News
State Minister calls for sensible solution: Ask farmer to buy fertiliser to prevent overuse
By Saman Indrajith
Removing the subsidy and asking the farmers to buy their fertiliser requirement would have been the right answer to the problems created by the excessive use of chemical fertiliser, State Minister of Urban Development, Waste Disposal and Community Cleanliness, Dr. Nalaka Godahewa said.
Godahewa said that he was not sure whether anyone had understood the current fertiliser issue correctly. People were talking about ‘solutions’ and fighting over them without asking what was the ‘issue’ in the first place.
“Don’t we remember the public outcry against chemical fertiliser several years back? That was mainly because of the health issues created by the use of chemical fertiliser. The former president even requested the Chinese government to set up a kidney hospital in Polonnaruwa. That was because kidney diseases had become so widespread amongst the farming communities in the Polonnaruwa district. Our Doctors kept publishing research papers on how the health of our younger generation is affected by consuming food produced using chemical fertiliser. It was indeed a big issue. The list goes on and it was a no-brainer that the excessive use of chemical fertiliser was becoming harmful to society,” he said.
Chemical fertiliser was used all over the world to increase crop productivity, while It had a positive impact on the yield but the excessive use of chemical fertiliser could lead to several other problems, Dr. Godahewa said.
“Then what we should have discussed in the first place would have been how we can reduce the excessive use of chemical fertiliser. To answer that question one should have discussed why farmers were using too much chemical fertiliser on their lands,” he said.
One obvious answer would have been the availability of free fertiliser subsidies, which could be statistically proven. When the government stopped the fertiliser subsidy a few years back the amount of fertiliser imports to the country reduced drastically. But when the government restored fertiliser subsidies, the demand almost doubled. So it was very clear that the farmers used chemical fertilier more than what they needed when it was given free, he said.
The State Minister said: “Removing the subsidy and asking the farmers to buy their fertiliser requirement would have been the right answer. Then the use of fertiliser would have been more efficient. Obviously this wouldn’t have been politically popular. The second point we should have discussed would have been the availability of chemical fertiliser less harmful to the users. Technology is moving fast and the world is experiencing new innovations all the time. Instead of going for the cheapest source for buying, successive governments should have introduced some regulations on the types of fertiliser that can be imported”.
The recent decision of the government to import nano-nitrogen fertiliser could be a move in the right direction as it seemed to be a less harmful, technologically advanced product from the information currently available, he said
Organic farming was an obvious solution to reduce damage to the environment, Dr. Godahewa said. However, it couldn’t be the only solution.
“There must be other answers. I already pointed out two such answers above. Today we act as if our whole objective is to shift our entire cultivation to organic fertiliser. But is it what we want in the first place or is this all a big miscommunication? I strongly feel where we are going wrong is too much emphasis on a solution without asking what was the issue in the first place,” he said.
Latest News
Department of Registration of Persons back to normal
The computer system at the Department of Registration of Persons has been rectified and the services are back to normal.
News
SJB: China, India taking advantage of Lanka’s unregulated oil market
… questions why the price of a by-product like kerosene was jacked up
China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec Group) and Indian Oil Corporation Lanka (IOC PLC) have increased the prices of certain products significantly more than the Ceylon Petroleum Corporation (CPC). However, the fourth player in the market R.M. Parks, a US company in collaboration with Shell that launched operations here in late February last year, has increased its prices in line with Ceypetco.
Convener of the Samagi Joint Trade Union Alliance, Ananda Palitha, yesterday (23) told The Island that foreign players had immensely benefited from the latest price revision at the expense of Sri Lankan consumers.
Alleging that Sinopec and Lanka IOC PLC had become a law unto themselves, Palitha pointed out that the failure on the part of successive governments to establish an Independent Commission and Regulatory Authority for the petroleum sector had allowed Ceypetco and all foreign players to do as they please. Palitha said that in the absence of proper regulatory mechanism, CPC/Energy Ministry should ensure genuine competitiveness in the market.
Palitha said that the NPP government had exploited the ongoing Middle East war to earn unconscionable profits at a time the economy was reeling under the impact of the Hormuz Strait blockade. According to him, all four players increased Auto Diesel by Rs. 79 to Rs. 382 per litre, and Octane 92 Petrol by Rs. 81 to Rs. 398 per litre, while Sinopec and Lanka IOC PLC price list differed in respect of other products. At most filling stations Octane 92 was not available and only higher priced Octane 95 petrol was available.
