Connect with us

Business

Sri Lanka’s current nutrition challenges: How can they be addressed?

Published

on

Dr Pulasthi Amarasinghe is a Research Fellow at IPS with research interests in labour, health, and development economics. He is also interested in fiscal policy and social welfare programmes and their effects on household and individual behaviour. His recent work focuses on migration, social protection, and discrimination in low-income nations using various econometric tools. Dr Amarasinghe holds a BA in Economics and Mathematics from the University of Maryland, an MSc in Economics from Iowa State University, and a PhD in Economics from the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.

By Dr Pulasthi Amarasinghe

Sri Lanka is reaching a critical point as a result of poor access to affordable, nutritious food. Nutritional security has taken a backseat to simply meeting basic calorie requirements.

The nutritional landscape can significantly improve through shifts in tobacco and alcohol expenditure to food without solely relying on major macroeconomic transformations.

Appropriate fiscal policies and regulations should be a key focus to make nutritious diets affordable, accessible, and desirable for the poor and vulnerable communities.

In the face of recent crises that have undone long-term development gains, nutrition and its related health problems are major concerns for Sri Lanka. The economic downturn following the COVID-19 pandemic, inflation, and supply chain disruptions have exacerbated food and nutrition problems. It has led to a rise in food prices and income losses that significantly constrained the population’s ability to afford a nutritious diet.

The Household Survey of the Department of Census and Statistics (DCS) on the Impact of Economic Crisis 2023 revealed that over 90% of households experienced increased monthly expenditures, with food inflation being the primary cause​. The impact is particularly severe for the poorest and most vulnerable communities, especially in the rural and estate sectors and female-headed households. The prevalence of stunting, wasting, and underweight children under five years of age has increased post-pandemic, highlighting long-term health issues.

Amidst macroeconomic uncertainty, less explored approaches, such as shifting away from adverse health behaviours such as smoking and drinking, can create additional space for expenditures to shift toward nutritional needs. It provides a mechanism to improve and diversify diets without relying on significant economic structural transformations in the country. With the upcoming general elections, the voters and policymakers should understand nutritional problems in the country and recognise the crucial role of policy changes, regulations, and advocacy in overcoming nutritional challenges.

An Overview of Access to Food and Nutrition

Nutrition security is no longer a primary concern in the face of increased food insecurity, with households and government policies targeting increased energy intake at the cost of meeting nutrient requirements. The IPS’ Sri Lanka: State of the Economy 2024 report finds that households have struggled to maintain a balanced diet, often undergoing a shift in meal composition across rural and urban households, that sacrifices nutrition for quantity. For instance, protein sources such as meat, fish, and eggs have become prohibitively expensive for many families. In response to these challenges, households have employed various coping strategies to manage their limited resources.

These include reducing the number of meals per day, limiting the consumption of adults to ensure children have enough to eat, and skipping meals altogether. 59.6% of households relied on less preferred and cheaper food options in 2022, up from 17.1% in 2019. This shift highlights how economic hardships have pushed families toward a more calorie-centric diet at the expense of macro and micronutrient intake.

The caloric yield from food items per LKR 100 has also decreased significantly, with rice, dhal, and wheat flour showing more than a 50% reduction in caloric yield from 2019 to 2023​. The cost-effectiveness of households is likely to be affected as well, meaning that households are unlikely to receive the same value they previously got from LKR 100 worth of food and are constrained in their ability to be cost-effective. While the cost-effective capacities of the poorest quintiles are historically relatively high compared to the wealthiest quintile, the economic crisis has worsened such capabilities of the poor while forcing even the richest quintiles to become more cost-efficient than before.

Reducing tobacco and alcohol expenditure for nutritional gains, among other measures, is far-reaching as it benefits health through many channels. Improving food and nutritional security in Sri Lanka lies in addressing the non-food expenditure of low-income households, particularly on items like tobacco and alcohol. A demand system analysis of major food items suggests that reallocating expenditures from smoking and alcohol to food could substantially improve caloric and nutrient intake. For instance, for the poorest 20% of households, reallocating tobacco expenditures toward food could increase the daily caloric intake by approximately 4.2%, while redirecting both tobacco and alcohol expenditures could lead to a 19.1% increase​.

