Connect with us

News

Sabry questions rationale behind Ravi, Shani supervising Easter Sunday carnage probe after filing FR petitions to prevent their own arrest over same terror attacks

Published

on

Sabry

President’s Counsel Ali Sabry has told the Court of Appeal that two respondents in a petition filed by Col. Kelum S. Maddumage to prevent his arrest in connection with the ongoing 2019 Easter Sunday carnage investigation––namely, Public Security Ministry Secretary Ravi Seneviratne (retired SDIG) and retired CID Director Shani Abeysekara–– had previously filed fundamental rights petitions in the Supreme Court to prevent their own arrests over the same attacks.

Sabry pointed out that the Attorney General had given an undertaking to the Supreme Court, on 20 October, 2024, that Seneviratne and Abeysekera wouldn’t be arrested.

Sabry said so appearing for Col. Maddumage, formerly of the Directorate of Military Intelligence (DMI) and current Commanding Officer of the Diyatalawa Military Academy.

The Court of Appeal extended the interim injunction against the arrest of Col. Maddumage till 11 November. The two-judge bench, consisting of Court of Appeal President Justice Rohan Abeysooriya and Justice Priyantha Fernando, issued the order on Tuesday (21) after having considered a writ petition filed by the ex-DMI officer.

Deputy Solicitor General Suharshi Herath, who appeared for the respondents, asked the two-judge bench to lift the ex parte interim injunction that prevented the serving officer’s arrest.

Sabry emphasised that there is no evidence whatsoever to arrest the officer.

The counsel for petitioner questioned the rationale in those who had been under investigation for the lapses on the part of police in the run up to the Easter Sunday attacks supervising the investigations. Declaring that the victims of the Easter Sunday carnage wanted the truth, Sabry alleged that the investigation has now turned into a political game.

Sabry told court that DMI had provided information 11 days before the Easter attack that such an attack was imminent, and Indian intelligence also provided detailed information about the locations and individuals involved. The PC accused the police of being inefficient, thereby paving the way for the attack.

The President’s Counsel, who had also served as the Foreign Minister, pointed out that the current investigation had been based on an unsubstantiated statement made by one Azad Maulana to the UK’s Channel 4. Emphasising that the Channel 4’s source had fled Sri Lanka and was seeking political asylum in Switzserland, the PC said that a commission, headed by Supreme Court Justice Imam that investigated Maulana’s claims, unanimously concluded that the claims had no basis or validity.

At this point, the President of the Court of Appeal asked the Deputy Solicitor General if there was an intention to arrest the petitioner. She replied that the decision to arrest, or not, rests with the investigating officers.

However, she stated that the CID had submitted a 68-page detailed “B report” to the Fort Magistrate’s Court, on 22 July, which includes extensive evidence summaries, including investigative information about the petitioner.

She informed the court that the petitioner is being investigated in connection with an incident where, in December 2018, information was allegedly provided to mislead investigators that the murder of two police officers in Vavunathivu was carried out by the LTTE.

Consequently, two former LTTE members were arrested and detained for investigation. However, investigations conducted after the Easter Sunday attack revealed that the police officers’ murders were carried out by Zahran’s group, the Deputy Solicitor General said. The first arrest had been made by the Vavunathivu police on the same day the two police personnel were killed.

In response, President’s Counsel Ali Sabry stated that it was initially believed the LTTE was responsible for the Vavunathivu murders. Sabry said that it was the police, not the petitioner, who first arrested the two former LTTE members and obtained detention orders from the Secretary of Defence to investigate them.

The PC reiterated that such politically motivated investigations will not allow the victims to find out the truth and that his client, an experienced Army intelligence officer, is being made a scapegoat.

The first clear information that Zahran Hashim’s group had carried out the Vavunathivu killings was received by the DMI (Batticaloa) on 09 April, 2019, and the CID informed of the development on 12 April, 2019, through proper channels.

By Shamindra Ferdinando



Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

Women’s T20 World Cup 2026 warm-up: Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helps Sri Lanka beat Pakistan

Published

on

By

File photo: Chamari Athapaththu top-scored for Sri Lanka (Cricinfo)

Captain Chamari Athapaththu’s 94 helped Sri Lanka chase down 169 with ease against Pakistan. Athapaththu and Vishmi Gunaratne together started strongly, putting up a 159-run stand as Sri Lanka won with eight balls to spare.

