Sports
Sri Lanka’s World Cup campaign in shambles

Rex Clementine in Hyderabad
Most fans back home are angry and disappointed at the start the Sri Lankan team has had in this World Cup campaign. In Delhi, they concede the most runs scored in a World Cup game in history and three days later in Hyderabad, they let the opposition to chase down the highest target in World Cup history. Our bowling is awful. Our cricket is pathetic. A team that set high standards in cricket two decades ago has become the laughing stock.
Let’s be realistic. Given the fact that you have just four players who had featured in World Cups before and your team had to qualify for the sport’s showpiece event, you have got to be happy if they beat Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Netherlands. Any other win has to be a bonus. The only upsets Sri Lanka could create was against South Africa and Pakistan on recent form.
However, now those two games are over, Sri Lanka is facing a tall order in the 2023 campaign.
This year, Sri Lanka suffered their worst ODI defeat in Trivandrum when they lost to India by 317 runs. This year, Sri Lanka suffered their worst ever Test defeat at home when Pakistan beat them by an innings and 222 runs. This year Sri Lanka were also bowled out for their lowest total at home – 50 – in the Asia Cup final.
There are too many lows this year and the list seems to be only growing. We need to address the issue now or face more embarrassment as we move on. There is every indication that Sri Lankan cricket is heading the same direction as West Indies cricket. Woe be the day if that happens.
Teams like India, New Zealand, England and Australia have taken their game to new levels whereas we are happy that we enjoyed a record winning streak, most of which came against associate nations like UAE, Scotland and Oman.
The fact that all these record defeats have happened under the same selection panel means there is an urgent need to get a new set of selectors who are firm but fair. The current panel made a hue and cry about fitness standards and made several players ineligible for selection. Once they got rid of half a dozen seniors, the rules changed. Now they play by a different set of rules, and you don’t become ineligible for selection if your fitness standards aren’t up to scratch.
There are serious questions about our High-Performance Center. Are we preparing players for the requirements of high intensity of international cricket?
How can your premier fast bowler send down 13 wides one day and 18 wides three days later? That too in a World Cup!
Our fielding that used to be the best in the region and on par with Australia and South Africa is crap at the moment. We end up paying princely sums to hire foreign coaches to improve fielding whereas someone like Upul Chandana, under whose watch the under-19 team has maintained high fielding standards, is wasting his time with development squads.
So much has been said about the standards of our domestic cricket. In 2017, we doubled the teams that play First Class cricket to 26 in order to please cricket’s voter base. A few years down the line we realized that it was a mistake and were keen to address the issue and a system was introduced to cut down the number of First-Class teams methodically. But that structure seems to have been thrown out of the window because you don’t want to antagonize your voter base.
Even our former captains who had championed the cause of domestic cricket and wanted teams to be cut down have been silenced with solid pay packages.
The injuries to our players are legendary. During the last T-20 World Cup in Australia, the team management promised to address the issue, but they have done precious little to overcome the problem. Our training methods and our rehabilitation need to be looked at.
Our wickets are horrible. In slow turners back home, we could give any team a run for their money, but we seem to forget that when we go for ICC events, we get belters. Having played on poor quality wickets, our bowlers are not up to the mark on flat decks and have no idea how to stop the run flow.
Forget international cricket. Even for Lanka Premier League we failed to produce decent wickets and they were played on lousy wickets. Some say that the national curator is picked not on merit but on how many votes he has. If that’s your yardstick, then good luck to your cricket.
If you don’t have any good curators, hire someone who is capable of producing good wickets from overseas for after all you have reached record profits and you are richer than the New Zealand Cricket Board.
These are some of the harsh realities that are facing our cricket. We need to address them, now. Unless we do that, our cricket is doomed. Now then, don’t shoot the messenger.
Sports
Mendis ton lifts Sri Lanka to 285 in series decider

Kusal Mendis answered his critics in style with a sublime century as Sri Lanka posted a competitive 285 for seven in their allotted 50 overs in the third and final ODI against Bangladesh on Tuesday at Pallekele.
With the three-match series deadlocked at 1-1, the hosts needed their top order to come good after a stuttering display in Colombo. Mendis, who had faced the heat after a reckless dismissal in the previous game, rose to the occasion with a polished 124 off 114 balls.
