Midweek Review
Shocking claim in House: Bandula reveals how sugar importers, their henchmen trapped Prez
Regular revelations, pertaining to high profile scams that had undermined revenue collection, underline the pathetic failure on the part of Parliament to ensure financial discipline. The Central Bank, five-member Monetary Board, Cabinet of Ministers and Parliament as an institution should accept the responsibility for the current crisis. The likes of Bandula Gunawardena continue to pursue an agenda, beneficial to them, or they are simply clueless about how such rip offs are staged, in spite of their self-proclaimed economic wizardry. And only now they are awakening to what happened. But luckily for the country in the case of the Central Bank bond scams, those who staged it could not hoodwink everyone at the CB. Political expediency is the name of the game as the country plunges deeper into economic quagmire.
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Alleging the Wickremesinghe-Rajapaksa government planned to appoint altogether 70 ministers (30 Cabinet and 40 State Ministers), Samagi Jana Balavegaya (SJB) lawmaker Dr. Harsha de Silva recently challenged the government to name a country that sustained such a top-heavy administration, during an economic crisis.
The Colombo District MP gave the challenge on Dec. 09, the day after Parliament overwhelmingly endorsed the 2023 Appropriation Bill, with a majority of 43 votes – six more than at the Second Reading, on Nov. 22. The outcome is nothing but extraordinary as President Ranil Wickremesinghe, leader of the UNP, who presented the Budget on Nov. 14, in his capacity as the Finance Minister, had only one UNP MP in Parliament.
Having been rejected by the Galle District electorate, at the last General Election, in August 2020, Wajira Abeywardena entered Parliament, in July this year, after the Sri Lanka Podujana Peramuna (SL)) elected UNP National List MP Wickremesinghe as the eighth President. The UNP managed to secure only one seat at that election, through its national list, after the country, as a whole, rejected all its candidates. In addition to the UNP, eight other recognised political parties won one seat each, both elected and appointed.
Against the backdrop of former Finance Minister, SLPP strategist Basil Rajapaksa’s declaration that the UNP leader was the most suitable to succeed his brother Gotabaya Rakapaksa, in July this year, amidst violent protests orchestrated by interested parties, there cannot be any dispute over the ruling party’s support to Wickremesinghe’s agenda. In spite of the breakup of the SLPP, into at least three factions, it remains a formidable political force, with its largest group unquestionably loyal to Basil Rajapaksa/Mahinda Rajapaksa.
Therefore, the appointment of Ministers, and State Ministers, as demanded by the SLPP, is a necessity, regardless of the economic catastrophe facing the country. That is the political reality. Dr. Harsha de Silva cannot be unaware of that certainty. Having entered Parliament, on the UNP National List, in 2010, after a successful career in the private sector, De Silva, who had an opportunity to receive the Finance portfolio in the current government, choose not to do so.
The former UNPer, who had served as Wickremesinghe’s deputy on economic affairs, during the Yahapalana administration, questioned the rationale behind such a large number of ministers at a time of an unprecedented political-economic-social crisis. In addition to being the Prime Minister, Wickremesinghe held the Cabinet portfolio for National Policies and Economic Affairs in that government.
The one-time yahapalana non-Cabinet ranker compared the massive allocation of public funds for Ministers, and the controversial new tax structure that had influenced professionals, including doctors, engineers, academics and IT professionals, to leave the country. The economist called the new tax structure unjust. Having voted against the Appropriation Bill, Dr. de Silva declared that daunting challenges, faced by the country, couldn’t be addressed by more ministerial appointments. Reference was made to 10,000 IT professionals leaving the country since the change of government, in July, this year.
The developing crisis should be examined, taking into consideration how successive governments obtained assistance from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on 16 previous occasions. In other words, Sri Lanka had continuously experienced balance of payments problems, during the war, and thereafter. The IMF ‘interventions’ had been almost routine and never really attracted public attention, or never being an issue at an election. In fact, IMF ‘interventions’ and the Yahapalana administration securing USD 12.5 bn in International Sovereign Bonds (ISBs), within four years (2015-2019), and nothing to show in terms of successful development projects, when compared with Mahinda Rajapaksa taking USD 3 bn (2007-2014) with many a feather in his cap. The UNP owed an explanation why such a huge amount in ISBs was taken. Perhaps the Yahapalana Finance Minister, Ravi Karunanayake (2015-2017), and State Minister, Eran Wickremaratne, MP, or Dr. de Silva, can explain the circumstances leading to the procurement of such a massive amount of ISBs, during that time, and nothing tangible to show in return, unlike the Rajapaksas, who carried out many development projects, while prosecuting a crippling war to a successful conclusion against the contrary advice of so-called experts.
