News
Ravi denies being in charge of Central Bank during bond scam
Former Finance Minister and NDF MP Ravi Karunanayake yesterday told Parliament that the Central Bank had not been under his purview when the bond scams took place.
“At no point during my tenure as the Minister of Finance I was assigned the Central Bank. This is the first time I am publicly mentioning this,” Karunanayake said.
He said so making a special statement under the provisions of the Section 27/8 Standing Order of Parliament. The Standing order provides for a personal explanation that could be made by an MP for the purpose of vindicating the personal conduct of that MP in response to a reference which has been made by another MP in the House while he was not present in the House.
Karunanayake said that he was making the special statement with the intention of rectifying a statement made by Prime Minister Dr Harini Amarasuriya, on 26 November, to the House, where she was answering a question pertaining to the Bond Scam. The Central Bank was under then Prime Minister Ranil Wickremesinghe, and the State and Private Banks were under the then Minister Kabir Hashim.
The Central Bank had always been under the Minister of Finance, except during the time that I held the office of Finance Minister,” Karunanayake said.
He said that incumbent Prime Minister Dr Amarasuriya’s statement on Nov 26 to the House implied that he was responsible for the Bond Scam. “That implication is a violation of my rights. It is misleading and damaging my rights. I make this statement not against PM Amarasuriya personally but to rectify the error and to set the record straight,” Karunanayake said.
Karunanayke said that PM Amarasuriya had stated that her answer was grounded in the recommendations contained in the Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry. “This is factually incorrect and misleading, for the Presidential Commission of Inquiry in their entire report did not find me guilty of anything or find me wanting in any way whatsoever,” he said.
The full text of MP Karunanayake’s statement: “I rise to bring to your notice a serious matter concerning a violation of my parliamentary privileges, and to seek your leave to make a personal explanation in terms of Standing Orders 21 and 27.
On 26 November 2025, during answers given in this House relating to the 2015 Treasury Bond issue — a matter pending before court for nearly five years — the Prime Minister made a statement that had the effect of attributing ministerial responsibility to me in a manner that is factually incorrect, misleading, and damaging to my reputation as a Member of Parliament.
In her response, the Prime Minister stated that her position regarding those responsible for the Central Bank bond transactions was “based on the recommendations contained in the Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry (PCoI).”
Although she did not expressly say that “the Central Bank came under Minister Ravi Karunanayake,” the clear implication of her answer — particularly when citing the PCoI — was that I bore ministerial responsibility for the Central Bank and its actions during that period. This implication is entirely incorrect, unsupported by the PCoI, and directly contradicted by the official Gazette notifications issued under Article 44(1) of the Constitution.
According to the Prime Minister’s response, I was described as “the Minister in charge of Finance” during the time of the alleged bond transactions, suggesting that ministerial authority over commercial banks rested with me. This is false. It misrepresents my official role, misleads the House, and prejudices ongoing judicial proceedings.
Mr. Speaker, at no point during my tenure as Minister of Finance I was assigned the subject of the Central Bank of Sri Lanka. The constitutional and administrative record (gazette ) is unambiguous:
The Central Bank has historically and at all times been under the Minister of Finance, except exceptionally , during the period I held that office. I did not exercise ministerial oversight over the Central Bank, its Monetary Board, or its regulatory actions during my tenure.
Ministerial oversight on the Central Bank had been assigned to the Prime Minister and the Minister of National Policies and Economic Affairs, Ranil Wickremesinghe. Cabinet records, Gazette notifications, and administrative circulars confirm this position beyond any dispute.
Similarly, commercial banks at the time in question fell under the purview of the Minister of Public Enterprise Development, Kabir Hashim.
His portfolio included State banks, Commercial banks, Bank of Ceylon, People’s Bank, National Savings Bank (NSB), SME Bank, and Banking governance functions.
Mr. Speaker, in conclusion, the Prime Minister stated that her answer was grounded in the recommendations contained in the Report of the Presidential Commission of Inquiry. This is factually incorrect and misleading , for the Presidential Commission of Inquiry in their entire report did not find me guilty of anything or find me wanting in any way whatsoever.”
By Saman Indrajith
News
Local firms move millions of dollars overseas for phantom imports: Govt.
… lead on Rs 13.2 bn NDB fraud
A sprawling fraud, involving the transfer of millions of dollars overseas under the guise of payments for non-existent imports, has been uncovered by law enforcement and customs authorities, Public Security Minister Ananda Wijepala told Parliament yesterday.
The Minister said investigations by the Central Crimes Investigation Bureau (CCIB), the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) and Sri Lanka Customs had revealed that large-scale foreign exchange transfers were being routed abroad through telegraphic transfer (TT) systems for goods that were never imported, contributing to significant dollar outflows from the country.
Wijepala said investigators were now working to identify political figures, state officials and banking sector employees, allegedly linked to the racket, adding that preliminary findings indicated the involvement of individuals across multiple institutional levels.
He told the House that provisions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, No. 5 of 2006 had earlier classified foreign exchange offences as predicate offences for money laundering,
but amendments under the Foreign Exchange Act, No. 12 of 2017 had removed such provisions, creating loopholes that were subsequently exploited for illicit capital flight. The government, he said, had now moved to amend the relevant legal framework.
The Minister outlined a series of parallel investigations that, he said, pointed to interconnected money laundering and narcotics-linked financial networks operating through shell companies and bank accounts.
In one major breakthrough, the Kelaniya Crime Division police conducting a random search in Peliyagoda discovered Rs. 30 million hidden in a three-wheeler. Two suspects were arrested and, following further interrogations, six more persons were taken into custody. Acting on initial suspicions of narcotics proceeds, the Inspector General of Police referred the case to the CCIB.
