Connect with us

Features

Freedom of Expression and of the Press

Published

on

A scene from the movie The Post

The proverbial killing of the messenger is being attempted as of now. Minister of Public Security, Tiran Alles, has threatened Attorney-at-law Sandaru Kumarasinghe with consequences for ranting against the issuing of visas at the BIA by a foreign company/companies on May 1, the video of which went viral. Due to this, people woke up to the fact that issuing visas to foreigners which had been competently carried out by officers of the Immigration and Emigration department was given over to the foreign outfits and consequently entry visas had risen from $50 for 30 days to $100.77, with a sizable slice of this earning being taken out of the country.

Many are the voices of protest against the threat to democracy and free speech by the government’s recent Online Safety Act No. 09 of 2024, and the Anti-Terrorism Bill. Much has been written and said about both. The recent Bill was to increase its draconian strictures and punishments.

The ongoing suppression by the US government on protests in universities across the country against Israel and its genocide in Gaza, and counter protests by pro-Israel students is bringing up debates on freedom of gathering together and protesting.

Infamous happening: noted film

I dare not comment on any of the issues mentioned above. But with thoughts of suppression and constant protests in Colombo and elsewhere, I opted to re-see the 2017 film

The Post,directed and produced by Steven Spielberg, starring Meryl Streep as Katharine Graham – the Washington Post’s owner and publisher – and Tom Hanks as Ben Bradlee, executive editor of the paper.

Set in 1971 it is the true story of attempts by journalists at the Washington Post to publish the infamous Pentagon Papers, a set of classified documents regarding the 20 year involvement of the US in the Vietnam War and earlier in French Indo China in the 1940s. The classified papers prove the guilt of all Presidents from John F Kennedy to Richard Nixon and their Secretaries of State. The uproar was triggered off by the US State Department commissioning analyst Daniel Ellsberg to go stay in Vietnam and study conditions of the American armed forces. He documents the reality of the war and concludes the war is hopeless. Back in the US, the Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara agrees but nothing is done; further deployments of soldiers to certain death continues.

After his mission, Ellsberg worked for the RAND Corporation, a think tank with access to classified information. He copies thousands of classified pages documenting long term interference in Vietnam from Truman’s time and then leaks the papers to the New York Times. The Washington Post too gets hold of the papers and Bradlee is determined to publish what is severely anti-government. This is with Richard Nixon as Prez. Graham holds back as all in the higher ranks of government are her social network. However, she gives the word to publish and then the resulting uproar. Her consent, to me, shows her commitment to truth and fearlessness, in plain language – country before self.

The film ends with a camera shot of Nixon in silhouette, phoning to say that Washington Post journos are not to be allowed in the White House. Then is shown a night guard at a DC hotel and office complex noticing a suspiciously taped exit door. This was June 17, 1972, and thus the investigation into the break-in to the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee which finally results in the resignation of Prez Richard. M. Nixon before he was impeached.

Second Post exposure and film

Just a year after the publication of the Pentagon Papers, two Washington Post reporters: Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein brought the Watergate story to Bradlee – what their source ‘Deep Throat’ had divulged to them. Katherine Graham promoted the investigative journalistic search and permitted Bradlee to publish reports on the Watergate scandal. Other newspapers were wary of such publishing with Nixon embroiled fully. Katharine Graham backed the two reporters and editor fully, though again it was against many in her social set; and dangerous.

Graham and editor Bradlee first experienced threats of censorship, government disapproval after initial doubts and fears of publishing the contents of the Pentagon Papers. Then it was the Watergate scandal. A story worth mentioning is the remark, really threat, Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, warned reporter Carl Bernstein about the Post’s expected Watergate exposure. “Katie Graham’s gonna get her tit caught in a big fat wringer if that’s published.” The Post published the quote probably pushed on by Katharine Graham, although Bradlee deleted the words about a part of her body. She later observed: “It’s especially strange of Mitchell to call me Katie, which no one has ever called me.” This was all in 1972

The biographical political drama thriller film about the Watergate scandal was directed by Alan J Pakula based on the 1974 book by Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward. The film All the President’s Men was released in 1978, starring Dustin Hoffman and Robert Redford as Bernstein and Woodward respectively. Jason Robards plays Ben Bradlee. Katharne Graham is not portrayed in the film, although originally she had wanted a scene with her questioning one of the reporters “What are you doing with my paper?”