Pointing out that since the eruption of the Middle East conflict, on 28 February, the NPP had twice increased fuel prices on 09 and 22 March, Palitha said that the government could have cushioned the impact by lowering taxes imposed on crude oil and refined petroleum products. Instead, the latest price revisions resulted in further increase of customs duties, VAT and Port and Airport Development Levy. Additional duties often apply, such as a surcharge tax, on diesel and petrol.
Since the entry of Lanka IOC into the market in 2003, Sinopec in 2023 and R.M. Parks in 2025 eroded the CPC share and, at the moment, it was down to about 57%, and the private players accounted for the rest. Palitha placed the number of filling stations players authorised to operate at Ceypetco (836), Lanka IOC (274) and Sinopec and R.M. Parks 150 each.
Palitha said Lanka IOC has increased Petrol Octane 95 to Rs. 487 a litre whereas the CPC priced the same at Rs. 455) a litre. Lanka IOC and Ceypetco have priced a litre of Super diesel at Rs. 572 and Rs. 443, respectively.
LIOC has also revised its premium fuel categories, with Xtra Premium Petrol priced at Rs. 465, Xtra Mile at Rs. 551, and Xtra Green Diesel at Rs. 588.
Claiming that the government had twice increased the prices of old petroleum stocks, procured at a maximum USD 70 a barrel, weeks, if not months, before the new war, Palitha found fault with the Opposition for not launching a sustained campaign against the exploitation of the public. Palitha said that the increase of a litre of kerosene by Rs. 13 on 09 March and Rs. 60 on 22 March was unjustifiable. “The people do not know that kerosene is a by-product in the process of refining crude oil. Sapugaskanda produces LPG, naphtha, petrol, diesel, kerosene and furnace oil.”
The price of a litre of kerosene to had been increased to Rs 255, Palitha said, adding that it could have been provided to the needy at a much lower rate. If those who represent Parliament bothered to study the issues at hand, they would be able to challenge the government on this disgraceful manipulation of the entire country, he said.
Palitha said that the Parliament owed an explanation as to why the Commission to regulate the oil trade hadn’t been appointed and whether some interested parties financially benefited at the expense of the country.
Palitha said that the introduction of the QR code to control fuel sales and the increase of the fuel quota last Sunday night had been used to deceive the public when those in power and their friends in the industry made money at the expense of the public.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
News
SL to redevelop Trinco tank farm expeditiously
Sri Lanka is planning to fast-track the redevelopment of the Trincomalee oil tank farm as a long-term solution to its ongoing energy crisis, with backing from India and the United Arab Emirates, The Hindu has reported.
Foreign Minister Vijitha Herath said the project, which involves restoring World War II-era oil storage facilities in the eastern district, is seen as a “permanent solution” to managing fuel supply challenges.
“Temporary solutions are not sustainable. We need a long-term strategy to deal with oil storage and distribution, given the global energy situation,” he told The Hindu.
The initiative follows a Memorandum of Understanding signed in April 2025 between Sri Lanka, India, and the UAE to develop Trincomalee as a regional energy hub.
Despite previous delays spanning decades, the project has gained renewed urgency amid the current global energy crisis, which has disrupted supply chains and driven up fuel costs.
Sri Lanka has already submitted a concept proposal to its partners, while technical aspects are being reviewed by the Energy Ministry before moving to the tender stage, according to the report.
The renewed push also marks a notable policy shift, as the ruling administration, led by the National People’s Power, had previously opposed Indian involvement in the project.
-
News7 days agoCIABOC questions Ex-President GR on house for CJ’s maid
-
News6 days agoBailey Bridge inaugurated at Chilaw
-
Features2 days agoTrincomalee oil tank farm: An engineering marvel
-
News5 days agoCIABOC tells court Kapila gave Rs 60 mn to MR and Rs. 20 mn to Priyankara
-
News6 days agoPay hike demand: CEB workers climb down from 40 % to 15–20%
-
Editorial7 days agoCouple QR-based quota with odd-even rationing
-
Features5 days agoScience and diplomacy in a changing world
-
News4 days agoColombo, Oslo steps up efforts to strengthen bilateral cooperation in key environmental priority areas
