Features
REFLECTIONS ON SRI LANKAN IMMIGRATION
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf4d1/cf4d195f17d5cec1a9c3497e5f3c46a26be8cba6" alt=""
INTO ITALY (1970-2000)
(Excerpted from Falling Leaves, an anthology of memoirs by LC Arulpragasam)
This article deals with the patterns, problems and some stories of Sri Lankan immigration into Italy during the period 1970 to 2000. Although it focuses on immigration into Italy, the problems discussed are common to most “new” countries of immigration. The latter are the non-English speaking countries, which have become Sri Lankan’s most important immigrant destinations since 1980. The writer and his family lived in Rome for 30 years during this period and were able to witness the progress and problems of Sri Lankan immigration and to listen to the immigrants’ stories: some of them glad, some of them sad.
General Considerations
Some general observations may be useful by way of background. First, the “colour bar” has always acted as an implicit or explicit bar to immigration in the early days to “white” countries such as Britain and Australia in the 1950s. In this light, it is remarkable that Italians showed little colour consciousness when Sri Lankan immigration began in the late 1970s. This is partly a heritage from Roman times when coloured Cleopatra was lionized in Rome, while a couple of the last Roman Emperors were from current Middle Eastern countries. A personal experience of mine illustrates this lack of colour consciousness in the early days.
Around 1975, having capsized in my boat during a storm in the middle of a large lake near Rome, I was left stranded about ten miles from where I had set out. I had no option but to walk to the main road bare bodied, bare-footed, and clad only in my swimsuit. I had barely thumbed a ride when the first three cars ground to a halt, competing to give me a ride, despite my rough appearance. For those helpful Italians, I was a stranger in their country (proclaimed by my colour), who needed their assistance. Forty years later, however, things have changed substantially – for both qualitative and quantitative reasons, as discussed later.
Secondly, the question of class has played an important role in determining the immigrant destinations of Sri Lankans in the early days. In the 1950s and 1960s, Ceylonese immigration was aimed at the English-speaking countries such as the UK and Australia. Apart from the question of colour, immigrants were accepted by those countries only if they were English-speaking and professionally or otherwise qualified. This in practice restricted such immigration only to the Ceylonese English-educated middle class.
Conversely, these middle-class migrants did not seek immigration to European countries, such as France, Germany and Italy, because they could not aspire to professional/middle class jobs in those countries because of needed language skills. Contrarily, these non-English speaking countries became the favoured immigration destinations for the poorer classes in Sri Lanka, who aimed only at low level labour and service jobs where local language skills did not matter so much.
Thirdly, the numbers and pressure of incoming immigrants also affects the attitude of the host country towards them. While Italy became the most popular destination for working class people from Sri Lanka, it ultimately also attracted a flood of immigrants from the Philippines and Bangladesh, with later inflows from Northern and Sub-Saharan African countries, multiplied again by influx from the Balkans and Eastern Europe.
The sheer numbers of the poor and uneducated people of different colours, languages and cultures caused pressures in the lower-level labour and housing markets, which together with cultural differences and exaggerated fears of immigrant crime gave rise to anti-immigrant feelings in Italy by the mid-1990s. For example, the Bangladeshis by the late 1980s had monopolized the activity of cleaning car windscreens at traffic-lights. Many Italians, who had always championed immigration submitted to their windscreens being washed – even if they did not need it – so as to pay the poor immigrants something. But even they got really fed up when accosted every day at every traffic light (about four times a day at the same traffic lights!) till even they shouted “basta” (enough)!
To this, I have to add my own experience. Whereas I had previously experienced a positive reaction to my dark colour in 1975, I had the opposite experience twenty years later in 1995 in Rome. The Italian experience with needy immigrants had this effect over the years. Coming out of a supermarket one day, I saw a frail old lady staggering along the uneven payment, bent double over her heavy shopping bags. Since I was walking in the same direction to my car, I walked up to her and said: “Signora, can I help you to carry those bags?” Even I was not prepared for her reaction: she recoiled in aversion or fear, clutching her bags away from me, shrieking shrilly “No, no, no!” I took off like a thief caught in the act!