Therefore, the ongoing negotiations with the IMF, and Sri Lanka’s bilateral donors, meant to pave the way for USD 2.9 bn Rapid Financial Instrument (RFI), shouldn’t be considered something extraordinary. The UNP’s track record, pertaining to managing the national economy, too, is dismal. Can the UNP and its offshoot the SJB absolve themselves of responsibility for the 2015 and 2016 Treasury bond scams and the dilution of the Exchange Control Act in 2017? (State Finance Minister Ranjith Siyambalapitiya recently told the writer that the weakening of the Exchange Control Act meant clipping the Central Bank of its regulatory powers.)
All SJB MPs, including its leader Sajith Premadasa, served the Yahapalana administration, and the break-up of the UNP happened in early 2020. Had the then President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s government negotiated with the IMF, in early 2020, as advertised by the lending body, perhaps the much respected wartime Defence Secretary could have avoided his calamitous exit. Dr. de Silva had been one of those who repeatedly pushed the Rajapaksa administration to seek the IMF’s intervention or face the consequences. But those who had the ear of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, ensured the government refrained from seeking the IMF’s assistance, until it was too late.
Perhaps those at the helm would have expected both China and India, in competition, to throw lifelines to rescue Sri Lanka, but with Basil increasingly sailing the Lankan ship of state towards US and West in lockstep with New Delhi, Beijing literally called it quits. But now with India clearly showing the West that it is no vassal of any power bloc, may be both China and India can help stabilise and strengthen Sri Lanka. In fact, solid Sri Lanka will be an asset to New Delhi with our historic cultural, linguistic and religious links with the sub-continent.
However, no less than the Governor of the Central Bank, Dr. Nandalal Weerasinghe, told Parliament how the then Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, who also served as the Finance Minister, ignored warnings of the impending financial crisis of unprecedented magnitude.
The disclosure was made during the proceedings of the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) on May 25, 2022.
Dr. Weerasinghe didn’t mince his words when he told the parliamentary watchdog committee how the then Governor, Prof. W.D. Lakshman, and Treasury Secretary, S.R. Attygalle, received warning from the IMF that Sri Lanka couldn’t procure assistance unless the government undertook an immediate debt restructuring programme. Dr. Weerasinghe declared that the IMF made its position clear after quite rightly asserting that Sri Lanka lacked debt sustainability. The CBSL Chief’s revelation prompted the then COPE Chairman Prof. Charitha Herath to call the government’s failure a crime.
Having received his letter of appointment, on April 07, 2022, Dr. Weerasinghe, over the past eight months ,laid bare the truth. Appearing before the parliamentary watchdog committees, on several occasions, and a special talk delivered on August 31, after Wickremesinghe, in his capacity as the Finance Minister, presented an interim budget, the intrepid official told lawmakers what no one had dared to tell them before.
His message was clear. Political parties have collectively ruined the economy. Recognise the failure on their part without further delay, take immediate remedial measures or face the consequences. Dr. Weerasinghe warned that the next round of protests could be far worse than the first that forced Gotabaya Rajapaksa to give up his presidency.
A negligent Parliament
Declarations made in Parliament, when examined against the backdrop of an utterly corrupt political party system, can help the public to comprehend how those who had the ear of the powers that be exploited even the revenue gathering mechanism.
Media and Transport Minister Bandula Gunawardena should be urged to disclose those who perpetrated the massive sugar tax scam that actually caused a catastrophic impact on Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s administration. It simply ruined the President’s reputation.
What the former Trade Minister revealed in Parliament, on Dec. 09, pertaining to the sugar tax scam (reduction of duty on sugar imports) implicated the then President in a horrendous fraud that deprived the Treasury of billions of rupees in taxes. Even Gunawardena, too, should be held responsible as he, as the Trade Minister and a member of Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s Cabinet, cannot absolve his culpability. Why did he wait so long to tell the truth?
Let me repeat what Minister Gunawardena told the House on the particular day. Former much-sought-after economic tuition master underscored the need to identify ‘economic assassins’ without pointing the finger at Presidents Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Mahinda Rajapaksa. The Colombo District lawmaker said that there was no point in holding ministers responsible for the ruination of the economy. Gunawardena stressed the need to ascertain what really happened to the country.
