Connect with us

News

Wartime FM calls for tangible measures to counter Geneva threat

Published

on

‘How come those who voted for Fonseka still push for an int’l war crime probe?’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Wartime Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama (2007-2010) yesterday (17) said that those who had been tainted by their association with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) were seeking the cooperation of external and internal elements to undermine the democratically elected government.

The former minister alleged that a coordinated campaign was underway ahead of the scheduled 46th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

Bogollagama said that the recent high profile intervention made by the four-party Tamil National Alliance (TNA), Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) and Tamil Makkal Tesiya Kootani (TMTK) backed by several civil society groups for international accountability mechanisms to probe Sri Lanka should be properly countered.

R. Sampanthan (TNA), Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam (TNPF) and retired Supreme Court Justice C.V. Wigneswaran (TMTK) and eight other parties, including the Bishop of Trincomalee signed a petition dated January 15, 2021 addressed to 47-member states of the UNHRC called for a new resolution with or without Sri Lanka’s consent. They requested UNHRC members to involve other organs of the UN including the UN Security Council and the UN General Assembly to take appropriate action by reference to the International Criminal Court and any other applicable and effective international accountability mechanisms to inquire into the crime of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Having failed to achieve Eelam through terrorism and conventional military means, those who still believed in the division of the country on ethnic lines were seeking international intervention, the former Minister said, urging those hell-bent on foreign intervention not to play politics with accountability issue.

Sri Lanka brought the war to a successful conclusion in May 2009. Responding to another query, the former minister said that the TNA had quite conveniently forgotten how the LTTE forced the political grouping to recognize Velupillai Prabhakaran as the sole representative of the Tamil people. The LTTE exploited that tag to the hilt until the Army put a bullet through the head of the Tiger supremo on the banks of the Nanthikadal lagoon, Bogollagama said. The former Minister emphasized the pivotal importance of Sri Lanka taking stock of the situation without further delay because a new resolution seemed inevitable.

Bogollagama said that Lord Naseby’s disclosure in Oct 2017 in the House of Lords could be part of Sri Lanka’s overall defence along with certain revelations made by Wikileaks since 2011. Continuing efforts to fault Sri Lanka over genocide of Tamil people should be dealt with for once and for all, the minister said, pointing out that both TNPF and TMTK reiterated genocide allegations at the onset of the current parliamentary sessions.

Bogollagama also made reference to wartime US Defence Attaché in Colombo Lt. Col. Lawrence Smith contradicting in public during an international seminar in Colombo war crimes accusations, two years after the conclusion of the war.

The former minister said that Tamil parties’ rhetoric shouldn’t be taken lightly. Asked whether he endorsed the efforts made by the SLPP to counter the threat, the ex-lawmaker said that the joint intervention made by the British-French governments in late April 2009 to halt the military offensive against the LTTE on the Vanni east front indicated the level of Western interest in the issue at hand. “I don’t have to remind you what the then British Foreign Secretary David Miliband’s comment on his government’s obsession with the war against the LTTE,” the former MP said, referring to a leaked classified US diplomatic cable originating from their mission in London at the height of the war here.

The former minister said that for the first time one-time LTTE mouthpiece, the TNA had the backing of two more political parties based in the North. Bogollagama pointed out though Wigneswaran quit the TNA in spite of having entered active politics through the outfit in 2013, the one-time Northern Province Chief Minister was working with the TNA and Gajandrakumar Ponnambalam’s TNPF on a common agenda. Geneva was going to be a big challenge, Bogollagama said, adding Western powers’ real interests and motives were wider issues than accountability in Sri Lanka.

Bogollagama said that the TNA owed an explanation as regards its relationship with the LTTE?. Having recognized Prabhakaran in late 2001 as the sole representative of Tamil people, the TNA, on behalf of the LTTE ordered Tamils to boycott the 2005 presidential election, Bogollagama said. The TNA represented the LTTE’s interests until the very end, Bogollagama said, recollecting how the European Union in the aftermath of 2004 parliamentary election faulted the TNA for winning 22 seats in the Northern and Eastern Provinces with the LTTE stuffing ballot boxes on its behalf.