From an overall point of view, there had been no change between 1975 and 1995 – except that the numbers of immigrants had redoubled many times over and that they were from different countries and cultures, but mostly from the unemployed poor. Hence, the sheer numbers and class of immigrants seemed to have changed the perceptions and attitudes of Italians towards them.
Push and Pull Factors
Any overall view on immigration needs to look at the push factors which cause emigration from the home country, as well as the pull factors which attract them to the receiving country. As for the push factors, the hard economic times of the late 1970s and 1980s caused the first wave of Sri Lankan immigrants, who were mainly from the poor fishing families of the west coast, mainly Catholics from Negombo, Wennapuwa areas. This was followed by more Sinhalese migrants from the west coast and the interior who migrated for the same reasons.
On the other hand, communal violence and lack of economic opportunities also impelled an exodus of Tamil migrants to Italy in the 1980s, which gathered momentum in later years. A good indicator of the force of the push factors can be gauged by the premium paid to agents to arrange the logistics of immigration. In the Sinhala areas, the price charged by agents for immigration to Italy was around Rs. 300,000 in the early 1980s, but had increased to around Rs. 600,000 by the year 2000. In the Tamil areas, due to political and security considerations, the rate had increased to around Rs. 900,000 by the year 2000, and is probably more today.
A consideration of the push factors also brings to mind the enabling factors that make such immigration possible. A ring of agents appeared who extracted money from the would-be immigrants to arrange their journey. When Italy introduced visa restrictions for Sri Lankans (around1981), people-smuggling became a recognized industry. Even fishing trawlers were used by smugglers to make the hazardous journey. Overland routes were also used, with immigrants being abandoned in transit countries both by land and by sea, while even outright scams were reported.
The pull factors which attracted migrants to Italy are equally important. The first was quite fortuitous. Soon after World War II, Ceylon and the Philippines were the only two advanced and westernized countries in Asia; hence Italy waived its visa requirements for them both. Italy thus became the primary immigration destination (the default position) for Sri Lankans, both as a base for future hoped-for entry into the UK or into other countries of Europe. If they failed in the latter, they returned to Italy for prolonged or permanent stay.
The main pull factor was obviously economic. Although Italy was a relatively poor country in the 1960s still recovering from World War II, it had already become a hive of economic activity in the 1980s-1990s, powered partly by a “black economy”, which was mainly dependent on cheap immigrant labour. Meanwhile, a middle class had emerged which could afford domestic help in the form of sub-wage immigrant labour, of which Filipinos and Sri Lankans were the most preferred. When success stories of the first immigrants reached home, more family and friends followed the good-luck trail to Italy.
Another pull factor arose from the exaggerated stories of successful or not so successful immigrants. The sociological literature has noted that the first immigrants are usually the more desperate or adventurous types, often those who had not done well in their own countries; those with secure jobs would seldom undertake the risk of the unknown. Some of the former exaggerated their stories to show how well they had done in the “promised land”. I remember how a recently arrived Sri Lankan immigrant posed for photographs of himself in his employer’s bed, having surrounded himself with the TV set and all the telephones in the house (to make sure that they all appeared in the photograph) to show how well he had fared in the new country. Needless to say, when this photo made the rounds in his village, everyone wanted to immigrate to Italy!
The third pull factor is the establishment of a “bridgehead” in the receiving country. The existence of a bridgehead or network in a new country served not only as a beacon of attraction but also as a support-system for new immigrants. We knew of a Sri Lankan maid working for a rich Kuwaiti family who, during that family’s one-week tourist visit to Rome, absconded and went underground, knowing that the Sri Lankan network would find her employment. Unfortunately, part of this Sri Lankan network later got into the business of forging Italian visas for family ,friends and even paying customers to enter Italy. Needless to say, this was done with the bribery and connivance of Italian immigration officers who allowed entry on the basis of these forged visas.
We also heard their stories through our Sri Lankan domestic helper: some of them happy, some of them sad.
