Features
Momentous events in Parliament
(Continued from last week)
Chapter 27
A 33 YEAR JOURNEY in PARLIAMENT COMES TO AN END
As I was reaching the age of retirement of 60 years, I felt it was a part of my official duties to call on H.E. the President D.B.Wijetunga to say farewell. Having received an appointment, I called on him. He greeted me very warmly saying “Nihal, why are you trying to leave us?” I promptly replied that at the age of 60, there was no option left to me. I must add that by this time, there had grown a great bond of friendship between us. This arose as a result of President Premadasa falling victim to an assassin bomb at Armour Street on May 1st, 1993. It was my duty to inform the House of this tragic accident. Since there was a vacancy in the Office of President, I as the returning officer under the law, would be receiving nominations from Members for the vacant post and fixed a day for the next Sitting of the House to receive nominations. The Government had by then decided that it was Mr. Wijetunga who was to be their nominee.
Mr. Wijetunga quite elated by the news of his nomination consulted me on many occasions as to how an election would be held and the procedure. I even recall him visiting me in my simple home in Havelock Road, to have a chat with me. Mr. Wijetunga was very well known for his stark simplicity and charm.
On the appointed day in the House, I rose and asked for nominations. Mr. Wijetunga’s name was proposed by the Government and seconded. I then asked for any other name. The SUP had decided not to propose a name and would support Mr. Wijetunga. As there were no other names proposed, after waiting for a few minutes, I declared Mr. Wijetunga elected unanimously as the new President of Sri Lanka. He was overjoyed and thanked me for all my help.
So, at our final meeting he said very cordially, “Nihal, you have over 30 year’s full-fledged experience in Parliamentary matters. We cannot allow you to leave.” I replied, “Sir, this is determined by the Constitution and there is no option for me.” He replied quickly, “‘Mere is a procedure in the Constitution for your term to be extended by moving a Motion in the House and we can get it through”. I said, “No, Sir. That would not be proper and you would be breaking tradition.” I added, “Sir, my Deputy is perfectly qualified to succeed me,” and added in jest, “Sir, he is a good Kandyan too and you should like him more.”
The President then chatted and asked me what my plans were and I replied “Nothing at present, but I will like some leisure time.” He then asked me if I was willing to accept a diplomatic assignment abroad and I thanked him sincerely for his kindness and replied that I would prefer to be with my wife and children here in Sri Lanka. After some more conversation, I took leave of him.
In Parliament, my staff had organized a farewell for me. It was attended by the then Speaker M.H. Mohamed, Deputy Speaker Gamini Fonseka, my two Deputies-Bertram Tittawella, Priyanee Wijesekara and most of the 800 plus staff.
Speeches were made by the above and a few other members of the staff, to which I replied to them for their kind words and thanked them for the full support given to me in running this vast establishment of over 800 and without their cooperation and help I could not have succeeded in my endeavors. On behalf of the entire staff, the Hon. Speaker was kind enough to hand over few generous gifts which I accepted with gracious thanks. After refreshments were served, all 800 plus of us sat for a group photograph outside Parliament.
My final farewell had been fixed for June 8th, 1994. Hansard of that day records as follows:-
Mr. Speaker: Leader of the House, before you move this Motion, may I have the permission of the House to invite Mr. S.N. Seneviratne to take his seat at the table? Does the House agree? Hon. Members: Aye.
Mr. Speaker: Mr. Seneviratne may be invited to the Chamber.
(Whereupon Mr. S.N. Seneviratne, having been escorted into the Chamber took his seat.)
Hon. Wijayapala Mendis — Minister of Transport and Highways and Leader of the House of Parliament:
“Mr. Speaker, I move, That Mr. Speaker be requested to convey to Mr. Sand Nihal Seneviratne on his retirement from the Office of the Secretary General of Parliament, an expression of the deep sense of appreciation of the Members of Parliament for the valuable services performed by him as Second Clerk Assistant and Clerk Assistant of the House of Representative, Deputy Secretary General of Parliament and Secretary-General of Parliament over a period of 33 years, particularly in regard to his wide knowledge of Parliamentary procedures and practices; their sincere thanks for the assistance and advice given by him and their recognition of the unswerving dedication with which he has discharged his responsibilities and the noteworthy contribution he has made to the several Associations of Parliamentarians both within, as well as, outside the Commonwealth”.
The Hon. Leader of the House Hon Wijayapala Mendis made a lengthy speech followed by Mr. K.B. Ratnayake, followed by Mr. Ranil Wickremesinghe, Prime Minister, Minister of Industries, Science and Technology. Others who joined to pay tribute were Mr. Dinesh Gunawardena, Mr. V.Anandasangaree, Mr. Mavai Senathirajah, Dr. Wimal Wickremasinghe, Minister of Environment and Parliamentary Affairs, Mr. Maithripala Senanayake, Mr. Richard Pathirana Al Haj S.S.M. Abu Bakar, Mr. P.P. Devaraj, Mr. C.V. Gooneratne, Mr. Ananda Dassanayake, Mr. U.B. Wijekoon, Mr. Dharmasiri Senanayake, Mr. Mangala Moonesinghe, A.H.M. Azwer.
