Connect with us

Sports

A script gone sour!

Published

on

36th Anniversary of Sri Lanka’s first ever Test match at Lord’s – Part 1

by Rohan Wijeyaratna

“We’ve actually come here” said the middle-aged man seated next to me, “to watch a proper game of cricket”. Dressed in jacket and a gaudy ‘bacon and eggs’ tie, he was with a group of four others, settling into their seats in the upper tiers of the New Tavern Stand, with the expectation of witnessing an enjoyable day’s cricket. The drift of their conversation seemed no different to the sentiments expressed in the English press and elsewhere, that the game about to begin would be agreeably one sided. Many felt England had a great opportunity of redeeming themselves after the fearful thrashing they received at the hands of the West Indies, earlier that summer.

No one could fault such sentiment. Sri Lanka’s lead up to their first Test at Lord’s had been less than impressive. Beginning 25th July, the Lankans played Nottinghamshire, Surrey, Gloucestershire, Hampshire, Kent, Sussex and Warwickshire and – barring Kent – they failed to bowl out any of the other sides even once. Also, they lost to Surrey. “Not much better than Cambridge University” was the honest appraisal of an experienced county coach, without stooping to insult. Going by the match results at the time, that seemed fair comment.

England’s rough summer

This was 23rd August 1984. England had suffered a complete ‘blackwash’ earlier that summer at the hands of the West Indies, losing 5-0. The pounding was so intense and intimidating, it prompted cricket sages like Jim Swanton to suggest the drawing of a mandatory line across the wicket, compelling bowlers to pitch beyond it. That the West Indians derived most of their menace through their unrelenting pace there was no doubt, but the extent to which they used the short pitched delivery made it seem that batting was as much an exercise in self defense as it was, in defense of the wicket. Even night-watchmen weren’t spared. Batsmen literally jumped out of their skins with both feet off the ground, trying to keep the ball down, or frantically swaying out of the way to avoid grievous injury. The bowlers were like men possessed. There were not just one or two of them, but often four in tandem; all delivering at furious pace, unrelenting fury and unerring accuracy. Importantly, they were all pitched short of a good length. Whichever side of the divide one belonged, there was no denying this was violent cricket, which fell way short of the game’s famed chivalry. Given all of that, the Sri Lankan match at the tail end of the summer, was expected to offer the perfect antidote to what had gone on before.

Manna from heaven!

On a murky overcast morning, David Gower won the toss and sensing some possible early inroads, decided to field. As it proved, it was a serious misjudgment. Shortly, Wettimuny and Amal Silva walked out from the shadows of the hallowed pavilion at Lord’s, nervously aware how many illustrious men have trodden those very same steps before. They were greeted with polite applause, and soon everyone had taken their positions. But just before ‘play’ was called, there was an interruption. A scattering of banner waving detractors invaded the field and held up play for several minutes, to the complete bemusement of all! It took a while to connect that this was a demonstration with political connotations. When the ground was finally cleared, it was evident the pitch invasion had left its mark on at least one person in the middle.

Walking to the middle and facing the first ball of a Lord’s Test match could be a daunting task to even the best amongst experienced campaigners. Sidath Wettimuny was no exception. The long walk, then taking guard, taking in the atmosphere, enduring the suspense of the ‘wait’ for the first ball; being sub-consciously reminded of his team’s expectations of him – all these would have created their own share of tensions, adding to the butterflies already in his stomach. Then suddenly, there came the disruption! To an already tensed Sidath Wettimuny, this seemed like manna from heaven!

On his way!

This disruption helped ease the mounting tension within Sidath Wettimuny and soon he was seen busily making explanations to his shell-shocked adversaries as to what the invasion was all about. Just moments before, these very same men had been aggressively scowling at him from the slip cordon and elsewhere, and now they were lapping up every word he uttered, as though it was the gospel! The interlude must have helped dispel all the butterflies in his stomach, for, when play got under way, and a shortish delivery presented itself outside the off, Wettimuny lost no time in getting well on top of it, cutting it neatly to the left of point for two. Shortly thereafter to a ball that was even shorter and wider, he launched into the type of shot he would normally never have played, unless well past 20. It was a well controlled, searing square cut, which sent the leather scuttling away between fourth slip and gully, to register Sri Lanka’s first Test boundary at Lord’s.

