Sports
‘2014 was the best year of my career and the England series was the icing on the cake’ – Angelo Mathews
The allrounder looks back at Sri Lanka’s memorable Test series win in England ten years ago
To start, what are your memories of that 2014 series?
It was one of my best years as player and captain. It will go into the record books and history books. We can cherish those moments for the rest of our lives, because it was such competitive cricket.
Let’s talk about that Lord’s Test first. You scored a hundred and Kumar Sangakkara hit the Lord’s century he’d been dreaming of…
In my first Test at Lord’s, being able to get on the honours board was such a delight for me. I was happy for Sanga as well because that was his last innings at Lord’s and he desperately wanted that hundred. Good things happen to good people.
The batters had a good game but it came down to Nuwan Pradeep, the No. 11, having to bat out five balls to save that Test. What were you feeling in the dressing room watching that?
The most important job was done by Nuwan Pradeep and the lower order, because if we had lost that game, we wouldn’t have won the series. I’m very grateful for the grit the bowlers showed with the bat in that game. In the dressing room we were counting down the overs. We were probably putting a lot of pressure on the batters who ended up having to go out there.
Bowlers do a lot of hard work just bowling, but sometimes end up having to do the team’s dirty laundry as well. I sometimes feel it’s pretty unfair. But they showed a lot of grit and a lot of courage against Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad, who were running in hard.
Nuwan Pradeep was not only courageous, he also remembered we had a review up our sleeves as well [he was given out lbw off the second-to-last delivery, but reviewed straight away and was shown to have got an inside edge to the ball]. Even though he’s not the best the best in facing the ball, he was so gritty in not letting the team down. In the dressing room we absolutely didn’t want to lose that game. We were hoping, praying, keeping our fingers crossed – all those things.
In the second Test. you got a few wickets in the first innings to keep Sri Lanka hanging in the match. What do you remember of that?
It was a pretty hostile series for both teams. There was a lot of talking and going at each other. It was quite fun on the field. I took the ball and tried to bowl on a good length. In England, if you land the ball on the spot and get it to move, it gives you a chance to take wickets. I just did that and got four wickets.
In that second innings, you had had a pretty good partnership with Mahela Jayawardene, but then he got out and a couple of wickets fell. When the No. 8 batter, Dhammika Prasad, got out first ball, you threw your bat in anger. Do you remember that moment?
Yes, I do. I had a go at Dhammika in the dressing room as well. Any batsman can get out. In the heat of the moment, I must have thrown my bat as well. It was all part of the game, because it was a very hostile series and we badly wanted to beat England.
We managed to claw our way back after that. Rangana Herath played a massive part by batting so well at the other end [Mathews and Herath put on 149 for the eighth wicket, of which Herath scored 48]. He managed to hold on at one end. I was able to play my natural game. We got a fairly decent lead.
When I got out, I was thinking, “Oh no, we should have got more runs.” But it worked out pretty well, because we only won that match off the penultimate ball, so looking back, the timing worked.
What I remember of that innings was you clobbering boundaries even when they had the field back to defend against that. You’ve now played over 100 Tests. Where does that 160 rate for you?
Right at the very top. It was foreign conditions, and playing that English team was a massive challenge. It was a 160 in a winning effort, which was the important thing. It wasn’t just the match, winning the series and creating history was special.
You said you had a go at Dhammika Prasad, but then later that day he took four wickets and set Sri Lanka up for the win. Have you ever spoken to him about what happened for him that evening?

Mathews rates his 160 at Headingley: “Right at the very top. It was foreign conditions, and playing that English team was a massive challenge”
We’ve had that conversation quite a bit since then. Yes, it stirred him up a bit. We know that Dhammika can also bat and score some runs, so that’s what we were expecting. Anyone can get out, it’s just the way he got out at the time [ramping a short ball and holing out to deep third]…
But he got very fired up coming out to bowl, and I personally say that’s the best spell I’ve seen him bowl. It was quite a flat wicket at the time. We were into the last session of the fourth day. The balls that he bowled to that top order were unplayable. We both agree that it’s one of the best spells that cricket has seen.
Late in that Test, Moeen Ali was batting very well, and James Anderson seemed to have his defence in order at No. 11, when you were one wicket away. You’d toiled for wickets all day. Were you preparing yourself emotionally for a draw at any point?
It was a rollercoaster of emotions. At one point, in my mind I kind of gave up [when] Anderson and Moeen Ali batted for quite a while. But then another part of me kept telling me we were going to win. We threw all our options out. I was going to bowl someone else for that last over, but in the last moment I gave it to Shamindra Eranga. Looking back, everything worked perfectly. But at some moments I did think I’d tried everything I can… but we kept trying every single trick.