This shift would increase caloric intake and improve macronutrient intake, including proteins and fats, which are critical for overall health. Proteins from food items like meat, fish, and eggs, which have become less accessible due to rising costs, could become more available if tobacco and alcohol expenditures were redirected​. The estimated increase in daily caloric intake for the poorest households could rise from 1,792 kilocalories (kcal) to 2,134 kcal if they reallocate tobacco and alcohol expenses to food. Those caloric gains could address the energy requirements considered first-order issues, while predicted improved variety and quality would also address nutritional security.

Notes:

The predicted changes in caloric and macronutrient consumption of the poorest 20% of households are estimated using Quadratic Ideal Demand System modeling. The model estimates the elasticities and shares of main food items given the prices and expenditures.

However, the success of this approach depends on effective public health interventions and awareness building that promote behavioural changes, quitting unhealthy behaviours and making tobacco and alcohol less affordable. IPS research shows that smoking and alcohol have become relatively more affordable as the prices of other food items have increased much faster. Therefore, while public policy interventions to promote behavioural changes are likely to manifest over a longer timeframe, taxation to make tobacco and alcohol less desirable commodities relative to other expenditures is a feasible and effective policy target.

Campaigns to reduce tobacco and alcohol consumption should be coupled with initiatives that educate households about the nutritional and health benefits of reallocating these expenditures. Such efforts could be part of broader social protection programmes that target low-income households with cash transfers and food vouchers, encouraging healthier spending habits and lifestyles.

Way Forward

Addressing nutritional challenges requires immediate interventions to ensure food and nutritional security and long-term strategies to promote sustainable agricultural practices, reduce food waste, and improve access to nutritious food through markets and environments. A less explored approach is to reduce non-food expenditure on tobacco and alcohol, which could significantly improve caloric and nutrient intake among low-income and estate-sector households. Redirecting these expenditures allows households to improve their nutritional intake and cushion the impact of the economic crisis on diet quality, achieving better food security without relying solely on broader economic reforms or sacrificing essential spending on health or education.

The policymakers, too, should consider both the short-term and long-term health and economic costs of poor nutrition. Policies to recognise and address nutrition insecurity as a critical symptom of transient poverty in the social protection systems would benefit the most vulnerable households. In addition, appropriate regulations and fiscal policies, such as VAT exemptions on essential food items with high nutrition value or taxation of unhealthy products like tobacco and alcohol to redirect household expenditure so that nutritious foods are affordable, accessible, and desirable, should be a priority for the upcoming candidates in the election cycle.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Sri Lanka’s tourism paradox: More visitors, less money

Published

on

Sri Lanka’s tourism industry is posting arrival numbers that many destinations would envy, yet it is increasingly troubled by a disconcerting trend: the country is welcoming record numbers of visitors, but tourism earnings are struggling to keep pace.

In May, Sri Lanka recorded its highest-ever monthly increase in tourist arrivals, welcoming 145,745 visitors, a 10% rise from a year earlier. However, tourism revenue fell 5.1% year-on-year to US$155.7 million, according to official data. For the first five months of 2026, earnings declined 12% to US$1.36 billion, despite continued growth in arrivals.

“These figures highlight a growing challenge for a country that depends heavily on tourism as a source of foreign exchange: attracting more tourists is no longer enough. The bigger question is how much they spend once they arrive,” a leading hotelier told The Island Financial Review.

“After being battered by the 2019 Easter Sunday attacks, the COVID-19 pandemic, and the 2022 economic crisis, Sri Lanka recorded a historic 2.36 million visitors in 2025. Authorities are now targeting 3 million arrivals in 2026. But beneath those anticipated numbers lies a more complicated story,” he said.