Obviously, the lawmaker is making a fool of himself. How can the President, who is the constitutional head of the Cabinet-of-Ministers absolve himself of ill-fated decisions? Having first entered Parliament, in 1989, on the Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP) ticket, and later having crossed over, served in the UNP-led government as the Finance Deputy Minister (2001-2004), lawmaker Gunawardena, too, must admit he is part of the corrupt system.
Referring to those who held the Finance portfolio, over the years, Minister Gunawardena said: “Ministers simply read out what was provided by officials (at the Finance Ministry). People think Ministers can decide on anything. But, that is not the reality.”
Speaking of the sugar tax scam, perpetrated in Oct. 2020, Minister Gunawardena said that he was at the Narahenpita Abhayaramaya when he heard the decision to reduce the tax on a kilo of imported white sugar, from Rs. 50 to 25 cents. In spite of being the Trade Minister at that time, lawmaker Gunawardena hadn’t been aware of the move until the media made the announcement. “During Cabinet proceedings, I strongly opposed the reduction of the sugar tax. I insisted the reduction of the sugar tax to 25 cents was wrong. But, President Gotabaya Rajapaksa was told by his advisors not to rescind that decision. Regardless of my opposition, they urged the President to stand by the reduction of the sugar tax to 25 cents.”
Minister Gunawardena looked quite silly repeating what Health Minister Keheliya Rambukwella said about the role played by R. Paskaralingam and Charitha Ratwatte during the previous administrations.
Minister Gunawardena said: “The people do not know the truth. SLFP General Secretary, Dayasiri Jayasekera, MP, reminded Minister Gunawardena how he, as a member of the then Joint Opposition, vigorously opposed the tax formula implemented by the Yahapalana administration. Having worked overtime to sabotage the revenue collection process, Gunawardena was now singing a different tune, MP Jayasekera declared.
What Minister Gunawardena didn’t say in Parliament, on that day, was that Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, too, had been with him when the media announced the slashing of sugar tax to 25 cents. When inquired, Mahinda Rajapaksa, too, has claimed he hadn’t been aware of the move. On the advice of Bandula Gunawardena, a Trade Ministry official has phoned the Secretary to the Treasury, S.R. Attygalle, to inquire about the development. Attygalle has promptly confirmed the decision.
Now that President Wickremesinghe has suggested an inquiry to ascertain the economic meltdown, sugar tax scam, too, can be examined. A Presidential Commission/Parliamentary Select Committee can question Minister Gunawardena regarding the sugar tax scam.
The following are some pertinent questions (1) If Mahinda Rajapaksa hadn’t been aware of the sugar tax reduction, who ordered the issuance of gazette. dated Oct. 13, 2020, pertaining to the sharpest ever decline in duty? (2) Had that been effected, without Finance Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa’s approval, why didn’t he reverse it? (3) Would Bandula Gunawardena name those who advised President Gotabaya Rajapaksa to maintain duty at 25 cents a kilo of white sugar (4) Did Bandula Gunawardena, at least, privately brief the then Chairman of Public Finance Committee, Anura Priyadarshana Yapa, of the sugar tax scam? (Gunawardena couldn’t have been unaware of the public condemnation of the sugar tax scam by lawmaker Yapa.) And (5) did Gunawardena criticize the issue at hand before his Dec. 09 speech in Parliament? And, perhaps, lawmaker Gunawardena can honestly explain his stand on his former Cabinet colleagues, Vasudeva Nanayakkara, Wimal Weerawansa and Udaya Gammanpila moving the Supreme Court against the New Fortress Energy deal, finalised on the night of Sept. 17, 2021, during Basil Rajapaksa’s tenure as the Finance Minister (June 2021-April 2022).
In spite of the summary dismissal of the case, the former ministers proved a point. Having turned a blind eye to years of skullduggery (condoned waste, corruption, irregularities and deliberate mismanagement), they had finally realised the ugly truth. The Cabinet-of-Ministers is not infallible. It can be corrupted.
The sugar tax scam and New Fortress Energy deal are just two of the high profile ‘transactions’ that received the blessings of the executive.