Features
Defining Oxygen Economy for sustaining life on Earth and growing intergenerational wealth
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3131/c3131a3312bd17a41a42ee6e2e40732114190143" alt=""
by Dr. Ranil Senanayake
The Oxygen that is present in the air that we breathe is the birth right of every organism that lives on this planet. It is free for everyone. However, the action of some to take out more than their share, without replacement, has created a condition, where the Global Commons of air is being rapidly degraded,
The most critical component of air is Oxygen. It surrounds us, filling our lungs with every breath we take. It is the invisible gift of nature that we take for granted. But this essential resource—the very foundation of life— is being constricted, because the volume of trees, plants, and photosynthetic organisms that produce oxygen is being lost across the planet. Further, there is no initiative for this generation capacity to be increased as a matter of urgency. exploited at present? Why couldn’t increasing the generation capacity of Oxygen have economic value? Could those who benefit most from using the resources of the Global Commons be required to contribute to its maintenance? This is the idea behind the Oxygen Economy, a bold and transformative concept that seeks to address environmental and social challenges in a way that is fair, sustainable, and forward-thinking beyond GDP value which measures the success of our societies today.
What Is the Oxygen Economy?
The Oxygen Economy is a financial framework, that recognises the value of the global stocks of Oxygen within the commons and records the deposition and consumption through economic activity.
The Oxygen Economy is a principled framework that recognises the stocks, transactions and deposits of Oxygen into the Global commons and assigns value to stocks from privately contracted production units, it stems from a growing recognition that Oxygen is a declining resource with an easy replenishment response.
Oxygen, considered a “free” resource. It is not. Much like oil and coal it is a ‘fossil’ resource that has been a part of the atmosphere for millions of years. It has been slowly declining, but is ‘topped up’ by a service provided by the earth’s ecosystems —particularly trees, plants, and other photosynthetic organisms. These organisms create molecular Oxygen through the process of photosynthesis, supporting life on earth and maintaining the balance of our atmosphere.
At its core, the Oxygen Economy aims to ensure that those who produce contracted and monitored oxygen, be it towns, farmlands, rural or forested lands, are fairly compensated for their efforts. It also holds industries and private-sector entities that benefit from oxygen consumption accountable in maintaining the sustainability of this resource.
What is the urgency to address oxygen as a depleting resource?
Other than the obvious fact of falling global stocks, the need of an Oxygen Economy arises from the urgency of addressing two critical challenges facing humanity: environmental degradation and economic inequality. Placing value on Oxygen production could effectively provide an effective response to both. For decades, efforts to combat climate change have focused primarily on carbon
sequestration. While important, the focus on Carbon sequestration often overlooks other vital ecosystem services, including oxygen production that can contribute towards a growing wealth paradigm. Oxygen, like water and food, is essential for life. However, unlike other resources, it has largely been treated as infinite and freely available, which it is not. In reality, the supply of Oxygen to the atmosphere is decreasing due to deforestation, while the consumption of Oxygen by space exploration, industrial production, war and transport are increasing. Today Oxygen levels have dropped by approximately 2%, raising concerns about the long- term sustainability of this critical resource.
How the Oxygen Economy works
The Oxygen Economy operates on the principles of private property being valued using financial tools such as valuation guarantees, stakeholder contracts and Insurances to monetise contractually produced oxygen as a financial product. This involves three key components:
1. Valuation guarantee:
Assigning an economic value to the oxygen produced by contracted and registered units in identified geographical areas of production is based on the researched, monitored and validated measurements of oxygen generation by trees / plants or photosynthetic organisms such as Cyanobacteria.
2. Deposition guarantee:
Issuance of certificates of completion and deposit of Oxygen into the global Commons Stakeholder Contracts and Compensation: Establishing formal agreements between oxygen consumers (e. g., corporations / Space exploration companies) and contracted oxygen producers (e.g., farmers, Local communities)
3. Policy and regulation: Introducing replicable legal frameworks at a regional scale to enforce accountability and prevent the uncontrolled exploitation of global oxygen resources.