Anderson and Moeen batted for more than an hour before that final over. You crammed the infield with fielders because Anderson was on strike. Do you remember where you were standing for that?
Yes, I was at leg slip and Rangana was next to me at leg gully. And it popped out to Rangana. Anderson was playing really well and he never gave up. They showed a lot of grit as well. That last-wicket pair batted for a lot of overs.
When that ball popped up, did you have any doubts about what was going to happen next?
No doubt at all, because all 11 of us were expecting that to come to us. I’m sure any of us would have taken that with our whole body – it was that important. We were waiting for even a quarter of a chance – not even half. I’m a 1000% sure Rangana was never going to drop that.
Shaminda had bowled extremely well to get that wicket. All the bowlers had bowled so well. They bowled their hearts out.
At that stage, you had won the Asia Cup, the T20 World Cup and then this Test series in England, all in the space of a few months. What do you remember about the celebrations?

Dhammika Prasad reduced England to 52 for 4 as they looked to chase 350 at Headingley
I keep saying 2014 was the best year of my career so far. The England series was the icing on the cake. The team was very confident. The way we’d played leading up gave us a huge boost coming into that series. When you keep winning, you tend to think you can beat any team in any conditions. That was our mindset. We lived up to those expectations.
From the current squad touring England for three Tests, you, Dinesh Chandimal and Dimuth Karunaratne played in that series. Have you been speaking to others about 2014 ahead of the series?
Yes, absolutely. We’ve been sharing about 2014, because it gives us hopes. We can say, “Yes, we’ve done it before, and we can do it again.” Now the team is different and the team we’re playing is different, but it’s been done before. If we play to our potential in this series, we can beat them again.
In 2014, you had a very heavy year in terms of your workload – playing all formats and bowling as well. And then you had an extended period of injury. Do you have any regrets about that period?
I’m extremely honoured to play any game for Sri Lanka. Ten years ago I was 27 and I wanted to play every single game – not that that’s not the case now. But the amount of cricket we play now is a lot. When you age you have to manage your workload. Back then I didn’t even think of workloads. I just wanted to play for my country in any format, and try to win every single game, with the bat or the ball. Maybe that led to injuries, but I have no regrets. I got injured while playing for my country.
Will we see you bowling in this series?
I’m pretty much undercooked with my bowling. Since the LPL, I haven’t been bowling that much. I have been preparing myself a bit to bowl. Even in these conditions it’s not easy to walk into the field and start bowling, and I haven’t had much bowling under my belt for a while. Let’s hope I will bowl.
Some of your most memorable spells have come in England, though. There must be some good vibes for you here?
I haven’t got a lot of pace, but I land it on the spot most of the time, so that gives me an opportunity to get wickets in a place like England. Looking back, even in the 2009 T20 World Cup semi-final, I got those three wickets in the first over and helped my team to victory. And then in the 2019 ODI World Cup against West Indies, I hadn’t bowled forabout eight months, but I used my experience to get the team over the line. I do have fond memories bowling in England.
[Cricinfo]
Sports
Winners to receive medals at Western Province School Games after many years
School athletes claiming podium positions at the Western Province Schools Games will receive medals for the first time in more than half a decade this year.
”Medals will be awarded to winners of all sports this time, whether it is team sports or individual events,” said Upali Amaratunga, Additional Provincial Director of Education, in an interview with The Island.
The Island has been highlighting the importance of awarding medals at the Western Province Schools Games ever since authorities abandoned the cherished tradition in the wake of financial constraints earlier this decade.
While almost all other provinces awarded medals at their annual events, Western Province authorities had either blamed the lapse on a lack of funds or simply avoided the question whenever it was raised in recent years.
Provincial Schools Games are part of the All-Island Schools Games. Home to the highest number of schools in the country, competition in the Western Province is fiercely contested.
The track and field events of the Western Province Schools Games are scheduled to commence at Diyagama next week.
(RF)
Latest News
Muneeba, Pakistan’s spinners knock Thailand out of Asia Cup
Muneeba Ali braved the oppressive heat of Dubai before Pakistan’s spinners put on a disciplined show to begin their T20 Asia Cup campaign with a commanding win over Thailand. The result knocked Thailand out of the competition as they suffered their second defeat in three matches.
On a pitch which stayed low, Fatima Sana backed her spinners to do the job by opting to bat at the toss, a decision which raised eyebrows at the time. She stood vindicated in the end as Pakistan completed a comfortable 35-run win.
But, it also brought to light Pakistan’s perennial batting woes as they managed only 119 for 9 in 20 overs despite Sana harbouring hopes of her side going beyond 150. Thailand never stood a chance of chasing the target against Pakistan’s quality spin attack and finished with 84-8 in 20 overs.
