Opinion
Protecting Sri Lanka’s maritime rights

Your editorial, Poaching: Grasp the nettle (The Island of 09 June), provides a good analysis of the issue concerning the poaching of fishery resources in Sri Lanka waters, particularly in the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar.
The maritime boundary between Sri Lanka and India was settled by two agreements entered into by the two countries in 1974 and 1976. Accordingly, fishing vessels and fishers of the two countries were debarred from fishing in the waters, the territorial sea and the exclusive economic zone of each other.
Subsequently, the Maritimes Zones Law, No. 22 of 1976 was enacted with provisions for the President to declare the limits of the agreed maritime boundary between the two countries, and different maritime zones of Sri Lanka, such as the historic waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, exclusive economic zone, pollution prevention zone and the continental shelf. This law prohibits unauthorised fishing in any of the maritime zones of Sri Lanka by any foreign vessel. The President did declare the maritime zones of Sri Lanka by a proclamation published in the Gazette 248/1 of 15-01-1977. Since then unauthorized fishing by Indian vessels on the Sri Lanka side of the Palk Bay and the Gulf of Mannar became illegal.
However, part of the agreement relating to fishing has never been honoured by India, whose fishers continued to fish on the Sri Lanka side of the Palk Bay, and on the Sri Lanka side of the Gulf of Mannar, which jointly form the historic waters of Sri Lanka. According to the Presidential Proclamation, waters on the Sri Lanka side of the Palk Bay form part of the internal waters of Sri Lanka while those on the Sri Lanka side of the Gulf of Mannar form part of the territorial sea (provisions of the Law of the Sea Convention of 1982 relating to internal waters and territorial sea do not contradict such declarations provided they are made on the provisions of the customary international law). On the other hand, although prior to signing of the Maritime Boundary Agreement of 1976, Sri Lankan fishing vessels were fishing in the Wadge Bank, which fell in the EEZ of India since the Agreement came into effect, no Sri Lankan vessels has been found fishing in that area.
At present, three days a week more than 1,000 Indian trawlers fish on the Sri Lanka side of the maritime boundary in violation of the law relating to fisheries in Sri Lanka. Any Sri Lankan vessel, irrespective of the part of Sri Lanka where it is fishing, should have been registered as a fishing vessel of Sri Lanka and obtained a fishing licence. Further, no such vessel is allowed to engage in mechanised bottom trawling.
There have been many discussions between the two countries since the 1990s to stop this illegal practice by Indian trawlers. Such discussions only end up with agreed minutes, but no solution. Fisheries (Regulation of Foreign Fishing Boats) Act, No 59 of 1979 provides for a High Court Judge to impose a penalty of a fine of Rs. 1.5 million on any foreign vessels engaged in unauthorised fishing in Sri Lanka waters. However, this provision was never used against any Indian trawler caught in Sri Lanka waters with unauthorised fishing, owing to practical difficulties. Subsequently, in 2017, the Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (Amendment) Act, No. 11 was enacted to impose a two-year jail term or a fine of at least Rs. 50,000 with a view to controlling this problem. Although the Sri Lanka Navy takes into custody Indian trawlers and hands them over with fishers to Fisheries authorities, the moment they get a letter from the Indian High Commission asking for their release, all are released. In this context, sinking unusable buses in the sea in this area appears to be a practical solution to the problem. For that also India has expressed objections. Sri Lanka has sovereign rights to take any decision in regard to its internal waters, and territorial sea (subject to the right of innocent passage of any foreign vessel) and historic waters (these form part of either internal waters or the territorial sea). Therefore, it is not necessary to stop this activity, just because India is objecting.
As regards the claim by India that Sri Lankan vessels also engage in unauthorised fishing in India waters, it should be noted that they are taken into custody rarely in very small numbers; that, too, mostly in the Indian EEZ, while they are returning after fishing in the Arabian sea. Any vessel has the right to navigation in the EEZ of any country. Even when innocent Sri Lankan fishers happen to be caught by the Indian authorities, they are made to suffer in Indian jails.
A few years earlier also, you expressed concern on this issue by an editorial, Saying it with fish, when Sri Lanka released all Indian fishers who were in jail in Sri Lanka pending trials, as a gesture of thanks for India’s vote at the UN in favour of Sri Lanka. Thank you for your concerns.
A. HETTIARACHCHI
hetti-a@sltnet.lk
Opinion
Fingers or forks?

