat—raising urgent questions about the ecological cost of large-scale renewable energy projects in the region.
The incident comes at a time when a fundamental rights petition, challenging the proposed wind power project, linked to India’s Adani Group, remains under examination before the Supreme Court, with environmental groups warning that the very risks they highlighted are now materialising.
At least two flamingos—believed to be part of the iconic migratory flocks that travel thousands of kilometres to reach Sri Lanka—were found dead after entanglement with high-tension transmission lines running across the sanctuary. Another bird was reportedly struggling for survival.
Professor Sampath Seneviratne, a leading ornithologist, expressed deep concern over the development, noting that such incidents are not isolated but indicative of a broader and predictable threat.
“These migratory birds depend on specific flyways that have remained unchanged for centuries. When high-risk infrastructure, like poorly planned power lines, intersect these routes, collisions become inevitable,” he said. “What we are witnessing now could be just the beginning if proper mitigation measures are not urgently implemented.”
Environmentalists argue that the Mannar region—particularly the Vankalai wetland complex—is one of the most critical stopover sites in South Asia for migratory waterbirds, including flamingos, pelicans, and various species of waders. The sanctuary’s ecological value has also supported a niche with growing eco-tourism sector, drawing birdwatchers from around the world.
Executive Director of the Centre for Environmental Justice, Dilena Pathragoda, said the incident underscores the urgency of judicial intervention and stricter environmental oversight.
“This tragedy is a direct consequence of ignoring scientifically established environmental safeguards. We have already raised these concerns before court, particularly regarding the location of transmission infrastructure within sensitive bird habitats,” Pathragoda said.
“Renewable energy cannot be pursued in isolation from ecological responsibility. If due process and proper environmental impact assessments are bypassed or diluted, then such losses are inevitable.”
Conservation groups have long cautioned that the installation of wind turbines and associated grid infrastructure—especially overhead transmission lines—within or near sensitive habitats could transform these landscapes into lethal zones for avifauna.
An environmental activist involved in the ongoing legal challenge said the latest deaths validate earlier warnings.
“This is exactly what we feared. Development is necessary, but not at the cost of biodiversity. When projects of this scale proceed without adequate ecological assessments and safeguards, the consequences are irreversible,” the activist stressed.
The debate has once again brought into focus the delicate balance between renewable energy expansion and biodiversity conservation. While wind energy is widely promoted as a clean alternative to fossil fuels, experts caution that “green” does not automatically mean “harmless.”
Professor Seneviratne emphasised that solutions do exist, including rerouting transmission lines, installing bird diverters, and conducting comprehensive migratory pathway studies prior to project approval.
“Globally, there are well-established mitigation strategies. The issue here is not the absence of knowledge, but the failure to apply it effectively,” he noted.
The timing of the incident is particularly worrying. Migratory flamingos typically remain in Sri Lanka until late April or May before embarking on their return journeys. Conservationists warn that if hazards remain unaddressed, larger flocks could face similar risks in the coming weeks.
Beyond ecological implications, experts also highlight potential economic fallout. Wildlife tourism—especially birdwatching—contributes significantly to local livelihoods in Mannar.
Repeated reports of bird deaths could deter eco-conscious travellers and damage the region’s reputation as a safe haven for migratory species.
Environmentalists are now calling for immediate intervention by authorities, including a temporary halt to high-risk operations in sensitive zones, pending a thorough environmental review.
They stress that protecting animal movement corridors—whether elephant migration routes or avian flyways—is a fundamental pillar of modern conservation.
As the controversy unfolds, one question looms large: can Sri Lanka pursue sustainable energy without sacrificing the very natural heritage that defines it?
Pathragoda added that for now, the sight of fallen flamingos in Mannar stands as a stark reminder that development, if not carefully planned, can carry a heavy and irreversible cost.
Features
‘Weaponizing’ religion in the pursuit of power
A picture of US President Donald Trump apparently being prayed for by supporters, appearing in sections of the international media, said it all loud and clear. That is, religion is being flagrantly leveraged or prostituted by politicians single-mindedly bent on furthering their power aspirations.
Although in the case of the US President the trend took on may be an exceptionally graphic or dramatic form, the ‘weaponizing’ of religion is nothing particularly new, nor is it confined to only religiously conservative sections of the West. For example, in South Asia it is an integral part of politics. The ‘South Asian Eight’ are notorious for it and it could be unreservedly stated that in Sri Lanka, the latter’s ethnic conflict would be more amenable to resolution if religion was not made a potent weapon by ambitious politicians of particularly the country’s South.
