Connect with us

News

SJB challenges FM’s claim that contaminated fertiliser only a commercial issue

Published

on

‘Hasn’t AG obtained enjoining order against Chinese company?’

By Shamindra Ferdinando

Foreign Minister Prof. G.L. Peiris says the current dispute over a contaminated consignment of carbonic fertiliser from China is not a diplomatic issue and shouldn’t be considered a row between China and Sri Lanka.

The Minister said so when the media sought his views on Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co Ltd sending a letter of demand to Dr. W.A.R.T. Wickramaarachchi, the Additional Director of the Plant Quarantine Service over a report issued under his signature that declared a sample of solid organic fertiliser sent by the Chinese company is contaminated.

The media took up the issue at the weekly SLPP briefing at the party office in Battaramulla.

Prof. Peiris emphasised that legal action had been initiated by the company concerned, not the Chinese government. The Minister said that the government couldn’t interfere with the decision taken by the Chinese company to move the court.

Both Prof. Peiris, who is also the SLPP Chairman and SLPP General Secretary Sagara Kariyawasam emphasized that it was a commercial transaction between two private parties. Asked whether China resorting to legal measures against a government official undermined Sri Lanka, Attorney-at-Law Kariyawasam urged the media not to interpret the developments wrongly.

Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) lawmaker Rohini Kaviratne said that the SLPP had quiet and conveniently forgotten the Attorney General on behalf of the government had moved the Colombo Commercial High Court not only against Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co Ltd but its local agent Chelinaa Capital Corporation Pvt Limited as well as the People’s Bank to prevent payment for the consignment.

The Matale District MP pointed out that following the court action initiated by the AG, China swiftly blacklisted the People’s Bank.

The situation remained quite problematic with the court extending the enjoining order issued to the People’s Bank and local shipping company preventing payment till Nov 19, MP Kaviratne said.

Responding to another query, the SJB MP said that the government owed an explanation as to why the services of a local agent was required as the government owned Ceylon Fertilizer Company could have dealt with the importation of carbonic fertilizer.  MP Kaviratne said that the government could have handled the matter in a transparent way.

“The Foreign Ministry seems to be unaware of what is going on,” the MP said, pointing out that Qingdao Seawin Biotech Group Co Ltd issued statements as regards developments through the Chinese Embassy in Colombo. The MP urged the government to examine the whole issue as quickly as possible to prevent further deterioration of relations with China.

She insisted Sri Lanka should never accept contaminated fertiliser. However, the government should prove its case against the Chinese company, the MP said. Noting that the original order placed with the Chinese company was for a staggering 99,000 metric tonnes of carbonic fertilizer, MP Kaviratne asked how the government intended to provide the required quantity. “We are well into the Maha season. Yet, farmers do not know whether they’ll receive fertilizer,” the MP said.

The SJB official said that both Chinese fertilizer and the import of liquid nano-nitrogen from India had been mired in controversy with Secretary to the President Dr. P.B. Jayasundera seeking the intervention of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) over the reportage of very serious accusations made in Parliament by the JVP in respect of Indian fertilizer.

The SJB MP challenged the government to come clean on fertilizer imports.

MP Kaviratne asked whether the government would defend the state official faced with legal action. The lawyers representing the Chinese firm had asked for USD 8 mn in compensation, the MP pointed out, urging the government to acknowledge the seriousness of the situation.



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

PSTA worse than PTA: FSP

Published

on

The Frontline Socialist Party (FSP) yesterday accused the government of seeking to use the proposed Protection of the State from Terrorism Act (PSTA) to suppress popular political activity, claiming that some of its provisions were more repressive than those of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA).

FSP Education Secretary Pubudu Jayagoda told a media briefing, in Nugegoda, that the definition of terrorism in the Bill was so broad that it could be used to label almost any form of popular political activity as terrorism.

He said the Bill’s approach to defining terrorism was based largely on attempts to compel a government, or an international organisation, to do, or refrain from doing something, rather than on internationally recognised criteria, such as killings, causing serious bodily harm, kidnapping or acts intended to spread terror among the public.

Jayagoda also alleged that the Bill transferred substantial powers from the judiciary to the executive, while extending powers of arrest, investigation and detention to the armed forces, in addition to the police.

He claimed that the government had sought to portray the Bill as a replacement for the PTA while retaining or introducing provisions that could facilitate political victimisation and repression.

The FSP also questioned the government’s decision to proceed with the Bill, despite having previously sought public views on an earlier draft.

Jayagoda said a draft had been published earlier this year, with the period for public submissions ending on February 28, but the Bill subsequently gazetted was essentially the same draft with some provisions rearranged.

Jayagoda also referred to a letter reportedly sent by Attorney-at-Law Saliya Peiris, a member of a Committee, chaired by President’s Counsel Rienzie Arsecularatne, that had been appointed to draft the legislation. He said Peiris had stated, in the October 06 letter, that changes had been made to the draft prepared by the Committee.

“This means that even the Committee, appointed to prepare the Bill, was a deception,” Jayagoda alleged.

He said that the PSTA was fundamentally similar to the Anti-Terrorism Bill introduced by the previous government, in 2023, which the National People’s Power (NPP) opposed and challenged in court.

“If the NPP opposed that Bill then and is now bringing the same legislation before Parliament, the government must explain its position,” he said.

Jayagoda called on NPP MPs to oppose the PSTA in Parliament and urged trade unions and other groups to build a broad public movement against the legislation.

He challenged the government to an open debate on the Bill.

Continue Reading

News

Shiranthi R remanded until 13 Oct.

Published

on

Former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa was yesterday remanded until 13 October after being produced before the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following her arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Shiranthi, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, was arrested at her residence on Poorwarama Road, Kirulapone, after CIABOC officers recorded a statement from her for nearly two hours.

According to the CIABOC, the arrest was made over allegations that Rs. 10 million obtained from the National Savings Bank through the Siriliya Saviya organisation was misappropriated.

The money was allegedly obtained to provide a Computed Tomography (CT) scanner to the children’s hospital. Investigators allege that the scanner was not provided and that the funds were instead unlawfully used.

CIABOC is investigating alleged offences under the Public Property Act and corruption-related provisions in connection with the transaction and other financial activities involving Siriliya Saviya, which was headed by Rajapaksa.

Rajapaksa returned to Sri Lanka on Monday night on a flight from Malaysia after travelling overseas for medical treatment. She left for Singapore on 16 September after being admitted to a private hospital in Colombo on 15 September following an illness.

She had been due to appear before the Financial Crimes Investigation Division (FCID) on 13 October in connection with its investigation into the financial affairs of Siriliya Saviya.

Meanwhile, her lawyers filed an anticipatory bail application before the Maligakanda Magistrate’s Court on Monday, seeking an order preventing her arrest in connection with the FCID investigation.

Continue Reading

News

Former NSB Chairman Kariyawasam granted bail

Published

on

Former National Savings Bank (NSB) Chairman Pradeep Kariyawasam was yesterday granted bail by the Colombo Magistrate’s Court following his arrest by the Commission to Investigate Allegations of Bribery or Corruption (CIABOC).

Kariyawasam, husband of former Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, was arrested in connection with the Bribery Commission’s investigation into the ‘Siriliya Saviya’ account linked to former First Lady Shiranthi Rajapaksa.

The investigation concerns financial activities involving the Siriliya Saviya initiative, which was headed by Rajapaksa, wife of former President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

CIABOC is continuing investigations into the alleged financial irregularities relating to the account.

Continue Reading

Trending