Elaborating further, he noted: “Tourism revenue reached roughly US$3.2 billion in 2025; only marginally higher than the previous year, despite a 15% jump in arrivals. More tellingly, earnings remain significantly below the levels achieved in 2018, when visitor numbers were comparable. So, the decline in average tourist spending has become impossible to ignore.”

According to official surveys, average daily tourist expenditure has been revised downward to approximately US$148 per day, compared with previous estimates exceeding US$170.

Referring to this trend, he added: “Destinations such as the Maldives attract substantially higher per-visitor spending through luxury tourism, premium experiences, and high-end accommodation. The debate should increasingly revolve around whether Sri Lanka is pursuing the right tourism model.”

For years, the country focused on boosting arrival numbers through aggressive marketing campaigns, Instagram influencer partnerships, and social media promotions. As a result, Sri Lanka may now be attracting too many budget-conscious travellers while failing to draw those seeking immersive, higher-value experiences rooted in the nation’s natural and cultural assets. “Are we grappling with the tension between ‘high-volume tourism’ and ‘high-value tourism’?” he asked. “Sri Lanka must encourage longer stays, diversify experiences beyond beaches and cultural sites, and develop premium offerings in wellness, eco-tourism, adventure, luxury rail, culinary, and wildlife sectors if it hopes to increase per-visitor spending.”

An inbound travel operator concurred, stating that the future should depend less on bringing in more people and more on attracting the right mix of travellers.

Against this backdrop, Sri Lanka appears to be intensifying efforts in key source markets. One of the most notable initiatives took place recently in Moscow, where Deputy Tourism Minister Prof. Ruwan Ranasinghe led a delegation to the sixth “Let’s Travel International Tourism Forum.” Discussions with Russian officials focused on direct flights, simplified visa procedures, destination promotion, and stronger bilateral tourism cooperation.

Russian travellers have become increasingly important to Sri Lanka’s tourism sector. Russia consistently ranks among the island’s top source markets, alongside India and the United Kingdom. In early 2026 alone, tens of thousands of Russian visitors arrived in Sri Lanka, underscoring the market’s growing significance. The Moscow forum also signalled a broader strategy: expanding beyond traditional hubs and reaching travellers across multiple Russian regions.

“The island’s beaches, wildlife reserves, ancient cities, tea-country landscapes, and wellness traditions already provide a strong foundation, and Sri Lanka has largely solved the problem of attracting visitors. Its next challenge is more difficult: transforming a popular destination into a high-value one. That will require investment in infrastructure, premium tourism products, transport connectivity, destination management, and visitor experiences that encourage travellers to spend more and stay longer,” the inbound operator said.

Tourism Minister Vijitha Herath recently told parliament that the current revenue figures reflect more accurate measurement methodologies rather than a collapse in spending. Referring to this, the hotelier said,” While that may be a technically valid assertion, it does little to mask a far more pressing reality: Sri Lanka is no longer attracting the high-spending travellers it once did. The data, when viewed alongside declining average daily expenditure and stagnant overall earnings, points to a structural shift in the country’s visitor profile, one that favours volume over value. Until Sri Lanka recalibrates its tourism strategy to prioritise quality over quantity, it risks becoming a destination that everyone visits but few truly invest in.”

By Sanath Nanayakkare

Continue Reading

Business

Climate resilience now central to Sri Lanka’s economic future, investors told

Published

on

The high level climate forum in progress.

Climate resilience is no longer an environmental concern on the periphery of policymaking but a critical economic imperative that will determine Sri Lanka’s future competitiveness, export performance, investment attractiveness and long-term growth prospects, leading development agencies and private-sector leaders warned at a high-level forum titled Sri Lanka Climate Summit in Colombo recently.

With climate shocks becoming increasingly frequent and costly, experts said that Sri Lanka must urgently strengthen climate-resilient infrastructure, reform key utility sectors, modernise its data systems and improve access to global climate financing if it hopes to sustain economic recovery and attract investment.

The discussion brought together representatives from multilateral institutions, development agencies and the private sector, who argued that climate adaptation should be viewed not as a financial burden but as one of the largest economic opportunities available to emerging economies.