The more enlightened sections of Christian believers in the US may not have been able to contain their consternation at the sight of the US President apparently being ‘blessed’ by pastors claiming adherence to Christianity. Any human is entitled to be blessed but not if he is leading his country to war without exhausting all the options at his disposal to end the relevant conflict by peaceful means.
More compounded would be his problem if his directives lead to the death of civilians in the hundreds. In the latter case he is stringently accountable for the spilling of civilian blood, that is, the committing of war crimes.
However, the US along with Israel did just that in the recent bombings of Iran, for instance. The majority of the lives lost were those of civilians. If the US President is endowed with a Christian conscience he would have paused to consider that he is guilty of ordering the taking of the life of another human which is forbidden in the teachings of Jesus Christ.
Moreover, the ‘pastors’ praying over the US President should have thought on the above lines as well. May be they were in an effort to curry the President’s favour which is as blame-worthy as legitimizing in some form the taking of civilian lives. Apparently, the realisation is not dawning on all Christian conservatives of the US that some of these ‘pastors’ could very well be the proverbial false prophets and the latter are almost everywhere, even in far distant Sri Lanka.
However, the political reality ‘on the ground’ is that the Christian Right is a stable support base of the Republican Right in the US. Considering this it should not come as a surprise to the seasoned political watcher if the Christian Right, read Christian fundamentalists, are hand-in-glove, so to speak, with President Trump. But it is a scathing indictment on these rightist sections that they are all for perpetrating war and destruction and not for the fostering of peace and reconciliation. Ideally, they should have impressed on their President the dire need to make peace.
That said, political commentators should consider it incumbent on themselves to point out that religion is being ‘weaponized’ in Iran as well. Theocratic rule in Iran has been essentially all about perpetuating the power of the clerical class. The reasons that led to the Islamic Revolution in Iran are complex and the indiscreet Westernization of Iran under the Shah dynasty is one of these but one would have expected Iran to develop from then on into a multi-party, pluralistic democratic state where people would be enjoying their fundamental rights, as enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, for example.
Moreover, Iran should have taken it upon itself to be a champion of world peace, in keeping with its Islamic credentials. But some past regimes in Iran had vowed to virtually bomb Israel out of existence and such regional policy trajectories could only bring perpetual conflict and war. Considering the current state of the Middle East it could be said that the unfettered playing out of these animosities is leading the region and the world to ‘reap the whirlwind’, having recklessly ‘sowed the wind’.
However, religious fundamentalism-inspired conflict and war has spread well beyond the Middle East into almost every region since 1979, the year of the Islamic Revolution in Iran. So much so, knowledgeable opinion now points out that religious identity has come to replace nationalism as a principal shaper of international politics or “geopolitics”, as quite a few sections misleadingly and incorrectly term it.
Elaborating on the decisive influence of religious identity, the well known and far traveled Western journalist Patrick Cockburn says in his authoritative and comprehensive book titled, ‘The Age of Jihad – Islamic State and the Great War for the Middle East’ at page 428 in connection with the war in Chechnya ; ‘If nationalism was not entirely dead, it no longer provided the ideological glue necessary to hold together and motivate people who were fighting a war. Unlike the Islamic faith, it was no longer a belief or a badge of identity for which people would fight very hard.’ (The book in reference was published by VERSO, London and New York).
In his wide coverage of Jihadist Wars the world over Cockburn goes on to state that today a call from a cleric could motivate his followers to lay down no less than their lives for a cause championed by the former. The 9/11 catastrophe alone should convince the observer that this is indeed true.
However, as often pointed out in this column, there is no alternative but to foster peace and reconciliation if a world free of bloodshed and strife is what is being sought. Fortunately we are not short of illustrious persons from the East and West who have shone a light on how best to get to a degree of peace. Besides Mahatma Gandhi of India, who was the subject of this column last week, we have former President of Iran Mohammad Khatami, who made a case for a ‘Dialogue of Civilizations’ rather than a ‘Clash of Civilizations’.
The time is more than ripe to take a leaf from these illustrious personalities, for, the current state of war in the Middle East has raised the possibility of a war that could transcend regional boundaries. The antagonists are obliged to exhaust all the peaceful options with the assistance of the UN system. Besides, war cannot ever have the blessings of the sane.
Features
Venerable Rahula Thera’s 35-year green mission and national Namal Uyana
It was 35 years ago, on March 28, 1991, that Venerable Rahula Thera, then a young monk, embarked on a journey to the Na forest in Ulpathagama, Palagama, in the Anuradhapura District. Today, three and a half decades later, this mission stands as living proof of the enduring bond between Buddhist philosophy and the natural world.