With the ball, right-arm seamer Chethana Vimukthi, who was called up as the injured Shashini Gimhani’s replacement. for the T20 World Cup, made an impact for Sri Lanka, finishing with figures of 4 for 31. Vimukthi broke the 60-run stand between openers Muneeba Ali and Gull Feroza, following which Pakistan lost wickets regularly. Captain Fatima Sana top-scored for Pakistan from No. 7 with 37 to push the total past 150. In reply, Sri Lanka made easy work of the chase, with Athapaththu itting five sixes and nine fours in her 56-ball stay.

Scores:

Sri Lanka Women 169 for 1 in 18.4 overs (Chamari Athapaththu 94, Vishmi Gunaratne 63*; Fatima Sana 1-20 ) beat Pakistan Women  168 for 8 in 20 overs (Muneesha Ali 36, Gull Feroza 26. Ayesha Zafar 10, Saira Jabeen 12,  Fatima Sana 37, Aliya Riyaaz 22;  Sugandika Kumari  1-33,  Chethana Vimukthi 4-31, Malki Madara 1-19, Nimasha Meepage 1-16) by nine wickets

(Cricinfo)

Continue Reading

News

Open hearing on coal procurement inquiry set for July first week

Published

on

Open hearing of evidence into alleged irregularities in coal procurement is scheduled to begin in the first week of July, while the Presidential Commission of Inquiry continues recording statements from relevant officials, investigators said.

So far, the Commission has recorded statements from around 40 government officials, including members of procurement committees and other personnel attached to institutions involved in coal-related transactions.

Officials said that, depending on evidence gathered during the ongoing inquiry, statements may also be obtained from former ministers if required.

The Commission has also received 28 complaints in connection with alleged irregularities in coal imports and related procurement processes.

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake on April 17 appointed a three-member Presidential Commission of Inquiry under the Special Presidential Commissions of Inquiry Act No. 07 of 1978 to probe alleged malpractice in coal imports and electricity generation since the inception of coal-based power generation up to April 16, 2026.

The Commission is chaired by Supreme Court Justice Gihan Kulatunga, with Court of Appeal Judge Aditya Patabendige and High Court Judge Sanjeewa Somaratne serving as members. Former State Ministry Secretary P.V. Bandulasena acts as Secretary to the Commission.

The inquiry covers alleged procurement irregularities, possible financial losses to the State, import of substandard coal, quality inspection failures, contractual breaches and operational issues in power generation, including whether corrective measures were taken where necessary.

It will also identify responsible political authorities, officials of Sri Lanka Coal Company (Private) Limited and suppliers, while recommending legal or administrative action and measures to prevent future lapses.

Meanwhile, the Committee on Public Enterprises (COPE) is also preparing to table its report on coal procurement in Parliament, with officials from relevant institutions having been summoned during its proceedings. COPE Chairman MP Dr. Nishantha Samaraweera said audit findings had also been considered, and any matters requiring further investigation would be referred to law enforcement and anti-corruption authorities.

Continue Reading

News

TNA MP calls for complete repeal of PTA

Published

on

Trincomalee District TNA MP Shanakiyan Rasamanickam has submitted a motion to Parliament calling for the immediate repeal of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (PTA), arguing that the controversial law has enabled arbitrary detention, torture and the targeting of minority communities for more than four decades.

In his motion, now published in the Addendum to the Order Book of Parliament, the MP urged the Government to repeal the Prevention of Terrorism Act, No. 48 of 1979, in its entirety and refrain from introducing any replacement legislation containing similar provisions.

Rasamanickam contended that the PTA had been used for over 40 years to facilitate prolonged arbitrary detention and to obtain false confessions through torture. He further alleged that the law had disproportionately affected minority communities and civil society groups.

The motion states that there is no justification for maintaining a permanent counter-terrorism law that grants sweeping powers to the authorities.

The TNA legislator argued that existing legal provisions were sufficient to address security threats, noting that terrorism-related offences could already be prosecuted under the Penal Code.

He also pointed out that the Government retained the power to declare a state of emergency when circumstances warranted extraordinary measures, rendering a permanent anti-terrorism framework unnecessary.

Accordingly, the motion calls on Parliament to resolve that the Government take immediate steps to abolish the PTA without replacing it with legislation containing comparable powers.

The Prevention of Terrorism Act, enacted in 1979, has long been the subject of criticism from human rights organisations, civil society groups and international bodies, which have raised concerns over provisions relating to detention without trial and safeguards against abuse.

Continue Reading

Trending