Perhaps State Finance Minister Ranjith Siyambalapitiya should look into Minister Gunawardena’s Dec. 09 declaration. Having vowed to recover the losses caused by the sugar tax scam, the SLFPer cannot ignore the accusations made by President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s advisors. Was Bandula Gunawardena also referring to those who had been faulted by the then Finance Minister, Ali Sabry, PC, for the economic ruination? In an interview with Swarnawahini, in early June, this year, following his return from Washington where he led the delegation for talks with the IMF, the outspoken Minister alleged the Secretary to the Treasury, Governor of the Central Bank, and senior economic advisor/advisors to the President, misled the Cabinet-of-Ministers as regards the economic situation.
Prof. W. A. Lakshman (Dec. 2019-Sept 2021) and Ajith Nivard Cabraal (Sept. 2021-March 2022) served as Governors of the CBSL, S.R. Attygalle served as Secretary, Ministry of Finance (Nov 2019-April 2022), whereas veteran financial wizard Dr. P. B. Jayasundera functioned as Secretary to the President (Nov. 2019-Dec. 2021).
Exactly a month before Bandula Gunawardena’s Dec. 09 disclosure, State Minister Siyambalapitiya told Parliament that he would recover 30 percent of the Rs 16 bn loss in tax revenue, suffered as a result of sugar tax scam. The Kegalle District lawmaker assured Parliament that hereafter one person wouldn’t be allowed to take such decisions. Was Siyambalapitiya referring to the Finance Minister or Secretary to the Treasury or someone else?
Siyambalapitiya is on record as having told Parliament that 10 sugar importers benefitted from the tax reduction. One of them imported 45 percent of the total sugar imports and during the period of the tax relief received, the largest beneficiary increased sugar imports by a staggering 1,220 percent. The Minister also revealed that in spite of the tax relief state-run Sathosa (under Bandula Gunawardena) suffered losses that ran up to Rs 10 bn by procuring sugar at a higher cost.
Media Minister Bandula Gunawardena should be questioned on this. In spite of knowing the sugar scam, did Bandula Gunawardena allow Sathosa to cause a further loss of Rs 10 bn? The writer was among the journalists the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) wanted to question over the disclosure of a massive garlic racket exposed at the onset of the Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration. Instead of punishing the wrongdoers, the government felt it could suppress the reportage of the fraudulent transactions. At the end, the entire Cabinet-of-Ministers, including the President ended up with egg on their faces.
Midweek Review
Year ends with the NPP govt. on the back foot
The failure on the part of the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP) government to fulfil a plethora of promises given in the run up to the last presidential election, in September, 2024, and a series of incidents, including cases of corruption, and embarrassing failure to act on a specific weather alert, ahead of Cyclone Ditwah, had undermined the administration beyond measure.
Ditwah dealt a knockout blow to the arrogant and cocky NPP. If the ruling party consented to the Opposition proposal for a Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to probe the events leading to the November 27 cyclone, the disclosure would be catastrophic, even for the all-powerful Executive President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, as responsible government bodies, like the Disaster Management Centre that horribly failed in its duty, and the Met Department that alerted about the developing storm, but the government did not heed its timely warnings, directly come under his purview.
The NPP is on the back foot and struggling to cope up with the rapidly developing situation. In spite of having both executive presidency and an overwhelming 2/3 majority in Parliament, the government seems to be weak and in total disarray.
The regular appearance of President Dissanayake in Parliament, who usually respond deftly to criticism, thereby defending his parliamentary group, obviously failed to make an impression. Overall, the top NPP leadership appeared to have caused irreparable damage to the NPP and taken the shine out of two glorious electoral victories at the last presidential and parliamentary polls held in September and November 2024 respectively.
The NPP has deteriorated, both in and out of Parliament. The performance of the 159-member NPP parliamentary group, led by Prime Minister Dr. Harini Amarasuriya, doesn’t reflect the actual situation on the ground or the developing political environment.
Having repeatedly boasted of its commitment to bring about good governance and accountability, the current dispensation proved in style that it is definitely not different from the previous lots or even worse. (The recent arrest of a policeman who claimed of being assaulted by a gang, led by an NPP MP, emphasised that so-called system change is nothing but a farce) In the run-up to the November, 2024, parliamentary polls, President Dissanayake, who is the leader of both the JVP and NPP, declared that the House should be filled with only NPPers as other political parties were corrupt. Dissanayake cited the Parliament defeating the no-confidence motions filed against Ravi Karunanayake (2016/over Treasury Bond scams) and Keheliya Rambukwella (2023/against health sector corruption) to promote his argument. However, recently the ongoing controversy over patient deaths, allegedly blamed on the administration of Ondansetron injections, exposed the government.
