Editorial
Supreme Court or People’s Court?

The country at large had few doubts that all the machinations clearly visible in recent weeks to ensure that no local elections countrywide will be held on March 9 was the work of President Ranil Wickremesinghe. Although various public service cat’s paws ranging from Neil Hapuhinna, the Secretary to the Ministry of Public Administration and Local Government, Mahinda Siriwardene, Secretary to the Treasury/Ministry of Finance and the Government Printer were the public face of the effort to scuttle these elections, the president’s speech in Parliament on Thursday made abundantly clear that he was the puppeteer pulling all the strings.
The Elections Commission and its Chairman, Nimal Punchihewa, admitted partial defeat when the postal voting scheduled to begin on Feb. 22 and continue for two more days thereafter was indefinitely postponed. The ostensible reason adduced for this was non-receipt of ballot papers. Although March 9 was announced as Election Day, deposits were received from candidates and nominations closed, there was no definitive statement from the powers that be that there will be no election next month. On the contrary, the ruling Wickremesinghe – Rajapaksa regime arranged for the UNP and SLPP to run together and submitted nominations on that basis. The SLPP’s general secretary, Sagara Kariyawasam in fact went public on many occasions expressing confidence of victory. That nobody took him seriously given the present country conditions is another matter. But the president’s parliamentary speech made very clear which way the papadam was crumbling.
Whether those who loudly proclaimed that they will bring the people to the streets if they are deprived of exercising their franchise will do so, or if the people will rally to their call, remain uncertain. The SJB’s recent attempt to march on Colombo was by no means spectacular. Wickremesinghe has made no secret of the fact that he long knew there will be no elections when he started his speech in Parliament on Thursday. He said he had sent word to SJB MP Mujibur Rahman, his party’s choice for Mayor of Colombo, not to resign his parliamentary seat anticipating the mayoralty. But Rahman (“I brought him to politics,” Ranil said) had not listened and paid the price of losing his parliamentary seat already filled by veteran AHM Fowzie who was next on the SJB’s preference list.
Wickremesinghe of course says that the election have not been postponed because no election has been called. He claims that what he previously called a “divided” Election Commission, had been inquorate when an election date had been fixed by its chairman and one other member. He has offered to provide evidence in support of this contention. As always he declared that he was a democrat but setting the economy right was his first priority. Nobody will disagree that given the current state of the economy and the government’s cash strapped situation, spending billions on an election will do little good for the country in a material sense. But the people also want to show the ruling establishment what they think of it. What better way of doing so but by an election? That is what the government funks and that, in the view of the electorate, is why, the government does not want to have any election at this point of time.
Remember it was at the last local election in 2018 when the Yahapalana government was in office that the electorate sent the first signal that the days of that administration were numbered. Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s election as president in November 2019 and the SLPP’s comfortable romp home to Parliament the next August followed. The majority of their electors today have little faith in local bodies that are well known to be both corrupt and inefficient. They will loudly applaud the promised measures to reduce the number of local councilors from about 8,000 countrywide at present to half that figure. But the electors are also too well aware that it is the very legislators who increased the number of councilors, be they members of Municipal/Urban Councils or Pradeshiya Sabhas to the present obscene level, who are now piously promising to halve the number. They will by no means willingly permit the incumbents in government to buy time for themselves by postponing elections.
We run a letter to the editor today by a reader who quit the public service at a senior level decades ago and lived in Geneva and the UK doing consultancy work for various UN agencies. Back now in Sri Lanka for good, he has suggested that we return to the pre-1977 old order and spread out local elections rather than have them in a single day. This is what is done in the UK and many other developed countries. He says that local bodies are elected by their constituencies to provide key services to local people. These elections were held in the past at different times, and not all together; he urges a return to that system so they are spread over several months. This would greatly reduce costs and may or may not be seen as the test of a central government’s popularity. Diffused local elections, of course, be less of a signal. Remember the UNP won the Colombo Municipal Council months after its 1956 rout.
Given that the president has now played the government’s hand, the response must be awaited. Will the opposition resort to the Supreme Court or the People’s Court. Are aragalayas past tense today with middle class support waning. Only time will tell.
Editorial
Trump in a china shop

Friday 11th April, 2025
US President Donald Trump has made another U-turn––a historic one. He has suspended unprecedented tariff hikes he announced the other day; he vowed that he would neither pause nor waive them under any circumstances. The 90-day tariff reprieve he has opted for has gladdened many hearts and made stock markets soar across the word, but a global recession is looming with a fierce tariff war between the US and China intensifying.
Trump has jacked up tariffs on all Chinese goods to a whopping 125%. China has stopped dilly-dallying and increased its tariff on imports from the US to 84%. The White House is reported to have said those who do not retaliate will be rewarded. Trump may have expected the Chinese leaders also to bow and scrape before him, asking for a tariff reduction.