Bogollagama said war crimes accusations collapsed five years before the previous yahapalana administration co-sponsored an accountability resolution in Geneva. How could the TNA explain backing war winning Army Chief Gen. Sarath Fonseka’s candidature at the 2010 presidential poll and the Northern and Eastern districts, including Digamadulla voting for him overwhelmingly though he lost the election by a staggering 1.8 mn votes. The TNA should have been challenged both in and outside parliament for its stand on unsubstantiated war crimes allegations, having backed the very man who executed the war.

Bogollagama pointed out how high profile accusations made by the then Northern Province  Chief  Minister Wigneswaran as regards poisoning of LTTE cadres undergoing rehabilitation (Aug 2016) and the Army being responsible for Mannar mass graves (2019) proved nothing but propaganda.

Bogollagama insisted that all evidence should be placed on the table, studied vis-a-vis 2015 Geneva resolution  co-sponsored by the then government and remedial measures taken.  It would be pertinent to mention that the government went ahead with co-sponsorship in spite of the then Sri Lanka’s Permanent Representative in Geneva Ambassador Ravinatha Aryasinha rejecting the draft proposal, the former Foreign Minister said.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Rupee slide rekindles 2022 crisis fears as inflation risks mount

Published

on

ECONOMYNEXT –The recent sharp decline of the Sri Lanka Rupee (LKR) over the past month has reignited anxieties reminiscent of the 2022 financial collapse.

The rupee has fallen more than 5 percent so far this year to a level seen in 2022 after being stable for over three years.

While Central Bank Governor Nandalal Weerasinghe has attributed this volatility to global trends, likely strengthening of the US Dollar and shifting international commodity prices, the domestic implications are profound.

For a nation still in the fragile stages of an IMF-backed recovery, currency depreciation is not merely a technical adjustment; it is a direct threat to the standard of living for every citizen not earning in foreign exchange.

The ripple effects of the depreciation could be detrimental for Sri Lanka’s recovering economy under an IMF deal. Here are a few effects that could adversely impact the island nation:

Sri Lanka remains heavily dependent on imports for essential goods, including fuel, medicine, and food. When the rupee loses value, the cost of bringing these goods into the country rises instantly.

Cost-push inflation is the most direct consequence. As the landing cost of fuel increases, transport and

production costs across all sectors rise, leading to a second wave of price hikes.

In 2022, hyperinflation peaked near 70% following the sudden float of the rupee. While the current depreciation is less drastic, it threatens to reverse the disinflationary trend achieved in early 2025.

Already the inflation has spiked to 5.4 percent in April from 2.2 percent in the previous month, mainly due to sharp fuel price increases and its spillover effects. The recent rupee depreciation has yet to be absorbed into prices.

For the average household, depreciation translates to a hidden tax.

As prices for electricity, gas, and groceries climb, the portion of income available for education, healthcare, and savings shrinks.

The 2022 crisis proved that the middle class is the most vulnerable to sudden depreciation, as their fixed salaries fail to keep pace with the rapidly rising cost of a basic consumption basket.

In 2022, the sudden and uncontrolled floating of the Sri Lanka Rupee acted as a primary catalyst for the nation’s deepest economic collapse, causing the currency to lose over 60% of its value within months.

This sharp depreciation triggered a cost-push inflationary spiral that saw headline inflation peak at an unprecedented 70%, while food inflation soared near 95%.

For the average Sri Lankan, this meant the price of essential imports such as fuel, cooking gas, and medicine, doubled or tripled almost overnight, effectively wiping out the purchasing power of fixed-income earners and pushing millions into food insecurity.

Today, while the current depreciation is more gradual and attributed by the central bank to global trends, rather than domestic depletion, the impact remains a significant threat to household stability.

Unlike the 2022 shock, which was characterized by absolute shortages and queues, this gradual slide serves as a silent tax, steadily eroding the marginal gains made during the recent disinflationary period.

