Connect with us

Sports

The Special One

Published

on

by Rex Clementine

When Jose Mourinho arrived in London from Portugal to take over as Chelsea’s Manager, he sat on that press conference chair at Stamford Bridge and told the reporters, ‘I am the Special One’. True to form Mourinho turned Chelsea’s fortunes. We too have a Special One. Not that he has turned around our cricketing fortunes. But every time he gets into trouble, he has some big shot waiting to bail him out; Danushka Gunathilaka is his name.

It is never easy when a sportsman is handed a lengthy suspension. But given Danushka Gunathilaka’s history, Colombo’s cricket circles was of the view that he deserved it; incorrigible.

A five member committee had recommended that along with Danushka Gunathilaka, Kusal Mendis who had breached the bio-secure bubble should be banned for two years while Niroshan Dickwella suspended for 18 months. A reduced sentence for Dickwella as he had no previous record. A fine of US$ 25,000 also had been recommended but that was increased to US$ 50,000. But fines you are not too sure whether will drive home the point.

Gunathilaka is a serial offender, the two year suspension on him at least should have remained.

This is also not the first time he has been bailed out.

In 2017, he was suspended on the recommendations of the team management but then Board President Thilanga Sumathipala, a man who wasn’t afraid to take on Lasith Malinga during his peak, gave in reducing Gunathilaka’s suspension by half.

Chandika Hathurusinghe arrived in Colombo in 2018 with a reputation as a no-nonsense coach. After all, he had taken on Bangladesh’s star performer Shakib-al-Hasan. But he treated Gunathilaka with kid’s gloves. During the home series against South Africa in 2018, he was suspended for misconduct. Hathurusinghe decided on the punishment that should be meted out to his opening batsman and very cleverly he suspended him for the remaining white ball matches against Proteas and made sure he would be available for the tour of New Zealand that followed.

The current administration now has bailed him out. Why is that everyone fearing Gunathilaka like the plague? Is it his SSC connections? Can not be as in the first place why the board appointed an independent panel was because they wanted this issue seriously dealt with. Then why show leniency is a question in everyone’s mind.

The panel that sanctioned a two year suspension comprised some brilliant lawyers. The committee was headed by a retired Supreme Court judge. Apparently, they were going to hand out one year suspensions only, but they were not all that impressed by Gunathilaka’s conduct.

To start with, Gunathilaka lied to the panel. He had claimed that he returned to the team hotel by 11pm. But upon checking CCTV footage, the committee found out this to be false. This claim has been denied by Gunathilaka’s management team who say that he had pleaded guilty for breaking team curfew.

There was another thing that upset the panel; Gunathilaka’s dress code. He had walked in with his shirt out, wearing deck shoes. The inquiry panel observed lack of remorse. That could be a key point.

Gunathilaka is one of the finest young batsmen we have and there’s no doubt about it. That’s why the likes of Sumathipala, Hathurusinghe and the current administration have tolerated him. But the point is, he is never learning.

Nobody should think he is indispensable. After all, USA basketball team won the Olympic gold in 1992 without Isiah Thomas. Australia won the 2003 World Cup having sent Shane Warne home on the eve of their first game. England turned around their cricketing fortunes having sacked Kevin Pietersen. No one is bigger than the game.

 

 



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

ICC introduces pink-ball daytime Test trial, new time-wasting penalties

Published

on

The changes to playing conditions will come into effect on October 1.

The ICC has introduced a trial allowing pink balls to be used in daytime Test matches, among a series of changes to the Playing Conditions that come into effect for international series beginning on October 1.

The pink-ball provision is aimed at reducing the loss of playing time due to bad light. Its use will require mutual agreement between the two teams before the start of the Test and, once agreed, the ball colour cannot be changed during the match.

Continuing the push to make full use of playing time, the ICC will also clamp down on excessive time-wasting by batters in men’s cricket. A batter who is not ready to face the next delivery within the prescribed time, in the umpires’ view, will receive a warning for the first offence, followed by a final warning for the second. A third and each subsequent offence will result in five penalty runs being awarded to the fielding side, with Code of Conduct provisions potentially invoked for repeated offences.

Time-wasting came into focus during the Lord’s Test in 2025 when India captain Shubman Gill alleged that his confrontation with Zak Crawley stemmed from the England opener and his batting partner Ben Duckett seemingly arriving at the crease 90 seconds late when tasked with seeing out one final over before close of play on Day 3.

In another Test-specific change, following an MCC recommendation, the fall of a wicket in the final over of the day’s play will no longer automatically bring the day’s play to an end. If conditions remain suitable and the over has not been completed, the remaining deliveries will be bowled rather than carried over to the following day.

The ICC has also tightened the specifications for balls used in women’s international cricket, with separate size and weight requirements now in place for men’s, women’s and junior cricket. A new men’s ball must weigh between 5.5 and 5.75 ounces (156-163 grams) and measure 22.4-22.9 centimetres in circumference. For women’s cricket, the ball must weigh 5-5.25 ounces (142-149 grams) and measure 21.5-22 centimetres in circumference.

