Connect with us


U.S. Congress to probe assets fleecing by US citizens of Sri Lankan origin



United States Congressman Steven Horsford expressing his awareness of the financial calamity and bankruptcy situation faced by Sri Lanka declared that he was well aware that a single family in authority in Sri Lankan affairs was largely responsible for it, and disclosed that he was initiating a Congressional investigation to ascertain who was responsible for fleecing Sri Lankan resources that led to the current unfortunate situation.

It was disclosed that such probe comes within the US Federal legal jurisdiction.

Horsford revealed that he would be in consultation with US Congressman Gregory Meeks, who heads the influential House Foreign Affairs Committee and also a senior member of the most powerful congressional Financial Services Committee, to initiate the probe. The revelation was made at a recent meeting with a group of US-based Sri Lankans.

Horsford is a member of the House Ways and Means and Budget Committees that have the jurisdiction to probe money laundering and asset fleecing. So is Congressman Meeks, a senior member of the House Financial Committee. The Committee he head, Foreign Affairs, has direct jurisdiction over Sri Lanka.

When he participated on Friday, April 22 at a fundraiser organized by Sri Lankan expatriates in Las Vegas, in the State of Nevada, Horsford disclosed his plan to intiate an investigation of foreign asset fleecing by US citizens who are part of the administration in Sri Lanka, Horsford represents a Congressional District in Nevada that has a large Sri Lanka expatriate community. He is up for re-election for the US Congress this November.

He stated at the fundraising event: “As the current situation in Sri Lanka, the country is facing bankruptcy and financial collapse due to the family that controls the nation. I’ll assure you that leadership of the United States is made aware of this. I am in touch with Chairman Gregory Meeks on this issue. I am confident I can work with the US Congress to disclose those responsible for fleecing Sri Lankan resources”.

Horsford used the term ‘asset fleecing’ thrice during his address.

The Nevada Congressman was largely responsible in getting increased amount of Covid-19 vaccines to Sri Lanka last year when the country was facing an acute shortage in consultation with the Department of State and US Agency for International Development (USAID), it was disclosed at this gathering by the convener of the fundraising event and a leading political activist of the Nevada Democratic Party Sanje Sedera.

Sedera is currently Chairman of the Sri Lanka America Chamber of Commerce, a national organisation involved in trade, commerce and investment based in Las Vegas while being the president of the Sri Lankan Association.

Horsford’s successful initiative to provide increased amount of medical supplies made Sri Lankan expatriate community rally round him to raise funds for his November re-election bid to the US Congress. The Sri Lankan expatriates said they were delighted to hear that Horsford would be in consultation with House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman and senior member of the Financial Services Committee Gregory Meeks to initiate an investigation of Sri Lanka’s First Family members of their alleged fleecing of the country’s assets.

Sri Lankans domiciled in the State of Nevada held a rally urging a change of system and administration voicing their displeasure at the ‘Rajapaksa rule’ two weeks ago in Las Vegas.

Congressman Steven Horsford made the above declaration as the United States has legal provisions in Federal statutes to launch such money laundering-fleecing investigation.

The United States has legal jurisdiction to probe such activities of US citizens are engaged in foreign countries. There are certain circumstances in which the United States may apply domestic law abroad. The US may give extraterritorial effect to its laws in cases involving (1) U.S. citizens abroad (2) Foreign citizens employed by U.S. companies abroad (3) Violation of certain laws, such as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

In the case of Asserting Jurisdiction Abroad, the US may assert jurisdiction over the conduct of US citizens abroad, and over the conduct of others against US citizens abroad.

The United States may assert jurisdiction abroad if doing so is necessary for its security or government functions.

Under the protective principle, a state has jurisdiction to prescribe a rule of law attaching legal consequences to conduct outside its territory that threatens its security as a state or the operation of its government functions.

The United States may assert jurisdiction over anyone committing a heinous crime, regardless of the location of the crime or nationality of offender or victim.