Subsequent investigations revealed that the cash had been intended for deposit into accounts linked to Next Gen (Pvt.) Ltd. The company was found to have transferred approximately Rs. 12,890 million abroad in 953 transactions to 256 companies across 26 countries, purportedly for imports that never materialised. The total outflow was estimated at USD 42.7 million.
Investigators further found that the company was controlled by a single director and shareholder and had no verifiable business activity. Authorities also established that funds linked to a recent Rs. 13 billion fraud, at NDB, had been routed into the same accounts.
Police have since frozen two accounts held at the People’s Bank’s Kolonnawa branch and Sampath Bank’s Wellampitiya branch.
In a separate incident, Negombo police arrested four suspects, on 15 February, 2026, in possession of heroin. Interrogations reportedly revealed that proceeds from narcotics sales were being channelled into a bank account, opened at a Divulapitiya branch of a Commercial Bank, allegedly linked to a Sri Lankan national, operating from Dubai.
According to investigators, the network involved deposits from drug dealers into the Divulapitiya account, with funds subsequently transferred to a Commercial Bank, Pettah branch account, belonging to AY Investments. The account reportedly held Rs. 2.2 billion after being opened on 09 September, 2024.
Authorities said withdrawals were made via cheques every two to three days and re-deposited into another AY Investments account at Union Bank’s Pettah branch. The company maintained four accounts at the branch, collectively holding around Rs. 13 billion.
Between 03 October, 2025, and 04 March, 2026, investigators said approximately USD 43 million had been transferred abroad from these accounts under the pretext of importing hardware, bathroom fittings and gold jewellery, none of which were brought into the country. A further Rs. 53.6 million balance has since been frozen as suspected proceeds of crime.
Investigators have also uncovered a wider pattern in which company directors allegedly establish import-export entities, operate them for short periods of around six months, and then dissolve or replace them with new entities. Customs officials have reportedly identified 105 local companies operating through 227 accounts in 13 banks, with funds transferred abroad in 26,108 instances between 01 January, 2023, and 30 September, 2025, for non-imported goods.
The racket is believed to involve 55 company directors and secretaries who allegedly function as facilitators in setting up and rotating such entities.
Officials noted that under existing procedures, banks are required to inform Sri Lanka Customs and the Central Bank within 180 days of TT transactions related to imports. Where goods are not received, Customs is expected to notify the Import and Export Controller and the Central Bank. However, investigators said these reporting mechanisms had not been properly followed, enabling systemic abuse.
Following the exposure of the racket, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake has summoned heads of relevant institutions for two high-level meetings, directing immediate action and comprehensive investigations.
Minister Wijepala said further inquiries were ongoing and assured that strict legal action would be taken against all perpetrators regardless of rank or position in the coming days.
By Saman Indrajith
News
Corruption case: Sarana sentenced to 16 years RI
Colombo High Court Judge Mohamed Mihal yesterday (09) found former Deputy Minister Sarana Gunawardena (UPFA) guilty on four counts of corruption charges and was sentenced to four years of rigorous imprisonment for each count. Accordingly, the court ordered a total sentence of 16 years of rigorous imprisonment.
In addition, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 1.8 mn on the ex-MP in respect of the four cases.
The indictments were filed by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC) under Section 70 of the Bribery Act of 1954, alleging the offence of corruption.
The prosecution alleged that, while serving as Chairman of the Development Lotteries Board in 2006, Gunawardena caused a loss to the State by procuring vehicles for the institution on a rental basis. Based on these allegations, CIABOC filed the four cases against him in 2022.
News
Sajith questions contradictory stands taken by Treasury and CB on USD 2.5 mn theft
Opposition and SJB Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday (09) called on the Government to immediately table in Parliament the Treasury report on the alleged USD 2.5 million financial loss.
Addressing the House, Premadasa said contradictory positions taken by the Central Bank and the Treasury had triggered what he described as a serious crisis in economic policy coherence, undermining the consistency required for effective fiscal and monetary management.
He warned that such divergences in official positions were weakening confidence at a time when both fiscal and monetary frameworks required clarity, coordination and predictability.
The Opposition Leader also urged the government to present a comprehensive policy framework on fiscal and monetary management, including the instruments in use, their respective targets, and the institutions tasked with implementation.
Premadasa further called for disclosure of the extent to which agreements with multilateral lenders and development partners, including the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank and Asian Development Bank, have influenced domestic policy decisions, particularly in relation to primary balance and revenue targets.
Drawing attention to the cost-of-living burden, he questioned the Government’s claim that Rs. 17,000 was sufficient for an individual to meet monthly living expenses, asking whether such an amount could realistically cover both food and non-food requirements.
He also sought details of measures taken to alleviate economic pressure on the middle class, professionals, small and medium enterprises, farmers, fishermen and low-income groups, who, he said, continue to be affected by high taxation, expenditure constraints and elevated interest rates.
Premadasa stressed the need to strengthen parliamentary oversight and enhance public accountability in the formulation and implementation of fiscal and monetary policy.
by Saman Indrajith
-
Latest News6 days agoKusal Mendis, Pathum Nissanka, bowlers put Sri Lanka 1-0 up
-
News6 days agoNew US tariffs proposed on 60 countries, including Sri Lanka
-
Features5 days agoPower crept into the Sangha and is now tearing it apart
-
Features5 days agoKondachchi wind farm and battery storage project to boost energy security, says Power Ministry Secretary
-
Features5 days agoSaudi Arabia sets new benchmark in Hajj management as 1.7 million pilgrims complete sacred journey
-
News3 days agoWomen’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan
-
News4 days agoAsst. Manager, security officer arrested over Rs 30 mn snatch at Horana PB branch
-
Editorial2 days agoProbe Sallay’s complaint