Mounting concerns over drug safety and regulatory oversight triggered strong calls from medical professionals, and trade unions, for the resignation of senior officials at the National Medicines Regulatory Authority (NMRA) and the State Pharmaceutical Corporation (SPC).
Medical and civil rights groups declared that the incident exposed deep systemic failures in Sri Lanka’s drug regulatory framework, with critics warning that the collapse of quality assurance mechanisms is placing patients’ lives at grave risk.
The Medical and Civil Rights Professional Association of Doctors (MCRPA), and allied trade unions, accused health authorities of gross negligence and demanded the immediate resignation of senior NMRA and SPC officials.
MCRPA President Dr. Chamal Sanjeewa is on record as having said that the Health Ministry, NMRA and SPC had collectively failed to ensure patient safety, citing, what he described as, a failed drug regulatory system.
The controversy has taken an unexpected turn with some alleging that the NPP government, on behalf of Sri Lanka and India, in April this year, entered into an agreement whereby the former agreed to lower quality/standards of medicine imports.
Trouble begins with Ranwala’s resignation
The NPP suffered a humiliating setback when its National List MP Asoka Ranwala had to resign from the post of Speaker on 13 December, 2024, following intense controversy over his educational qualification. The petroleum sector trade union leader served as the Speaker for a period of three weeks and his resignation shook the party. Ranwala, first time entrant to Parliament was one of the 18 NPP National List appointees out of a total of 29. The Parliament consists of 196 elected and 29 appointed members. Since the introduction of the National List, in 1989, there had never been an occasion where one party secured 18 slots.
The JVP/NPP made an initial bid to defend Ranwala but quickly gave it up and got him to resign amidst media furor. Ranwala dominated the social media as political rivals exploited the controversy over his claimed doctorate from the Waseda University of Japan, which he has failed to prove to this day. But, the JVP/NPP had to suffer a second time as a result of Ranwala’s antics when he caused injuries to three persons, including a child, on 11 December, in the Sapugaskanda police area.
The NPP made a pathetic, UNP and SLFP style effort to save the parliamentarian by blaming the Sapugaskanda police for not promptly subjecting him for a drunk driving test. The declaration made by the Government Analyst Department that the parliamentarian hadn’t been drunk at the time of the accident, several days after the accident, does not make any difference. Having experienced the wrongdoing of successive previous governments, the public, regardless of what various interested parties propagated on social media, realise that the government is making a disgraceful bid to cover-up.
No less a person than President Dissanayake is on record as having said that their members do not consume liquor. Let us wait for the outcome of the internal investigation into the lapses on the part of the Sapugaskanda police with regard to the accident that happened near Denimulla Junction, in Sapugaskanda.
JVP/NPP bigwigs obviously hadn’t learnt from the Weligama W 15 hotel attack in December, 2023, that ruined President Ranil Wickremeinghe’s administration. That incident exposed the direct nexus between the government and the police in carrying out Mafia-style operations. Although the two incidents cannot be compared as the circumstances differ, there is a similarity. Initially, police headquarters represented the interests of the wrongdoers, while President Wickremesinghe bent over backwards to retain the man who dispatched the CCD (Colombo Crime Division) team to Weligama, as the IGP. The UNP leader went to the extent of speaking to Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya, PC, and Speaker Mahinda Yapa Abeywardena to push his agenda. There is no dispute the then Public Security Minister Tiran Alles wanted Deshabandu Tennakoon as IGP, regardless of a spate of accusations against him, in addition to him being faulted by the Supreme Court in a high-profile fundamental rights application.
The JVP/NPP must have realised that though the Opposition remained disorganised and ineffective, thanks to the media, particularly social media, a case of transgression, if not addressed swiftly and properly, can develop into a crisis. Action taken by the government to protect Ranwala is a case in point. Government leaders must have heaved a sigh of relief as Ranwala is no longer the Speaker when he drove a jeep recklessly and collided with a motorcycle and a car.
Major cases, key developments
Instead of addressing public concerns, the government sought to suppress the truth by manipulating and exploiting developments
* The release of 323 containers from the Colombo Port, in January 2025, is a case in point. The issue at hand is whether the powers that be took advantage of the port congestion to clear ‘red-flagged’ containers.