Nominated in multiple Oscar, Golden Globe and BAFTA categories, it won many awards. In 2010, it was selected for preservation in the United States National Film Repository by the Library of Congress as being “culturally, historically, or aesthetically significant.

Remarkable woman

It is interesting to note a couple of facts about this remarkable woman, Katherine Graham. Born in New York to Alsatian Jewish father Eugene Meyer and Lutheran American socialite mother on June 16, 1917, Katharine Meyer lived a wealthy, privileged life entering Vassar College and then the University of Chicago. Her financier father proceeded from being Chairman, Federal Reserve, to Head of the World Bank. In 1933 he bought the Washington Post (WP) when its owning company went bankrupt.

Katharine married Philip Graham, graduate of Harvard Law School and clerk to a Supreme Court judge in 1940. Her father bequeathed the WP to his son-in-law in 1946, which Katharine said she did not mind at all. Philip however was alcoholic and suffered mental illnesses. He committed suicide in 1963 aged 48. Katharine, though inexperienced, took over chairmanship of the WP and became de facto publisher from September 1963. She was its formal publisher from 1969 to 1979 and chairwoman of the Board from 1973 to 1991. In 1972 she became CEO of the Washington Post Company – the first female CEO of a Fortune 500 company. In 1998 she received the Pulitzer Prize for her autobiography, Personal History, published the previous year. Professionally wise moves include selecting Benjamin Bradlee as editor and cultivating Warren Buffet for financial advice. He became a major shareholder.

Son Donald was publisher form 1979 to 2000. On July 14, Katharine fell and struck her head while visiting Sun Vale, Idaho. She died three days later, aged 84.

The focus of this article is not the two films described nor extraordinary Katharine Graham who changed from privileged housewife and socialite to be an intrepid publisher of a newspaper that stood for truth and making it known, whatever the consequences.

Then what is the focus, the reader may ask. It is media freedom. Fortuitously, Lynn Ockersz’s article Lukewarm reactions to targeting and killing of journalists is centre-paged in

The Island of May 9. He starts with the world’s present two war zones and writes that most governments chose to be silent in the face of the loss of life of journalists. “Since the free press is a principal factor to the furtherance of democracy, which in turn ensures the thriving of people’s rights, the life of a journalist in a democracy could be considered priceless.”

The press publication of the Pentagon Papers and report on probe into the Watergate break-in went through with no death to journalists even though times were bad in the US with Nixon as President. We in Sri Lanka grieved death, torture and chasing away journalists and most persons remained silent. It looks to be that the populace is more alert now. We hope so.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Features

The challenge of being positive about SAARC

Published

on

The RCSS forum addressed by SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar in progress. (Pic courtesy RCSS)

It was a few years back that a former President of Sri Lanka took it on himself to pronounce SAARC ‘dead’. Since then there have been other sections of Sri Lankan opinion that have joined the critics of SAARC and taken the solemn stance that SAARC has indeed died what may be called a natural death.

Their fatalism is understandable. SAARC has failed to meet at heads of government or state level for the past several years to take the SAARC process notably forward. Regional cooperation has more or less been only an appealing idea. No substantive concrete projects have taken off to make the idea a hard reality. ‘Inner paralysis’ seems to be SAARC’s lot. Hence the fatalism in these circles.

However, being one of the worst cash-strapped regions of the world and a teemingly populated one with people virtually left to their devices, what choices do the ‘SAARC Eight’ have other than to try their best to band together and continue with their cooperation efforts, however small they may be?

There is no escaping the mounting debt trap for many of these countries and bankrupt Sri Lanka is a glaring example, but ‘throwing in the towel’ and abandoning themselves entirely to the diktats of the strongest economies and their agencies will prove a ‘living death’ for many countries in the SAARC fold.

The gains may be meagre but giving-up on SAARC cooperation in full would prove self-defeating for the organization and South Asia. Right now, the collective intention ought to be to salvage what the region could from the tenuous cooperative efforts. Moreover, such initiatives could go some distance to generate a degree of goodwill among the Eight and help in sustaining a dialogue process.

Given this backdrop it proved ‘a stich in time’ for the Regional Centre for Strategic Studies (RCSS), Colombo, to recently host the SAARC Secretary General Ambassador Md. Golam Sarwar to a round table discussion on the unifying potential of SAARC and its future possibilities, besides other related issue areas.