Mr. Speaker finally ended the Proceedings thus: “I thank the Leader of the House and the Leader of the Opposition for jointly moving this Vote of Appreciation of the services of the retiring Secretary-General Mr. Nihal Seneviratne after nearly 33 years in Parliamentary service. Quite a lot has been said about Mr. Seneviratne and his services to Parliament during his three decades of service in various senior positions. I wish to join the Hon. Members who in their speeches referred to the untiring services Mr. Seneviratne has rendered particularly during his time as Secretary-General. I knew Mr. Seneviratne from the time he was Deputy Secretary General in Parliament. He has been a great source of help who was well versed in Parliamentary procedures. The job of a Secretary-General is not an easy one. One will have to adjust temperamentally to the needs of all the Hon. Members at various levels. Mr. Seneviratne did this job well. I have also had many Secretaries who worked under me and are proud to say that Mr. Seneviratne was one of the best. May I now wish Mr. and Mrs. Seneviratne all the very best, good health and prosperity?. I now take great pleasure, on behalf of the House, to present a token of appreciation, this souvenir to Mr. Seneviratne.”
Sittings were over around 12.00 noon and soon after a group photograph of all the Members present along with my self was taken. I bowed out soon after for the last time, saying adieu to the place where I had spent 33 memorable years.
Given the volatility of Sri Lankan politics, there were many momentous events within Parliament which I was privy to. Looking back, I can say that there was never a dull moment While there were ups and downs, great accomplishments, and terrible tragedies for the country, seeing up close and personal the men and women who trod the country’s political landscape during those three and half decades gave me a unique insight into the personal side of larger-than-life public figures, put me at odds with some powerful politicians and earned the respect of many. While I now remember those days with fondness, I feel privileged to have played a role in my quiet and resolute manner to stir the Legislature in the right direction during my time. It was not a career I ever planned for, nor was there any indication in my early life that one day I would be thrust into the center of many momentous and historic events in the country and at times be the cynosure of all eyes. It has indeed been a long journey, one that I feel deeply privileged to have trod.
THE PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN SRI LANKA
Although institutions of democratic nature have existed in Sri Lanka from ancient times, the Westminster type of parliamentary government was introduced to Sri Lanka in 1948 after independence from British rule. The post-independence Soulbury Constitution of 1948 provided a legislature comprising 101 members, the Governor-General and two Houses – the House of Representatives and the Senate. In 1972, Sri Lanka was declared a Republic. The republican Constitution of 1972, while retaining the Cabinet form of Government provided for a unicameral legislature called the National State Assembly and a nominated President. The present Constitution which came into operation in September 1978 has created a Presidential System of Government within a parliamentary framework. The Parliament of Sri Lanka which was also the First Parliament under the new Constitution consists of 168 members. At the General Election held in 1989, 196 members were elected on the Proportional Representation (PR) system which has been written into the 1978 Constitution and is a significant departure from the earlier first-past-the-post or Westminster System for election. With 29 MPs appointed through the National List, Parliament today consists of 225 members.
Parliament is elected for a period of five years since the introduction of the 19th Amendments to the Constitution in 2015.Prior to that, the term of Parliament was six years. The life of Parliament is divided into sessions with each usually lasting one year. At the opening for each session, the President’s Statement of Government Policy to Parliament outlines the government’s broad policies and proposed legislative programmes. Each Session is terminated by a Prorogation.
In the Republic of Sri Lanka, sovereignty is in the People and is inalienable. Sovereignty includes the powers of Government, fundamental rights, and the franchise. Parliament and the President who exercise the People’s sovereignty are the supreme instruments of State power. Parliament exercises the legislative and judicial powers of the People and the President the executive powers. The judicial powers, however, have to be exercised by Parliament through the courts, tribunals and institutions established by the Constitution and by law. In the discharge of its functions Parliament and its members are fortified by certain privileges , immunities and powers relating to which Parliament may exercise the judicial powers directly according to law and punish any person who commits a breach of privilege.
Sri Lanka has practiced representative democracy since 1833 and enjoyed Universal Franchise since 1931. Close to a century of exercise of the right to Universal Franchise has imbued in our people a keen political awareness and educated them the a process of the working of Parliamentary democracy.
As the supreme legislative authority in the country, Parliament has power to make laws, including repealing and amending existing laws, amending, or adding new provisions to the Constitution. Laws pertaining to the Constitution have to be passed by a two third majority of the whole number of MPs including those not present. The amendment to certain Articles in the Constitution however must receive the approval of the people at a referendum. Parliament cannot enact laws suspending the operation of the Constitution or any part thereof or repealing the Constitution, unless such a law also enacts a new Constitution to replace it.
The Constitution also lays down Directive Principles of State Policy to guide Parliament , the President, and the Cabinet of Ministers to govern and enact laws for the establishment of a free and just society in Sri Lanka. By these principals, the State is sworn to establish a democratic , socialist society that will ensure the full realization of the fundamental rights and freedoms of its people.