Lessons from Sri Lanka
One country that is already exploring the potential of the Oxygen Economy is in the bioregional area of Sri Lanka. Known for its rich biodiversity and commitment to environmental stewardship, Sri Lanka has implemented initiatives that align with the principles of the Oxygen Economy. In one notable project, women from farming communities established and nurtured trees using contracts that measured and validated payments for photosynthetic biomass on an annually recurring basis for a period of four years. The stakeholders earning substantive income from this project were sensitised to the emerging Oxygen Economy while contributing their obligations to global environmental resilience. Over three years, these participants generated thousands of litres of oxygen, demonstrating that the concept is not only viable but also impactful.
Scaling the Oxygen Economy globally:
While Sri Lanka’s efforts are a promising start, the true potential of the Oxygen Economy
lies in its ability to scale globally. Imagine a world where farmers are compensated for the establishment of trees, where rural and even urban greenery projects could receive funding to expand their impact for this paradigm of business. Such a system would not only help combat climate change but also address economic inequalities of the current GDP paradigm, by together contracting the Oxygen economic asset tool to those who sustain the planet’s life-support systems.
Addressing potential challenges
Like any transformative idea, the Oxygen Economy faces potential challenges. Critics may argue that assigning a monetary value to Oxygen risks commodifying a natural resource that should remain freely accessible. Others may question the feasibility of measuring, validating and regulating oxygen production on a global scale. These concerns can be addressed by emphasising the ethical principles behind the Oxygen Economy. The goal is not to charge people for breathing but to ensure that those who contribute to its sustainability profit from financial contracts for Oxygen production. Additionally, such transparent systems for measuring and validating oxygen production will be crucial for building trust and ensuring fairness towards the vision of accounting for intergenerational wealth beyond the GDP framework that exists.
A vision for the future
The Oxygen Economy represents a paradigm shift in how we think about our relationship with the planet. It challenges us to move beyond the notion of nature as an infinite resource and to recognise the boundaries of our Global Commons. The true value of planet Earth is as an ecosystem that sustains life for all biota. By aligning economic practices with environmental stewardship, the Oxygen Economy offers a path towards a more equitable and sustainable future. It supports the foundations of intergenerational wealth that will be reflected in our contributions to the cycling atmospheric gasses of our Global Commons.
Imagine a world where the air we breathe is not taken for granted but is cherished and protected. Where farmers, communities, and ecosystems are rewarded for their contributions to the planet’s well-being. Where industries operate with a framework of accountability to prioritise the health of our shared environment. This is the vision of the Oxygen Economy—a vision that is within our reach if we act together, with urgency and determination, to lay well informed, solid foundations.
Features
Two sides to a coin; each mourn threat; no threat, no budget blues
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de38d/de38d75ed6d09a21861528af95a46170675a454b" alt=""
The coin Cassandra starts her Friday Cry with the recent film Rani. Parroting what her friends said on seeing the film, Cass in her Cry just prior to this wrote: “It has been reviewed as outstanding; raved over by many; and already grossed the highest amount in SL cinema history – Rs 100 million from date of release January 30 to February 14. This last: testimony to its popular appeal and acceptance as an outstanding cinema achievement.
” Cass admitted she had not seen the film. She now realises her reluctance to jostle in the crowd in one of many cinemas retelling the murder of Richard de Zoysa and traumatic mourning of his mother, Manorani, was because there grew in her a distaste after watching short previews on YouTube of parts of the film. Most centered on is Swarna Mallawarachchi, starring as Manorani, downing alcohol and smoking cigarette after cigarette. Director Asoka Handagama was sensationlising the more dramatic incidents of the tragedy. That was to please the crowd.
We Sri Lankans, or many, have absolutely no tight upper lip. Most funerals of yesteryear and many rural ones still have writhing moaning and groaning and appeals to the dead to smile one more time, say a word, rise up. These loud gasped cries in between sobbing sent Cass wickedly into silent giggles. She thought: what if the dead obliged with even one request. Worst, if he rose up and sat in his coffin. The first to run away would be the callers! People love wallowing in sniffles of sorrow. Audiences much prefer fictionalised retelling of events to documentaries about them. Handagama does style his film as fictionalised history but he definitely is guilty of sensationalism. Cass’ gut feelings have been given words in a criticism on Face Book which was shared with Cass by a nephew.