Although the Customs repeatedly declared that they did nothing wrong and such releases were resorted even during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency (July 2022 to September 2024), the public won’t buy that. Container issue remains a mystery. That controversy eroded public confidence in the NPP that vowed 100 percent transparency in all its dealings. But the way the current dispensation handled the Port congestion proved that transparency must be the last thing in the minds of the JVPers/NPPers holding office.
* The JVP/NPP’s much touted all-out anti-corruption stand suffered a debilitating blow over their failure to finalise the appointment of a new Auditor General. In spite of the Opposition, the civil society, and the media, vigorously taking up this issue, the government continued to hold up the appointment by irresponsibly pushing for an appointment acceptable to President Dissanayake. The JVP/NPP is certainly pursuing a strategy contrary to what it preached while in the Opposition and found fault with successive governments for trying to manipulate the AG. It would be pertinent to mention that President Dissanayake should accept the responsibility for the inordinate delay in proposing a suitable person to that position. The government failed to get the approval of the Constitutional Council more than once to install a favourite of theirs in it, thanks to the forthright position taken by its civil society representatives.
The government should be ashamed of its disgraceful effort to bring the Office of the Auditor General under its thumb:
* The JVP/NPP government’s hotly disputed decision to procure 1,775 brand-new double cab pickup trucks, at a staggering cost exceeding Rs. 12,500 mn, under controversial circumstances, exposed the duplicity of that party that painted all other political parties black. Would the government rethink the double cab deal, especially in the wake of economic ruination caused by Cyclone Ditwah? The top leadership seems to be determined to proceed with their original plans, regardless of immeasurable losses caused by Cyclone Ditwah. Post-cyclone efforts still remain at a nascent stage with the government putting on a brave face. The top leadership has turned a blind eye to the overwhelming challenge in getting the country back on track especially against the backdrop of its agreement with the IMF.
Post-Cyclone Ditwah recovery process is going to be slow and extremely painful. Unfortunately, both the government and the Opposition are hell-bent on exploiting the miserable conditions experienced by its hapless victims. The government is yet to acknowledge that it could have faced the crisis much better if it acted on the warning issued by Met Department Chief Athula Karunanayake on 12 November, two weeks before the cyclone struck.
Foreign policy dilemma
Sri Lanka moved further closer to India and the US this year as President Dissanayake entered into several new agreements with them. In spite of criticism, seven Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs), including one on defence, remains confidential. What are they hiding?
Within weeks after signing of the seven MoUs, India bought the controlling interests in the Colombo Dockyard Limited for USD 52 mn.
Although some Opposition members, representing the SJB, raised the issue, their leader Sajith Premadasa, during a subsequent visit to New Delhi, indicated he wouldn’t, under any circumstances, raise such a contentious issue.
Premadasa went a step further. The SJB leader assured his unwavering commitment to the full implementation of the 13th Amendment to the Constitution that was forced on Sri Lanka during President JRJ’s administration, under the highly questionable Indo-Lanka Accord of July, 1987, after the infamous parippu drop by Indian military aircraft over Jaffna, their version of the old gunboat diplomacy practiced by the West.
Both India and the US consolidated their position here further in the post-Aragalaya period. Those who felt that the JVP would be in a collision course with them must have been quite surprised by the turn of events and the way post-Aragalaya Sri Lanka leaned towards the US-India combine with not a hum from our carboard revolutionaries now installed in power. They certainly know which side of the bread is buttered. Sri Lanka’s economic deterioration, and the 2023 agreement with the IMF, had tied up the country with the US-led bloc.
In spite of India still procuring large quantities of Russian crude oil and its refusal to condemn Russia over the conflict in Ukraine, New Delhi has obviously reached consensus with the US on a long-term partnership to meet the formidable Chinese challenge. Both countries feel each other’s support is incalculably vital and indispensable.
Sri Lanka, India, and Japan, in May 2019, signed a Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) to jointly develop the East Container Terminal (ECT) at the Colombo Port. That was during the tail end of the Yahapalana administration. The Gotabaya Rajapaksa administration wanted to take that project forward. But trade unions, spearheaded by the JVP/NPP combine, thwarted a tripartite agreement on the basis that they opposed privatisation of the Colombo Port at any level.
But, the Colombo West International Terminal (CWIT) project, that was launched in November, 2022, during Ranil Wickremesinghe’s presidency, became fully operational in April this year. The JVP revolutionary tiger has completely changed its stripes regarding foreign investments and privatisation. If the JVP remained committed to its previous strategies, India taking over CDL or CWIT would have been unrealistic.