The wicketkeeper-batter, under fire from both media and his own camp, including batting coach Thilina Kandamby, who publicly questioned the value of flashy fifties — dug deep to register his sixth ODI hundred and anchor the innings.
Coming to bat in the fourth over of the innings, Mendis played with a mix of caution and controlled aggression. He shared a crucial 124-run stand with skipper Charith Asalanka (58) for the fourth wicket, steadying the ship and setting the stage for a late flourish.
Having thrown away his wicket in Colombo after a whirlwind 20-ball fifty, Mendis showed far more application at Pallekele. His innings, laced with 18 boundaries, was a blend of crisp strokeplay and street-smart batting.
Importantly, Sri Lanka rectified their spin woes from the last outing. Left-arm spinner Tanvir Islam, who had bamboozled the batters with a five-for in the second ODI, was tackled with positive intent. The hosts employed the sweep to good effect, used their feet wisely and played with soft hands to negate the turn. Tanvir finished with unflattering figures of one for 61 off his ten overs.
Mendis eventually perished in the 46th over, top-edging a pull off part-time spinner Shamim Hossain, who ran back to complete a sharp catch off his own bowling.
By Rex Clementine
Latest News
Kusal 124 forms the centrepiece of Sri Lanka’s series victory

Kusal Mendis crashed 124 off 114, Sri Lanka ‘s seamers took three wickets apiece, and Sri Lanka surged to a series win, defeating Bangladesh by 99 runs in the deciding ODI.
The centrepiece of Sri Lanka’s batting was the 124-run partnership between Kusal and Charith Asalanka who made 58 off 68. Bangladesh’s bowlers did well either side of that partnership, particularly at the death, conceding only 62 off the last 10 overs.
But Sri Lanka’s 285 for 7 was too much, and Sri Lanka’s bowlers too penetrative. Bangladesh never really seemed to be on top of the chase, 20 for 2 in the fourth over, then 62 for 3 in the 14th. Towhid Hridoy made a half-century, but the required rate kept climbing, and Bangladesh could not mount a substantial enough partnership. They were all out for 186 in the 40th over.
Asitha Fernando was again the best of Sri Lanka’s bowlers, finding three wickets for 33 runs off seven overs, as he continued to target the stumps, as he has done all tour. Dushmantha Chameera attempted the shorter lengths, but found success with the fuller ones, bowling Hridoy with an especially memorable seaming delivery. He finished with 3 for 51 off eight overs. Wanindu Hasaranga and Dunith Wellalage took two apiece.
Bangladesh will be proud of their bowling to the top order – they had Sri Lanka 100 for 3 at the end of the 21st over. And they also claimed four wickets in the last 10. But in between, Kusal and Asalanka put serious meat on the bones of this Sri Lanka batting effort.
The highlight of Kusal’s innings was his severity on length. Anything short was punished, and though the seam bowlers tried repeatedly, they could not get their bouncers high enough to really test him. He used his short-arm-jab pull to devastating effect, hitting both spinners and quicks through square leg with spectacular timing. Seven of his 18 fours came behind square on the leg side. And all up 82 of his runs (66%) came on the legside. Sweeps of various description – the hard flat one, the paddle, and the slog sweep, were also productive shots for him.
There was never a time in the innings when Kusal seemed to be in discomfort. He eased through the powerplay, hitting 25 off 26 in that period, and though there was a little slowing down as he approached fifty, the same cannot be said of his getting to triple-figures. It took him six balls to scamper through the nineties. He got there off the 95th ball he faced.
Asalanka was not in such good touch by comparison, but nevertheless found ways to make runs. He manufactured sweeps against the spinners at times, and used his feet to find lengths that he could score off. He too was stronger on the legside, finding six of his nine boundaries in that direction.
Bangladesh’s bowlers hit back nicely after that partnership, though. It was Taskin Ahmed that separated them, even if not with an especially good ball. He sent down a low full toss, and Asalanka miscued his attempted six over wide long-on, sending it into the hands of Mehidy Hasan Miraz at mid-on instead. Kusal hit one more boundary, and was out playing a tired hoick off Shamim Hossain in the 46th over.
