Connect with us

News

Govt. rejects external evidence gathering resolution

Published

on

Himalee

Sri Lanka has rejected the resolution 60/L.1/Rev.1 presented to the UN Human Rights Council as the government couldn’t, under any circumstances, agree to external evidence gathering mechanism.

The following is the text of statement made by Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative in Geneva Ambassador Himalee Arunatilaka: “Sri Lanka participated in discussions on this resolution in a spirit of open and constructive engagement that we have demonstrated throughout in our interactions with this Council. We appreciate the core group’s engagement on language amendments proposed by Sri Lanka. We, however, regret that we couldn’t find agreement on certain key concerns for us. While we thank all delegations for their constructive participation on the draft text, Sri Lanka particularly wishes to thank very sincerely, those countries which made positive suggestions during informal consultations and bilateral meetings.

As Sri Lanka had indicated from the beginning to the core group, our fundamental issue with the text is the reference to resolution 51/1 of 2022 denoting the external evidence gathering mechanism on Sri Lanka within the OHCHR, which, in our view, is an unprecedented and ad hoc expansion of the Council´s mandate.

Participating in the Interactive Dialogue on Sri Lanka on 8th September, Minister of Foreign Affairs Vijitha Herath reiterated that Sri Lanka does not accept the external evidence gathering mechanism set up by the OHCHR, which it has labelled as the `Sri Lanka Accountability Project`, at a time when the Government is continuing to strengthen the domestic institutions, based on its genuine commitment to reconciliation and human rights in the interests of our own people. The ongoing domestic processes include strengthening the independent Offices on Missing Persons and Reparations, and the Office for National Unity and Reconciliation, as well as the operationalisation of a truth and reconciliation commission, and an independent Public Prosecutor´s Office.

Sri Lanka, as well as many other countries, have repeatedly questioned the credibility and transparency of how this Project, within the OHCHR, was set up, its work and the budget allocated to it. After four years of its existence, this Council is yet to see any benefits of this Project for the people of Sri Lanka. This is clearly evident from the contents of the High Commissioner’s Report as well. The extension of its mandate will only serve the interests of elements with vested interests seeking to create divisions and polarize the communities in Sri Lanka, and will be counterproductive to the Government’s efforts on promoting unity, reconciliation and human rights.

We firmly believe that genuine nationally owned processes are best placed to address matters relating to human rights. National processes are rooted in the local context, allow for greater ownership, recognise unique sensitivities, and make implementation of action more efficient and effective.

The High Commissioner for Human Rights, who visited Sri Lanka in June this year, had the opportunity to experience firsthand the “momentum of change” across all segments of the Sri Lankan society and the “genuine openness of the Government to address issues”. In his report to this Council, too, the High Commissioner highlighted that there is a historic opportunity in Sri Lanka to implement transformative reforms. As set out by the Minister of Foreign Affairs in his statement to this Council, within a very short time, the Government has taken a series of tangible and decisive steps on reconciliation and human rights. Therefore, it is only fair that Sri Lanka be allowed to seize this opportunity to advance the rights of its own people through domestic processes.

For these reasons, we do not agree with coercive international action, and we reject resolution 60/L.1/Rev.1 presented to this Council.”



News

Whistleblowers ask Treasury Chief to resign over theft of USD 2.5 mn

Published

on

Payment made to new account number outside agreement

Civil society group ‘Free Lawyers’, which exposed the payment of USD 2.5 mn loan instalment by the Treasury to a third party instead of Australia, yesterday (23) said that in spite of the Treasury having the legitimate bank account mentioned in the relevant agreement, the payment had been made to another account subsequently received from a person who had been in contact with some senior officials.

Civil society activist Keerthi Tennakoon on behalf of ‘Free Lawyers’ emphasised that the account number mentioned in the agreement couldn’t be changed without approval of the Secretary to the Treasury Harshana Suriyapperuma, who is also the Secretary to the Finance Ministry. Suriyapperuma, who quit his National List seat to receive the top appointment, should be held responsible for the unprecedented development, Tennakoon said.

If the Treasury had followed the time-tested procedures in place, a new bank account couldn’t have been introduced, and therefore a thorough investigation was required to reveal the truth.According to Free Lawyers, the scam had been detected by relatively junior officer and not those higher ups.

Free Lawyers’ would continue to follow the developments to ensure transparency in the investigations, Tennakoon said, noting that Suriyapperuma should step down as he was aware of a third party securing root access to the system in September 2025 but failed to take action to prevent the scam. Tennakoon said that the NPPer hadn’t informed relevant authorities, and altogether 16 officials were involved in the scam.

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Continue Reading

News

Hambantora port sets new record

Published

on

MSC Marie Leslie at Hambantota port

Hambantota International Port (HIP) successfully handled container vessel MSC Marie Leslie, marking one of its highest-volume vessel calls to date. The achievement further strengthens the port’s position as an emerging hub for containerised cargo in the region, according to HIP press release.

The vessel, operated by Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), was berthed at HIP from 11 to 15 April 2026. The port achieved 7,968 container moves during this period, translating to a total volume of 13,260 TEUs; the highest single-vessel throughput recorded by HIP to date.

This latest milestone surpasses previous records, including 12,957 TEUs handled on MSC Ilenia and 11,369 TEUs on MSC Ruby in March this year, reflecting a steady upward trend in the port’s container handling performance.

Continue Reading

News

US sinking of Iranian frigate off Sri Lanka unprecedented war crime Araghchi tells Vijitha

Published

on

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has told his Sri Lankan counterpart Vijitha Herath that US sinking of Iranian frigate IRIS Dena off Sri Lankan waters was an unprecedented war crime.

Of some 180 crew only 30 odd personnel survived.

While referring to crimes committed by the United States and Israel against Iran, Araghchi has stressed that they would never forget this crime, which constitutes a grave violation of the fundamental rules of international humanitarian law and the 1949 Geneva Conventions, and would employ all legal and political means to hold the perpetrators and those responsible accountable and bring them to justice.

Araghchi has said so during a telephone conversation with Herath regarding the ongoing West Asia conflict and related developments.

During the phone call, Araghchi expressed appreciation for the Sri Lankan government’s efforts in the rescue operation for the sailors of the IRIS Dena and for assisting in the transfer of the bodies of the crew of the vessel and other Iranian naval personnel back to Iran, according to the Iranian Embassy in Sri Lanka.

US sank Dena as it along with two other Iranian vessels awaited Sri Lanka approval to enter the Colombo port. Iranian ambassador in Colombo Dr. Alireza Delkhosh is on record as having said that the Commander of Sri Lanka Navy invited the Iranian ships to visit Colombo following their participation in International Fleet review and Milan 2026 held in India in late Feb. All Iranian vessels had been unarmed at that time in keeping with protocols regarding the participation in such events.

Continue Reading

Trending