Parliament cannot abdicate or in any manner alienate its legislative power and cannot set up any authority with legislative power. No court or tribunal can question on any ground the validity of legislation enacted by Parliament. However, before the enactment of such legislation, the constitutional jurisdiction of the Supreme Court could be invoked by any citizen.
Another principal function of Parliament is to scrutinize government policy and administration, particularly proposals for raising revenue and for expenditure. Parliament has full control over public finance and it alone authorizes taxes and duties to be levied and the various objects of expenditure. The Cabinet of Ministers is charged with the direction and control of the government and is collectively responsible and answerable to Parliament.
The Speaker is the representative and spokesman of Parliament in its collective capacity. He presides over sittings of Parliament and interprets and enforces Standing Orders. In his absence the Deputy Speaker and in their absence the Deputy Chairman of Committee presides over sittings of Parliament and performs the functions of the Speaker.
The head of the Parliament staff is the Secretary General of Parliament who is appointed by the President. The members of his staff are appointed by him with the approval of the Speaker.
The party system is a vital component of Parliamentary democracy and the organization of political parties represented in Parliament as Government and Opposition help to ensure that all aspects and viewpoints of matters placed before Parliament are duly considered before any decision is taken. The Government Group is organised under the Leader of the House and the Chief Government Whip. The leader of the Party in the Opposition with the largest number of members is recognized as the Leader of the Opposition. It also has its Chief Whip. The Leader of the Opposition is accorded the status and given the emoluments of a Cabinet Minister and provided with a separate staff, office, accommodation, official residence, and vehicle. The other parties in the Opposition, at their discretion, may come under the Whip of the Opposition.
The detailed arrangement of government business and the allocation of time for debate is decided at meetings of the Committee on Parliamentary business. It consists of the Speaker as Chairman, the Deputy Speaker, Deputy Chairman of Committees, the Leader of the House, Chief Government Whip, the Leader of the Opposition, the Chief Opposition Whip, and the leaders of the other parties.
The Sri Lanka Parliament has a strong and active Committee system comprising legislative Standing Committees, Select Committees and Committees for Special Purposes such as the Committee on Standing Orders, on Public Accounts, on Parliamentary Business, on Privileges, on Public Enterprisers and on Public Petitions.
The Parliament also by law provides for the establishment of the Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration (Ombudsman), empowered with the duty of investigating complaints and allegations of the infringement of fundamental rights and other injustices of maladministration,when asked to do so by the Public Petitions Committee of Parliament, to which petitions-presented by Members of Parliament, on behalf of members of the public, are rereferred. The Ombudsman’s powers of investigation extend to administrative actions by Central Government, and Local Government’s departments and corporations . The Ombudsman has access to departmental papers and reports findings to Parliament. The Ombudsman is appointed by the President.
The Committee of Public Petitions has assumed a great deal of importance after the creation of the office of Parliamentary Commissioner for administration because all matters going before the Commissioner have to be referred to him by the Public Petitions Committee. Grievances of citizens presented by Members in the form of petitions to Parliament and approved by the Speaker as conforming to Standing Orders are referred to the PPC. If the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the Parliamentary Commissioner, such petitions are referred to him by the PPC. In other cases, the Committee itself will inquire into the petition for which purpose it has been given powers to summon and question any person and call for papers and documents and to have access to stores and property. Since the Ombudsman started functioning there has been a great increase in the number of petitions presented to Parliament.
The privileges and immunities of Members of Parliament have been embodied in the Parliament (Powers and Privileges) Act. Apart from specifying the offences which are termed breaches of privilege, this Act declares and defines the privileges and immunities of the Parliament and its members. All questions of privilege have to be first discussed with the Speaker in his Chambers and then raised in the House. If the Speaker is satisfied there is a prime facie case, he would advise that the matter be referred to the Committee on Privileges. The practice in such cases has been for the Leader of the House to move a Motion referring the matter to the Committee. Although Parliament as a body can hear evidence and decide on matters of privilege, the practice is to refer it to the Committee which will in turn report back on whether a Breach of Privilege has been committed and make recommendations regarding what should be done.
There is also a system of consultative committees, each of these corresponding to the number of Ministries in the Cabinet. The Chairman of the Consultative Committee is the minister in charge of the functions and subjects which the Committee has been empowered to consider . Each Consultative Committee reflects as far as possible the party composition in Parliament. Parliament or the Minister who chairs the Committee can refer to it any matter for inquiry and report including proposals for legislation, supplementary or other estimates, statements of expenditure , motions, annual reports and papers. A Consultative Committee also has the power to initiate a Bill or Motion through the Chairman. It also provides members with a means of raising matters pertaining to their electorates.
With the amended Standing Orders adopted in March 2018, a few new committees have been established including the Committee on Public Finance, the Committee on Constitution Affairs, Liaison Committee, and the Backbenchers Committee.