Held on June 24th and moderated by RCSS Executive Director and former ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha, the forum brought together a vibrant, wide ranging audience comprising academicians, diplomats, senior public servants, civil society activists and many others. Following the presentation by Ambassador Golam Sarwar titled, ‘Reigniting SAARC: Achievements, Challenges and the Way Ahead’, a lively Q&A followed.

The above forum could be described as an act of lighting the proverbial ‘candle’ rather than ‘cursing the darkness.’ It surely is a ‘darkness’ that could be seen as daunting considering that the region’s pivotal powers, India and Pakistan, are failing to act in a spirit of accord but are engaged in bitter finger-pointing on a number of questions of vital importance to SAARC.

On the other hand, what is the rest of the region doing to bring the above sides together? It is disappointing that to date the rest of SAARC has failed to launch a major diplomatic drive to bring peace between the feuding regional heavyweights. It needs to act without delay and establish its earnestness and this effort would need to prove SAARC’s staying power in the unfolding months and even years.

In assessing SAARC’s seeming failure local opinion in particular has failed to factor in what could be described as weak leadership. Since Sheikh Mujibur Rahman of Bangladesh, the founding father of SAARC, the region has failed to produce a visionary leader who could advance the SAARC cause with charisma and drive.

Among other reasons, weak leadership accounts considerably for the faltering and stuttering status, as it were, of SAARC. Badly needed are leaders who could go the extra mile, think less of narrow national interests and work diligently towards the collective well being of the region but SAARC’s millions of ordinary people have been made to wait in vain for leaders of such stature. Instead, they have been burdened with politicians who seem to be relishing the apparently moribund state of SAARC.

Looking back, it could be said that it was the dynamic leadership factor that led to the launching of the Non-Aligned Movement and for its sustenance for a few decades. True, it could be seen in some quarters that NAM is no more, but as in the case of SAARC, the former too has been unfortunate to be burdened over the years with politicians who lack the vision and drive to unflaggingly advance the fortunes of the South. NAM and SAARC lack the dynamism and vision of leaders of the stature of Jawaharlal Nehru, for example, to give them the required guidance and intellectual depth.

The reasons are complex for there not being among us currently political leaders with the vision and the steadfast commitment to advance the legitimate interests of the South. However, it could be stated with conviction that the majority of Southern leaders have too easily caved in to the demands of the global North and its financial agencies.

These leaders have failed to see, for instance, that the largely market economy oriented Northern governments would not view with favour a centrist economic model that attaches priority to the interests of the dis-empowered publics of the South. This realization ought to have dawned on the current government in Sri Lanka, for instance, some while ago but it has no choice but to abide by IMF dictates since economic survival at present is unthinkable without the latter’s succour.

Accordingly for SAARC this should be the time for some soul-searching. Priority needs to be attached to ending the feuding between India and Pakistan since at present the material fortunes of the region hinge largely on these regional giants giving peaceful relations among them a try. This is no easy challenge to meet but some daring, visionary diplomacy needs to take hold among the rest of SAARC.

There is some sense in SAARC bringing the peoples of the region together through programs that address their best collective interests. A meeting of minds among SAARC nations could enable SAARC and its agencies to build a region-wide people’s movement for progressive political and economic change that could in turn lead to the region’s political leaders sensitizing themselves more to the neglected needs of their publics.

However, the time is ‘now’ for the initiation of these progressive changes and the voice of SAARC well wishers would need to drown out those of their critics.

Continue Reading

Features

OPA seminar examines Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and growth pathways

Published

on

(L to R) Dr Achinthya Koswatte, Anushan Kapilan, Dr Harsha Aturupane, Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President, OPA and moderator of the discussion, and Eng Chamil Edirimuny, General Secretary, OPA, at the head table.

A seminar, “Sri Lanka’s Economic Crossroads: Navigating Recovery, Resilience and Growth” was recently held by the Organisation of Professional Associations of Sri Lanka (OPA) at the OPA Auditorium, bringing together economists, OPA members, and professionals from diverse fields for an insightful discussion on Sri Lanka’s economic recovery and future growth prospects.

The event was held under the patronage of Jayantha Gallehewa, President of the OPA, and was jointly organised by the National Issues Committee (NIC) and the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee of the OPA. The event reaffirmed the organisation’s commitment to advancing professional excellence, fostering insightful intellectual engagement, facilitating interdisciplinary knowledge exchange and creating a constructive platform for informed dialogue on issues of national importance.