Sri Lanka’s bowlers hunted as a pack in the chase. Asitha had Tanzid Hasan caught behind in the third over, Chameera got Najmul Hossain Shanto playing on to his stumps with one that jagged in the fourth, and then the spinners imposed themselves. Wellalage and Hasaranga took two wickets apiece, making breakthroughs through the middle overs. Sri Lanka had Bangladesh 124 for 5 at the start of the 28th over.
The spinners having exposed the lower order, Sri Lanka’s quicks came back to wipe out the innings. Aside from Hridoy, no Bangladesh batter crossed 30.
Brief scores:
Sri Lanka 285 for 7 in 50 overs (Pathum Nissanka 35, Kusal Mendis 124, Charith Asalanka 58; Mehidy Hasan Miraz 2-48, Taskin Ahmed 2-51) beat Bangladesh 186 in 39.4 overs (Parvez Hossain Emon 28, Towhid Hridoy 51, Mehidy Hasan Miraz 28, Jaker Ali 27; Asitha Fernando 3-33, Dushmantha Chameera 3-51, Dunith Wellalage 2-33, Wanidu Hasaranga 2-35) by 99 runs
[Cricinfo]
Latest News
Kusal 124, Asalanka half-century lift Sri Lanka to 285

Kusal Mendis crashed 124 off 114 balls to continue his excellent form, and Charith Asalanka struck 58 as he joined Kusal for a dynamic fourth-wicket stand worth 124 off 117 balls.
Either side of that partnership, however, Bangladesh had strong showings. They had Sri Lanka 100 for 3 in the 21st over and conceded only 63 runs in the last ten overs. Though Sri Lanka’s 285 for 7 is a substantial total, they had been well-placed to push for a 300-plus score, given they’d been 222 for 3 after 40 overs, with two set batters at the crease.
But Bangladesh kept striking, varying speeds intelligently, as Taskin Ahmed and Mehidy Hasan Miraz picked two wickets, while Shamim Hossain took one at the death. Sri Lanka managed only five boundaries through the last ten overs.
Mehidy returned the best overall figures of 2 for 48, having dismissed Kamindu Mendis and Janith Liyanage. Shamim got the prize wicket of Kusal in the 46th over. Had he survived till the end, Sri Lanka may have added at least 20 to their total.
The highlight of Kusal’s innings was his severity on length. Anything short was punished, and though the seam bowlers tried repeatedly, they could not get their bouncers high enough to really test him. He used his short-arm-jab pull to devastating effect, hitting both spinners and quicks through square leg with spectacular timing. Seven of his 18 fours came behind square on the leg side. And all up, 82 of his runs (66%) came on the legside. Sweeps of various descriptions – the hard flat one, the paddle, and the slog sweep – were also productive shots for him.
There was never a time in the innings when he seemed to be in discomfort. He eased through the powerplay, hitting 25 off 26 in that period, and though there was a little slowing down as he approached fifty, the same cannot be said of his getting to triple figures. It took him six balls to scamper through the nineties. He got there off the 95th ball he faced.
Asalanka was not in such good touch in comparison, but nevertheless found ways to make runs. He manufactured sweeps against the spinners at times and used his feet to find lengths that he could score off. He too was stronger on the legside, finding six of his nine boundaries in that direction.
Brief scores:
Sri Lanka 285 for 7 in 50 overs (Pathum Nissanka 35, Kusal Mendis 124, Charith Asalanka 58, Wanidu Hasaranga18*; Mehidy Hasan Miraz 2-48, Taskin Ahmed 2-51) vs Bangladesh
[Cricinfo]
-
Features3 days ago
One of the finest foreign ministers the nation missed
-
News3 days ago
Cheap alms bowls imports hit Sri Lanka makers, monks
-
Opinion6 days ago
COPE findings and USJ reaction: External students left high and dry
-
News5 days ago
New KDU Medical Faculty admission policy challenged in Supreme Court
-
Features3 days ago
Going through Colombo Medical School
-
Features6 days ago
A shining example …
-
Sports3 days ago
Liverpool team join family of Diogo Jota, brother for funeral in Portugal
-
Editorial5 days ago
‘Celebration of debt’ and harsh reality