The failure on the part of the government to reveal its stand on visits by foreign research vessels to ports here underscored the intensity of US and Indian pressure. Hope our readers remember how US and India compelled the then President Wickremesinghe to announce a one-year moratorium on such visits. In line with that decision Sri Lanka declared research vessels wouldn’t be allowed here during 2024. The NPP that succeeded Wickremesinghe’s administration in September, 2024, is yet to take a decision on foreign research vessels. What a pity?
The NPP ends the year on the back foot, struggling to cope up with daunting challenges, both domestic and external. The recent revelation of direct Indian intervention in the 2022 regime change project here along with the US underscored the gravity of the situation and developing challenges. Post-cyclone period will facilitate further Indian and US interventions for obvious reasons.
****

Perhaps one of the most debated events in 2025 was the opening of ‘City of Dreams Sri Lanka’ that included, what the investors called, a world-class casino. In spite of mega Bollywood star Shah Rukh Khan’s unexpected decision to pull out of the grand opening on 02 August, the investors went ahead with the restricted event. The Chief Guest was President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who is also the Finance Minister, in addition to being the Defence Minister. Among the other notable invitees were Dissanayake’s predecessor Ranil Wickremesinghe, whose administration gave critical support to the high-profile project, worth over USD 1.2 bn. John Keells Holdings PLC (JKH) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment (Melco) invested in the project that also consist of the luxurious Nüwa hotel and a premium shopping mall. Who would have thought President Dissanayake’s participation, even remotely, possible, against the backdrop of his strong past public opposition to gambling of any kind?
Don’t forget ‘City of Dreams’ received a license to operate for a period of 20 years. Definitely an unprecedented situation. Although that license had been issued by the Wickremesinghe administration, the NPP, or any other political party represented in Parliament, didn’t speak publicly about that matter. Interesting, isn’t it, coming from people, still referred by influential sections of the Western media, as avowed Marxists?
By Shamindra Ferdinando
Midweek Review
The Aesthetics and the Visual Politics of an Artisanal Community
Through the Eyes of the Patua:
Organised by the Colombo Institute for Human Sciences in collaboration with Millennium Art Contemporary, an interesting and unique exhibition got underway in the latter’s gallery in Millennium City, Oruwala on 21 December 2025. The exhibition is titled, ‘Through the Eyes of the Patua: Ramayana Paintings of an Artisanal Community’ and was organized in parallel with the conference that was held on 20 December 2025 under the theme, ‘Move Your Shadow: Rediscovering Ravana, Forms of Resistance and Alternative Universes in the Tellings of the Ramayana.’ The scrolls on display at the gallery are part of the over 100 scrolls in the collection of Colombo Institute’s ‘Roma Chatterji Patua Scroll Collection.’ Prof Chatterji, who taught Sociology at University of Delhi and at present teaches at Shiv Nadar University donated the scrolls to the Colombo Institute in 2024.
The paintings on display are what might be called narrative scrolls that are often over ten feet long. Each scroll narrates a story, with separate panels pictorially depicting one component of a story. The Patuas or the Chitrakars, as they are also known, are traditionally bards. A bard will sing the story that is depicted by each scroll which is simultaneously unfurled. For Sri Lankan viewers for whom the paintings and their contexts of production and use would be unusual and unfamiliar, the best way to understand them is to consider them as a comic strip. In the case of the ongoing exhibition, since the bards or the live songs are not a part of it, the word and voice elements are missing. However, the curators have endeavoured to address this gap by displaying a series of video presentations of the songs, how they are performed and the history of the Patuas as part of the exhibition itself.
The unfamiliarity of the art on display and their histories, necessitates broader explanation. The Patua hail from Medinipur District of West Bengal in India. Essentially, this community of artisans are traditional painters and singers who compose stories based on sacred texts such as the Ramayana or Mahabharata as well as secular events that can vary from the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001 to the Indian Ocean Tsunami of 2004. Even though painted storytelling is done by a number of traditional artisan groups in India, the Patua is the only community where performers and artists belong to the same group. Hence, Professor Chatterji, in her curatorial note for the exhibition calls them “the original multi-media performers in Bengal.”
‘The story of the Patuas’ also is an account of what happens to such artisanal communities in contemporary times in South Asia more broadly even though this specific story is from India. There was a time before the 21st century when such communities were living and working across a large part of eastern India – each group with a claim to their recognizably unique style of painting. However, at the present time, this community and their vocation is limited to areas such as Medinipur, Birbhum, Purulia in West Bengal and Dumka in Jharkhand.
