Connect with us

News

Tycoons backed by pettifoggers eyeing Wattegama-Kebilitta forest for corn cultivation – MONLAR

Published

on

By Rathindra Kuruwita

A group of lawyers and businessmen were attempting to take over large swathes of Wattegama – Kebilitta forest reserve for large-scale corn plantation, Sajeewa Chamikara of Movement for Land and Agricultural Reform alleged yesterday.

Chamikara told The Island that people with political backing had been attempting to encroach on land in the reserve for years. “However, officials and grassroots groups in the area have been able to thwart these moves. These racketeers now work with a group of lawyers to exploit the land use policy of this government. If they succeed, there will be an ecological catastrophe.

“This is a forest land protected for decades and in November 2012, the government declared it a forest reserve through a gazette notification 1789/9. The gazette declared 28,926 hectares as the Wattegama – Kebilitta forest reserve.”

The Wattegama-Kebilitta forest reserve is an inter monsoon forest, which is home to a large number of wild animals, including elephants.

This is also the main catchment area of several important water sources of the area including Wila Oya, Kumbukkan Oya, Kotiyagala Wewa and Wattarama Wewa.

Chamikara said that Wila Oya fed 47 tanks, while Kumbukkan Oya 93 tanks and 145 anicuts. The Ratmake Ara and Una Ela, which start from the Wattegama-Kebilitta forest reserve feed a number of tanks outside the reserve. Therefore, almost all farmlands in the area are dependent on this forest reserve. “The forest reserve is a part of a forest network that also includes the Yala National Park and Kumbukkana Forest Reserve,” Chamikara said.

“The Meethotakanaththa Wewa, the Lepolonara Wewa, the Mailla wewa, the Hansaweli wewa and the Warakanaththa wewa that are inside the Wattegama-Kebilitta forest reserve are important sources of water to wild animals. There are many elephants in the areas and they do not enter human settlements because of these tanks and the ample sources of food found inside the forest,” he said.

Research has found that Moneragala is the district with the fourth highest rates of human-elephant conflict. The district also reports significant damage to farms and property by marauding elephants.

“During the last decade, there have been 1,127 reported instances of human elephant conflict. Around 330 humans and elephants have died in the same period. The reason for the spike in cases is the destruction of elephant habitats and feeding grounds and the establishment of large farms that fragment forest areas,” Chamikara said.

According to the Land Use Policy Planning Department, the Moneragala District comprises 563,900 hectares, out of which 296,125 are forests and grasslands. This is 52% of the land area of the district. Although Siyambalanduwa, affected most by the human-elephant conflict in the district, has 41% of forest cover, this has been fragmented greatly in recent years due to large scale farms.

“These farms prevent elephants from freely travelling between forests. The establishment of these farms correlate with the increase in human-elephant conflict in the district. In the past, there was a lot of chena cultivations that only operated in the maha season. They were abandoned in the Yala season and acted as foraging areas for elephants. However, now, these lands are used for corn and sugar cane cultivation which are operational throughout the year. These farms are protected by electric fences, and these compel elephants to maraud villages. If large swaths of Wattegama-Kebilitta forest reserve are given for corn farming, the human elephant conflict in the surrounding areas will skyrocket,” Chamikara warned.

Chamikara said that the Wattegama-Kebilitta forest reserve was linked to a wider network of forests that had hundreds of elephants. The forest reserve was a part of a forest network that also includes the Yala National Park and Kumbukkana Forest Reserve. Lahugala – Kithulana National Park, Bakmitiyawa – Thimbirigolla forest reserve, Kudumbigala – Panama sanctuary and Kumana National Park were also a part of the forest network. Those forests reduced the human-elephant conflict to some extent and disrupting that network to please a few greedy individuals would place thousands of farmers in harm’s way, Chamikara said.