Addressing the forum, Asian Development Bank (ADB) Country Director for Sri Lanka, Shannon Cowlin, said countries with stronger economic fundamentals are better positioned to absorb climate shocks and recover faster.

“Climate resilience is not only about infrastructure. It is also about macroeconomic resilience. Countries that maintain sound economic management can respond more effectively when disasters occur,” she said.

Referring to Sri Lanka’s recent response to Cyclone Ditwa, Cowlin noted that the country’s economic reforms and recovery programme had significantly improved its ability to manage the disaster compared with previous years.

The ADB highlighted the importance of ongoing reforms in the energy and water sectors, particularly efforts to establish cost-reflective tariffs that would enable utilities to maintain and upgrade critical infrastructure.

“We cannot expect financially distressed utilities to invest adequately in resilience,” she cautioned.

The bank is currently preparing emergency assistance financing to support post-cyclone recovery efforts while embedding internationally recognised “Build Back Better” principles into reconstruction programmes.

Rather than merely restoring damaged assets, future investments will focus on strengthening roads, drainage systems and other public infrastructure to withstand increasingly severe weather events.

Dilmah chairman and Chief Executive Officer Dilhan Fernando warned that climate change represents a direct threat to Sri Lanka’s export competitiveness, especially for premium products such as Ceylon Tea and Ceylon Cinnamon.

“Adaptation is simply another word for survival,” Fernando said.

He observed that rising temperatures, changing rainfall patterns and increasingly unpredictable weather events are beginning to challenge the environmental conditions that have historically given Sri Lankan agricultural products their global reputation.

“The planet has already warmed by more than 1.3 degrees Celsius. Scientists project warming levels approaching three degrees, which would create environmental conditions not experienced for millions of years, he said.

Fernando warned that climate pressures could significantly affect both production volumes and product quality in the tea sector.

“We speak about achieving 400 million kilograms of tea production. Given the climate extremes we are witnessing today, we need to question whether such targets remain realistic in the long term,” he said.

He also highlighted a growing commercial challenge emerging from international markets.

The European Union’s new sustainability and supply-chain regulations are expected to impose stricter environmental compliance requirements on exporters, potentially affecting market access for companies unable to demonstrate sustainable production practices.

“These developments are not simply regulatory requirements. They represent a structural transformation in global trade and consumer expectations,” Fernando said.

However, he argued that businesses should approach climate adaptation as a strategic growth opportunity rather than a compliance exercise.

By Ifham Nizam

Continue Reading

Business

Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation General Limited honoured

Published

on

Sri Lanka Insurance Corporation General Limited (SLICGL), the nation’s trusted leader in general insurance, has been recognised as Sri Lanka’s No. 1 Most Loved General Insurance Brand in 2026.

The prestigious honour, awarded by LMD – The Voice of Business, demonstrates the deep trust, confidence, and lasting relationships customers continue to place in SLICGL. It is clear evidence of the company’s continued commitment to service excellence, innovation, and reliability in protecting lives and businesses throughout the country.

As SLICGL continues to command the industry, it remains dedicated to protecting lives, supporting communities, and delivering trusted insurance solutions nationwide. The achievement also celebrates the dedication of employees, sales teams, business partners, and stakeholders whose collective efforts have strengthened the brand and nurtured long‑term customer relationships.

The recognition reinforces SLICGL’s position as the country’s leading force in the insurance sector, motivating the organisation to enhance products, services, and customer experiences, maintaining the highest standards for all touchpoints.

Today, the bond thrives on consistent delivery. SLICGL remains the undisputed market leader in Sri Lanka’s general insurance industry, with a 20.2% market share and a Gross Written Premium of Rs. 30.3 billion in 2025. During the year, the company settled Rs. 12.3 billion in insurance claims and benefits, including in the aftermath of Cyclone Ditwah, standing by policyholders when it mattered most. Its motor solutions arm, Motor Plus, retained its place as the country’s number one motor insurer.

Continue Reading

Trending