Connect with us

News

Lankan envoy frowns at UN one sided resolutions against Sri Lanka

Published

on

Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the United Nations in Geneva, Himalee Arunatilaka has recently said that UNHRC adopting resolutions in respect of Sri Lanka without the country’s consent was unhelpful.

Arunatilaka has said so once again rejecting the resolution 51/1 adopted in October last year. However, she assured that Sri Lanka would remain open to discussion with the Council.

“A series of unhelpful resolutions have been adopted by the HRC, the latest being resolution 51/1, without our consent as the country concerned. I reiterate Sri Lanka´s position, which was stated by the Minister of Foreign Affairs last October, that we reject this resolution, which will extend and reinforce the so-called external evidence gathering mechanism on Sri Lanka established by the OHCHR in line with its own interpretation of Resolution 46/1,” the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN in Geneva, Himalee Arunatilaka, said addressing the 52nd Regular Session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva recently.

She said that “these resolutions are unhelpful to the people of my country, will polarise Sri Lankan society, and do not serve the objective of promoting reconciliation in Sri Lanka. We are of the view that this is an unproductive drain on the scarce resources of UN Member States which can be productively deployed elsewhere.”

“Despite our opposition to country specific resolutions, as explained to this Council before, we remain open to discussion with the Council, Special Procedures and Treaty Bodies, and continue to believe in the value of constructive engagement.”

“It is in this constructive spirit that Sri Lanka participated in the UPR Process last month, despite the difficult circumstances in the country. We consider the UPR to be an extremely important tool, enabling countries to mutually assess the progress of each other’s human rights situation through engagement with peers in an atmosphere that is constructive and mutually respectful. Sri Lanka also looks forward to a meaningful dialogue when our 6th Periodic Report under the ICCPR is taken up for Review later this month.”



Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Ravi demands full disclosure on Lanka’s usable reserves, flags forex leakages

Published

on

Ravi

Opposition MP Ravi Karunanayake on Wednesday called for an urgent government statement to Parliament on the integrity and usability of Sri Lanka’s Gross Official Reserves (GOR), raising concerns over foreign exchange leakages and regulatory consistency under the Foreign Exchange Act No. 12 of 2017.

Raising the issue under Standing Order 27 (i), Karunanayake urged the Government to provide a comprehensive disclosure on the composition, encumbrances and deployability of the country’s reserves, as well as on the Central Bank’s oversight of foreign currency transactions.

“Reserve credibility depends not merely on headline numbers, but on transparency, enforceability and consistency in regulation,” the MP told the House.

He sought clarification on the latest reported GOR figure and the net usable reserves after excluding encumbered assets, swaps and pledged balances. He also requested details of annual revenue earned on reserves from 2023 to 2025.

Following are the questions raised by MP Karunanayake:

1. What is the latest reported GOR figure, and what is the net usable reserve after excluding encumbered assets, swaps, and pledged balances? What is the revenue earned on are GOR 23-25 per year?

2. Provide a separate and detailed breakdown of GOR, including: (a) Monetary gold (quantity and valuation basis) is it real gold or gold paper? (b) Foreign currency assets by major currency and instrument; (c) SDR holdings; (d) IMF reserve position; (e) Foreign currency swaps, specifying counterparty type, principal amount, tenure, maturity profile, and all-in cost; (f) Domestic swaps, specifying amount, tenure, rollover terms, collateralisation, and effective cost.

3. Of the total reserves reported, how much is encumbered, swap-backed, or otherwise not immediately deployable for debt servicing or currency stabilisation?

4. What SLR spread, fee, or margin does the Central bank apply when buying or selling USD to the Government for reserve accumulation and external debt servicing and what total profit or gain has the C.bank realised from such transactions during the past three financial years? Advice per year.

5. Is the Central Bank subject to continuous and statutory audit by the Auditor General? If so, will the Government table the most recent audit report, specifying audit scope, sample size, reserve confirmations, swap verification and gold custody validation?

6. What triggered the recent circular warning domestic institutions on foreign currency transactions?

7. Has the C.bank quantified foreign exchange and tax revenue losses resulting from Sri Lanka-based businesses routing credit card and commercial payments through overseas payment gateways?

8. If domestic entities are regulated strictly, why has a binding circular not been issued against noncompliant business entities using foreign payment gateway arrangements that divert foreign exchange outside Sri Lanka’s regulated banking system?

The government asked for two weeks’ time to respond to the queries.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Sajith exposes highly questionable coal imports from South Africa in 25 vessels; calls for independent probe

Published

on

Sajith

Opposition Leader Sajith Premadasa yesterday alleged in Parliament that eight recently imported coal shipments were substandard and called for an independent probe into the matter.Speaking in the House, Premadasa said Sri Lanka typically requires 36–38 coal shipments annually. While 11 Russian shipments received so far had raised no concerns, he claimed that 25 vessels ordered from South Africa under a new tender were facing quality issues.

He cited combustion reports from the Norochcholai Coal Power Plant showing that the eight shipments already received under the new tender failed to generate the expected 300 megawatts per unit. According to the MP, the outputs were: 285 MW, 290 MW, 260 MW, 295 MW, 285 MW, 270 MW, 275 MW, and 255 MW.

“These are scientific data generated automatically through boiler combustion reports that cannot be altered,” Premadasa said, asserting that the figures indicate the coal supplied was below required standards.

He warned that low-quality coal could increase fuel consumption, raise operational costs, and damage equipment. Any shortfall in power generation, he said, would necessitate additional coal imports or greater reliance on diesel power, ultimately driving up electricity tariffs for consumers.

“The loss will have to be borne by the electricity consumer,” Premadasa said, urging the government to clarify whether the shipments met required specifications.

He also criticized delays and changes in tender requirements, alleging that supplier eligibility criteria had been relaxed to allow non-standard providers.

by Saman Indrajith

Continue Reading

News

Ex-TRCSL Chairman Palpita enlarged on bail

Published

on

Former Mass Media Ministry Secretary and former Telecommunications Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka (TRCSL) Chairman Anusha Palpita was yesterday released on bail by the Colombo Chief Magistrate’s Court.Colombo Chief Magistrate Asanga S. Bodaragama granted bail after considering submissions made by officials of the Bribery Commission and counsel for the defence.

The Magistrate ordered the suspect’s release on two personal surety bonds of Rs. 5 million each and imposed a foreign travel ban.

When the case was taken up, Bribery Commission officials informed court that a report had been called regarding alleged investments made by the suspect in the stock market. They sought a further date to present facts pertaining to those reports.

Appearing for the suspect, Attorney-at-Law Kanchana Ratwatte submitted that his client had been in remand custody for nearly a month and was prepared to extend full cooperation to investigators. He moved for bail on that basis.

After hearing both sides, the Magistrate observed that no reasonable grounds had been placed before court to further remand the suspect and ordered his release on bail. The case was fixed for 29 May.

Palpita was arrested on 23 January in connection with an investigation initiated by the Bribery Commission over the alleged failure to disclose the source of assets amounting to Rs. 46 million.

The Commission stated that he had arrived at its office on the day of his arrest to give a statement and was taken into custody thereafter.

He was arrested on allegations of amassing assets and property disproportionate to his declared income during a specified period, following a probe into wealth allegedly accumulated beyond his lawful earnings.

Continue Reading

Trending