There was anticipation in the lead up to this contest as to whether the Thai left-arm orthodox bowler would surpass India’s Deepti Sharma as the highest wicket taker in the format. Thipatcha Putthawong did not make the spectators wait as she achieved the feat with a double-wicket maiden in the second over of the game.
Putthawong sent back Shawaal Zulfiqar on the second ball with the one that gripped off a length. It had Zulfiqar punch the ball right into the midriff of Suleeporn Laomi at point. Four balls later, she got her landmark wicket when Gull Feroza, back into the Pakistan side after missing the Sri Lanka T20Is, was caught at fine leg while playing the paddle.
That over tightened the screws on the Pakistan batters as they struggled to get going throughout the powerplay, which they finished with 32 for 3. Putthawong and Phannita Maya shared the six overs between themselves but it was the former’s figures of 3-0-21-1 that stood out.
Ayesha Zafar was the third batter to fall inside the powerplay, courtesy an outstanding catch by Natthakan Chantham at midwicket off Maya’s bowling.
Putthawong added another wicket to her tally in the last over of the innings. She now has 173 wickets in the format at a staggering average of 9.17 and economy of 4.11.
As has often been the case, the onus of doing the repair work fell on Muneeba, who opened the innings with Zulfiqar. She saw partners fall before putting together a solid partnership of 54 runs with Shamas.
Shamas picked up boundaries through point and wide of slip in her first four balls to kick the innings into gear. It helped Muneeba, who was struggling for breath because of the harsh Dubai weather, settle down. Muneeba often fell on her haunches to gather her breath and, at one point, had to be tended to by the team physio.
Conditions were tough for batting with the pitch playing slow and low, and the outfield being heavier than usual for a T20 game. Muneeba, nonetheless, continued to fight until the death overs and registered her fourth half-century. She finished with 54 off 52 with four boundaries and was stumped off Laomi’s bowling in the 17th over.
Shamas, who found herself in the main squad because of an injury to Najiha Alvi, made a crucial run-a-ball 20 to stop the floodgates. But her wicket, also to Laomi, re-opened the floodgates.
Laomi takes two in an over
Pakistan fans must have taken solace in the fact that Shamas was replaced by their captain, who had been at the top of her game in the T20 World Cup this year. But Sana had a brief stay at the crease. She was caught and bowled, second ball, as Laomi took a stunning catch diving forward. Both wickets fell in the 13th over of the innings. It was the second time in the innings that Pakistan lost two in an over.
Laomi varied her lengths and pace with great deception to finish as the best bowler for her side with 3-14 from four overs.
The average first-innings score at this venue in the women’s T20Is is 118, and that Pakistan managed one more was because of Tuba’s 12* off only four balls. She announced her arrival at the crease, amidst a flurry of wickets, with a gigantic six over square leg. She then hit a boundary through the covers in the last over.
Thailand might have harboured hopes of repeating the heroics from the 2022 edition of the T20 Asia Cup when they beat Pakistan. But they were eviscerated in Sadia Iqbal’s first over, the second of the run chase, as she sent back Maya and Nannapat Koncharoenkai.
Coincidentally, this over, like the second over of the first innings, ended up as a double-wicket maiden, and the two wickets in both these overs came on the second and last ball of the over across the innings.
Thailand needed one of their batters to emulate Muneeba, but they were starved of runs by Pakistan’s disciplined bowling and attacking field sets. They stood no chance at chasing the total down with the required run rate climbing every over.
The introduction of Nashra Sandhu after the powerplay further aggravated Thailand’s woes as the left-arm spinner allowed only six runs from her four overs, she picked up Chantham as well. Iqbal returned for the last over of the innings and picked up a wicket on the last ball to finish with 3 for 11 from four overs.
That Pakistan were able to secure a win despite a subpar batting performance was partly because they played a weaker opposition. But, their next opponents, India, are not likely to provide them much of a leeway.
Scores:
Pakistan Women 119 for 9 in 20 overs (Muneeba Ali 54, Sadaf Shamas 20, Umm e Hani 17, Tuba Hassan 12*; Phannita Maya 2-34, ; Thipatcha Putthawong 3-18, Sunida Chaturongrattana 1-23, Suleeporn Laomi 3-14) beat Thailand Women 84/8 in 20 overs (Naththakan Chantham 14, Naruemol Chaiwai 17, Aphisara Suwanchonrathi 13, Chanida Sutthiruang 25; Fatima Sana 1-22, Sadia Iqbal 3-11, Nashra Sandhu 1-06, Tuba Hasan 2-17) by 35 runs
[Cricinfo]
Sports
Namal’s faux pas
by Rex Clementine
Parliamentarian Namal Rajapaksa has taken to social media to criticise the government over Sri Lanka supposedly missing out on hosting the inaugural Women’s Champions Trophy, scheduled for next year. The former Sports Minister has been shedding crocodile tears, bemoaning the politicisation of sport in Sri Lanka.