A pertinent question is how the scroll painters from Medinipur have survived the vagaries of time when others have not. Professor Chatterji provides an important clue when she notes that these painters, “unlike their counterparts elsewhere, are also extremely responsive to political events.” As such, “apart from a rich repertoire of stories based on myth and folklore, including the Ramayana and other epics, they have, over many years, also composed on themes that range from events of local or national significance such as boat accidents and communal violence to global events such as the tsunami and the attack on the World Trade Centre.”
There is another interesting aspect that becomes evident when one looks into the socio-cultural background of this community. As Professor Chatterji writes, “one significant feature that gives a distinct flavour to their stories is the fact that a majority of Chitrakars consider themselves to be Muslims but perform stories based largely on Hindu myths.” In this sense, their story complicates the tension-ridden dichotomies between ethno-cultural and religious groups typical of relations between groups in India as well as more broadly in South Asia, including in Sri Lanka. Prof Chatterji suggests this positionality allows the Patua to have “a truly secular voice so vital in the world that we live in today.”
As a result, she notes, contemporary Patuas “have propagated the message of communal harmony in their compositions in the context of the recent riots in India and the Gulf War. Their commentaries couched in the language of myth are profoundly symbolic and draw on a rich oral tradition of storytelling.” What is even more important is their “engagement with contemporary issues also inflects their aesthetics” because many of these painters also “experiment with novel painterly values inspired by recent interaction with new media such as comic books and with folk art forms from other parts of the country.”
From this varied repertoire of the Patuas’ painterly tradition, this exhibition focusses on scrolls portraying different aspects of the Ramayana. In North Indian and the more dominant renditions of the Ramayana, the focus is on Rama while in many alternate renditions this shifts to Ravana as typified by versions popular among the Sinhalas and Tamils in Sri Lanka as well as in some areas in several Indian states. Compared to this, the Patua renditions in the exhibition mostly illustrate the abduction of Sita with a pronounced focus on Sita and not on Ravana, the conventional antagonist or on Rama, the conventional protagonist. As a result, these two traditional male colossuses are distant. Moreover, with the focus on Sita, these folk renditions also bring to the fore other figures directly associated with her such as her sons Luv and Kush in the act of capturing Rama’s victory horse as well as Lakshmana.
Interestingly, almost as a counter narrative, which also serves as a comparison to these Ramayana scrolls, the exhibition also presents three scrolls known as ‘bin-Laden Patas’ depicting different renditions on the attack on New York’s Twin Towers.
While the painted scrolls in this collection have been exhibited thrice in India, this is the first time they are being exhibited in Sri Lanka, and it is quite likely such paintings from any community beyond Sri Lanka’s shores were not available for viewing in the country before this. Organised with no diplomatic or political affiliation and purely as a Sri Lankan cultural effort with broader South Asian interest, it is definitely worth a visit. The exhibition will run until 10 January 2026.
Midweek Review
Spoils of Power
Power comes like a demonic spell,
To restless humans constantly in chains,
And unless kept under a tight leash,
It drives them from one ill deed to another,
And among the legacies they thus deride,
Are those timeless truths lucidly proclaimed,
By prophets, sages and scribes down the ages,
Hailing from Bethlehem, Athens, Isipathana,
And other such places of hallowed renown,
Thus plunging themselves into darker despair.
By Lynn Ockersz
-
News3 days agoMembers of Lankan Community in Washington D.C. donates to ‘Rebuilding Sri Lanka’ Flood Relief Fund
-
Business7 days agoUnlocking Sri Lanka’s hidden wealth: A $2 billion mineral opportunity awaits
-
News7 days agoArmy engineers set up new Nayaru emergency bridge
-
Latest News6 days agoLandslide early warnings issued to the districts of Badulla, Kandy, Kurunegala, Matale and Nuwara-Eliya extended till 8AM on Sunday (21)
-
News7 days agoTISL, civil society flay NPP govt. for holding up Auditor General’s appointment
-
Opinion7 days agoThe Maha Jana Handa at Nugegoda, cyclone destruction, and contenders positioning for power in post-NPP Sri Lanka – II
-
Latest News7 days agoTannane goal from own half sets Morocco on way to FIFA Arab Cup 2025 title
-
News7 days agoSri Lankans rescued from cybercrime centers in Myanmar repatriated