When Congressmen Horsford and Gregory Meeks along with other US Federal officials meet to deliberate of Sri Lankan assets’ fleecing, and whether such acts hinder the operation of US government functions, the above federal laws will be discussed.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Cardinal appeals to Pope to solicit aid for Sri Lanka



“Fix responsibility on those accountable”

by Norman Palihawadane

Colombo Archbishop Malcolm Cardinal Ranjith says that the need of the hour is the initiation of a high profile investigation to find out how this country was dragged down to its present plight of being a beggar nation, fix responsibility for these crimes and find ways to recover the money stolen from the people.

“People have a right to know how the foreign reserves that had been at around seven to eight billion US dollars had dropped to zero within two years,” the Cardinal said at the Feast of the Sacred Heart Mass at the Ragama Hospital Chapel last week.

He asked how the gold stocks in the Central Bank had disappeared and why were they wasted wasted irresponsibly.

“The disappearance of the gold will have to be investigated someday. People need to know who wasted this money,” Cardinal Ranjith said.

He said the country’s reserves were down to zero.

“Doctors working in hospitals find it difficult to come to hospitals on time due to the fuel crisis. We are with the people in their grief,” he said.

The Cardinal appealed to the international community to assist in providing Sri Lanka with medicines and equipment for hospitals amid its economic crisis.

“We urge Pope Francis to request the international community to assist Sri Lanka,” he said.

“We need to support the children’s hospital in Borella and the cancer hospital in Maharagama, especially for medicines and equipment.”

“People suffer without fuel and essential goods because of mismanagement. Children can’t go to schools due to the fuel crisis”.

Continue Reading


Election win should trigger Scottish independence, says Sturgeon



Scotland could become independent if the SNP won a majority of votes in a UK election, Nicola Sturgeon has said, according to a BBC dispatch.

It said: The first minister wants a referendum in 2023, and is pushing for the Supreme Court to rule on a bill to set this up.

If this does not happen, she has said the SNP would treat the next general election as a “de facto referendum”.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson said it was the government’s “longstanding position” that it was not the right time for another independence vote.

He said: “We will look carefully at what [Nicola Sturgeon] says. Don’t forget that the longstanding position is that we don’t think this is the right time to be doing a constitutional change.”

“I think our economy is all the stronger for being together,” he added.

Johnson continued: “This is a time really now to focus on things which the union can deliver for the economic benefit of everybody.”

In an interview with BBC Scotland, the first minister said: “Scotland can’t become independent without a majority of people voting for it”.

She said: “I hope we can resolve these things in a referendum, that is the proper way of doing it. But if all routes to that are blocked then the general election will become the vehicle for people to express their view.”

Ms Sturgeon said she wanted to be clear about the principle and the practical reality “that Scotland cannot become independent unless and until a majority of people in Scotland vote for independence”.

She added: “The issue of practical reality is that when a majority vote for independence, I hope in a referendum, that will have to be followed by a negotiation with a UK government to implement that decision.”

If there were to be a vote in favour of Scottish independence – whether that be via the referendum Ms Sturgeon wants, or a de facto referendum based on a general election result – it would be followed by negotiations between the Scottish and UK governments.

Then, legislation would have to be passed at Westminster and perhaps Holyrood before Scotland became independent.

Ms Sturgeon said on Tuesday that the UK Supreme Court had been asked to rule on whether the Scottish government has the power to hold an independence referendum without agreement from Westminster.

Ahead of the 2014 referendum, the UK government agreed to a temporary transfer of powers to Holyrood to allow the referendum to go ahead.

he idea of a “de facto referendum” is a radical one, given Nicola Sturgeon’s reputation for caution and the fact her team had previously dismissed it as a strategy.

It raises many questions about how such a scheme would work, which ministers now find themselves talking about rather than their main plan – to hold an actual referendum.

After all, the first minister’s hope is that the last resort will never be needed. Her wish is still to do a deal with the UK government which would see both sides sign up to an agreed process in the style of 2014.

Bold talk of using a general election instead is chiefly a tool to force the pro-UK side to take their fingers out of their ears and engage with the issue, rather than a finalised strategy to deliver independence.