Coming from Namal, that is quite something.
Namal is a lawyer by profession. Those who practise law are generally expected to do their homework before presenting a case. When MP Rajapaksa shoots from the hip like this, however, one is entitled to wonder about that much celebrated law degree. This, after all, is a man who reportedly passed his law examinations with flying colours. A little fact checking, therefore, should hardly be beyond him.
The ICC does not recognise government appointed interim committees and does not permit countries operating under such arrangements to host ICC events. But to claim that Sri Lanka has already been stripped of the Women’s Champions Trophy is both premature and inaccurate. If the host nation is to be changed, that decision is expected at the next ICC Board meeting in November. By that time, SLC should be ready for fresh elections.
Nor is it correct to suggest that Sri Lanka will miss out on participating in the tournament. Ranked sixth in the world, Sri Lanka remain very much in contention to play, with the qualification criteria comprising the top five ranked teams plus the hosts. So, even if India were to host the tournament, Sri Lanka would still be part of the competition.
It appears politician Rajapaksa is fishing in troubled waters. Unfortunately, he seems to have forgotten to check whether there are any fish.
The less said about the disasters that befell Sri Lankan sports when the Rajapaksas were running the country, the kinder we would be to Namal.
Sri Lanka were the designated hosts of the Men’s Asia Cup in 2022. Back to back India versus Pakistan games in Colombo would have been a tremendous shot in the arm for the economy, with supporters from around the world descending on the island for one of cricket’s greatest spectacles.
There was one small problem: Namal’s uncles had helped run the country’s petrol pumps dry.
With fuel not freely available and the country engulfed in an economic crisis, the Asian Cricket Council shifted the tournament to the UAE. Curiously, there were no crocodile tears then. Namal’s social media account appeared to have misplaced its outrage.
Now he lectures the country about politicising sport.
To this government’s credit, it has largely refrained from interfering with the affairs of the cricket administration or team selection. Take the recent selection of Niroshan Dickwella. Many Sri Lankan supporters disagreed with it, including people sympathetic to the government. Yet there was no ministerial intervention. During Namal’s father’s regime, Sports Ministers could change selection committees almost overnight.
It is also worth recalling that when President Chandrika Kumaratunga appointed the first three Interim Committees, she turned to respected figures such as Rienzie Wijetilleke, Hemaka Amarasuriya and Vijaya Malalasekara.
Mahinda Rajapaksa did not spare cricket from political patronage either. His appointees to Cricket Interim Committees included family members, individuals who had lost cricket elections and others close to the political establishment.
Namal may point out that his father also appointed a reputed former cricketer to head an Interim Committee in 2010. Quite correct. But Mahinda Rajapaksa, the shrewd politician that he was, usually had another card up his sleeve. His dream of an international cricket stadium in his electorate soon became reality.
Sport became so politicised during the Mahinda Rajapaksa administration that even club elections were not immune. Those who doubt it can ask what happened at Colts Cricket Club, where respected officials stepped aside amid fears of crossing uncle Gota.
Sports officials were not alone. The media had their share too. Photographers covering the Rajapaksa boys playing at the Welisara Navy camp were harassed. On one occasion, a reporter was assaulted by Navy personnel.
Then there was television.
A television station linked to the Rajapaksa family telecast international cricket after a Cabinet decision concerning broadcasting rights was altered. Cricket was a cash cow. While state television struggled financially, the Rajapaksa boys were hardly complaining about political interference in sport.
And now Namal cries foul, accusing this government of politicising cricket.
His father appointed more Interim Committees than any other President. Even when elections were held, allegations of manipulation and political interference were rife. For years, Sri Lankan cricket suffered under administrators whose greatest qualification was often not what they knew about cricket, but whom they knew in politics.
That is why Namal Rajapaksa lecturing anyone about political interference in sport is rather like an arsonist complaining about the smell of smoke.
This government took on a cricket establishment that many had feared touching. There were warnings from the outset that reform would bring turbulence. So far, the authorities have managed to minimise those jolts. They should now be allowed to finish what they started. More strength to NPP and comrade AKD.
-
News6 days agoEight politicians in drug kingpin probe
-
Features4 days ago“Wrap Me Up in My Blazer”— A Gentlemanly Bradby Reminiscence
-
Business6 days agoSri Lanka opens up: A new season of direct connectivity
-
Features3 days agoWhen Sri Lankan stories find their own voice
-
Features6 days agoRedefining ageing in Sri Lanka
-
Latest News7 days agoNepal-Tibet floods: What happened, what caused them and who is missing?
-
Editorial7 days agoUnfolding El Niño and burning issues
-
Editorial6 days agoThe toxic legacy of two lakes