Marking the 35th year of this green mission, Rahula Thera’s relentless dedication has transformed the National Namal Uyana into an environmental landmark admired not only across Sri Lanka but around the globe, as well.
When studying the life of Venerable Rahula Thera, one cannot ignore the profound connection between Buddhism and the environment. Buddhism is a philosophy deeply attuned to nature. The historical use of the sacred “Na Ruka” by all four Buddhas: Mangala Buddha, Sumana Buddha, Revata Buddha, and Sobhita Buddha — for enlightenment —demonstrates that from time immemorial, Buddhism has maintained a sacred bond with the Na tree. From the birth of Siddhartha to his enlightenment, the propagation of the Dharma, and even the great Parinirvana, all of these milestones unfolded in verdant, living landscapes.
Venerable Rahula Thera did not embark on the Namal Uyana mission seeking government support or personal gain. His commitment sprang from a deep devotion to the Buddha’s teachings on grove cultivation. A grove cultivator is one who spreads compassion for nature. As the Vanaropa Sutta teaches:
Venerable Rahula Thera reclaimed Namal Uyana which was then under the control of timber smugglers and treasure hunters. The term “Wanawasi” does not merely mean living in a forest; it signifies finding rest and enlightenment through nature, free from the destructive roots of greed, sin, and delusion.
Another defining aspect of Venerable Rahula Thera’s 35-year mission is the purification of the human mind. He has consistently taught the thousands who visit Namal Uyana that a person who loves a tree will never harm another human being. As the Dhamma proclaims:
It is important to remember that Venerable Rahula Thera devoted his life, without fear, speaking the truth and taking necessary action, tirelessly advancing the national mission he began. From 1991 to the present, he has worked with every government elected by the people, maintaining impartiality and independence from political ideology. Yet, he never hesitated to raise his voice fearlessly against any individual, of any rank or party, who committed wrongdoing.
Religious and Social Mission
The National Namal Uyana is not merely a forest; it is a magnificent heritage site, dating back to ancient times. Scattered across the landscape are boundary walls, the remains of ancient monastery complexes, and stone carvings believed to date back to the reign of King Devanampiyatissa. In earlier centuries, this sacred land had served as a meditation sanctuary for hundreds of monks. The name “National Namal Uyana,” by which this ecological and archaeological treasure is known today, was introduced by Venerable Rahula Thera in 1991. The government’s later recognition of the site as the National Namal Uyana stands as a significant achievement for both religion and national heritage.
Venerable Rahula Thera is a monk who has lived a life of renunciation. A striking example of this is his decision not to assume the position of Chief Incumbent of the National Namal Uyana Viharaya, instead entrusting the temple to the Ramanna Nikaya and its trustees. In doing so, he set a precedent for the contemporary Sangha. The Thera himself stated that he was merely the trustee of Namal Uyana, not its owner.
Legacy and Continuing Inspiration
The 35th anniversary of Venerable Wanawasi Rahula Thera’s arrival at Namal Uyana is not merely the commemoration of a period of time; it is a message of nature to future generations. Through his work, the Thera revived the ancient Hela tradition of loving trees and venerating the environment as something sacred. This religious and environmental mission remains unforgettable.
The revival experienced by Namal Uyana, after the arrival of Venerable Wanawasi Rahula Thera, is beyond simple description. Some of the major accomplishments achieved under his leadership include:
* Securing and protecting the largest Rose Quartz (Rosa Thirivana) reserve in South Asia.
* Restoring the Na forest spread across hundreds of acres, providing shelter to numerous rare plants and animal species.
* Transforming the area into a living centre for environmental education, offering practical learning experiences for thousands of schoolchildren and university students.
* Drawing the attention of world leaders and international environmentalists to Sri Lanka’s unique environmental heritage.
In recognition of his immense contribution to environmental conservation, Venerable Rahula Thera was honoured with the Presidential Environment Award and the Green Award in 2004—a significant moment in his life. Yet the Thera himself has always remained devoted to the work rather than the recognition it brings, making such appreciation even more meaningful.
-
News2 days agoSenior citizens above 70 years to receive March allowances on Thursday (26)
-
Features4 days agoTrincomalee oil tank farm: An engineering marvel
-
News7 days agoCIABOC tells court Kapila gave Rs 60 mn to MR and Rs. 20 mn to Priyankara
-
Features7 days agoScience and diplomacy in a changing world
-
Features4 days agoThe scientist who was finally heard
-
News2 days agoJapanese boost to Sri J’pura Hospital, an outright gift from Tokyo during JRJ rule
-
News2 days agoCEB Engineers warn public to be prepared for power cuts after New Year
-
News6 days agoColombo, Oslo steps up efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation in key environmental priority areas