Meanwhile, President Trump will have a hard time repairing relations with the traditional US allies in Europe. He did not mince his words, when he said, while announcing the new US tariffs, the other day, that many Americans thought Europe was a friend but it had actually ripped off the US. He has shown, albeit unwittingly, that Europe cannot trust the US as an ally. Besides, Der Spiegel, a German magazine once revealed that the CIA had been operating a global network of 80 eavesdropping centres, including 19 listening posts in Europe.
The White House has sought to help Trump save face; it has claimed that his flip-flop is part of a strategy to further US economic interests globally. But the truth is otherwise. Trump got cold feet as stock markets tumbled the world over, and protests erupted in the US itself against his new tariff policy. Initially, he, true to form, chose to dig his heels in, and even coined a new word to disparage the critics of his tariffs. On Truth Social, he called them ‘panicans’. He said: “The United States has a chance to do something that should have been done DECADES AGO. Don’t be Weak! Don’t be Stupid! Don’t be a PANICAN. Be Strong, Courageous, and Patient, and GREATNESS will be the result!” He also said, “Be cool! Everything is going to work out well. The USA will be bigger and better than ever before. On Monday, he announced from the White House that “we’re not looking at” a tariff pause …” He also bragged in a Truth Social post announcing the 90-day tariff pause, that “more than 75 Countries” had called US officials seeking to strike new trade deals. But it is clear that he had to bite the bullet and suspend the tariff hikes. The EU has put its retaliatory tariffs on hold, as a result.
The suspension of US tariff hikes has brought immense relief to the developing countries dependent on the US as a major export destination, but prudence demands that they continue with their efforts to formulate strategies to ensure the survival of their fragile economies in the worst-case scenario. They had better consider the tariff reprieve at issue only an interval in hell, as it were, and brace themselves for what is to come after three months.
Trump’s strategy of using tariffs to subdue the world has yielded some unintended benefits, the main being that it has prompted other nations, including traditional American allies, to realise the risk of being overdependent on the US as a trading partner, diversify their trade relations as well as exports, and, most of all, look for an alternative to the US. The on-going efforts to adopt an alternative international reserve currency is bound to gain a turbo boost from Trump’s abortive bid to leverage America’s hold on the global economy to undermine other nations.
The world owes President Trump a big thank you—not for jacking up US tariffs and then suspending them but for having revealed how far the US is ready to go to further its interests at the expense of the other nations, including its allies.
Editorial
Cushioning tariff shock

Thursday 10th April, 2025
President Anura Kumara Dissanayake’s letter to US President Donald Trump over the US tariff hikes has received much publicity. The NPP government is reportedly sanguine about a positive response from Washington to its request for lower tariff on Sri Lanka’s exports, especially apparels. Hope is said to spring eternal, and there is nothing wrong with being optimistic, but it behoves Sri Lanka to prepare for the worst-case scenario. President Trump’s mind is so elusive that it is not possible to predict his moves, much less guess what he expects the smaller economies to do if they are to qualify for US tariff reductions, if any. He is eyeing mineral resources in Ukraine in return for US military aid to that war-torn nation. Sri Lanka has no such resources to offer. Is the Trump administration trying to pressure it into going out of its way to help further Washington’s geostrategic interests in this part of the world?
China has retaliated by increasing tariffs on imports from the US thereby aggravating global economic uncertainty. Washington says its tariff increases are reciprocal, and therefore the countries affected by them may think they can gain relief by reducing duties on US exports. But the question is whether such action will help the US rectify its massive trade imbalance significantly. The demand for American exports will not increase substantially even if countries like Sri Lanka lower duties thereon, for factors such as cost and quality basically drive demand. Imports from the West, especially input materials, are not in high demand in the developing world because of the availability of cost-effective alternatives.
So, the Trump administration is likely to insist that apparel producing nations like Sri Lanka import commodities such as cotton fabric from the US so as to give a fillip to the American industries. This is what US Ambassador Julie Chung told former Minister Mano Ganeshan at a recent meeting, according to a report we published on 27 March. Such a move is bound to increase the cost of Sri Lankan apparels because US products are very expensive and will adversely affect the competitiveness of Sri Lanka’s apparels in the global market.
President Trump is hopeful that ‘jobs and factories will come roaring back’ because of the tariff hikes at issue, but he does not seem to have factored in the high cost of production in the US and increases in the prices of imports due to high tariff hikes. Tech analysts have pointed out that Apple iPhone prices would soar if they were to be made in the US, and even if the existing supply chains are maintained, their prices will increase substantially. The same may hold true for other commodities, whose prices remain low in the US at present owing to cheap labour and lax environmental laws in the other countries where they are produced.