Wettimuny continued in this vein, taking most of the strike and doing most of the scoring. Presently, he essayed a sublime drive past point off Botham for four, and then unfurled a sumptuous repeat of the shot off Ellison. At most times he was copybook perfect, and when he wasn’t, he made sure the ball met the bat at its sweetest spot. Wide half volleys were spectacularly square driven while several other memorable strokes followed, as he reached the first of several milestones during his epic innings. He brought up his 50 by rolling off two dashing fours off Agnew in the final over before lunch; the first – an uppish slash over the slips to a very wide ball which stood up, and the other – a near one handed cover drive, coiling and then uncoiling with the shot, in one beautiful symphonic movement. Sri Lanka came into lunch at 81 for 2 with Wettimuny having made 51 of them.

Near vulnerable position

For a while at least within the first hour when the scoreboard read 42-2 after 13 overs, Gower’s decision with the toss seemed vindicated. Even though Jim Fairbrother’s farewell wicket to Test cricket was the friendliest featherbed any batting side could have asked for, and even though the bowling did no justice to the four slips and gully that stood in patient hope, Amal Silva batting with no trouble at all was trapped leg before to a Botham in-swinger. Madugalle the next man in, was comprehensively bowled shortly thereafter, to a delivery which swung back late. This left Wettimuny and Roy Dias to navigate the innings from a somewhat vulnerable position to the safety of the luncheon break, with the game still, evenly poised.

A throwback to a bygone era

If England harboured any hopes of an early breakthrough upon resumption, such hopes were quickly dashed by the two Sri Lankans. What unfolded after lunch was a delightful interlude of sublime Asian batting artistry, where wristwork, footwork, placement and touch, were amply displayed in a throwback to a by-gone era of technically correct batting, laced with style and unending grace. There was no further evidence needed to showcase the cricketing pedigree of both these batsmen. Relying mostly on his water-tight technique and his lyrical off-side driving, Wettimuny shortly reached his hundred in the 54th over, out of a total of 154. As the entire ground stood to him in warm applause, it was evident that the spirit of cricket was alive and well, and good cricket was being recognized; never mind from where it came.

Dias meanwhile, not to be outdone, displayed shades of his undisputed class. His regally elegant off-side play was complemented with decisive clips through midwicket to anything that was on his pads. He had not just style and grace, but command as well in all his offerings, but just when the stage was really well set for one great innings to remember, Dias fell victim to a clever piece of deception by the wily Surrey off- spinner Pocock. The bowler enticed him to go through with the shot, to a ball that hadn’t quite arrived and Dias paid the penalty. He made 32 out of a 102 run partnership from 150 minutes of batting.

In his element

The departure of Roy Dias brought the pugnacious 21 year old Ranatunga to the center. Looking every bit as cheeky as he always was, Ranatunga quickly set about scuttling the bowling with an array of off side shots, using no noticeable back lift and curbing himself until the ball was almost upon him. He would then lean into it with some muscle and scuttle it away, be it from backward point to long-on. Anything that was on his pads, he would deftly deflect backward of square, with the assurance of a man who was in complete control of himself.

Wettimuny meanwhile, was increasingly stricken with cramp and was content on playing second fiddle. This allowed Ranatunga to take on the bulk of the bowling. The leftie would busily square drive or punch on the off, picking gaps or creating them, while gorging himself on the bowling as if it were a plate of rice. At tea, Sri Lanka were 173 for three and by the end of the day’s play 30 minutes before the scheduled close, they were 226 for three. Amply blessed with patience and style, Wettimuny returned unbeaten on 116 on a day he could do no wrong even if he tried. Ranatunga remained unbeaten on 54.

To be continued tomorrow.



Latest News

Last over in multi-day cricket to continue despite a wicket after latest amendments to Laws

Published

on

By

"It was felt unfair that, if a fielding side takes a wicket in the final over of the day, the batting side does not have to send out a new batter." [Cricinfo]

The final over of the day’s play in multi-day cricket, including potentially in Tests, will not end if there is a wicket. As per the new edition of the Laws of Cricket, which were announced by the MCC on Tuesday, the over will be completed, and a new batter will need to walk in.

That is one of the significant changes the MCC has carried out in the Laws, which also includes allowing laminated bats in adult recreational cricket, improvising the understanding and definition of hit wicket, and simplifying the definition of overthrows. Overall, the MCC said in a media statement on Tuesday that it has carried out “73 material changes” to the Laws, along with some “linguistic changes”.