In addition to that, Sectoral Oversight Committees, numbering not more than 20, have been set up and they have the power to examine any Bill, any subsidiary legislation including Regulation, Resolution, Treaty, Report, or any other matter relating to subjects and functions within their jurisdiction.
Apart from the passing of laws, an important function of Parliament is to provide a forum for Members to raise matters of public importance, to discuss Government policy and to air public grievances. They have the facility to raise questions from Ministers as well as initiate adjournment motions to discuss matters of public importance.
Any speech made in Parliament is recorded in the Official Report of parliamentary debates, the Hansard, in the language in which it was spoken. Members are free to speak in Sinhala, Tamil or English with simultaneous translations provided in all languages.
by Nihal Seneviratne ✍️
Advocate of the Supreme Court
Retired Secretary General of Parliament
(From Memories of 33 years in Parliament)
Features
Building a sustainable future for Sri Lanka’s construction industry
Sri Lanka’s construction industry has long been a central pillar of sustainable development. From roads and bridges to homes, schools, and hospitals, construction shapes the country’s physical landscape and supports economic progress. As the nation continues to rebuild and modernise, the demand for construction materials and infrastructure keeps rising. However, this growth also brings a significant environmental cost. Cement, steel, bricks, aggregates, and timber all require energy, resources, and transportation, contributing to carbon emissions and environmental damage. If Sri Lanka continues with traditional construction practices, the long-term impact on the environment will be severe.
The encouraging news is that Sri Lanka has many opportunities to adopt more sustainable construction practices while still maintaining the highest standards of quality and safety. Sustainable construction does not mean weaker buildings or lower standards. It means using sustainable materials, reducing waste, improving design, and choosing methods that protect the environment. Many countries have already moved in this direction, and Sri Lanka has the potential to follow the same path with solutions that are practical, affordable, and suitable for local conditions.
A promising option
One promising option is the use of Compressed Earth Blocks (CEB), which are different from the concrete blocks commonly used in Sri Lanka for the past 25 years. CEBs are made from soil mixed with a small amount of stabiliser and pressed using machines. Unlike traditional fired clay bricks, CEBs do not require high-temperature kilns, which consume large amounts of firewood or fossil fuels. This makes CEBs a low-carbon alternative with a much smaller environmental footprint. In Sri Lanka, CEBs are already used in eco-resorts, community housing projects, and environmentally focused developments. They offer good strength, durability, and thermal comfort, making them suitable for many types of buildings. By expanding the use of CEBs, Sri Lanka can reduce energy consumption, lower emissions, and promote locally sourced materials.
Recycled aggregates also offer significant potential for sustainable construction. These materials are produced by crushing concrete, demolition waste, and construction debris. In Sri Lanka, recycled aggregates are already used in road construction, particularly for base and sub-base layers. They are suitable for non-structural building work such as pathways, garden paving, drainage layers, landscaping, and backfilling. Using recycled aggregates reduces the need for newly quarried rock and aggregates, decreases landfill waste, and lowers transportation emissions. With proper quality control and standards, recycled aggregates can become a reliable and widely accepted material in the construction industry.
Timber and sustainability
Timber is another important area where sustainability can be improved. In the past, timber for construction was often taken from natural forests, leading to deforestation and loss of biodiversity. Today, this approach is no longer sustainable. Instead, the focus must shift to legally sourced timber from managed plantations. Sri Lanka’s plantation-grown teak, jak, and kubuk can provide high-quality, legally sourced timber for construction while protecting natural forests and supporting rural economies. Using plantation timber ensures that harvesting is controlled, trees are replanted, and the supply chain remains legal and ethical.
Beyond materials, sustainable construction also involves better design and planning. Buildings that are designed to maximise natural ventilation, daylight, and energy efficiency can significantly reduce long-term operating costs. Simple design improvements such as proper orientation, shading devices, roof insulation, and efficient window placement can reduce the need for artificial cooling and lighting. These measures not only lower energy consumption but also improve indoor comfort for occupants. Sri Lanka’s tropical climate offers many opportunities to incorporate passive design strategies that reduce environmental impact without increasing construction costs.
Waste reduction is another key component of sustainable construction. Construction sites often generate large amounts of waste, including concrete, timber offcuts, packaging, and soil. By adopting better site management practices, recycling materials, and planning construction sequences more efficiently, contractors can reduce waste and save money. Proper waste segregation and recycling can also reduce the burden on landfills and minimise environmental pollution.
Promoting sustainable construction
Public projects such as schools, hospitals, and government buildings can play a leading role in promoting sustainable construction. When government projects adopt greener materials and designs, the private sector follows. This creates a positive cycle where environmentally responsible choices become the industry standard. Public sector leadership can also encourage local manufacturers to produce sustainable materials, improve quality standards, and invest in new technologies.