The sent around message is titled: Misconceived, Misinterpreted, Miscast and a Big Mistake. That tells it all. However there follows an incisive critique of the film Rani by one of Richard’s friends who knew Manorani well and how she was after her son’s death. He signs himself, but Cass will not quote the name here since there is much truth, lies and even hidden agendas in what is posted on social media.
He writes: “Badly acted, badly directed and badly researched … A clear example of character assassination via a deliberate misuse of artistic license! … I want to state my opinion about two people that many of us loved, respected and knew intimately.” He then goes on to point out mistakes and exaggerations: Manorani was never even bordering on alcoholism and hardly ever smoked. And when she did, socially or to dim her sorrow, she did it elegantly. A Man Friday commented: they should have taught Swarna how to hold a cigarette and smoke it as it should be smoked. Hence my contention, every coin, even a box office success, has two sides to it, two diverse criticisms and in-betweens. Decision: Cass will not queue for a cinema ticket.
Each morn
Phoned a US living friend who was recovering from a harsh winter’s gift to her – severe flu. She said the flu was leaving her but depression and distraught-ness about hers and the US’s future were threatening to drown her in emotional turmoil much worse than the worst cough ‘n cold.
I knew the reason – Trump’s trumpets of new opinions, threats, enactments et al. She dreaded getting up each morning wondering what new calamity was to descend on the American people and by influence, spreading to the world. Her son has forbidden TV news watching and reading the newspapers which she says are so opposed to media treatment of the Prez.
I could very well sympathise with her. We in Sri Lanka suffered bouts of such threatened discomfort, nay calamitous warnings and sheer dread. My remembering mind went to Shakespeare in his tragic play Macbeth. Macduff’s description of Scotland under the reign of Macbeth to Malcolm, son and heir of murdered Duncan now sheltered in England, goes thus: “Each new morn/ New widows howl, new orphans cry/ new sorrows strike heaven on the face that it resounds.”
Cass does not know about you but dread lurked in her heart and mind when the JVP 1989 insurrection took place – for her teenage son. The LTTE and suicide bombs caused utter destruction of life, limb and infrastructure. Families who had travelled together now travelled to schools and workplaces separately since no bus or train was safe. Nor were the privately owned cars. Then came two tyrant Presidents with sudden deaths of prominent persons and media personnel like Richard and Lasantha and many others.
Blatant robbing of our money had us gasping helplessly. Riff raff rose in power and lorded, one such tying a man to a stake for not attending a meeting. Then rode to power on popular vote another brother in the newly created powerful dynasty. Word of mouth minus stroke of pen had orders given out to be promptly executed. White vans which plied the streets were reduced but worse happened.
One order and the rice fields had no grain, fruits dried on trees, forex earning luscious two leaves and a bud withered and could not be plucked. Bankruptcy resulted. But we had a ‘shipless’ harbour which had to be mortgaged for a song to the Chinese; a plane-less airport sounding death to elephants and peafowl; and a gaudy tower to gaze on or commit suicide from. A gathering of people on Galle Face Green righted things.
Then came into power a party that had two men and a woman in Parliament which yielded a true Sri Lankan with country first and last in mind, as President. Followed a sharp victory for the coalition of parties led by the hopefully reformed JVP so that three seats became almost two thirds of all seats in Parliament and a woman as Prime Minister. She had no connection to previous Heads unlike a former woman PM and Prez. The first woman PM rode to power weeping for her murdered husband; the younger very promising Prez because she was daughter of two Heads of Sri Lanka. But there was, even under their reign, mutterings and difficulties.
Truth be told, we sleep better at night and wake up with no dread in our innards. We rise to shine (if possible, in the heat of Feb) knowing people are working and corruption is not wrought by those in power. Thank goodness and our sensible voters for this peace we savour.