This is the third time the MCC’s Laws sub-committee has edited the Laws since the 2017 Code came into effect: first in 2019, and again in 2022. While the latest changes to Laws will be effective from October 1, 2026, they will be also be discussed by the ICC’s Cricket Committee at its next meeting to ratify the new tweaks to be included in the international Playing Conditions.

The MCC has also left it for the national governing boards to decide on whether they will adopt changes to the Laws in their playing conditions in their domestic cricket.

Last over to continue despite a wicket

One of the key reasons the MCC’s Laws sub-committee felt the last over of the day could not be carried forward to the next morning in case a wicket fell was that not only was it favourable to the batting team but it also robbed the match of some “drama”.

“The final over of a day’s play will not end if there is a wicket,” the MCC said, expanding on the reason for tweaking Law 12.5.2. “This is a significant change that will impact multi-day cricket. It was felt unfair that, if a fielding side takes a wicket in the final over of the day, the batting side does not have to send out a new batter.

“This doesn’t save time (which is the case at lunch and tea) as the remaining balls need to be made up the next day, and it takes the drama out of the game, while letting the incoming batter off the hook – at a time when the conditions are often more favourable to bowling. The new change means that the final over of the day will be bowled fully, even if a wicket falls during it (assuming conditions remain fit).”

Laminated bats

The MCC has also authorised that laminated bats can be used in adult recreational cricket. A laminated bat is a combination of different types of wood which significantly reduces the cost of a bat compared to a bat made of pure high-quality willow. With an English willow tree usually taking 15-plus years to mature and the demand for the bats rising exponentially, the MCC has been doing research on laminated bats for a long time.

In 2017, it approved the used of laminated bats in junior cricket. And now having coordinated closely with bat manufacturers globally, including holding a conference last October at Lord’s, the MCC has approved laminated bats are good for use by adults in club cricket.

The MCC said allowing laminated bats was “part of an attempt to slow the rising costs” of bats globally. It is for the NGBs (National Governing Bodies) to decide at what level laminated bats, which the MCC has called Type D bats, will be used.

“Laminated bats can use up to three pieces of wood, allowing for more of the best quality willow trees to be used, and for lower quality willow to be glued to a high-quality face,” the MCC said. According to the MCC, laminated bats did not offer any “performance advantage” over the normal bats.

Hit Wicket Law

There are two changes to the Hit Wicket Law (35.1.1 and 35.2). Firstly, the MCC has defined a batter is hit wicket if they fall onto the stumps while attempting to find the balance well after receiving the ball. The MCC said “receiving the ball lasts until the batter has gained control of their balance after playing the ball. If the batter is off balance because of the shot they played, hops around for a few steps, and falls onto their stumps, that is as a result of the action they took to receive the ball. The ball may be long gone, but the striker is still out Hit wicket”.

Strikers, though, wouldn’t be declared Hit Wicket when they, while regaining balance, come into contact with a fielder who pushes them onto the stumps. “If, however, the contact with the fielder is purely incidental – perhaps they are falling onto the stumps – and in doing so their bat brushes the wicketkeeper, that will not protect them. If a part of the batter’s equipment becomes detached and makes any contact with another player before hitting the stumps, then they cannot be out Hit wicket. So if the batter accidentally lets go of the bat, and it hits the wicket, the batter will be out Hit wicket. However, if the bat hits the wicketkeeper and then the wicket, it will be Not out.”

Overthrows Law

The MCC has essentially discarded its “vague” wording used in Law 19.8, which deals with overthrows, and thus created a distinction with misfield. The updated version defines an overthrow as an “attempt to direct the ball towards the stumps to stop run-scoring or attempt a Run out”.

Whereas for a misfield, the MCC said, “whether an attempt to stop the ball or pass it to another fielder close to the boundary – should not be treated as an overthrow.”

Ball ‘finally settled’

No longer does the ball need to be in the bowler or the wicketkeeper’s hand for it to become dead. The MCC pointed out this was “quite a big” change in the Law (20.1.1.1), wherein the umpire will have “much greater leeway to determine whether a ball is finally settled, which can often be extremely important, particularly on the final ball of a close game”.

The MCC said: “The ball no longer has to be in the bowler or wicketkeeper’s hands to be finally settled. It can be in the hands of any fielder, or stationary on the ground. This allows umpires the freedom to make reasonable decisions on when the ball is Dead, even if one fielder, or one batter, is still attempting to play on.

The two previous clauses – regarding the ball being finally settled and clear to the umpire that none of the players regard it as being in play – have been combined into one place.”