The countries hit by the US tariff increases have adopted different strategies to cushion the blow from the drastic US action, which has led to a global stock market rout, and sparked protests in the US itself. India is seeking to strike more trade deals with other nations, according to Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, who says such measures have become necessary in view of prevailing global uncertainty. Sri Lanka can learn from how India is trying to mitigate the impact of the US tariff hikes.
Prof. C. A. Saliya, a senior banker turned academic, has pointed out in his latest column, Out of the Box, in this newspaper that if the emerging economies get their act together, they may be able to turn disruptions caused by the isolationist, protectionist, and coercive US trade practices into an opportunity to diversify their exports and trade relations, invest in technology and undertake structural reforms to ensure their economic resilience.
Meanwhile, the formulation of Sri Lanka’s strategy to navigate the new US tariff regime should arise from a tripartite effort if it is to be effective. The government, industrialists and workers should be represented in discussions on the issue. It is high time trade unions shifted their focus from their demand-oriented activism to the pressing need to play a crucial role in protecting the domestic industrial sector. The government should do everything in its power to help industrialists keep costs manageable, ensuring the competitiveness of their products in the global market, and the captains of industry must carry out their export operations in a transparent manner without resorting to sordid practices such as parking most of their export proceeds overseas.
Editorial
Lies, damned lies, and political claims

Wednesday 9th April, 2025
Hardly a day passes in Sri Lanka without the government and the Opposition locking horns and trading allegations of deception, lying and corruption. Deputy Minister of Vocational Education Nalin Hewage, who is at the forefront of the government’s propaganda campaign against the ruling NPP’s political rivals, has caused quite a stir by making a false claim about Sri Lanka’s economic recovery process.
Politicians as well as their mistruths, half-truths and blatant lies are rarely, if ever, out of the news in this country. Politics is generally thought to be a web of deceit, intrigue and lies due to manipulation, horse dealing, dishonesty, power struggles, scandals, corruption and other negative factors it is often associated with.
It may not be fair to paint all politicians with the same brush and label them as liars; there are honourable men and women in politics. However, the general perception is that only the politicians following Machiavelli, who has argued that rulers sometimes have to resort to deception and lying, achieve success in Sri Lanka. This view is not without some merit if our experience with politicians’ claims is anything to go by.
Most Opposition politicians who were lucky enough to survive last year’s Maroon Wave, which swept the NPP to power with a steamroller majority, are lying through their teeth. Denying allegations of corruption against them, they make themselves out to be paragons of virtue, but they won’t account for their wealth. It has now been revealed that the SLPP politicians who lost some of their properties due to mob violence in 2022 falsified the estimates of their losses and obtained compensation far exceeding the actual damages. They also have the audacity to make absurd claims and insult the intelligence of the public. Prior to the 2019 presidential election, the SLPP propagandists claimed that a huge cobra had emerged from the Kelani Ganga and it was a miracle signalling the rise of their candidate to the presidency. When the first Treasury bond scam was committed in early 2015, most UNP parliamentary group members, some of whom are in the SJB at present, told blatant lies in a bid to cover it up.
Deputy Minister Hewage has come under a social media piranha attack, as it were, over his claim at a recent NPP local government election rally in Galle that when the NPP took over the reins of government, last year, Sri Lanka’s foreign reserves had plummeted to USD 20 million, and under the incumbent government they had increased to USD 6.1 billion. Interestingly, disappointed that his claim had not elicited a rapturous applause, Hewage faulted his audience!
Hewage is not alone in claiming that it is the incumbent government that put the economy back on an even keel. Almost all NPP leaders make that claim at political rallies. Besides, they have sought to grab the credit for the completion of some projects previous governments launched, such as the restoration of the Elephant Pass salt factory and the construction of a cold storage facility in Dambulla. What takes the cake is the NPP’s claim that the country has gained nothing since Independence.
It will be interesting to see the NPP’s reaction to Hewage’s claim, which continues to draw heavy criticism on social media. The CID is conducting a probe into SLPP National Organiser and MP Namal Rajapaksa’s law exam results. Going by the absurd claims made by the ruling party politicians, it looks as if the NPP government had to order an investigation into the educational qualifications of some of its own parliamentary group members, especially those who claim to be economic experts.
-
Business5 days ago
Colombo Coffee wins coveted management awards
-
Business7 days ago
Daraz Sri Lanka ushers in the New Year with 4.4 Avurudu Wasi Pro Max – Sri Lanka’s biggest online Avurudu sale
-
Features6 days ago
Starlink in the Global South
-
Business7 days ago
New SL Sovereign Bonds win foreign investor confidence
-
Features3 days ago
Sri Lanka’s Foreign Policy amid Geopolitical Transformations: 1990-2024 – Part III
-
Features6 days ago
Modi’s Sri Lanka Sojourn
-
Midweek Review3 days ago
Inequality is killing the Middle Class
-
Features5 days ago
Sri Lanka’s Foreign Policy amid Geopolitical Transformations: 1990-2024 – Part I