Among other changes following MCC recommendations, the ICC has also clarified the requirements around control of the ball, an area that has frequently come under scrutiny in run-out and stumping decisions. The revised laws make it explicit that mere contact with the ball is insufficient for a dismissal. For a wicket to be valid, the ball must be held with complete control at the moment the stumps are broken. Simply brushing the ball with a hand or glove while dislodging the bails will no longer meet the requirement.

The umpire will also have greater leeway in determining whether a ball is finally settled. The ball no longer necessarily has to be in the bowler’s or wicketkeeper’s hands to be considered finally settled.

Meanwhile, in ODIs and T20Is, the 15-minute interval in T20Is is now fixed, although it can be reduced to a minimum of 10 minutes when time has been lost. The ODI and T20I Playing Conditions are now aligned to allow the ‘Head Coach or their designate’ to enter the field of play at drinks intervals. [Cricbuzz]

Continue Reading

Sports

Sri Lanka’s gold hopes buried in 45 run debacle

Published

on

Sri Lanka’s batters struggled against the quality of Jasprit Bumrah as they were bowled out for 45 runs

Sri Lanka’s Asian Games gold medal hopes ended in humiliating fashion yesterday as they were bundled out for a paltry 45 in Nisshin, suffering a crushing 124 run defeat at the hands of defending champions India in the semi-final of the men’s cricket competition.

Set 170 for victory on a difficult surface, Sri Lanka’s chase never got off the ground as India’s bowlers exploited a cracked pitch superbly. The innings descended into a procession, with Sri Lanka bowled out for 45, the joint-lowest total by a Full Member nation in men’s T20 Internationals.

West Indies had also been dismissed for 45 by England in 2019.

Jasprit Bumrah led the demolition with two wickets for seven runs, while Axar Patel claimed two for eight and Abhishek Sharma returned remarkable figures of two for two. Sri Lanka compounded their problems with three run outs, including two involving top-order batters.

India’s bowlers hardly needed an invitation. Bumrah operated on probing Test match lengths and proved almost unplayable on a surface where the ball occasionally behaved alarmingly, while Axar strangled the batters with 14 dot balls.

The collapse was particularly disappointing after Sri Lanka had done reasonably well with the ball to restrict a powerful Indian batting line up to 169 for seven.

Ishan Kishan proved the difference between the sides, remaining unbeaten on 80 off just 46 deliveries, although Sri Lanka were left to rue opportunities that went begging.

Kishan enjoyed his share of fortune with several mistimed aerial strokes landing safely, but the biggest reprieve came when Nuwanidu Fernando put him down on 56. India’s wicketkeeper batsman made Sri Lanka pay heavily for the lapse.

Vaibhav Sooryavanshi chipped in with 38, while Sri Lankan skipper Sahan Arachchige returned two for 28 and Pavan Ratnayake picked up two for 32.

The surface, riddled with cracks, was never straightforward for batting and a couple of deliveries misbehaved sharply during India’s innings. But whatever difficulties India encountered, Sri Lanka found them considerably harder to negotiate.

Their 45 was also the second-lowest total recorded in the men’s cricket competition at the Asian Games.

The defeat ended Sri Lanka’s hopes of reaching the gold medal match, while India advanced to face arch-rivals Pakistan in the final , the first India-Pakistan final of the year, with the Asian Games title at stake.

Continue Reading

Sports

Hansana, Hirupama earn best athlete titles

Published

on

by Reemus Fernando

‎St. Joseph Vaz’s College Wennappuwa and Lyceum Inyernational Wattala rode their sprint strength to the Boys and Girls overall titles as Hansana Jayasinghe and Risana Hirupama bagged the best athlete awards of the Sir John Tarbat Senior Championships concluded on Thursday.

‎Lyceum’s Hirupama who dashed to victory breaking Dhamayanthi Dharsha’s longstanding record in 200 metres was awarded the best athlete title in the girls’ category. She clocked 24.10 seconds in a closely contested final against Dharmapala College Pannipitiya sprinter Ransini Perera (24.63).

‎The duo delivered another thrilling performance in the 100 m final as well. Once again Hirupama came on top winning in 11.98 seconds. Ransini prevented a one two finish for Lyceum by placing second ahead of Dhananjana Fernando. As expected Lyceum were the winners of the 4×100 metres relay where once again the powerful presence of Ransini made it a battle between the two schools for the gold.

‎World Junior Championship participant Hansana Jayasinghe of St. Benedict’s College came up with another dazzling performance to win the Under 20 boys’ triple jump. His 16.23 metres feat sealed the best athlete title in the boys’ category.

‎I.M. Bogoda’s dashing run in the Under 20 boys’ 400 metres was probably the highlight for St. Joseph Vaz’s as they claimed the boys’ overall championship with a tally of 167 points. Maris Stella College Thimbirigaskatuwa were the runners up with 108 points.

‎Bogoda clocked 46.96 seconds to win the one lap race in a near top national level feat.

‎S. Thomas’ high jumper S. Thribashith who cleared 2.09 metres in the Under 18 high jump and St. Joseph’s Balika Kegalle athlete Sithmini Ranaweera who cleared 6.12 metres to win the Under 20 long jump and Bogoda were awarded for their outstanding performances.

‎The Lyceum International won the overall girls’ championship with a tally of 192 points, while Ratnayake Central Walala were placed second with an aggregate of 125 points.

Continue Reading

Trending