The panel of speakers comprised Dr. Harsha Aturupane, Lead Economist and Programme Leader for Human Development at the World Bank for Sri Lanka and the Maldives; Dr. Achinthya Koswatta, Senior Lecturer in Economics at the Open University of Sri Lanka, and Anushan Kapilan, Lead Economist at Verité Research.

In his welcome address, the President of the OPA emphasised that Sri Lanka was at a critical juncture in its economic recovery journey where sustained reforms, effective implementation, and collective national commitment are essential to achieving long-term stability, resilience and inclusive growth. He noted that the country had experienced one of the most severe economic crises in its history with the economy contracting by 7.8 percent in 2022 and a further 11.5 percent in 2023, resulting in significant economic and social challenges.

Delivering his introductory remarks Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee, underscored the need to move beyond short-term economic stabilisation towards a comprehensive agenda of structural transformation. He observed that the economic crisis had revealed deep-rooted weaknesses within the economy, including persistent fiscal pressures, rising public debt, foreign exchange limitations, and insufficient diversification of the export base. He stressed that addressing these challenges through strategic reforms, institutional strengthening and long-term economic planning would be essential to establishing a more resilient and competitive economy.

While acknowledging recent positive developments, including improved inflation management, tourism recovery and signs of economic stabilisation, Wijeyaratne stressed the need to advance reforms aimed at strengthening fiscal discipline, enhancing productivity, improving competitiveness, developing human capital and reinforcing governance and institutional effectiveness.

He further highlighted the important role of professionals, businesses, academia and other stakeholders in contributing to evidence-based dialogue and supporting Sri Lanka’s journey towards a resilient, inclusive and sustainable economic future.

Delivering the keynote presentation, Dr. Harsha Aturupane provided a comprehensive assessment of Sri Lanka’s economic prospects within the broader context of global economic transformation. He argued that Sri Lanka functioned as a small open economy whose performance is significantly influenced by developments in the global marketplace. External factors could not be controlled, and the country must strengthen its domestic capacity and resilience to respond effectively to international economic shifts, he noted.

Tracing the evolution of global economic systems, Dr. Aturupane highlighted the transition from ideological divisions between state-controlled and market-oriented economies towards increasingly pragmatic approaches focused on growth, competitiveness and development. He noted that Sri Lanka’s own economic journey reflects a similar evolution, with contemporary policy debates now centred on practical solutions for sustainable economic progress.

The presentation also examined the transformative impact of globalisation. Dr. Aturupane observed that global economic integration had enabled several East Asian economies, including South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong, to achieve remarkable economic advancement through export-led growth strategies. Sri Lanka similarly benefited from this process through the expansion of its apparel industry and increased integration into global value chains.

Turning to Sri Lanka’s recovery programme, Dr. Aturupane emphasised that the ongoing stabilisation process should be viewed as a national programme supported by the International Monetary Fund rather than solely as an IMF initiative. He observed that strong worker remittances, improved tourism earnings, enhanced government revenue mobilisation and prudent import management have contributed significantly to economic stabilisation.

Despite this progress, he cautioned that rebuilding foreign exchange reserves and meeting future debt obligations remain major challenges. He underscored the need to strengthen export performance, attract investment and generate sustainable foreign exchange earnings to ensure long-term economic resilience.

The discussion also focused on monetary stability, inflation management and exchange-rate policy. Dr. Aturupane stressed that maintaining price stability was fundamental to sustainable growth and household welfare, while sound monetary policy remains essential for preserving economic confidence.

Looking beyond stabilisation, he argued that Sri Lanka must transition towards a broader economic transformation agenda. Sustainable growth, he noted, will depend on expanding productive capacity through investment, technological advancement, innovation, skills development and structural reforms.

Among the key constraints identified was the high cost of energy, which continues to affect competitiveness and investment attractiveness. Dr. Aturupane emphasised the importance of improving efficiency and affordability within the energy sector to enhance Sri Lanka’s business environment.

He further highlighted the social dimensions of the crisis, noting the rise in poverty and economic vulnerability among households. Strengthening social protection systems and ensuring inclusive growth, he argued, must remain central components of the national development agenda.

Another critical challenge identified was Sri Lanka’s demographic transition. With an ageing population, outward migration and evolving labour market dynamics, the country is increasingly confronting labour shortages in several sectors. Dr. Aturupane suggested that greater automation, increased labour-force participation and strategic workforce planning would be necessary to address these emerging realities.