“Sri Lankans are already experiencing the results of deforestation. Even by 1961, we had about 44.2% forest cover (2, 898, 842 hectares.) By 1985, FAO research found that Sri Lanka had a forest cover of 37.5% (2,458,250 hectares.) The number reduced to 31.2% by 1992 (2,046,599 hectares.) By 2010, it was at 29.7% (1,942,219 hectares.) Thus between 1961 and 2010, 947, 370 hectares of forest land had been cleared. 124,992 hectares in the intermediate zone had been cleared between 1992 and 2010, which is half of the total intermediate forests in 1992. The result of this has been chronic water shortages for human consumption and agriculture in districts like Moneragala, a rapid increase in human-elephant conflict, changes in weather and climate patterns and the drop in productivity in agricultural lands. Given this context, the government must not allow large clearings of forest land to plant corn, mainly to feed animals,” he said.

Chamikara said that the Forest Conservation Department officials were desperately attempting to prevent the particular group of businessmen and lawyers from encroaching the Wattegama – Kebilitta forest reserve. Earlier, the government had planned to release 9,960 acres of land under the Forest Conservation Department to farmers of the area. The idea was to promote mixed cropping, which works well in climatic conditions of Moneragala. However, these powerful businessmen were not allowing the transfer of lands to the people as well, Chamikara alleged.

“In recent years, we saw corn being attacked by Sena caterpillars. Even this year thousands of acres of corn were destroyed. This is just an indication of monocropping being a bad system of agriculture and we really shouldn’t allow the destruction of a forest to encourage this unsustainable form of agriculture,” he said.



News

Gnanasara Thero absconding after SC ruling

Published

on

Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero was not at his temple in Rajagiriya when prison officials visited the premises yesterday to take steps following the Supreme Court ruling that nullified the presidential pardon granted to him, police sources said.

Prison officials who visited the temple on Nawala Road, Rajagiriya, were reportedly informed by those present that the Thero’s whereabouts were unknown. The development comes a day after the Supreme Court declared former President Maithripala Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Gnanasara Thero null and void.

The three-member Supreme Court bench comprising Justices Janak De Silva, Dr. Sobhitha Rajakaruna and Sampath B. Abayakoon held that the pardon was arbitrary, violated the public trust and principles of natural justice, and was made beyond the proper exercise of the President’s constitutional discretion.

The case arose from Gnanasara Thero’s conduct at the Homagama Magistrate’s Court in January 2016 during proceedings relating to the disappearance of journalist and political cartoonist Prageeth Eknaligoda.

The Court of Appeal convicted him on four counts of contempt of court in 2018 and imposed concurrent prison terms amounting to six years. He had served about nine months when Sirisena granted him a presidential pardon on May 23, 2019.

The Supreme Court found that although Article 34 empowers the President to grant pardons, that power is held in trust for the people and is subject to constitutional limitations and judicial review. The Court concluded that Sirisena had effectively acted on the recommendation of the Additional Secretary (Legal) without demonstrating that he had independently considered the relevant material.

Justice De Silva held that the pardon was “arbitrary”, violated public trust and the rules of natural justice, and was ultra vires the President’s powers. The Court consequently found that the decision violated the fundamental right to equality guaranteed by Article 12(1) of the Constitution.

The ruling effectively restores the legal position under the original conviction, leaving Gnanasara Thero without the benefit of the 2019 pardon. The Supreme Court also clarified that a pardon does not erase a conviction or sentence, but merely relieves an offender from serving the sentence to the extent specified in the pardon.

Gnanasara Thero, the General Secretary of the Bodu Bala Sena, had been convicted over his conduct during proceedings concerning the disappearance of Eknaligoda, who went missing in January 2010 and has not been located.

Sandhya Eknaligoda, Prageeth Eknaligoda’s wife, was among those who challenged the presidential pardon before the Supreme Court, alongside the Centre for Policy Alternatives and its Executive Director Dr. Paikiasothy Saravanamuttu.

The detailed account of the judgment indicates that the Court’s ruling primarily nullified the pardon and restored the legal effect of the original sentence, with the implementation of the sentence falling to the relevant authorities.

Police sources said that the Supreme Court, however, did not permanently close the door on executive clemency. It held that a future President could grant Gnanasara Thero another pardon, provided the power is exercised lawfully and after proper consideration of all relevant material.

