Connect with us

News

Sexual harassment didn’t take place in Parliament – report

Published

on

Speaker

The final investigation report on the alleged sexual harassment of a female officer, attached to Parliament, was tabled in the House yesterday, with findings concluding that no such harassment had occurred.

Speaker Dr. Jagath Wickramaratne informed the MPs that the report was presented during yesterday’s sitting (04) and that a copy had been placed in the Parliamentary Library for reference.

The inquiry stemmed from a matter raised in the Chamber on 07 January, 2025, by MP Mujibur Rahman, who alleged that a female employee of the Department of Information Systems and Management of Parliament had been subjected to sexual harassment.

An internal inquiry was subsequently conducted. However, as the complainant expressed dissatisfaction with its outcome, the Parliamentary

Staff Advisory Committee, at its meeting on July 25, 2025, resolved to appoint an external investigator.

Retired High Court Judge Sujatha Alahapperuma was entrusted with the probe. She summoned all relevant parties, examined material pertaining to the incident and compiled a comprehensive report.

The final report was submitted to the Speaker on 24 November, 2025. In line with a decision taken at the Parliamentary Advisory Committee meeting held on 19 February, 2026, the document was formally tabled in Parliament yesterday.

According to the findings submitted to the Speaker, the investigation concluded, on the basis of the evidence reviewed, that no act of sexual harassment had taken place against the officer who lodged the complaint.

The report has revealed that no incidents of sexual harassment involving any other female officers in the same division took place.

By Saman Indrajith



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest News

SAARC Training Workshop on Financial Modeling for Renewable Energy Projects from 5th to 7th October in Colombo

Published

on

By

The Energy Centre of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) has planned to conduct a training workshop under the theme ‘Financial Modelling for Renewable Energy Projects’ in Colombo from 2026-10-05 to 2026-10-07.

It is expected that two persons from each member country,
including Sri Lanka, will participate in this workshop. The Energy Centre of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) will provide all local hospitality facilities and  transport, excluding airfare.

Taking into consideration the resolution furnished by the Minister of Energy regarding this workshop, which is vitally important for the capacity building of public officers and other related parties regarding project evaluation and financial modeling in the renewable energy sector, the Cabinet of
Ministers has decided to grant its consent to hold this workshop and extend Sri Lanka’s hospitality for this event.

Continue Reading

News

National Children’s Week from 25th September to 01st October

Published

on

By

Sri Lanka commemorates Children’s Day on 1st October every year with the objective of further strengthening social attention towards protecting the rights of children, education, health, and well-being.

It has been observed that the challenges encountered by present-day children, such as risk, psychological and social stress, negligence, and various social and economic vulnerability conditions related to the internet and digital technology, have broadened rather than traditional child protection issues.

Furthermore, it has been recognized that there is a need to develop awareness regarding the rights of children and the
protection of not only children but also all parties involved, including parents, teachers, public officials, service providers, and the general public who are consistently associated with children.

Consequently, it has been proposed to establish “A National Children’s Week” in line with the national commemoration
of Children’s Day with the objective of raising public awareness of the rights of children, fostering social sensitivity towards children, and encouraging community involvement in the protection of children.

Accordingly, the Cabinet of Ministers has approved the resolution furnished by the Minister of Women and Children Affairs to implement special programs declaring “A National Children’s Week – 2026” from 25-09-2026 to 01-10-2026.

Continue Reading

News

US Supreme Court rejects Trump mail ballot restrictions ahead of midterms

Published

on

By

US Supreme Court in Washington, DC, on September 1, 2026 [Aljazeera]

The US Supreme Court has rejected President Donald Trump’s bid to allow the US Postal Service to enforce a rule targeting mail-in ballots.

On Monday, the conservative-majority court refused to lift an order by US District Judge Indira Talwani that blocked the measure, dealing a blow to Trump’s efforts to restrict voting by mail before the November midterm elections.

The postal agency adopted the rule after Trump signed an executive order in March seeking to tighten rules around mail-in voting. Under this measure, states were required to send the Postal Service a list of recipients and use ballot mail envelopes previously approved by the agency.

The Postal Service was allowed to deny ballots if they failed to comply with the new standards or were not associated with registered voters on the lists.

Talwani imposed an injunction blocking the rule, saying that it likely violated the US Constitution and would be impossible to apply given the nearing midterms.

Shortly after, the Trump administration issued an emergency request to the Supreme Court urging it to allow an “important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud”.

In late August, the Supreme Court had temporarily allowed Trump to move ahead with his executive order on procedural grounds, but did not rule on the legality of the plan.

In the latest decision, the court said in an unsigned order that the administration was “unlikely to succeed on the merits” of its challenge. Justice Samuel Alito and Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, with Alito writing that some plaintiffs lacked standing while the rest were pursuing a claim the court had recently called a “Hail Mary pass”.

[Aljaeera]

Continue Reading

Trending