Sri Lanka also carries a proud and remarkable history in construction, with achievements that continue to inspire the world. The engineering brilliance behind Sigiriya, the advanced urban planning of Polonnaruwa, the precision of the Aukana Buddha statue, and the sophisticated water management systems of ancient tanks and reservoirs all demonstrate the deep knowledge our ancestors possessed. These historic accomplishments show that innovation is not new to Sri Lanka; it is part of our identity. As the world moves toward 2050 with increasing sustainability challenges, Sri Lanka can draw strength from this heritage while embracing modern technologies and sustainable practices. With the combined efforts of skilled professionals, industry experts, academic researchers, and strong government support, the country can introduce new systems that improve efficiency, reduce environmental impact, and strengthen resilience. By working together with determination and sharing knowledge across generations, Sri Lanka’s construction industry can build a future that honours its past while leading the way in sustainable development.
Foundation of sustainable development
Sri Lanka’s construction industry has always been a foundation of sustainable development. Today, it also has the chance to take a leading role in sustainability. By choosing sustainable materials, reducing waste, improving design, and supporting responsible sourcing, the country can build a future that is both modern and environmentally responsible. Sustainability is essential for Sri Lanka’s long-term goals of reducing carbon emissions and limiting the impacts of global warming. As Sri Lanka moves forward, the construction industry must embrace sustainability not only as an environmental responsibility but also as an opportunity to create stronger, smarter, and more resilient buildings for future generations. Sri Lanka has the talent, the heritage, and the technical capacity to shape a more sustainable future, and with the right national direction, the construction industry can become a model for the region. If professionals, policymakers, and communities work together with a shared vision, the country can transform its construction sector into one that protects the environment while supporting long-term progress.
About the Author: P.G.R.A.C. Gamlath Menike,
BSc (Hons) Quantity Surveying (University of Reading, UK), MSc Quantity Surveying (University College of Estate Management, UK), MCIArb, Doctoral Student, Department of Building and Real Estate, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, is a Senior Quantity Surveyor: Last Project (2022 -2025) Hong Kong International Airport Terminal 2 Construction Project, Gammon Engineering Construction (Main Contractor).
By P.G. R. A. C. Gamlath Menike
Features
Palm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka – 1
Palm leaf manuscripts have been in existence in Sri Lanka since ancient times. The two oldest palm-leaf manuscripts found in Sri Lanka today are the Cullavagga Pâli manuscript of the H. C. P. Bell collection, which is held at the Library of the National Museum, Colombo, and the Mahavagga Pâli manuscript in the University of Kelaniya collection. Photocopies of both are available at the Library of the University of Peradeniya. Both are dated to 13 century. Cullavagga manuscript has wooden covers richly decorated in lac with a design of flowers and foliage.
Karmmavibhâga
However, the oldest known Sinhala palm leaf manuscript in the world is the Karmmavibhâga which was found in a Tibet monastery in 1936 by the Indian scholar Rahul Sankrityayan. Rahul Sankrityayan, (1893–1963) former Kedarnath Pandey, was an Indian polymath, who searched out rare Buddhist manuscripts on his travels abroad. Sankrityayan visited Sri Lanka as well. Vidyalankara Pirivena is mentioned.
Sankrityayan visited Tibet several times to collect manuscripts from the Buddhist monasteries there. In May 1936 on his second visit to Tibet, Sankrityayan visited the Sa-skya monastery. The Chag-pe-lha-khang Library in this monastery was specially opened for Sankrityayan.
He stated in his autobiography that when the clouds of dust which greeted this rare opening of its doors had subsided, they beheld rows of open racks where volume on volume of manuscripts were kept. “After rummaging around, I came across palm-leaf manuscripts. They were not wrapped in cloth, but were tied between two wooden planks with holes through them.” Sankrityayan found several important manuscripts he had been looking for, in that collection.
Sankrityayan catalogued fifty-seven manuscripts bound in thirty-eight volumes. The thirty-seventh volume was written in the Sinhala script. Sankrityayan records that this volume contained ninety-seven palm- leaves each of which measured 18 1/4 by 1 1/4 in. (46 x 3 cm.) and that there were seven lines of writing on each folio.
According to Sankrityayan, these Sinhala texts originally belonged to a Sri Lankan monk called Anantaśrî who had come to Tibet in the time of ŚSrî Kîrttidhvaja (Kirti Sri Rajasinha). Analysts noted that Sankrityayan does not give the source of this information and the manuscript makes no mention of Anantaśrî.
Sankrityayan had taken with him to Tibet, one Abeyasinghe, (Abhayasimha) to help him with copying manuscripts. They made hand-copies of the important manuscripts. Abhayasimha had copied about 250 to 350 strophes each day. But he fell ill due to the extreme cold and was sent home in June. Abeyasinghe had written letters home during his stay in Tibet.
Photographs of the manuscripts found during Sankrityayan’s expeditions in Tibet are preserved at the National Archives in Colombo. There is also a copy in Vidyalankara pirivena library The Historical Manuscripts Commission In its 1960/1961 report, drew attention to this manuscript, known as Sa-skya Codex, describing it as “a unique document.” (Annual Report of the Government Archivist 1960/61, 1963)
Sinhala scholar P.E.E. Fernando examined photographs of the Sa-skya Codex at the request of the Historical Manuscripts Commission and assigned it to the 13th century. The Historical Manuscripts Commission, dated it to either twelfth or the thirteenth century.