We grew up cleaning teeth using ground charcoal readily available in most households as ordinary people used firewood for cooking. Then came a noticeable uplift in our living standards when my father finally gave in to Amma’s constant complaining to buy a kerosene cooker! All siblings were pretty excited even to brag about it to classmates! Charcoal gave way to an Indian pink tooth powder called Gopal coming in packs. Notwithstanding the “primitive” stuff, our culture stressed the importance of oral hygiene! It meant just cleaning your teeth itself wasn’t good enough – cleaning your tongue was just as important! I recall my father asking to look into his mouth whether tongue was clean enough after almost making himself sick constantly poking his fingers in the process!
White people are not accustomed to it! No one in the family would be allowed the customary morning cup of black coffee until we have been put through the ablution! Having milk in coffee became possible when Milk Board opened a stall opposite Moratuwa Railway station which meant me trek a good five miles to fetch a bottle! It was 55 cents! All these rituals were in sharp contrast to British culture – cup of tea or coffee is given priority over oral hygiene! I still look down upon this habit though keep my opinion to myself.
After half a century of living in the U.K., I admit to using knife and fork as a force of habit now, though white people think using your fingers is “filthy”! Well, if you cannot trust your own fingers for cleanliness and hygiene as opposed to cutlery, there is something wrong somewhere in your logic!
In all fairness to British strict table etiquette, you are not supposed to talk while eating! More to the point, it’s common sense – we could spit unintentionally especially if we have gaps in our teeth! I am no exception. Also, you should not leave the table until everyone has finished. If you must, excuse yourself.
Something totally hilarious and very embarrassing happened to me in the Majestic shopping mall in Colombo long time ago – my wife and daughter were still enjoying the food when I had to excuse myself to go into the washroom mainly to rinse my mouth as I have gaps in my teeth. There was a row of wash hand basins and a “long mirror” I presumed above.
So, I was busy looking myself in the “mirror” mouth wide open. My wife and daughter not least others were shocked and hugely embarrassed! Not to me as I thought it was simply a reflection from the “mirror”. Need I say walking back to the table wasn’t fun!
Reverting back to Suddhas ways, it is not uncommon to see them giving their dinner plates with leftovers to the pet dogs to finish it off! All these in sharp contrast to their customs saying “Oh, pardon me when you sneeze”, and you are supposed to “Bless you!” Anyway, let me conclude on a happier note, Cheers! Bacchus was the Roman god of wine, fertility, and revelry! My mother enjoyed Southern comfort during our regular visits, saying “Comfort, comfort!”
Saturday 08th March marked our beloved Amma’s death anniversary! May she attain Nibbana! She visited us in UK three times, my father did so twice.
Sunil Dharmabandhu
Wales, UK
Opinion
Insulting SL armed forces

No Head of State of Sri Lanka had ever alleged that the country’s security forces were unprofessional until unrecently.
Our forces successfully suppressed two insurgencies in 1971 and 1989, fought a thirty-year war against the world’s most ruthless terrorist group, and emerged victorious. The then-President proudly named his Commander of the Army as the best Commander in the world.
Our forces have been continually selected by the UN to serve as peacekeeping forces globally.
However, President Anura Kumara Dissanayake, who appointed a his Secretaries of Defence and Public Security and the Deputy Minister of Defence retired personnel from the Army and Police, now claims in Parliament that Sri Lanka’s armed forces are unprofessional.
Does the President wish to go down in world history as the only elected leader who insulted his armed forces?
A Ratnayake
Opinion
Beyond Victory: sportsmanship thrives at Moratuwa Big Match

The 75th annual Prince of Wales vs. St. Sebastian’s College Big Match, Moratuwa’s most significant social event, took place at De Soysa Park from February 28 to March 2. This marked the first time the Big Match was played over three days, with both teams thoroughly prepared for the grand occasion. The host, Prince of Wales College, did an excellent job organizing the event. Schoolboys, alumni, and well-wishers from both sides eagerly anticipated the start of the match and traditional pre-match gatherings and parties were held with many choosing to prioritize the sporting spirit over excessive revelry.
Unfortunately, the weather gods had other plans. Showers disrupted play on all three days with a particularly heavy thunderstorm on the evening of the second day forcing a delayed start on the third day. The match concluded at 4:00 PM due to bad light, resulting in a tame draw. But as the saying goes, “For when the one great scorer comes to mark against your name, he writes not if you won or lost, but how you played the game.” Both teams upheld the values of cricket and played with commendable sportsmanship.
While the details of the 75th Big Match may fade from memory, the closing ceremony speech by Prince of Wales Principal, Mr. Hasitha Kesara Weththimuni, will undoubtedly be remembered, especially by those present at the venue. Thanks to social media, courtesy of Sebastianite alumni, this speech is now widely shared. Traditionally, the Big Match is perceived as rivalry between schools. However, Mr. Weththimuni introduced a new culture, emphasizing brotherhood and the true spirit of cricket, setting a positive example for students, alumni, and supporters alike. It is hoped that future Big Matches will reflect this spirit.
Beyond the Big Match, Principal Weththimuni also acknowledged the ongoing Schools League One cricket tournament. Despite Prince of Wales not qualifying for the finals, he paid a heartfelt tribute to the St. Sebastian’s College cricket team for reaching the finals against Royal College, Colombo. He sincerely wished St. Sebestian’s good luck, expressing his hope that they would bring the cup back to Moratuwa, promising that victory celebrations would commence at Prince of Wales College.
Principal Weththimuni, your leadership is commendable. We are proud of your vision, and I am confident that the community of Moratuwa will greatly benefit from your guidance from Prince of Wales College.
Ralph Gunawardena
A former St. Sebastian’s cricketer
-
News2 days ago
Private tuition, etc., for O/L students suspended until the end of exam
-
Sports5 days ago
Thomians drop wicket taking coloursman for promising young batsman
-
Editorial4 days ago
Cooking oil frauds
-
Features6 days ago
Bassist Benjy…no more with Mirage
-
Features3 days ago
Shyam Selvadurai and his exploration of Yasodhara’s story
-
Features6 days ago
Nawaz Commission report holds key to government response at UNHRC
-
Features5 days ago
Life, happiness, and the value of existence
-
News6 days ago
Sri Lanka and Cambodia discuss bolstering trade and investment ties