2025 Budget
Cass’ title has the phrase ‘no budget blues’. Looks like it is generally correct. Of course, the Opposition is criticising Finance Minister AKD’s presented budget. Cass is no economist, not by a long chalk, but she was glad to see that expenditure on health and education were substantial. We had a time when the armed forces were allocated more than education and health combined. Much has been looked into: including pregnant women and the Jaffna library among a host of mentioned amenities. We have no need to pessimistically await a Gazette Extraordinary stating negative segments of the future year’s financial plan. Thanks be!
Gaza and Ukraine are worse in position and the world is awry. But Sri Lanka is in a phase where Kuveni’s curse is stilled and people are considering themselves Sri Lankans, uniting to re-make Sri Lanka Clean as it was before selfish corrupt politicians took over.
Features
As Africa toes Chinese line …
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d0cb/9d0cba31743aaa9b96998f61452479f238a86529" alt=""
Mitchell Gallagher
Every year, China’s minister of foreign affairs embarks on what has now become a customary odyssey across Africa. The tradition began in the late 1980s and sees Beijing’s top diplomat visit several African nations to reaffirm ties. The most recent visit, by Foreign Minister Wang Yi, took place in mid-January 2025 and included stops in Namibia, the Republic of the Congo, Chad and Nigeria.
For over two decades, China’s burgeoning influence in Africa was symbolised by grand displays of infrastructural might. From Nairobi’s gleaming towers to expansive ports dotting the continent’s shorelines, China’s investments on the continent have surged, reaching over $700 billion by 2023 under the Belt and Road Initiative, China’s massive global infrastructure development strategy.
But in recent years, Beijing has sought to expand beyond roads and skyscrapers and has made a play for the hearts and minds of African people. With a deft mix of persuasion, power and money, Beijing has turned to African media as a potential conduit for its geopolitical ambitions. Partnering with local outlets and journalist-training initiatives, China has expanded China’s media footprint in Africa. Its purpose? To change perceptions and anchor the idea of Beijing as a provider of resources and assistance and a model for development and governance. The ploy appears to be paying dividends, with evidence of sections of the media giving favourable coverage to China.
But as someone researching the reach of China’s influence overseas, I am beginning to see a nascent backlash against pro-Beijing reporting in countries across the continent. China’s approach to Africa rests mainly on its use of “soft power,” manifested through things like the media and cultural programmes. Beijing presents this as “win-win cooperation”—a quintessential Chinese diplomatic phrase mixing collaboration with cultural diplomacy. Key to China’s media approach in Africa are two institutions: The China Global Television Network (CGTN) Africa and Xinhua News Agency.
CGTN Africa, which was set up in 2012, offers a Chinese perspective on African news. The network produces content in multiple languages, including English, French and Swahili, and its coverage routinely portrays Beijing as a constructive partner, reporting on infrastructure projects, trade agreements and cultural initiatives. Moreover, Xinhua News Agency, China’s state news agency, now boasts 37 bureaus on the continent. By contrast, Western media presence in Africa remains comparatively limited.
The BBC, long embedded due to the United Kingdom’s colonial legacy, still maintains a large footprint among foreign outlets, but its influence is largely historical rather than expanding. And as Western media influence in Africa has plateaued, China’s state-backed media has grown exponentially. This expansion is especially evident in the digital domain. On Facebook, for example, CGTN Africa commands a staggering 4.5 million followers, vastly outpacing CNN Africa, which has 1.2 million—a stark indicator of China’s growing soft power reach. China’s zero-tariff trade policy with 33 African countries showcases how it uses economic policies to mould perceptions.
And state-backed media outlets like CGTN Africa and Xinhua are central to highlighting such projects and pushing an image of China as a benevolent partner. Stories of an “all-weather” or steadfast China-Africa partnership are broadcast widely and the coverage frequently depicts the grand nature of Chinese infrastructure projects. Amid this glowing coverage, the labour disputes, environmental devastation or debt traps associated with some Chinese-built infrastructure are less likely to make headlines. Questions of media veracity notwithstanding, China’s strategy is bearing fruit.