The Supreme Court has so far overturned three presidential pardons granted to two former Presidents. In January 2024, the Court declared former President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s pardon of former MP Duminda Silva unlawful and invalid. In June 2024, it invalidated two pardons granted by former President Maithripala Sirisena to Royal Park murder convict Jude Shramantha Anthony Jayamaha — the first in May 2016, which commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment, and the second in October 2019, which released him from prison. Jayamaha, who was convicted of the murder of 19-year-old Yvonne Johnson, remains at large. Most recently, on September 10, 2026, the Supreme Court declared Sirisena’s 2019 pardon of Ven. Galagoda Aththe Gnanasara Thero null and void, ruling that it was arbitrary and inconsistent with the Constitution.

Continue Reading

News

House to debate 22A, Judicature Bill next week

Published

on

Parliament is scheduled to debate the Twenty-Second Amendment to the Constitution Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill on September 24 and 25, subject to the Speaker’s announcement following the delivery of the Supreme Court determination on petitions filed against the Bills.

The programme for the Parliamentary Week from September 22 to 25 was decided at a meeting of the Committee on Parliamentary Business held on Thursday (10) under the chairmanship of Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne.

On each sitting day, Parliamentary Business under Standing Orders 22(1) to 22(6) will be taken up from 9.30 am to 10 am, followed by Questions for Oral Answers from 10 am to 11 am Questions under Standing Order 27(2) will be taken up from 11 am to 11.30 am.

On Tuesday (22), the Orders published in Extraordinary Gazette No. 2497/37 under the Petroleum Resources Act and the Promotion of Export Agriculture (Amendment) Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm.

The Tredso Development Foundation (Incorporation) Bill, a Private Member’s Bill, will then be taken up for Second Reading before being referred to the Legislative Standing Committee.

An Opposition motion at the Adjournment Time will follow.

On Wednesday (23), the Chartered Institute of Media Professionals of Sri Lanka Bill will be debated from 11.30 am to 5 pm, followed by Questions at the Adjournment Time.

The Second Reading debate on the 22nd Amendment Bill and the Judicature (Amendment) Bill is scheduled for 11.30 am to 7 pm on Thursday (24) and Friday (25).

Continue Reading

News

Wrong house targeted in underworld grenade attack: Two children killed

Published

on

Two children aged 11 and 17 were mistakenly killed and their 55-year-old father injured in an early morning hand grenade attack on Sirisangabo Mawatha on Friday. Police investigations later revealed that the attackers targeted the wrong house during an ongoing underworld clash.

Three police teams have been deployed to investigate the attack, which occurred at around 3 am.

According to police, a man who arrived near the house in a three-wheeler knocked on the front door before throwing a grenade into the premises and fleeing.

The victims were identified as 17-year-old Kasun Rashmika and 11-year-old Duminda Gihan. Their 56-year-old father, Nalin Thusantha Perera, was seriously injured and admitted to the Kalubowila Teaching Hospital.

Police said the injured man’s brother was allegedly a close associate of a drug trafficker known as ‘Sando’ and had also been accused of involvement in drug trafficking.

The brother lives in a house adjoining the one targeted in the attack, and police suspect the grenade may have been thrown at the wrong house.

Police are also investigating information that the attack was allegedly carried out at the direction of several overseas-based drug traffickers, identified as Pandithage Shantha Kumara alias ‘Kos Malli’, Samantha Perera alias ‘Chuwa Samantha’, ‘Kudu Avishka’ and ‘I.D.’

Police said the attack was believed to be linked to an ongoing conflict between two underworld factions, which have targeted each other’s associates in shootings and grenade attacks. More than 20 people have reportedly been killed in such attacks.

Security agencies are also investigating alleged links between one faction and overseas-based criminals including Kanjipani Imran, Unakuruwe Shantha, Dubai Gagana and Handaya.

Security agencies have also received information that overseas-based criminals identified as Kanjipani Imran, Unakuruwe Shantha, Dubai Gagana and Handaya are allegedly behind the supply of firearms and drugs to the faction associated with Kos Malli and Chuwa Samantha.

Continue Reading

Trending