Sports
Sri Lanka’s World Cup campaign in shambles
Rex Clementine in Hyderabad
Most fans back home are angry and disappointed at the start the Sri Lankan team has had in this World Cup campaign. In Delhi, they concede the most runs scored in a World Cup game in history and three days later in Hyderabad, they let the opposition to chase down the highest target in World Cup history. Our bowling is awful. Our cricket is pathetic. A team that set high standards in cricket two decades ago has become the laughing stock.
Let’s be realistic. Given the fact that you have just four players who had featured in World Cups before and your team had to qualify for the sport’s showpiece event, you have got to be happy if they beat Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Netherlands. Any other win has to be a bonus. The only upsets Sri Lanka could create was against South Africa and Pakistan on recent form.
However, now those two games are over, Sri Lanka is facing a tall order in the 2023 campaign.
This year, Sri Lanka suffered their worst ODI defeat in Trivandrum when they lost to India by 317 runs. This year, Sri Lanka suffered their worst ever Test defeat at home when Pakistan beat them by an innings and 222 runs. This year Sri Lanka were also bowled out for their lowest total at home – 50 – in the Asia Cup final.
There are too many lows this year and the list seems to be only growing. We need to address the issue now or face more embarrassment as we move on. There is every indication that Sri Lankan cricket is heading the same direction as West Indies cricket. Woe be the day if that happens.
Teams like India, New Zealand, England and Australia have taken their game to new levels whereas we are happy that we enjoyed a record winning streak, most of which came against associate nations like UAE, Scotland and Oman.
The fact that all these record defeats have happened under the same selection panel means there is an urgent need to get a new set of selectors who are firm but fair. The current panel made a hue and cry about fitness standards and made several players ineligible for selection. Once they got rid of half a dozen seniors, the rules changed. Now they play by a different set of rules, and you don’t become ineligible for selection if your fitness standards aren’t up to scratch.
There are serious questions about our High-Performance Center. Are we preparing players for the requirements of high intensity of international cricket?
How can your premier fast bowler send down 13 wides one day and 18 wides three days later? That too in a World Cup!
Our fielding that used to be the best in the region and on par with Australia and South Africa is crap at the moment. We end up paying princely sums to hire foreign coaches to improve fielding whereas someone like Upul Chandana, under whose watch the under-19 team has maintained high fielding standards, is wasting his time with development squads.
So much has been said about the standards of our domestic cricket. In 2017, we doubled the teams that play First Class cricket to 26 in order to please cricket’s voter base. A few years down the line we realized that it was a mistake and were keen to address the issue and a system was introduced to cut down the number of First-Class teams methodically. But that structure seems to have been thrown out of the window because you don’t want to antagonize your voter base.
Even our former captains who had championed the cause of domestic cricket and wanted teams to be cut down have been silenced with solid pay packages.
The injuries to our players are legendary. During the last T-20 World Cup in Australia, the team management promised to address the issue, but they have done precious little to overcome the problem. Our training methods and our rehabilitation need to be looked at.
Our wickets are horrible. In slow turners back home, we could give any team a run for their money, but we seem to forget that when we go for ICC events, we get belters. Having played on poor quality wickets, our bowlers are not up to the mark on flat decks and have no idea how to stop the run flow.
Forget international cricket. Even for Lanka Premier League we failed to produce decent wickets and they were played on lousy wickets. Some say that the national curator is picked not on merit but on how many votes he has. If that’s your yardstick, then good luck to your cricket.
If you don’t have any good curators, hire someone who is capable of producing good wickets from overseas for after all you have reached record profits and you are richer than the New Zealand Cricket Board.
These are some of the harsh realities that are facing our cricket. We need to address them, now. Unless we do that, our cricket is doomed. Now then, don’t shoot the messenger.
Latest News
Three more Iran football team members change minds over asylum
Three more members of the Iranian women’s football delegation – who were given humanitarian visas to stay in Australia – have changed their mind and will return home.
The trio have been named by human rights activists in the Iranian diaspora as Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar, Mona Hamoudi, and Zahra Sarbali.
Concerns grew for the Iranian team after they were silent for the country’s anthem in their opening Asian Cup match against South Korea on 2 March – which led to them being branded “war traitors” in Iran.
Confirming the decisions, Australia’s home affairs minister said his government had done everything it could to ensure the women were given the chance to have a safe future in the country.