Earlier on Wednesday, Ms Sturgeon’s deputy John Swinney suggested that he considered a win to be the SNP winning the majority of seats contested in Scotland.

He was asked on BBC Radio’s Good Morning Scotland: “If you have a majority of Scottish MPs at the next UK general election, that would be a mandate to start negotiations for an independent Scotland?”

He replied: “That’s correct, yes.”

But he went on to Tweet that he had “misheard” the question, and added that his view would be that the SNP would need to win a majority of votes in a general election, not a majority of seats.

He said when he was asked about a “majority of seats”, he had only picked up on “majority”.

Mr Swinney added: “Referenda, including de facto referenda at a UK general election, are won with a majority of votes. Nothing else.”

Douglas Ross, the leader of the Scottish Conservatives, said on Tuesday that another referendum was the “wrong priority for Scotland” and would hinder Scotland’s recovery from the pandemic.

Scottish Labour’s constitution spokeswoman Sarah Boyack said the SNP were “hell-bent on gaming the electorate to suit their ends”.

She said it was “deeply embarrassing for Nicola Sturgeon to be so publicly contradicted… by her own deputy”.

The party has also asked for the Lord Advocate to make a statement to MSPs on Thursday to ascertain her views on whether the Scottish government had the power to hold a referendum without the UK government’s approval.

It was the Lord Advocate – as the Scottish government’s chief legal adviser – who was responsible for referring the matter to the Supreme Court.

A statement from Scottish Labour said it wanted the Lord Advocate to appear in the chamber to “shed some light on her views, decisions and role”.

Alex Cole-Hamilton, of the Scottish Liberal Democrats, said less than a day after Ms Sturgeon’s plan was unveiled that “the wheels are falling off the clown car”.

He went on: “They seem to have conceded that they are heading for a defeat in court and so they are brainstorming barmy schemes for what comes next.”

Continue Reading


Human Rights Council President appoints Radhika Coomaraswamy to serve on Ethiopia rights body



GENEVA (28 June 2022) – The President of the Human Rights Council, Ambassador Federico Villegas (Argentina), announced today the appointment of Radhika Coomaraswamy of Sri Lanka to serve as a member of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia. Ms. Coomaraswamy will join Kaari Betty Murungi of Kenya (chair) and Steven Ratner of the United States of America, who were appointed to serve on the human rights investigative body on 2 March 2022.

The Geneva-based Human Rights Council created the Commission of Human Rights Experts on 17 December 2021 with a mandate to investigate allegations of violations and abuses of international human rights, humanitarian and refugee law in Ethiopia committed since 3 November 2020 by all parties to the conflict.

Today’s appointment comes after the resignation of Fatou Bensouda as a member of the three-person Commission on 8 June 2022, following her nomination to serve as The Gambia’s High Commissioner to the United Kingdom.

Ms. Coomaraswamy brings to this position years of experience as a human rights lawyer, expert and advocate having served in various positions in her country and in the international arena. She has held several prior roles, including as a member of the Human Rights Council-created Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar from 2017 to 2019 and as Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict from 2006 to 2012.

The Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia will deliver an oral report to the Human Rights Council on 30 June, which will be its first presentation to the Council. The Commission is scheduled to present a comprehensive written report to the human rights body in September and subsequently to the UN General Assembly session later this year.

Radhika Coomaraswamy, a lawyer by training and formerly the Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission, is an internationally known human rights advocate who has worked as the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women (1994-2003) and as a Member of the Human Rights Council-mandated Fact-finding Mission on Myanmar from 2017 to 2019.  Additionally, she served as Under-Secretary-General and Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict (2006-2012), for which she was charged with preparing the annual report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict.  In 2014, Ms. Coomaraswamy was appointed by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon as lead author on a Global Study on the implementation of UN Security Council resolution 1325 on women, peace and security.  She received her B.A. from Yale University, her J.D. from Columbia University, an LLM from Harvard University and honorary PhDs from Amherst College, the Katholieke Universities Leuven, the University of Edinburgh, the University of Essex and the CUNY School of Law.

Continue Reading