Concluding his presentation, he emphasised the need to improve governance, strengthen institutions, enhance competitiveness and create an enabling environment for private sector investment. Sri Lanka’s future success, he noted, will depend on its ability to move decisively beyond crisis management towards a development model founded on resilience, innovation, productivity and inclusive growth.

Dr. Achinthya Koswatta reiterated the importance of policy consistency and predictability in fostering investment and industrial development. She observed that frequent policy changes create uncertainty and discourage long-term investment decisions, whereas stable and coherent policy frameworks build confidence and support sustainable economic transformation.

Meanwhile, Anushan Kapilan highlighted the substantial progress achieved in restoring macroeconomic stability following the recent crisis. He noted significant improvements in fiscal performance, including increased government revenue, reduced reliance on debt financing and a historically low fiscal deficit.

He further observed that public debt levels are declining faster than anticipated, economic growth has exceeded expectations and inflation has been brought under control more rapidly than forecast. Nevertheless, he cautioned that the recovery remains uneven, particularly within the industrial sector and that many households have yet to experience a meaningful improvement in living standards.

The seminar was expertly coordinated by Eng. Chamil Edirimuni, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the Seminars, Workshops and Programmes Committee, while the technical moderation and interactive discussion session were facilitated by Bhanu Wijeyaratne, Vice President of the OPA and Chairman of the National Issues Committee.

The event was attended by Tisara De Silva, President-Elect of the OPA, Eng. Ravi Rupasinghe, General Secretary, Past Presidents, members of the Executive Council, representatives of the General Forum and professionals representing a wide range of disciplines.

The seminar concluded with a vibrant exchange of ideas and perspectives, reaffirming the importance of evidence-based policy dialogue, institutional collaboration and collective national commitment in advancing Sri Lanka’s economic recovery, resilience and sustainable growth.

Continue Reading

Features

Her roots run deep in Sri Lanka

Published

on

Samantha Kay: Now based in the UK Samantha’s biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women Whenever she visits Sri Lanka, she says she loves spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa She released a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts

Yes, for UK-based presenter and artiste Samantha Kay, home is where the heart – and the roots – are. And her roots run deep in Sri Lanka.

In an exclusive interview with The Island, Samantha says “I’m proud to be Sri Lankan. My mum is from Kandy and my dad is from Colombo, so Sri Lanka has always held a very special place in my heart.

“Whenever I visit Sri Lanka, I love spending time on the beautiful south coast, especially Hikkaduwa and Mirissa. It’s somewhere I always feel connected to my roots and completely at peace.”

Now living in Bournemouth, on the south coast of England, where, she says, she is lucky to be close to some of the UK’s most beautiful beaches, including the iconic Sandbanks, Samantha has built a career that refuses to fit into one box.

She is a radio presenter, podcast host, singer-songwriter, personal trainer and life coach.

“I genuinely love the variety because every role allows me to connect with people and, hopefully, make a positive difference in someone’s day.”

Of course, music has taken her far.

One of her proudest achievements, she says, was releasing a song with 90s music icon Angie Brown, which reached No. 9 in the UK Club Charts.

She also reached the final stages of The X Factor and performed at Wembley Stadium in front of thousands.

Beyond music, Samantha competed in bikini bodybuilding across the UK, winning several titles. “It taught me discipline, resilience and self-belief,” she recalls.

Today, her focus is on radio, podcasting and coaching women. Her podcast encourages people to live life on their own terms rather than feeling pressured to follow society’s expectations.

Says Samantha: “Whether someone is single, changing careers, travelling solo or simply trying to find their purpose, I want them to know that it’s never too late to create a life that feels authentic. If you’ve ever felt like you don’t fit into the box, maybe you were never meant to.”

Samantha Kay also spent a year in Dubai, performing at five-star hotels, including FIVE, and coaching at the iconic outdoor gym on Palm Jumeirah.

“I taught strength and conditioning classes, and hosted wellness retreats, combining my passion for music, health and inspiring others.”

However, with family matters calling her back to the UK, she made the choice to return. “Family comes first,” she says.

Looking ahead, Samantha plans to grow her radio and podcast work, release more music, and expand her wellness retreats.

“My biggest passion is helping people, especially women, build confidence and believe in themselves,” she says.

“Wherever my career takes me, I hope to continue inspiring others to live with courage, kindness and authenticity, while never forgetting my Sri Lankan roots.”

Continue Reading

Trending