The Historical Manuscripts Commission observed that this manuscript was of great value for the study of the development of the Sinhala script. Ven. Meda Uyangoda Vimalakîrtti and Nähinne Sominda in their edition of the Karmmavibhâga published in 1961 agreed that the Sa-skya Codex represented an early stage in the evolution of the Sinhala language.
Mahavamsa
The Mahavamsa is considered a unique historical document. There is nothing like it in South Asia, and probably all Asia, with the exception of China. Mahavamsa provides a historical account of events, with emphasis on chronology and dating. This, it appears, was rare at the time.
However, Mahavamsa is not a political history, though that is the popular perception of it. It is a religious history. It was written to record the introduction and entrenchment of Buddhism in the country. Other Buddhist countries, such as Cambodia, Burma and Thailand value the Mahavamsa for this reason. They held copies of the Mahavamsa and used events from it in their temple frescoes.
But Mahavamsa is also an important reference source for reconstructing the political history of Sri Lanka. Political and social facts are included in the Mahavamsa narrative when describing religious events, and this makes the Mahavamsa important for historians. This tradition of history writing, beginning with the earlier Sihala Attakatha and Dipawamsa, it is suggested, started in Sri Lanka in 2nd or 3rd BC.
Today, the Mahavamsa has become a major source of historical information, not only for dating kings, temples and reservoirs, but also for reconstructing ancient Sinhala society. The fact that Kuveni was seated beside a pond, spinning thread has been used to indicate that there was water management and textiles long before Vijaya arrived. Dutugemunu (161-137 BC) paid a salary to the workers building the Maha Thupa. This shows that money was used at the time.
Copies of the Mahavamsa have been treasured and looked after in Sri Lanka for centuries. They have been copied over and over again. The manuscripts were held in temple libraries because the subject of the Mahavamsa was the entrenchment of Buddhism in Sri Lanka.
The Mahavamsa manuscripts did not pop up suddenly during British rule as people seem to think. The British did not ‘discover’ the Mahavamsa. It was there. When the British administration started to take interest in the history of the island, the sangha would have directed them to the Mahavamsa, in the same way that they directed HCP Bell to the ruins in Anuradhapura and the Sigiriya frescoes. HCP Bell did not discover those either.
The British administrators saw the value of the Mahavamsa and copies were sent to libraries abroad. The Bodleian library, Oxford has a well preserved Mahavamsa manuscript, taken from Mulkirigala, which Turner used for his translation. Cambridge has two Mahavamsa manuscripts. The two copies at India Office library, and the copy in East India Library are probably in the British Library today. The Royal Library, Copenhagen, has a copy, consisting of 129 sheets, 12 lines to a leaf, written in good handwriting.
In Sri Lanka there are several copies of the Mahavamsa in the Colombo Museum Library. One copy, known as the ‘Cambodian Mahavamsa ‘is in Cambodian script. University of Peradeniya has at least three copies.
It is interesting to note that the Mahavamsa was known to the Sinhala elite and some had copies in their private libraries. The Historical Manuscripts Commission of the 1930s said in its first report that five copies of the Mahavamsa and a 19th century copy of the Dipawamsa were found in private collections.
The temple libraries had many copies of the Mahavamsa. Some were of very high quality. Wilhelm Geiger had looked at the copies held at Mahamanthinda Pirivena, Matara and Mulkirigala vihara. Asgiriya, Nagolla Vihara and Watagedera Sudarmarama Potgul vihara, Matara, are three of the many libraries that held copies of the Mahavamsa.
Sirancee Gunawardene examined the copy at Mahamanthinda Pirivena, Matara, very closely. She says that it is a very old manuscript. According to its colophon, the manuscript was first copied 400 years ago. It is in a very good state of preservation. It has 232 folios. Each 50 cm long 6.25 wide. Nine lines on each side, in Pali metric verse.
The writer of the manuscripts said that his version was an improvement on the copy. He wrote, “I will recite the Mahavamsa which was compiled by ancient sages. [their version] was too long and had many repetitions. This version is free from such faults, easy to understand and remember. It is handed down from tradition, for arousing serene joy and emotion’ .
The Mahamanthinda manuscript records the continuous history of 23 dynasties from 543 BC to 1758 AD. It refers to the principle of hereditary monarchy as 39 eldest sons of reigning monarch succeeded their fathers to the throne. It highlights the fact that fifteen reigned only for one year, 34 for less than four years, 22 kings were murdered by their successors, 6 were killed during battles, 4 committed suicide, 11 were dethroned.
Mahawansa as a World Heritage document
An ola manuscript of the Mahavamsa, held in the Main Library of the University of Peradeniya has been recognised by UNESCO as a part of World Heritage. UNESCO announced In 2023 that it has included the Mahavamsa as one of the 64 items of documentary heritage inscribed in the UNESCO’s Memory of the World International Register for 2023. The manuscript is dated to the early 19 century.