As transport costs and electricity tariffs rise in tandem with the weakening rupee, hardworking families again face the prospect of a nutritional trade-off, where the increasing cost of imported inputs for production and logistics forces a reduction in the quality and quantity of daily consumption.

By Shihar Aneez

Continue Reading

News

Kapila Chandrasena case: GN phone records under court scrutiny

Published

on

Colombo Additional Magistrate Lahiru Silva has directed Keselwatta Police to obtain and examine the telephone data records of a Grama Niladhari who issued certification documents for bail guarantors in a suspected bail-for-money racket linked to proceedings involving former SriLankan Airlines CEO Kapila Chandrasena.

The order was issued after police requested further investigations when four suspects, including Perumal Ganesh, a domestic worker attached to the residence of former cricketer Aravinda de Silva, were produced before court over allegations of presenting fake bail guarantors.

Police told court that investigators have uncovered strong suspicions surrounding the issuance of 17 Grama Niladhari certificates within a five-month period to two individuals—Mohamed Rizwan and Mohamed Ishan—who allegedly acted as guarantors in multiple bail applications. According to police, Rizwan obtained 10 certificates while Ishan obtained seven, all of which were used in court-related proceedings, raising concerns of an organised racket.

The Magistrate ordered that telephone data records of the relevant Grama Niladhari from January to date be analysed as part of the probe.

Police further alleged that Rizwan, Ishan, and Ariya Tissa de Silva, residents of the Sanchi Arachchiwatte area near the Aluthkade Courts complex, provided cash and acted as personal guarantors in the bail application of Chandrasena, who had been remanded in connection with allegations of receiving a USD 2 million bribe in the Airbus deal.

On the 5th, court granted bail to Chandrasena under conditions including two personal sureties of Rs. 10 million each and cash bail of Rs. 500,000. Police allege that the guarantors presented were not known relatives or associates of the accused.

Investigators further informed court that Perumal Ganesh had signed the cash bail guarantee and was identified during an identification parade held on Thursday. The Crime Branch of Keselwatta Police, led by Sub-Inspector K.W.D. Anuruddha, told court that prison officials had identified him.

Police also raised objections to granting bail, noting that investigations into Chandrasena’s death remain ongoing and a final determination has not yet been reached.

However, defence counsel appearing for the suspects rejected the allegations, arguing that their clients were only present to facilitate bail and that no direct charges had been established against them.

After considering submissions, Magistrate Lahiru Silva ordered that the four suspects be further remanded until the 20th and directed police to submit a detailed summary of evidence in the case.

Continue Reading

News

Inland Revenue (Amendment) Bill takes centre stage in Parliament Tuesday

Published

on

Parliament is scheduled to meet from May 19 to 22, Acting Secretary-General of Parliament Hansa Abeyrathne said.The parliamentary agenda for the four sitting days was decided at the Committee on Parliamentary Business meeting held under the chairmanship of Deputy Speaker Rizvie Salih.

Accordingly, on each sitting day, the time from 9.30 am to 10 am has been allocated for Business of Parliament under Standing Order 22(1) to (6), while Questions for Oral Answers will be taken up from 10 am to 11 am. Questions under Standing Order 27(2) are scheduled from 11 am to 11.30 am.

On May 19, Parliament will take up the Second Reading debate on the Inland Revenue (Amendment) Bill from 11.30 am to 5 pm. Time from 5 pm to 5.30 pm has been reserved for the Opposition Motion at the Adjournment Time.

On May 20, an adjournment debate on the Central Bank’s Annual Economic Review for 2025 will be held from 11.30 am to 5.30 pm on a motion moved by the Government.Parliament is also scheduled on May 21 to debate three regulations under the Imports and Exports (Control) Act and nine resolutions under the Appropriation Act.

On May 22, Parliament will present votes of condolence in memory of former MPs Prof Tissa Vitarana, S.C. Muthukumarana, Chandradasa Galappatthy, Nandana Gunathilake, Janak Mahendra Adikari and Kanagasabai Thanmanpillai. Questions at the Adjournment Time will follow from 5 pm to 5.30 pm.

Continue Reading

Trending