“Australians should be proud that it was in our country that these women experienced a nation presenting them with genuine choices and interacted with authorities seeking to help them,” Tony Burke said in a statement.
“While the Australian government can ensure that opportunities are provided and communicated, we cannot remove the context in which the players are making these incredibly difficult decisions.”
Iran’s sports ministry also earlier confirmed the news, first reported by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-linked Tasnim News Agency, in a statement.
“The national spirit and patriotism of the Iranian women’s national football team defeated the enemy’s plans against this team,” the statement says, also accusing Australia’s government of “playing in Trump’s field”.
Tasnim said the three were on their way to Kuala Lumpur in Malaysia to join the rest of the squad and were “returning to the warm embrace of their families and homeland after withdrawing their asylum application in Australia”.
It said they had resisted “psychological warfare, extensive propaganda and seductive offers”.
It means that, of the seven who initially said they wanted to stay in Australia, only three now remain as defectors. One of the players made the same decision to return to Iran on Wednesday.
Hamoudi and Sarbali were among the original five who refused, after giving minders the slip at the team’s hotel on the Gold Coast, south of Brisbane, last Monday and being taken to a safe house by Australian Federal Police.
Zahra Soltan Meshkehkar, a member of the team’s technical staff, was one of two more women from the group to seek asylum the next day. The other – Mohaddeseh Zolfi – changed her mind hours after being given the right to stay. She is understood to have already rejoined the team.
There was concern in Australia that members of the team and their families might face repercussions in Iran after the players refused to sing the national anthem.
One conservative commentator on Iranian state media accused them of being “wartime traitors” and called for a harsh punishment.
The team did sing the anthem in their last two games before they were eliminated on Sunday, leading critics to believe they had been told to sing by government officials accompanying them during the tournament.
The remaining Iranian players left Australia on Tuesday night local time – two days after they were knocked out of the Asian Cup.
[BBC]
Sports
Kirsten brings pedigree, but Sri Lanka must fix the system
Our cricket bosses didn’t earn many admirers for their choice of chairman of selectors, but they have certainly struck a chord with students of the game like us, and more importantly with the fans, in their appointment of the national team’s head coach. In Gary Kirsten, Sri Lanka have brought in a man with a proven pedigree and it looks like a step in the right direction.
As an opening batsman for South Africa, Kirsten never quite possessed the charm, elegance or textbook technique of his older brother Peter Kirsten. Gary’s success was forged the hard way. He thrived on grit, discipline and a stubborn refusal to give in, the sort of qualities that don’t always make headlines but win you matches. Once asked to follow on by England, he dug in for more than 14 hours at the crease and churned out 275, the highest score of his career. That innings summed up the man perfectly. When the going got tough, Gary simply rolled up his sleeves and got going.
Those very traits travelled with him into coaching, where he carved out an enviable reputation. Managing a star-studded Indian dressing room featuring Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman and MS Dhoni is no walk in the park. Handling so many big personalities requires more than tactical nous; it demands man management. Kirsten passed that test with flying colours. Under his watch India climbed to the No.1 ranking in Test cricket and, of course, lifted the 2011 World Cup, breaking 21 million Sri Lankan hearts in the final in Bombay.
Kirsten was hugely popular with Indian supporters. Many wanted him to stay on, but he knew better than to overstay his welcome and bowed out gracefully.
Soon after, South Africa came calling and true to form he went about the job methodically, guiding the Proteas to the top of the world rankings. Wherever he has gone, results have tended to follow.
That said, simply because Kirsten has joined our ranks does not mean Sri Lanka will suddenly start knocking over the top sides week in, week out. Kirsten carries no magic wand. A coach, after all, can only take the horse to water; it is the players who must drink.
For a cricket team to flourish, the entire system needs to be rock solid. It starts with the players themselves, their hunger to improve, their willingness to leave their comfort zones and put in the hard yards. The next crucial cog in the wheel is selection. In years gone by, men like Michael Tissera and Sidath Wettimuny had the foresight to look beyond the obvious and the courage to make unpopular calls when necessary. A selection panel that continues to back Dasun Shanaka as captain, however, is asking for trouble. It’s a bit like appointing Sagala Ratnayake as National Security Adviser.