The certificate declaring the Mahawansa as a world heritage document was handed to the Chancellor of Peradeniya University by UNESCO Director General, who visited the University in 2024 specially to do so. She also unveiled a plaque marking the declaration.
The story began much earlier. The National Library of Sri Lanka and the Ministry of Buddha Sasana had jointly appointed a 6-member committee headed by Prof Malani Endagamage, to find the best preserved copy of the Mahavamsa in Sri Lanka. This would have been in 2000 or so. For two years, this team had examined copies from over 100 temples nationwide.
Temples around the country yielded copies, crumbling to well-preserved, reported Sunday Times. There was one from the Ridi Vihara that almost made the cut, but four other copies were shortlisted. One from the Dalada Maligawa, Kandy and three manuscripts from the Main Library of the University of Peradeniya. Three academics from the University’s History Department, Professors K.M. Rohitha Dasanayaka, Mahinda Somathilake and U.S.Y. Sahan Mahesh examined the three Peradeniya manuscripts
Dasanayaka said, “We poured over the copies together, and it became clear that one copy stood out. While the other two had numerous inconsistencies, this one, written in a curvy hand, was neat and beautiful. After more than two centuries, the manuscript was still very attractive, with a ‘flaming cinnamon orange’ cover and elegant lettering.
The first section of the manuscript ends with Mahasen (274–301 AD), written by the monk Mahanama. The second part ends at 1815. The author is given as Ven. Thibbotuwawe Buddharakkhita but he was dead by 1815. The final part was probably done by an acolyte. He has done a very neat job, seamlessly adding his bit, concluded Dasanayake.
This manuscript was acquired by the Library of University of Peradeniya when K. D. Somadasa, was the Librarian (1964 – 1970). It is held in the Main Library and its Accession Number is 277587.
National Library & Documentation Services Board of Sri Lanka, which administers the National Library of Sri Lanka submitted a nomination to UNESCO on behalf of this manuscript. UNESCO responded positively to the application.
UNESCO said the Mahavamsa was recognized as one of the world’s longest unbroken historical accounts, presenting Sri Lanka’s history in a chronological order from the 6th century BCE. The authenticity of the facts provided in the document has been confirmed through archaeological research conducted in Sri Lanka and India.
It is an important historical source in South Asia, said UNESCO. It was the first of its kind in South Asia, initiating a mature historiographical tradition. It has contributed singularly to the identity of Emperor Asoka in Indian history. The existence of a number of manuscripts of the Mahavamsa in several countries as well as the transliteration and translation of the text to several Southeast Asian and European languages stand testimony to its immense historical, cultural, literal, linguistic and scholarly values, .” UNESCO press release said.
Further, UNESCO found that this manuscript was correctly conserved at the University Library. The university and its library maintained high standards in safeguarding the palm-leaf manuscripts, preventing deterioration, declared UNESCO. (Continued)
REFERENCES
https://archives1.dailynews.lk/2021/02/25/local/242520/ola-leaf-mahavamsa-be-declared-world-heritage
Sirancee Gunawardana Palm leaf manuscripts of Sri Lanka . 1977 p 41,44-47 , 253 290 292, ,
N. E. I. Wijerathne Methods, Techniques and Challenges in Deciphering the Sa-skaya Codex. Vidyodaya Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (2025), Vol. 10 (01) https://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/vjhss/article/view/8571/6001
First report of the Historical Manuscripts Commision.1933 SP 9 of 1933. p . 53, 95, 96
https://journals.sjp.ac.lk/index.php/vjhss/article/view/8571/6001https://www.austriaca.at/0xc1aa5572%200x00314cc3.pdf
https://leftword.com/creator/rahul-sankrityayan/
https://www.sundaytimes.lk/230910/plus/in-search-of-the-perfect-mahavamsa-531513.html
https://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking-news/Mahawansa-declared-a-world-heritage/108-287528
https://mfa.gov.lk/en/visit-of-unesco-dg/
https://sundaytimes.lk/online/education/UNESCO-ready-to-support-digitalisation-of-Ola-leaf-books/290-1146314
https://media.unesco.org/sites/default/files/webform/mow001/53_131%252B.pdf
by KAMALIKA PIERIS
Features
A new Sherlock Holmes novel
Tales of Mystery and Suspense – 1
“The House of Silk” is set in a grim Victorian winter, and moves from Baker Street to a luxurious suburban villa, from dingy pubs to elegant London clubs, from a correction school for boys high on a hill to Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, which provided noisy low life entertainment. Holmes and Watson went there in search of the House of Silk, a name they had heard when looking into the death of one of Holmes’ Baker Street irregulars (slum children who ferreted out information for him) .
I do not think highly of sequels to books written by highly regarded writers, though I must admit that this dislike is based on just a few samples. But while in England I was given by my former Dean, with a forceful recommendation, a book about a Sherlock Holmes mystery, supposedly written by Dr Watson. I began on it soon after I got back home, and found it difficult to put down, so I suppose I will not look on Anthony Horowitz as an exception to my rule. I may even look out for his efforts at continuing the adventures of James Bond, though I suspect Fleming’s laconic style will be less easy to emulate.