A Gallup poll from April 2024 showed China’s approval ratings climbing in Africa as US ratings dipped. Afrobarometer, a pan-African research organisation, further reports that public opinion of China in many African countries is positively glowing, an apparent validation of China’s discourse engineering. Further, studies have shown that pro-Beijing media influences perceptions. A 2023 survey of Zimbabweans found that those who were exposed to Chinese media were more likely to have a positive view of Beijing’s economic activities in the country. The effectiveness of China’s media strategy becomes especially apparent in the integration of local media.
Through content-sharing agreements, African outlets have disseminated Beijing’s editorial line and stories from Chinese state media, often without the due diligence of journalistic scepticism. Meanwhile, StarTimes, a Chinese media company, delivers a steady stream of curated depictions of translated Chinese movies, TV shows and documentaries across 30 countries in Africa. But China is not merely pushing its viewpoint through African channels. It’s also taking a lead role in training African journalists, thousands of whom have been lured by all-expenses-paid trips to China under the guise of “professional development.” On such junkets, they receive training that critics say obscures the distinction between skill-building and propaganda, presenting them with perspectives conforming to Beijing’s line.
Ethiopia exemplifies how China’s infrastructure investments and media influence have fostered a largely favourable perception of Beijing. State media outlets, often staffed by journalists trained in Chinese-run programmes, consistently frame China’s role as one of selfless partnership. Coverage of projects like the Addis AbabaDjibouti railway line highlights the benefits, while omitting reports on the substandard labour conditions tied to such projects—an approach reflective of Ethiopia’s media landscape, where state-run outlets prioritise economic development narratives and rely heavily on Xinhua as a primary news source. In Angola, Chinese oil companies extract considerable resources and channel billions into infrastructure projects.
The local media, again regularly staffed by journalists who have accepted invitations to visit China, often portray Sino-Angolan relations in glowing terms. Allegations of corruption, the displacement of local communities and environmental degradation are relegated to side notes in the name of common development. Despite all of the Chinese influence, media perspectives in Africa are far from uniformly pro-Beijing. In Kenya, voices of dissent are beginning to rise and media professionals immune to Beijing’s allure are probing the true costs of Chinese financial undertakings. In South Africa, media watchdogs are sounding alarms, pointing to a gradual attrition of press freedoms that come packaged with promises of growth and prosperity.
In Ghana, anxiety about Chinese media influence permeates more than the journalism sector, as officials have raised concerns about the implications of Chinese media cooperation agreements. Wariness in Ghana became especially apparent when local journalists started reporting that Chinese-produced content was being prioritised over domestic stories in state media.
Beneath the surface of China’s well publicised projects and media offerings, and the African countries or organisations that embrace Beijing’s line, a significant countervailing force exists that challenges uncritical representations and pursues rigorous journalism. Yet as CGTN Africa and Xinhua become entrenched in African media ecosystems, a pertinent question comes to the forefront: Will Africa’s journalists and press be able to uphold their impartiality and retain intellectual independence? As China continues to make strategic inroads in Africa, it’s a fair question.
(The writer is a PhD candidate of political science at Wayne State University, US. This article was published on www.theconversation.com)
-
Sports6 days ago
Remarkable turnaround for Sri Lanka’s ODI team
-
Features6 days ago
Scammed and Stranded: The Dark Side of Sri Lanka’s Migration Industry
-
Business6 days ago
UN Global Compact Network Sri Lanka: Empowering Businesses to Lead Sustainability in 2025 & Beyond
-
News7 days ago
Speaker agrees to probe allegations of ‘unethical funding’ by USAID
-
Features5 days ago
Don’t betray baiyas who voted you into power for lack of better alternative: a helpful warning to NPP – II
-
Features5 days ago
Two films and comments
-
News3 days ago
Commercial High Court orders AASSL to pay Rs 176 mn for unilateral termination of contract
-
Editorial7 days ago
Coal giant awakes, but uncertainty prevails