Sri Lanka Cricket deserves credit for trimming down the number of teams competing in the First Class tournament, but the worrying reality is that the number of international games Sri Lanka play each year has shrunk alarmingly. Last year the country played a grand total of four Test matches, hardly enough cricket for a side hoping to stay relevant in the longest format. The Test calendar needs beefing up and the Lanka Premier League must return to the fold if Sri Lanka are to stay competitive in white-ball cricket.
For a team to succeed consistently, cricket has to run like a well-oiled machine. In Sri Lanka’s case, however, the wheels tend to wobble. Ahead of almost every major tournament our leading bowler seems to be nursing an injury. That is hardly the hallmark of a smooth operation.
Kirsten, to his credit, has struck all the right notes since being appointed. He has spoken about improving Sri Lanka’s rankings, winning overseas and developing a strong bench, the sort of forward thinking the game desperately needs here.
Just look at India for an example of depth. Sanju Samson walks in as their back-up wicketkeeper and ends up as Player of the Tournament in a World Cup. They can hand the gloves to Ishan Kishan, while players of the calibre of Rishabh Pant and KL Rahul struggle to find a place in the squad. Any one of those four would walk into most international sides as the first-choice keeper. Such is the luxury of India’s bench strength.
There’s no point envying them. The smarter move is to learn from them.
Kirsten, therefore, has plenty on his plate. And if he is looking for a place to begin, he might start with a rather pressing issue, figuring out how Sri Lanka’s batters plan to play spin, a challenge that has been turning our innings into a procession far too often in recent times.
by Rex Clementine ✍️
Latest News
Agha calls for ‘sportsman spirit’ after controversial dismissal
Salman Ali Agha said that he would have done things ‘differently”, after Mehidy Hasan Miraz ran him out in controversial circumstances in the second ODI in Dhaka.
Agha, who made 64 from 62 balls, had been backing up at the non-striker’s end when Mohammad Rizwan drove the ball back towards him. He was still out of his ground as Mehidy swooped round behind him in an attempt to gather, and Agha had appeared ready to pass the ball back to the bowler before Mehidy reached down to grab it first and throw down the stumps.
Agha reacted furiously to the dismissal, throwing his gloves and helmet down in disgust at the decision. However, he later came to the post-match press conference, ahead of captain Shaheen Shah Afridi and player of the match Maaz Sadaqat, to clear the air.
“I think sportsman spirit has to be there,” Agha said. “What he [Mehidy] has done is in the law. I think if he thinks it’s right, it’s right, but if you ask me my perspective, I would have done differently. I would have gone for sportsman spirit. We haven’t done this [type of thing] previously, we would never do that in the future as well.”
Agha explained that he had been trying to pick up the ball to give to Miraz, thinking it was likely to have been called dead. “Actually, the ball hit on my pad and then my bat,” he said. “So I thought he can’t get me run-out now, because the ball already hit on my pad and my bat.
“I was just trying to give him the ball back. I was not looking for the run or anything like that, but he already decided [to make the run-out].”
Agha however regretted his angry reaction. “It was just heat-of-the-moment kind of stuff,” he said. “If you ask me what would I have done, I would have done things differently. But it was everything, whatever happened after that, it was in the moment.”
He was also involved in a robust exchange with Bangladesh wicketkeeper Litton Das, though he didn’t divulge many of the details.
“I can’t remember what I was saying and I can’t remember what he was saying,” he said. “I’m sure I wasn’t saying nice things, and I’m sure he wasn’t saying nice stuff as well. But it was just heat of the moment, so we are fine.
Asked if he had patched things up with Mehidy, Agha said: “I haven’t yet, but don’t worry, I’ll find him.”
Pakistan won the match by 128 runs via the DLS method.
[Cricinfo]
-
News6 days agoRepatriation of Iranian naval personnel Sri Lanka’s call: Washington
-
Features6 days agoWinds of Change:Geopolitics at the crossroads of South and Southeast Asia
-
News5 days agoProf. Dunusinghe warns Lanka at serious risk due to ME war
-
Sports4 days agoRoyal start favourites in historic Battle of the Blues
-
Sports3 days agoThe 147th Royal–Thomian and 175 Years of the School by the Sea
-
News3 days agoHistoric address by BASL President at the Supreme Court of India
-
Business4 days agoBOI launches ‘Invest in Sri Lanka’ forum
-
News4 days agoCEBEU warns of operational disruptions amid uncertainty over CEB restructuring