The updated Laws and other tweaks have been published on the MCC website. The MCC said the new edition of Laws was drafted on two principles: firstly, they are “fit for the modern game”, and that they are “inclusive” for everyone.

“Cricket is a fast-evolving sport, and this edition is drafted with the modern game in mind, as we are constantly looking to ensure that the Laws, which the Club has administered since being founded in 1787, are fit for all levels of cricket across the globe,” Fraser Stewart, the MCC Laws Manager, said in the media statement.

[Cricinfo]

Continue Reading

Latest News

England will bat first in 3rd ODI

Published

on

By

England won the toss and elected to bat first in the 3rd T20I in Pallekelle.

Sri Lanka: Pathum Nissanka, Kamil Mishara, Kusal Mendis (wk), Pavan Rathnayake,  Kamindu Mendis, Dasun Shanaka (capt),  Janith Liyanage, Dunith Wellalage, Maheesh Theekshana,  Dushmantha Chameera,  Matheesha Pathirana

England: Ben Duckett, Jos Buttler (wk),  Jacob Bethell, Tom Banton,  Harry Brook (capt), Sam Curran, Will Jacks,  Jamie Overton,  Liam Dawson, Adil Rashid,  Luke Wood

 

Continue Reading

Latest News

Sri Lanka aim to overcome disarray and end trophy drought

Published

on

By

Pathum Nissanka is proper pedigree at the top of Sri Lanka's batting line-up [Cricinfo]

Where in other formats, Sri Lanka have had brief shining moments in the past few years, their T20I returns have been consistently modest. Since the start of 2022, there has not been a single calendar year in which Sri Lanka have won more T20Is than they have lost. This, despite some of their oppositions through this period not being especially highly-ranked.

(Sri Lanka arrive at this World Cup in now customary disarray. A captain has been switched. Or more accurately, circled back to [Dasun Shanaka had led Sri Lanka before, but had given up the captaincy to Charith Asalanka, who in turn was ousted to make way for Shanaka’s return.]  Selectors have tried options out of nowhere and ditched them almost as fast. The coach and support staff are operating under pressure. In the last few months they have been beaten by Zimbabwe, trounced by Pakistan and in their most recent series, at home, England have been all over them.

When discussing Sri Lanka men’s teams of this era, you are frequently left discussing what could be rather than what is. Members of this top order – Pathum Nissanka, especially – have the potential to light up a global tournament. Wanidu Hasaranga’s quality is known, even if his recent returns have not been stellar. Dunith Wellalage has the broad skillset to impose himself in home conditions. And Dushmantha Chameera – when in good rhythm – is a reliable leader of the seam attack.

But together, these players have not put together winning performances. Glimmers of brilliance. Patches where the Lankan batters dominate attacks. A penetrative opening burst followed by an opposition resurgence through the middle overs. These have been the general trends. Up against the T20I pedigree other teams are bringing to this event, Sri Lanka are again in the position of hoping for magical inspiration.

Between 2009 and 2014, Sri Lanka made the semi-final of four men’s T20I World Cups, winning the championship in Dhaka. They have not progressed to the knockouts in any tournament since.

They have just lost a series to England on the back of drawing one against Pakistan, both at home.

Pathum Nissanka is one of the few batters in the world with an ODI double-hundred and a T20I century. That his triple-figure score in the shortest format came against India in an Asia Cup gives you a sense of his ceiling. There are also few batters who take on the short ball as effectively as he does.

Also making a charge is Pavan Rathnayake who struck an excellent ODI hundred and has shown signs of an enterprising style in T20Is as well.

This World Cup is likely to be the last for Kusal Perera. This is the only format he plays internationally and it is the one most suited to his batting, although in what has been an unusual, injury-riddled career, he is probably better known for that sublime Test innings – the 153 not out in South Africa. Kusal is not an automatic starter in the Sri Lanka XI (he has not played a T20I since November), particularly following Rathnayake’s arrival. But he will likely be required at some stage in this campaign.

Best XI

Pathum Nissanka, Kamil Mishara,  Kusal Mendis (wk),  Pavan Rathnayake, Charith Asalanka/Kusal Perera,  Dasun Shanaka (capt.),  Dunith Wellalage,  Wanindu Hasaranga,  Dushmantha Chameera,  Eshan Malinga/Maheesh Theekshana,  Matheesha Pathirana
[Cricinfo]
Continue Reading

Trending