“The House of Silk” is set in a grim Victorian winter, and moves from Baker Street to a luxurious suburban villa, from dingy pubs to elegant London clubs, from a correction school for boys high on a hill to Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, which provided noisy low life entertainment. Holmes and Watson went there in search of the House of Silk, a name they had heard when looking into the death of one of Holmes’ Baker Street irregulars (slum children who ferreted out information for him). They had asked Holmes’ brother Mycroft for help in finding what and where this was, but he had warned them off, having been himself told by someone very senior in government that it might involve those in very high positions, and further inquiries might prove dangerous.
Needless to say, Holmes does seek further, and is lured to an opium den where he is drugged, to be found outside with a gun in his hand and the body of a girl beside him, the sister of the murdered boy Ross. A passer-by swears he had seen Holmes fire the shot, and the owner of the opium den and a customer swear that Holmes had taken too much opium and left the den in a demented condition. A police inspector who had been passing promptly arrests Holmes and Watson, and even their old acquaintance Inspector Lestrade finds it difficult to get access to him.
Watson eventually gets to see him when he is in the infirmary, after he has been told by a mysterious man that Holmes was going to be murdered before his case could be taken up. The man said he had earlier tried to get Holmes to investigate the House of Silk by sending him a white silk ribbon, such as had later been found tied round the hand of the murdered boy. But, as a criminal himself, he said, he could not reveal more, though he himself was horrified by the business of the House of Silk, which gave criminality a bad name, which is why he wanted it all stopped.
Holmes escapes from the infirmary, with a little help from the doctor whom he had once assisted earlier, right under the nose of the nasty Inspector Harriman. He then joins up with Watson, and having with the help of Lestrade overcome the men designed to kill him at Dr Silkin’s House of Wonders, he sets off, with an even large posse of policemen, to the House of Silk.
After much suspense, the habitues of the House of Silk are arrested, the Inspector having broken his neck in the course of a chase downhill, having fled when his misdeeds were exposed. The mastermind claims that he will not face a trial because of the important people involved, but instead falls down a staircase while in prison and breaks his neck. One of the noblemen involved commits suicide, but another, and the medical man who had sworn he saw Holmes kill the young lady, get off without charge.
But then we revert to the original story, which had involved an art dealer who came to Holmes because he was being followed by someone he thought was an American gangster out for revenge. This was because he had shipped some pictures to an American buyer, and these had been destroyed when a train was held up by an Irish gang and the coach with the safe in it dynamited. The buyer and the dealer had got a private agency to investigate, and this had ended with the gang being killed in a shootout, though one of the twins who led it had escaped. The buyer had subsequently been killed, and Mr Carstairs feared that the twin who survived had followed him to England.
Holmes and Watson went to Carstairs’ house, where they met his wife, whom he had met on the boat back from America, and his sister. Their mother had died some months earlier, when gas had filled her room after the flame had gone out. It transpired that there had been a break in, and some money and a necklace stolen from a safe, and it was in tracing these, through a pawnbroker, that Holmes and Watson had found the American murdered in the hotel where he had been staying.
The leader of the irregulars had come to tell Holmes that they had traced the man to the hotel, and Ross had been left on guard. He seemed terrified when Holmes and Watson and Carstairs turned up, but said he had seen nothing. When the boys had been dismissed, and the room opened up, the man was found dead, the murderer obviously having gained entrance through a window.
Holmes assumed the boy had seen someone he recognized, but he could not be traced, until he was found dead, horribly tortured. The silk band around his wrist then led Holmes to pursue the House of Silk. One of the boys at the school where Ross had been mentioned that he had a sister at a pub, and she, when confronted, asked in fear if they were from the House of Silk and then, having lunged at Watson with a knife, ran off – herself only to be found dead outside the opium den, which prompted the arrest of Holmes.
After the drama at the House of Silk, Holmes and Watson go to the Carstairs household, where he explains exactly what had taken place, identifying the murdered man as not a member of the gang but the head of the private agency which had investigated them. As my Dean told me, Horowitz then ties up all the loose ends with consummate skill, connecting with a fine thread all the malefactors, of various kinds.
-
News3 days agoCJ urged to inquire into AKD’s remarks on May 25 court verdict
-
News1 day agoMIT expert warns of catastrophic consequences of USD 2.5 mn Treasury heist
-
News4 days agoUSD 3.7 bn H’tota refinery: China won’t launch project without bigger local market share
-
News5 days agoEaster Sunday Case: Ex-SIS Chief concealed intel, former Defence Secy tells court
-
News6 days agoTen corruption cases set for court in May, verdict ordered in one case – President
-
Business5 days agoDialog Surpasses 1,000 5G Sites, Strengthening Nationwide 5G Coverage
-
Editorial4 days agoDeliver or perish
-
Editorial1 day agoClean Sri Lanka and dirty politics
